Cosmetic problems not fixed

[Julian Field]

At 10:50 06/08/2002, you wrote:
>Denis Beauchemin wrote:
>>On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 13:58, Julian Field wrote:
>>
>>>You will need to edit sweep.pl line 1082, which currently says
>>>             Log::InfoLog($Config::NameLog[$i] . " in $attach");
>
>Wouldn't it simplify things for translators if only the variable $attach
>was add by the perl and the " in" bit was in the template file?

But what then happens when you have more than 1 report for the same file?
This is why it cannot go in the template file.

>  That way
>the "customers" have complete control over what appears. (As an aside I've
>sometimes thought that the " in " doesn't really fit with the rest of the
>message anyway...)

Suggestions for better wording always welcome...
--
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