Klez.H

[Julian Field]

On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Ron Broersma wrote:
> McAfee likes to live in /usr/local/uvscan.  The McAfee "install-uvscan"
> script puts it there be default...
>
> # Default installation location
> default_dir="/usr/local/uvscan"
>
> If you remember to override the default and have it install in
> /usr/local/mcafee instead (where mailscanner expects it), then it works
> just fine.  However, to avoid potential confusion for those installing
> it the first time or for those that already installed mcafee in its
> default location, it would be best for mailscanner to be consistent with
> the mcafee default of /usr/local/uvscan.

Does it put the DAT files in that directory as well, or in a subdirectory
of it?

> Julian Field wrote:
>
> > Is there a consensus that the mcafee wrapper and autoupdate scripts
> > should
> > be changed to use new locations?
> > If so, what would you all like?
> >
> > I can always put some checking code in the RPM so that it spits a big
> > warning if the old directory still exists, so you get told to move your
> > copy of McAfee to the new location.
> >
> > Any suggestions welcome!
> >
> > Jules.
> >
> > At 20:47 31/05/2002, you wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> El Vie 31 May 2002 12:54, escribiste:
> >> > I have not bought a new version of mcafee in a while but the one I
> >> > use installs by default into a directory named uvscan and puts the
> >> > dat files in the same folder.  This has caused me problems several
> >> > times with the rpm install of mailscanner, and I always have to
> >> > remember to go fix the mcafeewrapper.
> >> >
> >> > I've thought about creating a source rpm for mailscanner that
> >> > builds a more "truely" binary set of rpm's (as apposed to the
> >> > script based rpm taht builds the perl modules and etc on install
> >> > now) that just drop the files in the correct location and then
> >> > tries to dynamically generate a more proper config however, I'm not
> >> > sure if this would be of any use to anyone.  Or if this would be to
> >> > specialized for one platform(and rejected on that basis)
> >> >
> >> > --robert
> >>
> >> I have the same problem. I would appreciate a copy of the modified
> >> mcafeewrapper script, if at all possible.
> >>
> >>
> >> - --
> >> Alfredo J. Cole
> >> http://www.acyc.com (Accounting Systems)
> >> http://www.clshonduras.com (Linux Hardware)
> >> PGP Key available from certserver.pgp.com
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> >> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> >>
> >> iD8DBQE899Nku5DxuPWE298RAvYwAKCCRMVCRiScs3t1q/uy/lYW9rcP1wCfdNz+
> >> fkruml4RiJePPbpw2LbmIWk=
> >> =axMV
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> > --
> > Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
> > jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
> > Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
> >                             Southampton SO17 1BJ
>
>
>

Jules
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk