jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sat Jun 1 20:29:16 IST 2002
Is there a consensus that the mcafee wrapper and autoupdate scripts should
be changed to use new locations?
If so, what would you all like?
I can always put some checking code in the RPM so that it spits a big
warning if the old directory still exists, so you get told to move your
copy of McAfee to the new location.
Any suggestions welcome!
At 20:47 31/05/2002, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>El Vie 31 May 2002 12:54, escribiste:
> > I have not bought a new version of mcafee in a while but the one I
> > use installs by default into a directory named uvscan and puts the
> > dat files in the same folder. This has caused me problems several
> > times with the rpm install of mailscanner, and I always have to
> > remember to go fix the mcafeewrapper.
> > I've thought about creating a source rpm for mailscanner that
> > builds a more "truely" binary set of rpm's (as apposed to the
> > script based rpm taht builds the perl modules and etc on install
> > now) that just drop the files in the correct location and then
> > tries to dynamically generate a more proper config however, I'm not
> > sure if this would be of any use to anyone. Or if this would be to
> > specialized for one platform(and rejected on that basis)
> > --robert
>I have the same problem. I would appreciate a copy of the modified
>mcafeewrapper script, if at all possible.
>Alfredo J. Cole
>http://www.acyc.com (Accounting Systems)
>http://www.clshonduras.com (Linux Hardware)
>PGP Key available from certserver.pgp.com
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Julian Field Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
More information about the MailScanner