<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#333333">
Thanks for your reply Jay, <br>
<br>
On average, how much email sitting on your postfix incoming queue ?<br>
I am currently using MailScanner-4.61.7-2 & postfix-2.3.2-2.<br>
<br>
I dont see any changes between these version of postfix / mailscanner
when it comes to processing incoming queue,<br>
and I dont see any reason for current mailscanner/postfix will fix
this. <br>
<br>
Anyway .. I will upgrade postfix + Mailscanner to latest version, and I
will post an update.<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Rianto Wahyudi<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Jay Chandler wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:47310E12.1010501@sequestered.net" type="cite">R
Wahyudi wrote:
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
But their replay was short and sweet :
<br>
<br>
'Nuff said, you are using Mailscanner. Stop using Mailscanner and
the
<br>
problem will go away. Mailscanner has a long history of causing
various
<br>
similar issues, it is not supported here.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Ah, the sweet smell of misleading bullshit.
<br>
<br>
I've been running Postfix with MailScanner for two years, both here and
as a University mail handler for half a million messages a day.
<br>
<br>
No worries.
<br>
<br>
Latest versions of both are ALWAYS a good plan, but past that I've
never seen an instance of corruption or delay based on this model.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>