how is your expire bayes conf? <br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/2/13, DAve <<a href="mailto:dave.list@pixelhammer.com">dave.list@pixelhammer.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Jay Chandler wrote:<br>> I have two servers.<br>><br>> Here's one:<br>><br>> aconcagua# tail -f /var/log/maillog |grep rocessed<br>> Feb 13 08:39:58 aconcagua MailScanner[83401]: Batch (1 message)<br>
> processed in 6.66 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:39:58 aconcagua MailScanner[83008]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in 10.06 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:00 aconcagua MailScanner[83989]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in
6.11 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:03 aconcagua MailScanner[83677]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in 6.84 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:04 aconcagua MailScanner[82475]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in 6.70 seconds
<br>> Feb 13 08:40:05 aconcagua MailScanner[82359]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in 8.74 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:06 aconcagua MailScanner[83301]: Batch (2 messages)<br>> processed in 12.81 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:07 aconcagua MailScanner[82879]: Batch (1 message)
<br>> processed in 7.75 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:09 aconcagua MailScanner[82035]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in 6.53 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:11 aconcagua MailScanner[83989]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in
6.41 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:11 aconcagua MailScanner[84046]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in 6.84 seconds<br>> Feb 13 08:40:12 aconcagua MailScanner[83301]: Batch (1 message)<br>> processed in 6.56 seconds
<br>><br>> Here's the other:<br>><br>>> spacecowboy# tail -f /var/log/maillog |grep rocessed<br>>> Feb 13 08:38:57 spacecowboy MailScanner[54541]: Batch (9 messages)<br>>> processed in 252.21
seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:12 spacecowboy MailScanner[49475]: Batch (2 messages)<br>>> processed in 61.60 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:12 spacecowboy MailScanner[53408]: Batch (4 messages)<br>>> processed in
86.83 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:14 spacecowboy MailScanner[53430]: Batch (2 messages)<br>>> processed in 31.38 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:17 spacecowboy MailScanner[54987]: Batch (8 messages)<br>>> processed in
166.69 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:18 spacecowboy MailScanner[53490]: Batch (19 messages)<br>>> processed in 531.03 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:21 spacecowboy MailScanner[53398]: Batch (14 messages)<br>>> processed in
384.67 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:30 spacecowboy MailScanner[53412]: Batch (8 messages)<br>>> processed in 97.58 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:32 spacecowboy MailScanner[54123]: Batch (2 messages)<br>>> processed in
62.52 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:38 spacecowboy MailScanner[53430]: Batch (1 message)<br>>> processed in 24.16 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:39 spacecowboy MailScanner[55686]: Batch (30 messages)<br>>> processed in
647.57 seconds<br>>> Feb 13 08:39:48 spacecowboy MailScanner[56780]: Batch (5 messages)<br>>> processed in 68.93 seconds<br>><br>> Any idea what would be causing this? Same configuration, same MX<br>> priority. The one with delays has built quite the queue backlog.
<br>><br><br>Can both machines resolve DNS with the same speed?<br>Do you have a caching name server on both machines?<br>Is the Bays DB the same size on both machines?<br><br>DAve<br><br><br>--<br>Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
<br>logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos<br>for other non-international holidays, but nothing for<br>Veterans?<br><br>Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.<br>--<br>MailScanner mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br><a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
</a><br><br>Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a><br><br>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!<br></blockquote></div><br>