Delivery Method.

[Miguel Koren O'Brien de Lacy]

No, I'm using version 2.6, watching from the sidelines as all the new bugs are
ironed out .... :-)

Miguel

Kelly Hamlin wrote:

> I had about 900 messages in my mqueue.in dir, i was starting to panic, this
> is the first day in a live prodcution enviroment. Im running spamassassin
> 2.0 with this also. Are you using spamassasin?
> i restarted with QUEUE to see if it works better than batch
> thanks.
> Kelly
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Miguel Koren O'Brien de Lacy" <miguelk at KONSULTEX.COM.BR>
> To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Delivery Method.
>
> > Kelly;
> >
> > This was a concern of mine when I first instaled Mail Scanner (about 3
> > months ago) and I set it up like this (not a 'high' volume site though):
> >
> > - delivery method = queue
> >
> > - starting Mail Scanner:
> >
> > /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=queueonly
> > -OQueueDirectory=/var/spool/mqueue.in
> > /usr/sbin/sendmail -q1m
> >
> > This has worked very well for me and I never see anything queued up nor
> any
> > appreciable delay (not anything that anyone compains about).
> >
> > But I am interested in other people's opinion if this is the way to go for
> > high throughput.
> >
> > Miguel
> >
> > Kelly Hamlin wrote:
> >
> > > Just curious what you guys with higher volumn mail servers use for that
> > > option. I currently have it set to batch, and my mqueue.in folder is
> > > starting to backup a bit.
> > > We do around 75k mail a day on this server, thanks.
> > > Ive also set sendmail -q1m
> > >
> > >                   //////
> > >                 ( o o )
> > > +--.oooO--(_)--Oooo.-----------------+
> > > | [Kelly Hamlin]
> > > | kellyh at cyberstreet.com
> > > | http://www.bomb.net
> > > |   .oooO
> > > |      (  )    Oooo.
> > > +--- \  (----(   )----------------------------+
> > >           \_)    ) /
> > >                 (_/
> >