I have MS + Postfix 2.4 + Postgrey working fine here.<br><br>[]´s<br>Thiago<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Glenn Steen</b> <<a href="mailto:glenn.steen@gmail.com">glenn.steen@gmail.com
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 07/05/07, Claude Gagné <<a href="mailto:claude.gagne@multitech.qc.ca">
claude.gagne@multitech.qc.ca</a>> wrote:<br>> Daniel Maher a écrit :<br>> ><br>> > Hello all,<br>> ><br>> > I would love to hear some first-hand accounts of people who are using<br>> > MailScanner with Postfix
2.4. Does it work well? Are there any<br>> > particular nuances which need to be addressed in specific? Does<br>> > anybody have any horror stories?<br>> ><br>> > Thank you, all.<br>> ><br>> > --
<br>> ><br>> > _<br>> > °v° Daniel Maher<br>> > /(_)\ Administrateur Système Unix<br>> > ^ ^ Unix System Administrator<br>> ><br>> > //"How can a man choose between Fresh and Fly? And believe me, there
<br>> > IS a difference." – Crack Stuntman, 2007.////<br>> ><br>> Works good for me so far.<br><br>As it should... It is only if you a) use milters and b) those milters<br>do full body edits... Then you can, and will, run into problems. If a)
<br>but not b) (that is: only header edits) then I've supplied some<br>patches that should take care of this ... and a+b patches is in the<br>works:-).<br></blockquote></div>