MailScanner and Ensim Webppliance

[Lists Only - Daron]

I had pretty much the same problem solved by this forum pos ( see notes
after installing MS}:
http://forum.rackshack.net/showthread.php?s=&postid=61109#post61109

Now my problem is that Sendmail outgoing will just stop but incoming will
continue to process just not deliver. I have to restart MS and sendmail
several times a day. Julian is looking at it but neither of us can find the
problem.

-Daron

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lundy" <mark at NEWSUMMITMEDIA.COM>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: MailScanner and Ensim Webppliance


> No, actually, it doesn't work on my machine!  Every time I start up
> MailScanner, I get complaints from users that they are not receiving
emails.
> I wouldn't want to have the domain's root dir fill up with orphaned,
> queued emails!  You say your script copies them to
> /home/virtual/[domain_name]/fst/var/spool/mqueue, right?  Why copy them,
> why not just move them there?  Or, what do you do with the orphaned
> files in the domain's root dir after copying?
> Point taken on disabling /etc/init.d/sendmail script.
> I'll worry more about bandwidth monitoring after I get MailScanner
working!
>
> Mark
>
>
> Steffan Henke wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mark Lundy wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>I see what you're doing.  What version of MailScanner are you using?  I
> >>have 4.10-1, and sendmail v8.11.6-3ensim1, which already has the
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I am using mailscanner-4.04-1, same sendmail as you. The day I have some
> >spare time, I'll give 4.10 a try.
> >
> >
> >
> >>preloading of Ensim libs in its /etc/init.d/sendmail startup script.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Don't use the sendmail initscript anymore once you use mailscanner !
> >I made a symlink to /etc/init.d/MailScanner.
> >
> >
> >
> >> There's really nothing else different between what you sent me and my
> >>install already!  Still a conundrum why queued mail gets orphaned in the
> >>domain's root dir.  Seems only outgoing mail is affected by this
anomaly.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Yep, but why bother as long as they get copied by that small script ?
> >The more important issue for me is the bandwidth monitoring.
> >But apart from that - it does work on your machine, doesn't it ?
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Steffan
> >
> >
> >