this version seems faster...

[Dhawal Doshy]

Dave Strydom wrote:
> What Paul said.
> 
> there is definately an increase in processing speed.
> So far i've pushed just over 12 000 mails through the 4.54.2 setup,
> and it all looks good.
> 
> Dave

JFYI, have been running 4.54.2 on 2 new production servers (outgoing 
smtp servers) without spamassassin. No problems so far :-)

The Average Processing Speed has increased from 28.7 kB/s to 50.4 kB/s, 
but i do not know whether to attribute it to newer hardware OR the newer 
mailscanner OR both.

- dhawal

> On 5/22/06, Paul Edlund <Paul.Edlund at comtrol.com> wrote:
>> Comparing 4.53.8 to 4.54.2, I see little processing speed difference. The
>> Processing Speed graph on MailScanner-mrtg doesn't show a noticeable 
>> change
>> of speed between the two versions. I would think the speed depends on the
>> size of the messages also.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Julian Field [mailto:MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 2:36 PM
>> To: MailScanner Beta-testers
>> Subject: Re: this version seems faster...
>>
>>
>> What versions are you comparing?
>>
>> Dave Strydom wrote:
>> > I was doing about 24 seconds per a 10 message batch.
>> >
>> > May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Uninfected: Delivered 10
>> > messages
>> > May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Virus Processing
>> > completed at 5024507 bytes per second
>> > May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Disinfection completed at
>> > 393160530 bytes per second
>> > May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Batch completed at 17051
>> > bytes per second (147073 / 8)
>> > May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Batch (10 messages)
>> > processed in 8.63 seconds