The spam header<br><br>Received: from n2.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com (n2.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.237.109])<br> by abc.ptm.my (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BF664928B4<br> for <7aff2004@ptm.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:13:18 +0800 (MYT)<br> Received: from [68.142.237.87] by n2.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Mar 2008 11:02:30 -0000<br> Received: from [66.196.97.135] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Mar 2008 19:06:33 -0000<br> Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp108.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Mar 2008 19:06:33 -0000<br> X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 419020.11902.bm@omp108.mail.re3.yahoo.com<br> Message-ID: <419020.11902.bm@omp108.mail.re3.yahoo.com><br> Received: (qmail 22582 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2008 19:06:02 -0000<br> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;<br> s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;<br>
h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding;<br> b=dyaMqEvTfAGfBq2uhN9YUggoN1kArAxKdYokNv5+/LzeoFTeKnsIyR43hDdSh2pF/JGSXhI95UehfP/N6NLKo3z1qkF7RUvF11+6++tCbVlx/wAiYloCenWURyO9XV0KviqAke6pAp6/RgoROJQ1UnC0E9WLlvVQNU1DuJDlAOk= ;<br> Received: from unknown (HELO www.microsoft.com) (danniepennington2774@211.74.94.168 with login)<br> by smtp115.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2008 19:06:01 -0000<br> X-YMail-OSG: psvhvSMVM1njT8UHFY4ICCqUf3VawsKR4VElwwIXv2g.5pv13BAg58V0GFm.nZJsyGH1_5LzAa48FpAf9JHtiGXYdDrevXTJXWJDzg--<br> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5<br> From: danniepennington2774@yahoo.co.uk<br> To: 7acidgroove@arnet.com.ar<br> Reply-To: danniepennington2774@yahoo.co.uk<br> Subject: lovely ojg Shemales pvx uu vtn.<br> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:22:02 +0100<br> MIME-Version: 1.0<br> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251<br> Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit<br><br>with spam
record score<br><table style="width: 322px; height: 171px;" class="sa_rules_report" border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="2"><tbody><tr><td align="left">1.00</td><td style="vertical-align: top;"><br></td><td width="200">BAYES_00</td><td>Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%</td></tr> <tr><td align="left">0.50</td><td style="vertical-align: top;"><br></td><td width="200">RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100</td><td>Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%</td></tr> <tr><td align="left">1.50</td><td style="vertical-align: top;"><br></td><td width="200">RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100</td><td>Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level above 50%</td></tr> <tr><td align="left">0.50</td><td style="vertical-align: top;"><br></td><td width="200">RAZOR2_CHECK</td><td>Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)</td></tr></tbody></table><br><br>Sometimes it got hit with the above rules and other rules such as URIBL_BLACK, URIBL_JP_SURBL, but sometimes the spam was not caught by any rule except for
Bayes_00<br><br><b><i>Scott Silva <ssilva@sgvwater.com></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> on 3-17-2008 9:12 PM Cheng Bruce spake the following:<br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> I am not sure if you turn on RBL list. I got 12.4 points.<br>> <br>> Content analysis details: (12.4 points, 7.0 required)<br>> <br>Probably because it was reported and showed up on the RBL's later.<br><br>Can you provide a complete copy of the message, with headers intact for testing?<br><br><br>-- <br>MailScanner is like deodorant...<br>You hope everybody uses it, and<br>you notice quickly if they don't!!!!<br><br>-- <br>MailScanner mailing list<br>mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info<br>http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner<br><br>Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting<br><br>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
<br></blockquote><br><p> 
<hr size=1>Looking for last minute shopping deals? <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping">
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.</a>