From gpapamichelakis at gmail.com  Wed Feb  3 00:09:29 2021
From: gpapamichelakis at gmail.com (George Papamichelakis)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 02:09:29 +0200
Subject: Postfix hold
Message-ID: <CAHhLBrEXNkCy0J+zZ+XC3UOWz0BMJD-Z=LqN9X9_iwbPHMdfOA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi list,

If I use mailscanner as suggested by documentation by putting all incoming
mails on hold does that rule out any additional rules I put in
header_checks file ? Since they come after the hold rule which is first.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210203/87baa624/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Wed Feb  3 00:26:01 2021
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:26:01 -0800
Subject: Postfix hold
In-Reply-To: <CAHhLBrEXNkCy0J+zZ+XC3UOWz0BMJD-Z=LqN9X9_iwbPHMdfOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHhLBrEXNkCy0J+zZ+XC3UOWz0BMJD-Z=LqN9X9_iwbPHMdfOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8a1482ec-dc7a-7e83-9436-e342c242784c@msapiro.net>

On 2/2/21 4:09 PM, George Papamichelakis wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> If I use mailscanner as suggested by documentation by putting all
> incoming mails on hold does that rule out any additional rules I put in
> header_checks file ? Since they come after the hold rule which is first.

You can use the milter option instead which doesn't hold mmessages with
header checks. My configuration for enabling the milter option is

Doc is at
<https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/blob/master/doc/MailScanner%20Milter%20Guide.pdf>

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From gpapamichelakis at gmail.com  Wed Feb  3 06:12:49 2021
From: gpapamichelakis at gmail.com (George Papamichelakis)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 08:12:49 +0200
Subject: Postfix hold
In-Reply-To: <8a1482ec-dc7a-7e83-9436-e342c242784c@msapiro.net>
References: <CAHhLBrEXNkCy0J+zZ+XC3UOWz0BMJD-Z=LqN9X9_iwbPHMdfOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <8a1482ec-dc7a-7e83-9436-e342c242784c@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <CAHhLBrF7_r_j0JcsAMDHFemn2wjo5rO9==bdpL-FAJ8J-c1QTA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, 02:26 Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> wrote:

> On 2/2/21 4:09 PM, George Papamichelakis wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > If I use mailscanner as suggested by documentation by putting all
> > incoming mails on hold does that rule out any additional rules I put in
> > header_checks file ? Since they come after the hold rule which is first.
>
> You can use the milter option instead which doesn't hold mmessages with
> header checks. My configuration for enabling the milter option is
>
> Doc is at
> <
> https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/blob/master/doc/MailScanner%20Milter%20Guide.pdf
> >
>

I already tried that,  it works but in the logs I see that a milter discard
action is triggered but the mails are delivered.

Then some users reported that it brakes outgoing mails , no headers almost
, everything converted to plain text etc. Unfortunately I this is on alive
machine
That was working with postfix/mailscanner for more than ten years now.
I was forced to stop using mailscanner as the hold portion of the system
was used to flood the machine with backscatter messages, the only way to
stop it was this
and add rules in the header_checks file (and body).

The previous setup was working ok but I don't want to risk getting into the
same situation again.

George



> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210203/488d1637/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Wed Feb  3 11:19:33 2021
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 06:19:33 -0500
Subject: Postfix hold
In-Reply-To: <CAHhLBrF7_r_j0JcsAMDHFemn2wjo5rO9==bdpL-FAJ8J-c1QTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHhLBrEXNkCy0J+zZ+XC3UOWz0BMJD-Z=LqN9X9_iwbPHMdfOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <8a1482ec-dc7a-7e83-9436-e342c242784c@msapiro.net>
 <CAHhLBrF7_r_j0JcsAMDHFemn2wjo5rO9==bdpL-FAJ8J-c1QTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1f87b323-8d4e-3804-2f90-329969e20a83@summitgrid.com>


> I already tried that,? it works but in the logs I see that a milter 
> discard action is triggered but the mails are delivered.
>
Discard is by design. This is to simultaneously queue the message for 
MailScanner instead of passing it forward in the postfix pipeline.


