Mailscanner Spam header

Vance Baker vkbaker at IEEE.ORG
Mon Sep 3 13:49:06 IST 2001


Flagging a subject line in order to make a spam message more identifiable
may prove helpful if additional utilities are utilized to control message
delivery.

My proposal has more to do with utilizing MailScanner to intercept "junk
mail" in order to manage e-mail volume and more importantly reduce the size
of the target that solicitors and other such vermin consider educational
institutions to be.  I am of the opinion that this is a function more
appropriately performed at the MTA rather than the client (i.e. outlook).

The invasiveness of this proposal may be considered irrelevant due to the
fact that the mail targeted for  interception is that which is uninvited,
unwanted and a non-productive use of educational IS resources.

Thanks for your earlier reply.


At 09:59 AM 9/3/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Would a configuration option such as "subject-munge" be desirable? This
>would place at the start of the subject line text of your choice, e.g.
>"{SPAM?} " if the message is potentially spam (and hence has an
>X-Mailscanner-Spam" header, or whatever it's called).
>
>The rational behind this is that filtering on non-standard headers isn't
>that easy and particularly for many of our users using Outlook Express
>filtering on Subject line would be much more simple.
>
>Or perhaps it might be considered a bit too "invasive"?
>
>Cheers, Steve
>--
>Syshelp - UNIX Systems Support, Southampton University Computing Services



More information about the MailScanner mailing list