Someone already recommend that; No, putting the RBLs at the MTA would reject the message, I still need to be able to store it in case someone wants to retrieve false positive.<br><br>Also, putting RBL's on the MTA eliminates any whitelisting that would be provided by MailScanner.<br>
<br>-Vlad<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/7/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jeff Mills</b> <<a href="mailto:Jeff.Mills@versacold.com.au">Jeff.Mills@versacold.com.au</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br><br>________________________________<br><br> From: <a href="mailto:mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner-bounces@lists.mailscanner.info</a>] On Behalf Of Vlad<br>
Mazek<br> Sent: Friday, 8 February 2008 9:22 AM<br> To: MailScanner discussion<br> Subject: {Disarmed} Re: Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an<br>RBL<br><br><br> Nope, still gets processed by MailScanner:<br>
<br> Feb 7 17:18:45 MailScanner[18224]: RBL checks: m17M9lxS016045<br>found in SBL+XBL<br> Feb 7 17:18:46 inbound42 MailScanner[18224]: SpamAssassin cache<br>hit for message m17M9lxS016045<br> Feb 7 17:18:46 MailScanner[18224]: Message m17M9lxS016045 from<br>
MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious: <a href="http://75.63.44.11">75.63.44.11</a><br><<a href="http://75.63.44.11">http://75.63.44.11</a>> (<a href="mailto:ka@creativeholidays.com.au">ka@creativeholidays.com.au</a>) to <a href="http://rmel.org">rmel.org</a> is spam,<br>
SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin (cached, score=23.378, required 5,<br>autolearn=disabled, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50,<br>RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50,<br>RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 2.19, RCVD_IN_XBL 2.90,<br>
STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TVD_FINGER_02 2.72, URIBL_BLACK 1.96,<br>URIBL_JP_SURBL 2.86, URIBL_OB_SURBL 2.13, URIBL_SC_SURBL 2.52,<br>URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.10)<br><br> Notice that it still passes it through SpamAssassin.<br>
<br> I have the the following in my MailScanner.conf:<br><br> Spam List = SBL+XBL<br> Spam Lists To Be Spam = 1<br> Spam Lists To Reach High Score = 1<br><br> -Vlad<br><br><br>Can you not put the RBLs at MTA level?<br>
--<br>MailScanner mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br><a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner</a><br>
<br>Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a><br><br>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br><br>-Vlad