RBL check at the MTA wouldn't store the messages in the MailScanner quarantines... <br><br>-Vlad<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/7/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Denis Beauchemin</b> <<a href="mailto:Denis.Beauchemin@usherbrooke.ca">Denis.Beauchemin@usherbrooke.ca</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Vlad Mazek a écrit :<br>> Is there any way to skip/bypass the SA check (and the resources it<br>> takes up) and store spam in the quarantine automatically if the sender<br>> is on an RBL?<br>><br>> I'm looking over my stats over the past few days and can't help but<br>
> see that SA resources are wasted on the senders that are on RBLs but<br>> we still have to keep them for that one out of a million SPAMs that<br>> someone will eventually consider critical :(<br>><br>> -Vlad<br>
Vlad,<br><br>Personnally, I do RBL checks at the MTA level and in SA but none in MS.<br>I also run a caching-nameserver. That way I don't waste many resources.<br><br>Denis<br><br>--<br> _<br> °v° Denis Beauchemin, analyste<br>
/(_)\ Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.<br> ^ ^ T: 819.821.8000x62252 F: 819.821.8045<br><br><br>--<br>MailScanner mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner</a><br><br>Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a><br>
<br>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br>-Vlad