<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The strip_html feature only works on emails marked as spam...correct?</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Is there any way that *all* email could be stripped of the 1 image nasty porn emails?</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Or even maybe a list of users who want this feature?</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Thanks,<br>
.....................................<br>
Christopher S. Campbell<br>
UNIX Admin<br>
First Albany Corp<br>
<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Julian Field <mailscanner@ECS.SOTON.AC.UK></b></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK></font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">03/18/2003 07:10 AM</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to MailScanner mailing list</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To: MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc: </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject: Re: spam volume</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">At 12:03 18/03/2003, you wrote:<br>
> are we alone in thinking there has been a significant increase in the<br>
>amount on SPAM (much of it pretty nasty) which has arrived in the last<br>
>few days ?<br>
><br>
><br>
>Does anyone have an explanation or is it just a sad fact of the modern<br>
>Internet.<br>
<br>
Over the past few months, we have seen spam rise from 15% to over 25% of<br>
our total mail volume.<br>
<br>
I strongly advise people to start using the "striphtml" spam action to<br>
clean up nasty spam.<br>
--<br>
Julian Field<br>
www.MailScanner.info<br>
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>