make sure that there is only 1 recipient in the email as MS will only checked the recipient based on the envelope-to.<div><br></div><div>(if necessary split multiple recipient emails into individual emails as in the wiki pages)</div>
<div><br clear="all">-- <br>Martin Hepworth<br>Oxford, UK<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/4/17 Alessandro Bianchi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alex@skynet-srl.com">alex@skynet-srl.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Hi everyone<br>
<br>
I've been using MS for some time and I thought that rules precedence
was a clear fact to me.<br>
<br>
I've just discovered this is not true.<br>
<br>
I'm using a scanDomain.rules files in the following form:<br>
<br>
From: noscan@mydomain no<br>
From: foo@foodomain and To: *@foodomain no<br>
To: *@foodomain yes<br>
Default: no<br>
<br>
It has always worked like a charm, email from noscan@mydomain are
not processed by MailScanner, but suddenly rule 2 stopped working.<br>
<br>
It says "unable to analyze message"<br>
<br>
They are sending from address foo@foodomain to addresses in
*@foodomain so it seems that the rule "To: *@foodomain
yes" takes over.<br>
<br>
I tried placing the exception before or after the scan domain rule
but it seems to have no effect at all.<br>
<br>
This client is using some sort of automatic processing that sends an
empty email (no body) with a funny capitalized subject like
"#FOCUS2106##ASKFILE# A_C_1407.sdr" and it seems there is no way to
unlock this emails that the customer badly needs.<br>
<br>
I need to bypass MailScanner completely when user foo@foodomain
sends email to *@foodomain .<br>
<br>
I know thisi is no good for security, but the customer's asks this!<br>
<br>
I also tried to set up a header_check rule in postfix to unqueue the
email with no luck.<br>
<br>
I looked in the archives with no luck, and I'm pretty sure I'm
missing the simple...<br>
<br>
In addiction in the last month I am seeing many "Attachment too
small" errors in the logs but they are not related to the above
(they are two totally different problems).<br>
<br>
Any idea?<br>
<br>
Thank you in advance<br>
<br>
Alessandro Bianchi<br>
<div>-- <br>
<p>SkyNet SRL</p>
<p>Via Maggiate 67 - 28021 Borgomanero (NO) -
tel.
+39 0322-836487/834765 - fax +39 0322-836608</p>
<p align="CENTER"><a href="http://www.skynet-srl.com/" target="_blank">http://www.skynet-srl.com</a></p>
<p>Autorizzazione Ministeriale n.197</p>
<p>Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono
riservate e confidenziali ed č vietata la diffusione in
qualunque
modo eseguita.<br>
Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente
messaggio č destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo ed a
distruggerlo
non divulgandolo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. <br>
Per
qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare
<a href="mailto:info@skynet-srl.com" target="_blank">info@skynet-srl.com</a>
(e-mail dell'azienda). Rif. D.L. 196/2003</p>
</div>
</div>
<br>--<br>
MailScanner mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner" target="_blank">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner</a><br>
<br>
Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting" target="_blank">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a><br>
<br>
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>