<br><br><b><i>Drew Marshall <drew@themarshalls.co.uk></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> On Wed, March 29, 2006 09:49, spart cus wrote:<br>> Here's one of the logs that produces the same email.<br>><br>> 028e01c6537e$4aed2cc0$1a01a8c0@globalknfb8aba<br>> 028301c6537e$3c71bf30$1a01a8c0@globalknfb8aba<br>><br>> [root@mail log]# cat maillog |grep globalknowledge@pldtdsl.net<br>> Mar 29 13:02:01 mail postfix/cleanup[32433]: 236D8362639: hold: header<br>> Received\<br>> : from exsmtp02.epldt.local (exsmtp02.epldt.biz [203.131.76.231])??by<br>> mail.drea\<br>> m.ph (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236D8362639??for <care @dream.ph="">; Wed, 29 \<br>> Mar 2006 13:02:01 +0800 (PHT) from exsmtp02.epldt.biz[203.131.76.231];<br>> from=<gl \=""><br>> obalknowledge@pldtdsl.net> to=<care @dream.ph=""> proto=ESMTP<br>> helo=<exsmtp02.ep \=""><br>>
ldt.local><br>> Mar 29 13:02:01 mail postfix/cleanup[32433]: 236D8362639: hold: header<br>> Received\<br>> : from globalknfb8aba ([58.69.89.211]) by exsmtp02.epldt.local with<br>> Microsoft S\<br>> MTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);?? Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:50:59 +0800 from<br>> exsmtp02.epldt.biz\<br>> [203.131.76.231]; from=<globalknowledge @pldtdsl.net=""><br>> to=<care @dream.com.ph=""> pro\<br>> to=ESMTP helo=<exsmtp02.epldt.local><br>> Mar 29 13:02:13 mail postfix/qmgr[2148]: 16C0F362643:<br>> from=<globalknowledge @pld=""><br>> tdsl.net>, size=31958, nrcpt=1 (queue active)<br>> Mar 29 13:22:24 mail postfix/cleanup[327]: 3047D362639: hold: header<br>> Received: \<br>> from exsmtp01.epldt.local (exsmtp01.epldt.biz [203.131.76.230])??by<br>> mail.dream.\<br>> com.ph (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3047D362639??for <care @dream.ph="">; Wed, 29<br>> Ma\<br>> r 2006 13:22:24 +0800 (PHT) from
exsmtp01.epldt.biz[203.131.76.230];<br>> from=<glob \=""><br>> alknowledge@pldtdsl.net> to=<care @dream.ph=""> proto=ESMTP<br>> helo=<exsmtp01.epld \=""><br>> ----:%%-F1 Untitled 1~<br>> (Fundamental)--L1--Top----------------------------<br><br>These look like seperate messages. Look at the times in the logs, 20<br>minutes a part. A better check would be if I could see the whole log for<br>13:02:01 -> 13:04:00 and 13:22:24 -> 13:24:00<br><br>This should show the first delivery and then the second. The problem is<br>that Postfix can and does reuse it's message ids as they are based on<br>inode numbers. If your /var/spool/postfix partition is a bit small/ full<br>it will reuse the numbers faster. The theory goes that Cyrus should be<br>using unique message ids so there is no duplication. I know Postfix<br>generates another id when it delivers the mail it's self (To unix mailbox<br>or maildir) as opposed to handing off the the Cyrus delivery
agent.<br><br>Drew<br><br></exsmtp01.epld></care></glob></care></globalknowledge></exsmtp02.epldt.local></care></globalknowledge></exsmtp02.ep></care></gl></care></blockquote>Hi Drew,<br> What specific things should i look on the logs. Im getting 4 emails with the same message id. And im using dovecot for my pop3 services. Like for example , i have these email tag as spam but i received 4 times with the same message id. is there something wrong with my postfix and Mailscanner?<br> <br> <br><p>
<hr size=1>Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com"> PC-to-Phone Calls</a> using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.