> Then some users reported that it brakes outgoing mails , no headers 
> almost , everything converted to plain text etc. Unfortunately I this 
> is on alive machine
> That was working with postfix/mailscanner for more than ten years now.
> I was forced to stop using mailscanner as the hold portion of the 
> system was used to flood the machine with backscatter messages, the 
> only way to stop it was this
> and add rules in the header_checks file (and body).
>
I have never heard of this behavior. The milter has no code to strip 
headers or manipulate the message itself.


> The previous setup was working ok but I don't want to risk getting 
> into the same situation again.
>
> George
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net <mailto:mark at msapiro.net>> ? ? ? The
>     highway is for gamblers,
>     San Francisco Bay Area, California? ? better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
>     -- 
>     MailScanner mailing list
>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210203/517906f8/attachment.html>

From gpapamichelakis at gmail.com  Wed Feb  3 15:54:44 2021
From: gpapamichelakis at gmail.com (George Papamichelakis)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:54:44 +0200
Subject: Postfix hold
In-Reply-To: <1f87b323-8d4e-3804-2f90-329969e20a83@summitgrid.com>
References: <CAHhLBrEXNkCy0J+zZ+XC3UOWz0BMJD-Z=LqN9X9_iwbPHMdfOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <8a1482ec-dc7a-7e83-9436-e342c242784c@msapiro.net>
 <CAHhLBrF7_r_j0JcsAMDHFemn2wjo5rO9==bdpL-FAJ8J-c1QTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1f87b323-8d4e-3804-2f90-329969e20a83@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <548df6a6-0048-43c2-aea6-1de674b97e72@gmail.com>

Also I don't understand the term short | long postfix queue ? I google 
the term

but I can't find any info regarding that

MSMail Queue Type = short | long


what is this for ?

George



On 2/3/21 1:19 PM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
>
>> I already tried that,? it works but in the logs I see that a milter 
>> discard action is triggered but the mails are delivered.
>>
> Discard is by design. This is to simultaneously queue the message for 
> MailScanner instead of passing it forward in the postfix pipeline.
>
>
>> Then some users reported that it brakes outgoing mails , no headers 
>> almost , everything converted to plain text etc. Unfortunately I this 
>> is on alive machine
>> That was working with postfix/mailscanner for more than ten years now.
>> I was forced to stop using mailscanner as the hold portion of the 
>> system was used to flood the machine with backscatter messages, the 
>> only way to stop it was this
>> and add rules in the header_checks file (and body).
>>
> I have never heard of this behavior. The milter has no code to strip 
> headers or manipulate the message itself.
>
>
>> The previous setup was working ok but I don't want to risk getting 
>> into the same situation again.
>>
>> George
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net <mailto:mark at msapiro.net>> The
>>     highway is for gamblers,
>>     San Francisco Bay Area, California? ? better use your sense - B.
>>     Dylan
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     MailScanner mailing list
>>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>     <http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210203/d246e64f/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Wed Feb  3 16:00:59 2021
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:00:59 -0500
Subject: Postfix hold
In-Reply-To: <548df6a6-0048-43c2-aea6-1de674b97e72@gmail.com>
References: <CAHhLBrEXNkCy0J+zZ+XC3UOWz0BMJD-Z=LqN9X9_iwbPHMdfOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <8a1482ec-dc7a-7e83-9436-e342c242784c@msapiro.net>
 <CAHhLBrF7_r_j0JcsAMDHFemn2wjo5rO9==bdpL-FAJ8J-c1QTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1f87b323-8d4e-3804-2f90-329969e20a83@summitgrid.com>
 <548df6a6-0048-43c2-aea6-1de674b97e72@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a1cd24a1-3bdc-8168-729e-0a51882aa2de@summitgrid.com>

This should match whether you are using long queue ids in postfix or not.

On 2/3/21 10:54 AM, George Papamichelakis wrote:
>
> Also I don't understand the term short | long postfix queue ? I google 
> the term
>
> but I can't find any info regarding that
>
> MSMail Queue Type = short | long
>
>
> what is this for ?
>
> George
>

From gpapamichelakis at gmail.com  Thu Feb  4 20:20:28 2021
From: gpapamichelakis at gmail.com (George Papamichelakis)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:20:28 +0200
Subject: Bypass host from mailscanner
Message-ID: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>

Hi , continuing on my previous question about milter setup (Postfix Hold)

I want? to bypass one host (or a subnet if possible) from going through 
mailscanner

(with milter setup ). Is that possible ?


