<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/4/18, Richard Frovarp <<a href="mailto:Richard.Frovarp@sendit.nodak.edu">Richard.Frovarp@sendit.nodak.edu</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Eduardo Casarero wrote:<br>> hi, i've a case of an email that seemed to skip the black/whitelist<br>> filter. Three emails where detected by the blacklist, and a fourth was<br>> delivered as HAM. The only diference is the email size, that in the
<br>> last case was bigger than the "too big for spam" limit.<br>><br>> Did anyone had the same issue?<br>><br>> Thanks.<br>><br>> Eduardo.<br>><br>Look for Max Spam Check Size in MailScanner.conf
<br>--</blockquote><div># Spammers do not have the power to send out huge messages to everyone as<br>
# it costs them too much (more smaller messages makes more profit than less<br>
# very large messages). So if a message is bigger than a certain size, it<br>
# is highly unlikely to be spam. Limiting this saves a lot of time checking<br>
# huge messages.<br>
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.<br>
Max Spam Check Size = 150000<br><br>It does not clarify if it bypass white/blacklist checking.<br><br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
MailScanner mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br><a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
</a><br><br>Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a><br><br>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!<br></blockquote></div><br>