this version seems faster...

[Paul Edlund]

Comparing 4.53.8 to 4.54.2, I see little processing speed difference. The
Processing Speed graph on MailScanner-mrtg doesn't show a noticeable change
of speed between the two versions. I would think the speed depends on the
size of the messages also.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Field [mailto:MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 2:36 PM
To: MailScanner Beta-testers
Subject: Re: this version seems faster...


What versions are you comparing?

Dave Strydom wrote:
> I was doing about 24 seconds per a 10 message batch.
>
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Uninfected: Delivered 10 
> messages
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Virus Processing
> completed at 5024507 bytes per second
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Disinfection completed at
> 393160530 bytes per second
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Batch completed at 17051
> bytes per second (147073 / 8)
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Batch (10 messages)
> processed in 8.63 seconds
>
>
> Dave

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.

-- 
MailScanner-Beta mailing list
mailscanner-beta at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner-beta

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!