George


From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Thu Feb  4 21:48:56 2021
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:48:56 -0500
Subject: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>

You will probably want to take a look at milter maps for that.

http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html#per-client

On 2/4/21 3:20 PM, George Papamichelakis wrote:
> Hi , continuing on my previous question about milter setup (Postfix Hold)
>
> I want? to bypass one host (or a subnet if possible) from going 
> through mailscanner
>
> (with milter setup ). Is that possible ?
>
>
> George
>
>
>

From sales at edenusa.com  Sat Feb 13 23:52:20 2021
From: sales at edenusa.com (Paul Scott)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:52:20 +0000
Subject: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>

Hello MailScanner folks,

I hope that all is well.  I suppose this is off-topic, but as I use Linux pretty much just for DNS and Sendmail with MailScanner, I thought it might still be appropriate.

With the demise of CentOS coming soon (v8 this year and v7 in 2024), I was wondering if any of you might have a suggestion for someone like me, who has been using nothing but Red Hat or CentOS for 20+ years now.

So, the question is, what would be the most similar Linux distribution for me to use, in place of the CentOS?

Thank you!

Paul Scott
Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated 
866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com 
https://www.edenusa.com 





-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner <mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson via MailScanner
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2021 1:49 PM
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Cc: Shawn Iverson <shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
Subject: Re: Bypass host from mailscanner

You will probably want to take a look at milter maps for that.

http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html#per-client

On 2/4/21 3:20 PM, George Papamichelakis wrote:
> Hi , continuing on my previous question about milter setup (Postfix Hold)
>
> I want? to bypass one host (or a subnet if possible) from going 
> through mailscanner
>
> (with milter setup ). Is that possible ?
>
>
> George
>
>
>


-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner


From mark at msapiro.net  Sun Feb 14 00:16:42 2021
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:16:42 -0800
Subject: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
 <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>

In a hijacked thread
On 2/13/21 3:52 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> 
> With the demise of CentOS coming soon (v8 this year and v7 in 2024), I was wondering if any of you might have a suggestion for someone like me, who has been using nothing but Red Hat or CentOS for 20+ years now.
> 
> So, the question is, what would be the most similar Linux distribution for me to use, in place of the CentOS?


I used CentOS for several years before switching to Ubuntu. I now use
Ubuntu exclusively on servers I manage.

I would say Debian/Ubuntu is definitely not the most similar distro to
CentOS/RHEL (maybe Fedora is, but I don't know), and when I used CentOS,
I was not a fan of 'the Debian way', but I not only got used to it; I
like it.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From sales at edenusa.com  Sun Feb 14 02:49:14 2021
From: sales at edenusa.com (Paul Scott)
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 02:49:14 +0000
Subject: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
 <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <BY5PR10MB43537654F1A16EC9DB5F347CB0899@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>

Thank you for your input Mark.  I am looking into Ubuntu, and have seen very similar feedback to yours out there.

Sincerely,

Paul Scott
Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated 
866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com 
https://www.edenusa.com 





-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner <mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 4:17 PM
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner

In a hijacked thread
On 2/13/21 3:52 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> 
> With the demise of CentOS coming soon (v8 this year and v7 in 2024), I was wondering if any of you might have a suggestion for someone like me, who has been using nothing but Red Hat or CentOS for 20+ years now.
> 
> So, the question is, what would be the most similar Linux distribution for me to use, in place of the CentOS?


I used CentOS for several years before switching to Ubuntu. I now use
Ubuntu exclusively on servers I manage.

I would say Debian/Ubuntu is definitely not the most similar distro to
CentOS/RHEL (maybe Fedora is, but I don't know), and when I used CentOS,
I was not a fan of 'the Debian way', but I not only got used to it; I
like it.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan


-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner


From email at ace.net.au  Tue Feb 16 04:19:32 2021
From: email at ace.net.au (Peter)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:49:32 +1030
Subject: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR10MB43537654F1A16EC9DB5F347CB0899@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
 <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>
 <BY5PR10MB43537654F1A16EC9DB5F347CB0899@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <202102161449320088.1CB8FF4F@nx33.ace.net.au>

CloudLinux have announced a RHEL fork to replace Centos.

https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fo
rk-by-cloudlinux

RedHat are allowing free use of up to 16 copies of RHEL.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-
for-up-to-16-production-servers/

