<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.24.1.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
I use it, it's fine. Exim only signs when it actually sends the message, so it includes the mailscanner headers.<BR>
<BR>
No idea about postfix/sendmail/whatever else<BR>
<BR>
Make sure you have separate sending and receiving systems (Sending signs, receiving checks)<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<BR>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:37 +0000, Julian Field wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
How badly does DKIM interact with MailScanner when MailScanner is used
in a mail forwarding system?
What could I do to improve the situation?
Jules
--
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
<A HREF="http://www.MailScanner.info">www.MailScanner.info</A>
Buy the MailScanner book at <A HREF="http://www.MailScanner.info/store">www.MailScanner.info/store</A>
MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at <A HREF="mailto:Jules@Jules.FM">Jules@Jules.FM</A>
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
PGP public key: <A HREF="http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc">http://www.jules.fm/julesfm.asc</A>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>