Bayes issue

[Mark Sapiro]

On 7/27/20 11:09 PM, Miron Jajtić wrote:
> 
> 28. 07. 2020. u 01:47, Mark Sapiro je napisao/la:
>> On 7/27/20 1:21 AM, Miron Jajtić wrote:
>>> Directly is tested using `spamassassin -t` command.
>>
>> What happens if you test directly with `spamc` rather than with
>> `spamassassin`?
> 
> 
> Content analysis details:   (1.9 points, 5.0 required)
> 
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
>  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
> blocked.
>                             See
>                            
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
>                              for more information.
>                             [URIs: xxxx.xx]
>  0.0 SPF_NONE               SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
>  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
>  0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO        No description available.
>  0.7 SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_FEW    Possible punctuation-obfuscated Subject: header
>  1.2 SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_MANY   Punctuation-obfuscated Subject: header


So it doesn't appear to be a `spamc` (invoking spamd) vs `spamassassin`
issue. Have you tried removing /var/spool/MailScanner/spamassassin/*

Also, do you have

MCP Checks = yes

somewhere in your MailScanner configuration? If so, do you have

use_bayes  1

in /etc/MailScanner/mcp/mcp.spamassassin.conf?

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200728/b759dd0b/attachment.sig>