Cheers


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 14/02/2021 at 2:49 AM Paul Scott wrote:

>Thank you for your input Mark.  I am looking into Ubuntu, and have seen
>very similar feedback to yours out there.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Paul Scott
>Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated 
>866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com 
>https://www.edenusa.com 
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MailScanner
><mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On Behalf
>Of Mark Sapiro
>Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 4:17 PM
>To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
>
>In a hijacked thread
>On 2/13/21 3:52 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>> 
>> With the demise of CentOS coming soon (v8 this year and v7 in 2024), I
>was wondering if any of you might have a suggestion for someone like me,
>who has been using nothing but Red Hat or CentOS for 20+ years now.
>> 
>> So, the question is, what would be the most similar Linux distribution
>for me to use, in place of the CentOS?
>
>
>I used CentOS for several years before switching to Ubuntu. I now use
>Ubuntu exclusively on servers I manage.
>
>I would say Debian/Ubuntu is definitely not the most similar distro to
>CentOS/RHEL (maybe Fedora is, but I don't know), and when I used CentOS,
>I was not a fan of 'the Debian way', but I not only got used to it; I
>like it.
>
>-- 
>Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
>San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
>-- 
>MailScanner mailing list
>mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>-- 
>MailScanner mailing list
>mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner




From mailinglists at feedmebits.nl  Tue Feb 16 06:27:09 2021
From: mailinglists at feedmebits.nl (Maarten)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:27:09 +0100
Subject: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <202102161449320088.1CB8FF4F@nx33.ace.net.au>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
 <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>
 <BY5PR10MB43537654F1A16EC9DB5F347CB0899@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <202102161449320088.1CB8FF4F@nx33.ace.net.au>
Message-ID: <56f014bdb222e1ba655b3b99bdd3498b@feedmebits.nl>

Rocky Linux is still in the make and I converted my personal systems 
from Centos8 to Springdale Linux 8.


On 2021-02-16 05:19, Peter wrote:
> CloudLinux have announced a RHEL fork to replace Centos.
> 
> https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fo
> rk-by-cloudlinux
> 
> RedHat are allowing free use of up to 16 copies of RHEL.
> 
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-
> for-up-to-16-production-servers/
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> 
> On 14/02/2021 at 2:49 AM Paul Scott wrote:
> 
>> Thank you for your input Mark.  I am looking into Ubuntu, and have 
>> seen
>> very similar feedback to yours out there.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Paul Scott
>> Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated
>> 866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com
>> https://www.edenusa.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner
>> <mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On 
>> Behalf
>> Of Mark Sapiro
>> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 4:17 PM
>> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
>> 
>> In a hijacked thread
>> On 2/13/21 3:52 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>>> 
>>> With the demise of CentOS coming soon (v8 this year and v7 in 2024), 
>>> I
>> was wondering if any of you might have a suggestion for someone like 
>> me,
>> who has been using nothing but Red Hat or CentOS for 20+ years now.
>>> 
>>> So, the question is, what would be the most similar Linux 
>>> distribution
>> for me to use, in place of the CentOS?
>> 
>> 
>> I used CentOS for several years before switching to Ubuntu. I now use
>> Ubuntu exclusively on servers I manage.
>> 
>> I would say Debian/Ubuntu is definitely not the most similar distro to
>> CentOS/RHEL (maybe Fedora is, but I don't know), and when I used 
>> CentOS,
>> I was not a fan of 'the Debian way', but I not only got used to it; I
>> like it.
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
>> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

From bfebrian at gmail.com  Tue Feb 16 16:31:32 2021
From: bfebrian at gmail.com (Budi F)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 23:31:32 +0700
Subject: Eset EFS v7 not working in MailScanner 5.3.3
In-Reply-To: <1c3167d1-7874-5bc3-4334-e1a418dccf10@summitgrid.com>
References: <CAC+B5E+q+DF-s9w06CqFfZ1VDPEkDnPfLm4MkMt2B_u1Y68n9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <1c3167d1-7874-5bc3-4334-e1a418dccf10@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+B5EJajKNxyCatzGjZuvq5A5jDbFhbi3Rj_Q3CQ5Z-qi8-iw@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry for late reply
this is the content of virus.scanners.conf

