<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.StileMessaggioDiPostaElettronica17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 2.0cm 2.0cm 2.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="IT" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi everyone<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I found that antivirus scanning, 4 example clamscan, takes a long time and cpu to load it and less 4 scan file<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This is an example :<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">time /usr/bin/clamscan --database /var/lib/clamav3 /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20181214/nonspam/1595B20064.A5116<br>
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Known viruses: 6899927<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Engine version: 0.100.2<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Scanned directories: 0<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Scanned files: 1<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Infected files: 0<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Data scanned: 0.00 MB<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Time: 15.838 sec (0 m 15 s)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">real 0m15.843s<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">user 0m14.934s<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">sys 0m0.905s<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So it takes 15 secs of cpu to do a scan of a single email, sigh<br>
If i scan entire dir it take a little bit more, so the time is spent to load libraries itself<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is possible to have it in memory so we can do it faster and less cpu expensive ?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>