mails with valid SPF sender don't get marked SPF_PASS
Thom van der Boon
thom at vdb.nl
Fri Jul 24 08:09:00 UTC 2020
Symlink is OK
Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards,
Thom van der Boon
E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl
Van: "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Aan: "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Cc: "Shawn Iverson" <shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
Verzonden: Donderdag 23 juli 2020 22:42:01
Onderwerp: Re: mails with valid SPF sender don't get marked SPF_PASS
I would add just to verify that your /etc/mailscanner/spamassassin.conf is properly symlinked to your spamassassin config directory, but yes, if that isn't the problem, appears to be a spamassassin question.
On 7/23/20 4:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 7/23/20 1:39 AM, Thom van der Boon wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hi guys,
I have something weird. Most mails with valid SPF record are marked
correctly (SPF_FAIL or SPF_PASS), but I see some messages which should
be marked as SPF_PASS get no SPF_PASS
Assuming you are talking about the SPF_PASS rule in the SpamAssassin
report in the X-vdbeu-MailScanner-SpamCheck: header, this is a
SpamAssassin question, not a MailScanner question per se. You might do
better on a SpamAssassin list. See [ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/MailingLists | <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/MailingLists> ] .
BQ_END
--
Shawn Iverson
[ mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com | shawniverson at summitgrid.com ]
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200724/caea3153/attachment.html>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list