avg                     /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/avg-wrapper
     /usr
avast                   /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/avast-wrapper
     /bin
avastd                  /bin/false
     /
bitdefender             /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/bitdefender-wrapper
     /opt/BitDefender
clamav                  /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/clamav-wrapper
    /usr
clamd                   /bin/false
     /usr
clamavmodule            /bin/false
     /usr/share/perl5/ClamAV
#esets                  /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/esets-wrapper
     /opt/eset/esets/sbin
esets                   /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/esets-wrapper
     /opt/eset/efs/sbin/cls
f-secure                /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/f-secure-wrapper
    /opt/f-secure/fsav
f-secured               /bin/false
     /opt/f-secure/fsav
generic                 /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/generic-wrapper
     /dev/null
sophos                  /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/sophos-wrapper
    /opt/sophos-av
sophossavi              /bin/false
     /tmp
none                    /bin/false
     /dev/null
drweb                   /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/drweb-wrapper
     /usr/bin
kaspersky               /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/kaspersky-wrapper
     /opt/kaspersky/klms
kse                     /bin/false
     /opt/kaspersky/ScanEngine

i changed the default esets as i notice that the efs v7 install in new
directory structure

and this is the content of /usr/lib/MailScanner/wrapper/esets-wrapper

#PackageDir=$1
PackageDir="/opt/eset/efs/sbin/cls"
shift
#Prog=esets_scan
Prog=cls

if [ "x$1" = "x-IsItInstalled" ]; then
  [ -x ${PackageDir}/$Prog ] && exit 0
  exit 1
fi

# Comment out if using sudo method
# exec ${PackageDir}/$Prog "$@"

# Uncomment if using sudo method
exec sudo ${PackageDir}/$Prog "$@"

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:53 AM Shawn Iverson via MailScanner <
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> wrote:

> What is the entry in your virus.scanners.conf?
> On 1/27/21 12:12 PM, Budi F wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what happened, I installed clamd and eset, but it seem eset
> never scan emails as it supposed to, I only see clamd that do the virus scan
>
> I notice this problem as some email with virus able to get through to
> users, but luckily esets desktop able to scan the virus
>
> [MailScanner]# MailScanner --lint
> Trying to setlogsock(unix)
>
> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf
> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README
> Read 1500 hostnames from the phishing whitelist
> Read 5545 hostnames from the phishing blacklists
> Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging
> MailWatch: Started MailWatch SQL Logging child
>
> Checking version numbers...
> Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.3.3) is correct.
>
> Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct.
> MailScanner setting GID to  (89)
> MailScanner setting UID to  (89)
>
> Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)...
> Using SpamAssassin results cache
> Connected to SpamAssassin cache database
> SpamAssassin reported no errors.
> Connected to Processing Attempts Database
> Created Processing Attempts Database successfully
> There are 0 messages in the Processing Attempts Database
> Using locktype = posix
> MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = clamd esets"
> Found these virus scanners installed: esets, clamd
> ===========================================================================
> Filename Checks: Blocked Filename Detected (1 eicar.com)
> Other Checks: Found 1 problems
> Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> Clamd::INFECTED::Win.Test.EICAR_HDB-1 :: ./1/
> Virus Scanning: Clamd found 1 infections
> Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
> Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses
> ===========================================================================
>
> If any of your virus scanners (esets,clamd)
> are not listed there, you should check that they are installed correctly
> and that MailScanner is finding them correctly via its virus.scanners.conf.
> Config: calling custom end function MailWatchLogging
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210216/c0219649/attachment.html>

From sales at edenusa.com  Wed Feb 17 02:46:57 2021
From: sales at edenusa.com (Paul Scott)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 02:46:57 +0000
Subject: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <56f014bdb222e1ba655b3b99bdd3498b@feedmebits.nl>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
 <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>
 <BY5PR10MB43537654F1A16EC9DB5F347CB0899@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <202102161449320088.1CB8FF4F@nx33.ace.net.au>
 <56f014bdb222e1ba655b3b99bdd3498b@feedmebits.nl>
Message-ID: <BY5PR10MB435323F52883CD5A9FBF52F7B0869@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>

Just an FYI.  I just got through downloading and installing Fedora Server 33, and it installs and runs exactly the same as CentOS 7 or 8.

I will next try to install Sendmail and Mailscanner, along with DoveCot and then fire up several hundred domains under bind and see how things go.

Will let you know how it all goes.  Thank you!

