The problem too is that at least here we've seen a 40% increase in message load specifically in NDRs and null senders over the past 2-3 days. The iron is starting to turn orange..<br><br>-Vlad<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/28/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Scott Silva</b> <<a href="mailto:ssilva@sgvwater.com">ssilva@sgvwater.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
on 2-28-2008 9:39 AM Kevin Miller spake the following:<br> <br>> Scott Silva wrote:<br> >> I see a new reason to block OoO replies;<br> >><br> >> It seems that spammers are using legitimate webmail accounts to<br>
>> bounce their garbage via OoO replies. Just fake the sender, and<br> >> suddenly you have spam with legitimate DKIM sigs, valid SPF, and<br> >> maybe even whitelists.<br> >><br> >><br> > <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/022608-out-of-office-messages-turn">http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/022608-out-of-office-messages-turn</a><br>
> ed.html<br> >> Filthy spammers!<br> ><br> > Dang those boys are clever. Imagine if they turned their creativity to<br> > world peace and cheap, clean energy. Too bad there's no money in that.<br>
><br> > So how are you blocking Oo0 replies? There a spamassassin ruleset for<br> > that or what?<br><br></blockquote></div>