<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><DIV><DIV>On Aug 15, 2006, at 2:46 AM, Jon Bates wrote:</DIV><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV><SPAN class="310564106-15082006"><FONT face="Arial" size="2">I was just wondering what peoples opinions were on running multiple virus scanners with MailScanner. I'm currently only running ClamAV, and I was thinking about running one or two more. </FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class="310564106-15082006"><FONT face="Arial" size="2">Could someone recommend what other scanner/s to use? My main concern is system resources. I would like something that doesn't load up the server too much more as ClamAV is quite light on resources from my experience with it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><DIV>Clam is good, but I also use CA's eTrust AV. I find that using two scanners increases the chances of picking up newly discovered variants, for in some cases eTrust has the definitions before Clam.</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>Hope this helps.</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>Regards,</DIV><DIV>--Sam</DIV></BODY></HTML>