Paul Scott
Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated 
866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com 
https://www.edenusa.com 





-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner <mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On Behalf Of Maarten via MailScanner
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 10:27 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Cc: Maarten <mailinglists at feedmebits.nl>
Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner

Rocky Linux is still in the make and I converted my personal systems 
from Centos8 to Springdale Linux 8.


On 2021-02-16 05:19, Peter wrote:
> CloudLinux have announced a RHEL fork to replace Centos.
> 
> https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fo
> rk-by-cloudlinux
> 
> RedHat are allowing free use of up to 16 copies of RHEL.
> 
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-
> for-up-to-16-production-servers/
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> 
> On 14/02/2021 at 2:49 AM Paul Scott wrote:
> 
>> Thank you for your input Mark.  I am looking into Ubuntu, and have 
>> seen
>> very similar feedback to yours out there.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Paul Scott
>> Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated
>> 866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com
>> https://www.edenusa.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner
>> <mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On 
>> Behalf
>> Of Mark Sapiro
>> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 4:17 PM
>> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
>> 
>> In a hijacked thread
>> On 2/13/21 3:52 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>>> 
>>> With the demise of CentOS coming soon (v8 this year and v7 in 2024), 
>>> I
>> was wondering if any of you might have a suggestion for someone like 
>> me,
>> who has been using nothing but Red Hat or CentOS for 20+ years now.
>>> 
>>> So, the question is, what would be the most similar Linux 
>>> distribution
>> for me to use, in place of the CentOS?
>> 
>> 
>> I used CentOS for several years before switching to Ubuntu. I now use
>> Ubuntu exclusively on servers I manage.
>> 
>> I would say Debian/Ubuntu is definitely not the most similar distro to
>> CentOS/RHEL (maybe Fedora is, but I don't know), and when I used 
>> CentOS,
>> I was not a fan of 'the Debian way', but I not only got used to it; I
>> like it.
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
>> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner


-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner


From kenneth at khansen-it.dk  Wed Feb 17 05:33:54 2021
From: kenneth at khansen-it.dk (Kenneth Hansen)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 06:33:54 +0100
Subject: =?utf-8?q?RE=3A?= Linux Distros - =?utf-8?q?was=3A?= Bypass host from
 mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR10MB435323F52883CD5A9FBF52F7B0869@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <6f71-602cab00-3-6b19ea80@149649373>


I have been trying out AlmaLinux. Given, it is still in beta but from my initial testing it seems to run as a drop-in replacement for CentOS 8.
I am not that sure about Fedora, since it is a running distribution having bleeding edge versions of the software components.
So from the looks of it, I will be shifting my own deployments from CentOS7/8 to AlmaLinux

On Onsdag, Februar 17, 2021 03:46 CET, Paul Scott <sales at edenusa.com> wrote:
?Just an FYI. I just got through downloading and installing Fedora Server 33, and it installs and runs exactly the same as CentOS 7 or 8.

I will next try to install Sendmail and Mailscanner, along with DoveCot and then fire up several hundred domains under bind and see how things go.

Will let you know how it all goes. Thank you!

Paul Scott
Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated
866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com
https://www.edenusa.com





-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner <mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On Behalf Of Maarten via MailScanner
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 10:27 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Cc: Maarten <mailinglists at feedmebits.nl>
Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner

Rocky Linux is still in the make and I converted my personal systems
from Centos8 to Springdale Linux 8.


On 2021-02-16 05:19, Peter wrote:
> CloudLinux have announced a RHEL fork to replace Centos.
>
> https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fo
> rk-by-cloudlinux
>
> RedHat are allowing free use of up to 16 copies of RHEL.
>
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-
> for-up-to-16-production-servers/
>
> Cheers
>
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 14/02/2021 at 2:49 AM Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your input Mark. I am looking into Ubuntu, and have
>> seen
>> very similar feedback to yours out there.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Paul Scott
>> Engineer, Eden USA, Incorporated
>> 866.501.3336 | 951.505.6967 | sales at edenusa.com
>> https://www.edenusa.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner
>> <mailscanner-bounces+sales=edenusa.com at lists.mailscanner.info> On
>> Behalf
>> Of Mark Sapiro
>> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 4:17 PM
>> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
>>
>> In a hijacked thread
>> On 2/13/21 3:52 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>>>
>>> With the demise of CentOS coming soon (v8 this year and v7 in 2024),
>>> I
>> was wondering if any of you might have a suggestion for someone like
>> me,
>> who has been using nothing but Red Hat or CentOS for 20+ years now.
>>>
>>> So, the question is, what would be the most similar Linux
>>> distribution
>> for me to use, in place of the CentOS?
>>
>>
>> I used CentOS for several years before switching to Ubuntu. I now use
>> Ubuntu exclusively on servers I manage.
>>
>> I would say Debian/Ubuntu is definitely not the most similar distro to
>> CentOS/RHEL (maybe Fedora is, but I don't know), and when I used
>> CentOS,
>> I was not a fan of 'the Debian way', but I not only got used to it; I
>> like it.
>>
>> --
>> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
>> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
>>
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner


