this version seems faster...

[Julian Field]

What versions are you comparing?

Dave Strydom wrote:
> I was doing about 24 seconds per a 10 message batch.
>
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Uninfected: Delivered 10 
> messages
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Virus Processing
> completed at 5024507 bytes per second
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Disinfection completed at
> 393160530 bytes per second
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Batch completed at 17051
> bytes per second (147073 / 8)
> May 22 21:02:26 Cerberus MailScanner[12571]: Batch (10 messages)
> processed in 8.63 seconds
>
>
> Dave

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.