<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Steve Freegard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steve.freegard@fsl.com">steve.freegard@fsl.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Every last bit of performance that can be extracted from a system matters.<br>
<br>
</div>I rate reliability over performance - particularly on a production mail<br>
system and especially when it comes to filesystems. Which is exactly<br>
why I'd stick with ext3 on Linux.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>In that case XFS, JFS or Reiser will be a better choice than Ext3. Ext3 has been very very slow compared with XFS on my mailstores and spools. <br><br><br>--<br>Zaeem <br></div></div><br>