<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I did a simple grep and found at least a dozen "blessings" IIRC ...<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Aug 30, 2008, at 3:53 AM, "Glenn Steen" <<a href="mailto:glenn.steen@gmail.com">glenn.steen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/8/29 Richard Frovarp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard.frovarp@sendit.nodak.edu"><a href="mailto:richard.frovarp@sendit.nodak.edu">richard.frovarp@sendit.nodak.edu</a></a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Ken A wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Richard Frovarp wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
How much of an improvement? Can you describe both the test and the manual perl compile process and put it up on the wiki?<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The test doesn't use MailScanner. We have RHEL 4 and RHEL 5 boxes running MS. Doing the test RHEL 4 is fine, and RHEL5 isn't. However, we have not noticed any performance difference between the two releases when it comes to running MS.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Same here, but with FC6 buggy perl. It would be nice to know if MailScanner is affected in any significant way. Why upgrade perl for new bugs when the old ones work fine?<br>
<br>
Ken<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>
Well my testing and other testing reported back here, seems to indicate there isn't a problem. No one has said anything on the SA list. Run that test code and add an extra 0 onto the end. RHEL 4 finished in about 4 seconds. RHEL 5 on a beefier box was only half done after 40 minutes and was slowing down. It would appear that when this one hits, it hits very hard.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>
Richard</font></blockquote><div>Yikes!<br><br>Well then. Are we to guess there is no use of bless/overload in the MS code and all it's depended upon modules? Seems unlikely, but perhaps true. I wonder if even Jules knows:).<br>
</div></div><br clear="all">Cheers<br>-- <br>-- Glenn<br>email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com<br>work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se<br>
</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>-- </span><br><span>MailScanner mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting"><a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a></a></span><br><span></span><br><span>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! </span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>