<br clear="all"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 September 2011 10:14, Glenn Steen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:glenn.steen@gmail.com">glenn.steen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On 13 September 2011 20:10, Jason Ede <<a href="mailto:J.Ede@birchenallhowden.co.uk">J.Ede@birchenallhowden.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
> Just pulled up the stats for the incoming postfix instance on one of our servers for yesterday, although not quite at the levels you have it still seems to show the same pattern.<br>
><br>
> I've not looked too deeply at what makes up the rejections yet if it is xen or the other rbls or invalid addresses etc...<br>
><br>
> Per-Hour Traffic Summary<br>
> time received delivered deferred bounced rejected<br>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> 0000-0100 79 80 0 0 273<br>
> 0100-0200 74 75 0 0 261<br>
> 0200-0300 101 101 0 0 297<br>
> 0300-0400 115 115 0 0 510<br>
> 0400-0500 91 91 0 0 327<br>
> 0500-0600 125 125 0 0 325<br>
> 0600-0700 103 103 0 0 510<br>
> 0700-0800 151 154 0 0 597<br>
> 0800-0900 326 337 0 0 760<br>
> 0900-1000 443 455 0 0 970<br>
> 1000-1100 628 644 0 0 1272<br>
> 1100-1200 655 680 0 0 774<br>
> 1200-1300 711 724 0 0 2597<br>
> 1300-1400 630 665 0 0 7021<br>
> 1400-1500 630 665 0 0 3998<br>
> 1500-1600 657 674 0 0 946<br>
> 1600-1700 584 602 0 0 4129<br>
> 1700-1800 450 459 0 0 6995<br>
> 1800-1900 264 268 0 0 2401<br>
> 1900-2000 215 214 0 0 502<br>
> 2000-2100 200 205 0 0 425<br>
> 2100-2200 184 191 0 0 477<br>
> 2200-2300 149 51 4 0 271<br>
> 2300-2400 137 139 111 0 171<br>
><br>
> Jason<br>
<br>
</div></div>I've got pflogsumm daily reports stored since August -08, and apart<br>
from natural differences (layoffs making the total volume drop,<br>
temporarily driving up the "no such address"-rejections back in -09) a<br>
cursory comparision of a semi-random selection show no real difference<br>
during the last months (well, there's always a lull during the<br>
summer/vacation period:-).<br>
<br>
But that might only show quirks of my particular setup, volume and<br>
usage patterns of my userbase etc. I suspect an ISP-type organization<br>
would be more likely to ... attract ... badness:-).<br>
<br>
(snip)<br>
Cheers!<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
-- Glenn</font><br></blockquote><div><br>seeing similar increases in spam (bursts) myself all to unknown recipients and we're not an ISP, but only to one of the 4 domains I handle.<br><br>-- <br>Martin Hepworth<br>Oxford, UK<br>
<br></div></div>