<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I guess you have the config right?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">here are my settings from a working system:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Spam Checks = yes</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Spam Header = X-MailScanner-SpamCheck:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Spam Modify Subject = yes</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Spam Subject Text = {SPAM?}</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Use SpamAssassin = yes</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Max SpamAssassin Size = 2000000</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">SpamAssassin Timeout = 120</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Spam List =</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">watch out for the last one, as I think the default file from the tarball came with 2 lines enabled, and I wasnt sure what the outcome would be.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">here is a excerpt from my maillog:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jan 5 15:35:58 icconsulting3 mailscanner[29215]: Forwarding 1 clean messages, 1720 bytes</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jan 5 15:36:08 icconsulting3 mailscanner[29215]: Message g054YiW29255 is spam according to SpamAssassin</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jan 5 15:36:08 icconsulting3 mailscanner[29215]: About to deliver 1 messages</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The system I am running mailscanner 3.01 and spamassassin on to test is a Pentium 200 and 64Mb of RAM - and I had to allow spamassassin more time to check the mails (note the 120 seconds in my config). I did sees a spamassassin timeout when I had it set to 10secs in my maillog.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
regards<br>
Scott Farrell <br>
<br>
http://www.icconsulting.com.au<br>
ic Consulting - the people that make eBusiness happen.<br>
We offer e-business consulting and perform services. We deliver high impact consulting, and fast turn around projects for our clients.<br>
Ask us about Web Content Management, Web Self Service, or working closer with your customers or suppliers.<br>
<br>
0412 927 156, 02 9411 3622 mailto:sfarrell@icconsulting.com.au</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Gerry Doris <gerry@DORFAM.CA></b></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK></font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">05/01/2002 02:04 PM</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to MailScanner mailing list</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To: MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc: </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject: Re: Can't get spam checking working?</font></table>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">I'm using version 1.5 of spamassassin and compiled it from source. I<br>
noticed the rpm's were for 586 and 686 cpu's and didn't think they would<br>
work.<br>
<br>
I've seen no errors at all from either spamassassin or mailscanner.<br>
mailscanner just seems to ignore internal spam checking. I might try it<br>
on 1.8Ghz system to see if it works there. However, that system is in big<br>
demand and someone always wants it back into windows (the game players<br>
hate linux!!!).<br>
<br>
Gerry<br>
<br>
<br>
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Scott Farrell wrote:<br>
<br>
> what version of spamassassin are you using - 1.5 seems to be supported<br>
> (1.3 didnt connect with mailscanner)<br>
><br>
> did you compile spammassion from source, or did you use one of the rpms?<br>
><br>
> I would suggest compile from source - as the rpm's ar 686 and 586 - and<br>
> not 486.<br>
><br>
> do you get any errors on startup of mailscanner - I had to upgrade to 1.5<br>
> to get rid of library problems.<br>
><br>
> regards<br>
> Scott Farrell<br>
<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>