<p>True, but if implemented via a milter on Postfix... You'd best do as Jason Ede mentioned and do the signing in a separate pf instance after MS... Else the order will be reversed and the sig ... Unuseable.</p>
<p>Cheers<br>
-- <br>
-- Glenn</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Den 22 sep 2011 14:06 skrev "Rick Cooper" <<a href="mailto:rcooper@dwford.com">rcooper@dwford.com</a>>:<br type="attribution">> <br>> <br>> <br>> _____ <br>> <br>
> From: <a href="mailto:mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info</a>] On Behalf Of John Mark<br>
> Niar<br>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:17 AM<br>> To: <a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br>> Subject: mailscanner and opendkim<br>> <br>> <br>
> <br>> Hello All,<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> I've just implemented MailScanner. Great software by the way! When I run<br>> MailScanner I run into OpenDKIM problem. My OpenDKIM was working already<br>
> before I run the MailScanner.<br>> <br>> Now even if OpenDKIM adds a signature, it will result o dkim: permerror (bad<br>> sig). I know MailScanner inserts some information inside the header and<br>> probably overwrites the OpenDKIM header information?<br>
> <br>> If so, does anyone can help me solve this?<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Should not matter what MailScanner does because the DKIM signature should<br>> not be added until the last thing before sending, existing signatures should<br>
> be checked before anything is altered or added <br>> <br></div>