<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.18.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:00 +0100, Peter Farrow wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
I have no problems with Sorbs, used it for many years processing millions of emails a month.<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Indeed, except millions per day.<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
The rule to the sender is, if you're listed on SORBS or any other blacklist its very real and its for a reason.<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
The OP's IP was checked in SORBS (ok, not likely the ones he's upset about being listed) and no listing was found, it was however found in another RBL, the backscatter list.<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
I have had no problems telling blacklisted senders how to unlist themselves, its pretty simple and fairly <BR>
<BR>
black and white, if you want to email my clients: SORBS is one the blacklists you must not be on.<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
*nods*<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
There are no excuses here, and SORBS is a good blacklist, if you have trouble with SORBS it generally means your<BR>
<BR>
clients senders are on crappy ISPs that need to sort themselves out or start taking spam seriously<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
*nods* most of the time the listing with SORBS is because X sent spam to a spamtrap address, and given the above mentioned factor, thats likely to happen more often than not with a certain posters server(s).<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Cheers<BR>
n.
</BODY>
</HTML>