Hey,<br><br>Problem solved :))<br><br>Solution (Patch) at below link<br><a target="_blank" href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:related_software:patches:qmail_unique_id_patch&amp;do=index">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:related_software:patches:qmail_unique_id_patch&amp;do=index
</a><br><br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/24/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Glenn Steen</b> <<a href="mailto:glenn.steen@gmail.com">glenn.steen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 18/04/06, Pravin Rane <<a href="mailto:pravin.rane@gmail.com">pravin.rane@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Hi<br>><br>> This is my first posting to Mailscannner list.<br>><br>> I am using Qmail + MailScanner + Mailwatch + ClamAV + Spamassassin.
<br>><br>> My problem is I am getting same messae-Ids for mulitple mails in Mailwatch<br>> interface. After searching in Mailwatch FAQ I found the author pointed to<br>> counsult with Mailscanner's Author since all this information its getting
<br>> from MailScanner.<br>><br>> Is there any work-arround (Patch) to get unique message-ids?. Since qmail<br>> uses same message-ids to different messages if it does not find that inode<br>> no. in queue.
<br>><br>><br>><br>> Regards<br>><br>> Pravin Rane<br>><br>(Sorry for the late reply.... I've been in the mountains (Skiing...<br>downhill.... formerly broken leg smarting as h*ll, but still....<br>
Wonderful!:-))<br><br>This is pretty much the same problem Postfix used to have, and the<br>solution would be the same. I suggest you contact the maintainers of<br>the Qmail port (Openprotect, is it?) and suggest they do a similar fix
<br>as Jules did for Postfix.<br>In the meantime, you can ... alleviate ... the problem by configuring<br>your system so that it is sure to have a high degree of i-node<br>consumption (pretty much everything on one partition/filesystem). Will
<br>not cure it completely, but might at least make it not that frequent.<br>--<br>-- Glenn<br>email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com<br>work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
<br>--<br>MailScanner mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info">mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info</a><br><a href="http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner">http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
</a><br><br>Before posting, read <a href="http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting">http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting</a><br><br>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Regards<br><br>Pravin