Hi<br><br>in that case then sendmail isn't setup properly to talk to mailscanner. Look at the manual steps for setting up sendmail in the wiki.<br><br>Also FC isn't considered a good system to run a server on as it needs a full OS upgrade too often. May I suggest Centos as an alternative (it's the free version of RHES).<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Martin Hepworth<br>Oxford, UK<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/8/31 Maurizio Salvadeo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:maurizio.salvadeo@ecostampa.it">maurizio.salvadeo@ecostampa.it</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
the MTA is sendmail. in the received email there are no mailscanner<br>
headers. the conf file is different from the one on the system tha runs<br>
correctly because this one is a newer version.<br>
<br>
Jules Field ha scritto:<br>
<div class="im">><br>
><br>
> On 30/08/2009 15:13, Mark Sapiro wrote:<br>
>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 02:37:31AM +0200, Maurizio Salvadeo wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> hi, thanks fro your help.<br>
>>> this is a new install on fedora 10. clamav was installed from the tar.gz<br>
>>> in /usr/local/ and mailscanner was installed excuting ./install.sh. i<br>
>>> also have installed Mail;;ClamAV perl module.<br>
>>> it never worked at all.<br>
>>> two months later i installed another server with an older version of<br>
>>> mailscanner and it runs properly.<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> According to MailScanner --lint, it is running clamav via the perl module<br>
>> and properly detecting the eicar test. Note however that these days,<br>
>> clamd<br>
>> is preferred to the clamav module.<br>
>><br>
>> The only problem detected is the absence of the unrar executable.<br>
>><br>
>> What is difference between this install's MailScanner.conf and that of<br>
>> the working install? Are the MTAs the same. If the MTA is, e.g., Postfix,<br>
>> have you made the necessary MTA config changes?<br>
>><br>
>> Are there MailScanner entries in the system mail log? Do they offer<br>
>> clues?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
> And do message which have been through your MailScanner show any signs<br>
> of any X-MailScanner headers in them?<br>
><br>
> Jules<br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
</div><div class="im">Maurizio Salvadeo<br>
ICT Manager<br>
L'Eco della Stampa S.p.A.<br>
Via Compagnoni 28<br>
20129 - Milano<br>
+39 02 748113<br>
+39 348 5161936<br>
skype: maurizio.salvadeo<br>
--<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">MailScanner mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner" target="_blank">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner</a><br>
<br>
Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting" target="_blank">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a><br>
<br>
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br>