--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
?


?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210217/fbc6757e/attachment.html>

From it at festa.bg  Wed Feb 17 08:37:52 2021
From: it at festa.bg (Valentin Laskov)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:37:52 +0200
Subject: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR10MB435323F52883CD5A9FBF52F7B0869@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
 <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>
 <BY5PR10MB43537654F1A16EC9DB5F347CB0899@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <202102161449320088.1CB8FF4F@nx33.ace.net.au>
 <56f014bdb222e1ba655b3b99bdd3498b@feedmebits.nl>
 <BY5PR10MB435323F52883CD5A9FBF52F7B0869@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <bcdc0662-674e-57ed-7916-0b1ad236ab87@festa.bg>

Hi all,

Sendmail, MailScanner and others are running nice on Slackware 14.2 - a 
very stable (no systemd :) ) Linux distro.
I'm using Cyrus IMAP
If someone decide to try, be warned :) : this is like a LEGO. Most of 
things you must do yourself.
https://slackbuilds.org/ is a good place for making packages

Regards!
Valentin


?? 17.02.2021 ? 04:46, Paul Scott ??????:
> Just an FYI.  I just got through downloading and installing Fedora Server 33, and it installs and runs exactly the same as CentOS 7 or 8.
>
> I will next try to install Sendmail and Mailscanner, along with DoveCot and then fire up several hundred domains under bind and see how things go.
>
> Will let you know how it all goes.  Thank you!
>
> Paul Scott
>

From phaleintx at gmail.com  Wed Feb 17 16:06:36 2021
From: phaleintx at gmail.com (Phil Hale)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:06:36 -0600
Subject: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <bcdc0662-674e-57ed-7916-0b1ad236ab87@festa.bg>
References: <4a110bff-dea2-e3a3-4f34-dc309ecd4d26@gmail.com>
 <6b27d95e-c2b8-c833-a804-e4ea0f2a5e4a@summitgrid.com>
 <BY5PR10MB4353D531D1CF479A024CF039B08A9@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <ec922e37-c513-33c3-20ab-8aa72cf8a729@msapiro.net>
 <BY5PR10MB43537654F1A16EC9DB5F347CB0899@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <202102161449320088.1CB8FF4F@nx33.ace.net.au>
 <56f014bdb222e1ba655b3b99bdd3498b@feedmebits.nl>
 <BY5PR10MB435323F52883CD5A9FBF52F7B0869@BY5PR10MB4353.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <bcdc0662-674e-57ed-7916-0b1ad236ab87@festa.bg>
Message-ID: <0d83f1ee43b271cc7fa0a0224a5ef2593cc67540.camel@gmail.com>


If your going to consider using Fedora 33, you might as well look at
CentOS 8 Stream. ?It's a "just before it lands in RHEL 8" distro going
forward and will be a lot more stable that Fedora, which is the
"bleeding edge" in Red Hat land. ?The flow going forward for the Red
Hat ecosystem is

Bleeding Edge -> Leading Edge -> Stable
Fedora -> CentOS Stream -> RHEL

I did the conversion from CentOS 8 to CentOS 8 Stream and there were
only about 400 packages updated. ?You could consider CentOS 8 Stream as
"CentOS 8 + CentOS 8 Continuous Updates" with a "little extra" since
the stream versions are going to track the packages that land in the
next point release of RHEL.

Just my observation so far. ?YMMV.

