<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.7">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Sanjay,<BR>
<BR>
I believe that you should be at version 2.55 of SpamAssassin. This should make a difference.<BR>
<BR>
Steve<BR>
Steve <A HREF="mailto:SwaneySteve@Swaney.com">Swaney</A><BR>
<A HREF="mailto:SwaneySteve@Swaney.com">Steve@Swaney.com</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 11:38, Sanjay K. Patel wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>Thanks for the response,
Here are the headers. I am using version 2.52
SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.4, required 5,
FOR_JUST_SOME_AMT 0.18, HTML_50_60 0.10, HTML_FONT_BIG 0.22,
HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.10, HTML_FONT_COLOR_GRAY 0.10,
HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.10, HTML_WEB_BUGS 0.10,
ORIGINAL_MESSAGE -0.50)
This was the normal buy Norton junk. It should have scored higher.
SKP
-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
Of Martin Sapsed
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:23 AM
To: MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: More spam after spamassain upgrade
Sanjay K. Patel wrote:
> We are seeing more spam getting through after upgrading spam assassin to
the
> latest version. Even the buy Norton cheap spam is getting through. All the
> spam scores below our threshold of 5.
>
> Have the spammers got smarter or do we need to fine tune something?
Can you post the headers for e.g. a "buy Norton cheap" message which got
through - the categories SA lists might help us to advise you. Which
version do you mean by "the latest version"? What platform? What version
of MailScanner etc etc
I'm using a copy of 2.60 from a little while ago along with DCC (with
it's score raised) and virtually nothing gets passed that.
Cheers
Martin
--
Martin Sapsed
Information Services "Who do you say I am?"
University of Wales, Bangor Jesus of Nazareth</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>