You may find 3 a bit low to tag at, I use 5<br><br>Also deleting above 10 is a good idea as this pretty much spam<br><br>On Monday, 10 October 2011, Mike's List <<a href="mailto:mikelist@leawood.com">mikelist@leawood.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thank you Markus, I setup .procmailrc for client-side filtering.<br>> Manually deleting some spams isn't that bad...leaving the global "store"<br>> feature for now.<br>><br>><br>> ## SpamAssassin start<br>
> #<br>> :0fw: spamassassin.lock<br>> | /usr/bin/spamc<br>><br>> :0:<br>> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes<br>> spam-folder<br>><br>> ## SpamAssassin end<br>><br>><br>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Markus Nilsson wrote:<br>
><br>>> Yes as you see in the headers below, the mail has been classified as spam:<br>>><br>>> > X-Spam-Status: Yes<br>>><br>>> Either configure your mail client to put mails with the x-spam-status header in a spam folder, or handle it with actions in MS.<br>
>><br>>> Setting mails with scoring > 3 to delete, is in my opinion *very* aggressive<br>>><br>>> The options you have now is reasonable (maybe a too low Required score), just configure your client to handle the header and you should be fine!<br>
>><br>>> /Markus<br>>><br>>> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br>
>> Från: "Mike's List" <<a href="mailto:mikelist@leawood.com">mikelist@leawood.com</a>><br>>> Till: "MailScanner discussion" <<a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a>><br>
>> Skickat: måndag, 10 okt 2011 16:01:51<br>>> Ämne: Re: Not Catching Spams and Config<br>>><br>>><br>>> Required SA = 3<br>>> High SA Score = 10<br>>> Spam Actions = deliver header "X-Spam-Status: Yes"<br>
>> High Scoring Spam Actions = store<br>>> Non Spam Actions = deliver header "X-Spam-Status: No"<br>>><br>>> I see. So I need to modify my "Spam Actions" and "High Scoring Spam<br>
>> Actions" to that of "= delete" to remove spams and not store, i.e.<br>>> deliver with {spam?} status?<br>>><br>>> Thank you.<br>>><br>>><br>>> Mike<br>>><br>
>><br>>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Markus Nilsson wrote:<br>>><br>>> > Hi,<br>>> ><br>>> > SA does not trust DKIM, but you can use it to whitelist (or blacklist) certain senders that are using DKIM.<br>
>> ><br>>> > If you check the scoring, you see that DKIM gives a (close to) 0 result.<br>>> ><br>>> > DKIM_SIGNED 0.10<br>>> > DKIM_VALID -0.10<br>>> > DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10<br>
>> ><br>>> > I'd guess that your MS setting for scoring is not correctly set, what does your options<br>>> ><br>>> > Required SpamAssassin Score =<br>>> > High SpamAssassin Score =<br>
>> > Spam Actions =<br>>> > High Scoring Spam Actions =<br>>> > Non Spam Actions =<br>>> ><br>>> > say?<br>>> ><br>>> > /Markus<br>>> ><br>>> >_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br>
>> _<br>>> > Från: "Mike's List" <<a href="mailto:mikelist@leawood.com">mikelist@leawood.com</a>><br>>> > Till: "MailScanner discussion" <<a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a>><br>
>> > Skickat: måndag, 10 okt 2011 14:59:26<br>>> > Ämne: Re: Not Catching Spams and Config<br>>> ><br>>> ><br>>> > I reset my Bayesian filter daily, 86400 sec, so this seems to help a<br>
>> > bit. Additionally, I noticed spams are getting through even though<br>>> > I set my required score at 3 and the score > 3, example below.<br>>> > Furtheremore, there seems to be a pattern that spams are using DKIM<br>
>> > to bypass SpamAssassin?<br>>> ><br>>> > All the spams that got through used servers with DKIM signature. This<br>>> > is not a MailScanner issue but probably SpamAssassin issue with allowing<br>
>> > and/or trusting mail servers with DKIM?<br>>> ><br>>> > Get on SA mailing list and notify?<br>>> ><br>>> ><br>>> > DKIM-Signature: v=1;<br>>> > a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=<a href="http://usmortgagehelper.com">usmortgagehelper.com</a>; s=gamma;<br>
>> > t=1318215904; bh=VEP5C3Xju7bl6QtMCTmnJKkE8pk=; h=To:From;<br>>> > b=TVBqyP5jfRrp1f5hxil8Dmyz5n5d6WFoeiI/33/3N/8+NJXy9uKfEdJBLqplEsykz<br>>> > BvGivaUFmcXyTP1eprjGHcWBLeKcdxfxwe9uHQh3hlqP9mxqQkcnj8RoU5Une/B<br>
>> > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;<br>>> > s=gamma; d=<a href="http://usmortgagehelper.com">usmortgagehelper.com</a>;<br>>> > h=To:From;<br>>> > b=CwjXvg9wNQhJ4hhquqk+9iYNi8RvvejnDQx7DAp8/UwUYjeudyDovC2eVW1vpRrGU<br>
>> > uKSNCL3cffKOWrM1XsQ/97JRsyHNwFlw2M69JQdReaxiFwBxY5aJS0ZAkmY/tUO;<br>>> > Received: from <a href="http://vargas.desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info">vargas.desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info</a> by<br>>> > <a href="http://vargas.desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info">vargas.desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info</a> with local (Exim 4.63)<br>
>> > id 683438-q83a1858095-34<br>>> > for <a href="mailto:root@desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info">root@desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info</a>; 09 Oct 2011 23:05:04 -0400<br>>> > Received: from <a href="http://usmortgagehelper.com">usmortgagehelper.com</a> (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])<br>
>> > by <a href="http://vargas.desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info">vargas.desylva.onlinejobhelpers.info</a> (Postfix) with ESMTP id<br>>> > 44q83a1858095<br>>> > for root@localhost; 09 Oct 2011 23:05:04 -0400<br>
>> > Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1318215904.olhnweddetoyjhlvanr@usmortgagehelper.com">1318215904.olhnweddetoyjhlvanr@usmortgagehelper.com</a>><br>>> > Precedence: bulk<br>>> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:<a href="mailto:list@usmortgagehelper.com">list@usmortgagehelper.com</a>?subject=unsubscribe><br>
>> > Content-Language: en-US<br>>> > Content-type: multipart/alternative;<br>>> > boundary="__MailScanner_found_Cyrus_boundary_substring_problem__"<br>>> > X-ORG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more<br>
>> > information<br>>> > X-ORG-MailScanner-ID: p9A35PY9014111<br>>> > X-ORG-MailSc<br><br>-- <br>-- <br>Martin Hepworth<br>Oxford, UK<br>