Phil



-----Original Message-----
From: Valentin Laskov <it at festa.bg>
Reply-To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Subject: Re: Linux Distros - was: Bypass host from mailscanner
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:37:52 +0200

Hi all,

Sendmail, MailScanner and others are running nice on Slackware 14.2 - a
very stable (no systemd :) ) Linux distro.
I'm using Cyrus IMAP
If someone decide to try, be warned :) : this is like a LEGO. Most of 
things you must do yourself.
https://slackbuilds.org/?is a good place for making packages

Regards!
Valentin


?? 17.02.2021 ? 04:46, Paul Scott ??????:
> Just an FYI.? I just got through downloading and installing Fedora
> Server 33, and it installs and runs exactly the same as CentOS 7 or
> 8.
> 
> I will next try to install Sendmail and Mailscanner, along with
> DoveCot and then fire up several hundred domains under bind and see
> how things go.
> 
> Will let you know how it all goes.? Thank you!
> 
> Paul Scott
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210217/0ae0cb46/attachment.html>

From nerijus at users.sourceforge.net  Sun Feb 21 20:42:46 2021
From: nerijus at users.sourceforge.net (Nerijus Baliunas)
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 22:42:46 +0200
Subject: do not report attachments sent to some users
Message-ID: <Mahogany-0.68.0-8064-20210221-224246.00@nerijus.sat.lt>

Hello,

I have a mail backup configured in postfix, so that all received and sent messages are forwarded to
backup-recvd-username at example.com and backup-sent-username at example.com.
The problem is when disallowed attchment is sent.
Sending user gets:

Our e-mail content detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:

  To: backup-sent-user at example.com, email at example2.com
or:
  To: backup-recvd-user at example.com, user at example.com
  Subject: ...
  Date: Fri Feb 19 09:45:41 2021

One or more of the attachments (2021 02 18.doc) are on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and will not have been delivered.

How do I hide these backup-recvd-user at example.com and backup-sent-user at example.com?
I tried adding:
Allow Filenames = %rules-dir%/filename_allow.rules

filename_allow.rules:

To:    backup-recvd-*@example.com       \.*$
To:    backup-sent-*@example.com        \.*$

FromOrTo:       default

But then message with disallowed attachment is delivered to both backup-recvd-user at example.com and user at example.com.

Regards,
Nerijus

From fesarlis at gmail.com  Mon Feb 22 12:27:54 2021
From: fesarlis at gmail.com (aris fesarlis)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:27:54 +0200
Subject: URGENT - SILENT VIRUSES EXCEPTIONS
Message-ID: <3eef3284-6fab-de72-1f9c-04841f2b439b@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210222/6ecc6a31/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Feb 23 00:06:44 2021
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:06:44 -0500
Subject: URGENT - SILENT VIRUSES EXCEPTIONS
In-Reply-To: <3eef3284-6fab-de72-1f9c-04841f2b439b@gmail.com>
References: <3eef3284-6fab-de72-1f9c-04841f2b439b@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a51eb19b-afe7-f661-52a0-f368434e00fd@summitgrid.com>

"Notify Senders" must also be set to yes for this to work, so you 
probably need this as well.

On 2/22/21 7:27 AM, aris fesarlis wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to create a ruleset regarding silent viruses, to allow 
> specific senders to receive a notification. This must be done because 
> there are some false positives (eg xls files recognized by heuristic 
> scanning as infected) and the sender never gets the chance to know his 
> message was not delivered.
>
> I've tried to create a ruleset like this:
>
> FromOrTo:??? default ??? ??? ? HTML-IFrame All-Viruses
>
> From: sender at domain.com
>
>
> but this does not work I have also created a ruleset about "Notify 
> Senders Of Viruses" :
>
> FromOrTo: default???????????????????????? no
> From: sender at domain.com ???????????? yes
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210222/df8ef2bb/attachment.html>

From fesarlis at gmail.com  Sat Feb 27 18:06:50 2021
From: fesarlis at gmail.com (aris fesarlis)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:06:50 +0200
Subject: URGENT - SILENT VIRUSES EXCEPTIONS
In-Reply-To: <a51eb19b-afe7-f661-52a0-f368434e00fd@summitgrid.com>
References: <3eef3284-6fab-de72-1f9c-04841f2b439b@gmail.com>
 <a51eb19b-afe7-f661-52a0-f368434e00fd@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <d65978e0-0b62-effc-7b28-85e6c370daa7@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20210227/4042735a/attachment.html>