mails with valid SPF sender don't get marked SPF_PASS

Thom van der Boon thom at vdb.nl
Fri Jul 24 08:09:00 UTC 2020


Symlink is OK 

Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards, 


Thom van der Boon 
E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl 


Van: "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> 
Aan: "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> 
Cc: "Shawn Iverson" <shawniverson at summitgrid.com> 
Verzonden: Donderdag 23 juli 2020 22:42:01 
Onderwerp: Re: mails with valid SPF sender don't get marked SPF_PASS 



I would add just to verify that your /etc/mailscanner/spamassassin.conf is properly symlinked to your spamassassin config directory, but yes, if that isn't the problem, appears to be a spamassassin question. 
On 7/23/20 4:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: 



On 7/23/20 1:39 AM, Thom van der Boon wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Hi guys,

I have something weird. Most mails with valid SPF record are marked
correctly (SPF_FAIL or SPF_PASS), but I see some messages which should
be marked as SPF_PASS get no SPF_PASS 



Assuming you are talking about the SPF_PASS rule in the SpamAssassin
report in the X-vdbeu-MailScanner-SpamCheck: header, this is a
SpamAssassin question, not a MailScanner question per se. You might do
better on a SpamAssassin list. See [ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/MailingLists | <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/MailingLists> ] . 

BQ_END

-- 

Shawn Iverson 
[ mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com | shawniverson at summitgrid.com ] 



-- 
MailScanner mailing list 
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200724/caea3153/attachment.html>


More information about the MailScanner mailing list