mails with valid SPF sender don't get marked SPF_PASS

[Shawn Iverson]

You need to merge those two into just spamassassin.conf and ditch 
spam.assassin.prefs.conf.

On 7/24/20 7:32 AM, Thom van der Boon wrote:
> MailScanner 5.3.3
>
> root at mail:/etc/MailScanner# ls -l
> total 888
> (...)
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root    root     11404 Apr 30  2019 spamassassin.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root    root      1870 Jul 24 08:48 spam.assassin.prefs.conf
> (...)
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards,
>
>
> Thom van der Boon
> E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Van: *"MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Aan: *"MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Cc: *"Shawn Iverson" <shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
> *Verzonden: *Vrijdag 24 juli 2020 13:24:23
> *Onderwerp: *Re: mails with valid SPF sender don't get marked SPF_PASS
>
> What version of MailScanner do you have?
>
> And out of curiosity, do you have the following both present?
>
> /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf
>
> /etc/MailScanner/spamassassin.conf
>
> On 7/24/20 3:02 AM, Thom van der Boon wrote:
>
>     Mark,
>
>     It is a MailScanner issue (I think)
>
>     When I run the message through SA directly by the following command:
>
>     spamassassin -t -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf <
>     message.txt
>
>     I get a SPF_PASS
>
>      pts rule name              description
>     ---- ----------------------
>     --------------------------------------------------
>      0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4      RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
>                                 [185.201.16.36 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
>     -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at
>     https://www.dnswl.org/,
>                                  no trust
>                                 [185.201.16.36 listed in list.dnswl.org]
>     -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
>                                 [score: 0.0000]
>      0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
>     -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
>      0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME
>     parts
>      0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
>      0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
>      0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with
>     Strict
>                                 Alignment
>
>     but as stated before; the "live" message that went through my
>     mailscanner
>
>     X-vdbeu-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
>     	score=-1.786, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
>     	KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.10, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.00,
>     	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.00, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.00, SPF_HELO_NONE 0.00)
>
>
>     So, I don't get it
>
>     MailScanner --link reports nothing weird
>
>     Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards,
>
>
>     Thom van der Boon
>     E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl <mailto:thom at vdb.nl>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *Van: *"Mark Sapiro" <mark at msapiro.net> <mailto:mark at msapiro.net>
>     *Aan: *"MailScanner Discussion"
>     <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     *Verzonden: *Donderdag 23 juli 2020 22:38:17
>     *Onderwerp: *Re: mails with valid SPF sender don't get marked SPF_PASS
>
>     On 7/23/20 1:39 AM, Thom van der Boon wrote:
>     > Hi guys,
>     >
>     > I have something weird. Most mails with valid SPF record are marked
>     > correctly (SPF_FAIL or SPF_PASS), but I see some messages which
>     should
>     > be marked as SPF_PASS get no SPF_PASS
>
>
>     Assuming you are talking about the SPF_PASS rule in the SpamAssassin
>     report in the X-vdbeu-MailScanner-SpamCheck: header, this is a
>     SpamAssassin question, not a MailScanner question per se. You might do
>     better on a SpamAssassin list. See
>     <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/MailingLists>
>     <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/MailingLists>.
>
>     -- 
>     Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> <mailto:mark at msapiro.net>      The
>     highway is for gamblers,
>     San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
>     -- 
>     MailScanner mailing list
>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> -- 
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com <mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
>
>
>
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200724/bc89af9c/attachment.html>