From support at mmarzouki.de  Wed Apr  1 18:55:00 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 18:55:00 +0000
Subject: install mailscanner on centos7 / centos 8
Message-ID: <0785c4873b11dc4a525a7b3835f4761e@mmarzouki.de>

hello,

i want to install mailscanner for centos7.
but after the sucessfully installation of install.sh from github https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds
the mailscanner doesn't start.
then i installed the rpm package to and i received this message from systemd:


[root at mg-mailscanner ~]# systemctl status mailscanner.service
? mailscanner.service - LSB: MailScanner daemon
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/MailScanner/init/ms-init; disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2020-04-01 20:53:23 CEST; 6s ago
     Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
  Process: 23595 ExecStart=/usr/lib/MailScanner/init/ms-init start (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

Apr 01 20:53:21 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: Starting LSB: MailScanner daemon...
Apr 01 20:53:21 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: MailScanner starting ...
Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: Can't locate Filesys/Df.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Filesys::Df module) (@INC con>
Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 88.
Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: mailscanner.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=1
Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: mailscanner.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: MailScanner daemon.



is this a bug?
what is the problem?

thank you very much.

kind regards

From mark at msapiro.net  Wed Apr  1 19:24:03 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:24:03 -0700
Subject: install mailscanner on centos7 / centos 8
In-Reply-To: <0785c4873b11dc4a525a7b3835f4761e@mmarzouki.de>
References: <0785c4873b11dc4a525a7b3835f4761e@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <a5ce4a44-19e0-362e-fd9a-a219555bd5e6@msapiro.net>

On 4/1/20 11:55 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> hello,
> 
> i want to install mailscanner for centos7.
> but after the sucessfully installation of install.sh from github https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds
> the mailscanner doesn't start.
> then i installed the rpm package to and i received this message from systemd:
> 
> 
> [root at mg-mailscanner ~]# systemctl status mailscanner.service
> ? mailscanner.service - LSB: MailScanner daemon
>    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/MailScanner/init/ms-init; disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
>    Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2020-04-01 20:53:23 CEST; 6s ago
>      Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
>   Process: 23595 ExecStart=/usr/lib/MailScanner/init/ms-init start (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
> 
> Apr 01 20:53:21 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: Starting LSB: MailScanner daemon...
> Apr 01 20:53:21 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: MailScanner starting ...
> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: Can't locate Filesys/Df.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Filesys::Df module) (@INC con>
> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 88.
> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: mailscanner.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=1
> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: mailscanner.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: MailScanner daemon.


Try running

sudo ms-configure

That should install all the required Perl modules.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From support at mmarzouki.de  Thu Apr  2 07:12:12 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 07:12:12 +0000
Subject: install mailscanner on centos7 / centos 8
In-Reply-To: <a5ce4a44-19e0-362e-fd9a-a219555bd5e6@msapiro.net>
References: <a5ce4a44-19e0-362e-fd9a-a219555bd5e6@msapiro.net>
 <0785c4873b11dc4a525a7b3835f4761e@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <862f1fa502ef3c72e649b8755d9af4c6@mmarzouki.de>

thanks. yes now it works.
now i have installed it on centos8 with postfix.

but before i used /usr/sbin/ms-configure and that didn't work.

thank you :)


cheers

---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

Support-Team
MMarzouki

1. April 2020 21:24, "Mark Sapiro" <mark at msapiro.net> schrieb:

> On 4/1/20 11:55 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> 
>> hello,
>> 
>> i want to install mailscanner for centos7.
>> but after the sucessfully installation of install.sh from github
>> https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds
>> the mailscanner doesn't start.
>> then i installed the rpm package to and i received this message from systemd:
>> 
>> [root at mg-mailscanner ~]# systemctl status mailscanner.service
>> ? mailscanner.service - LSB: MailScanner daemon
>> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/MailScanner/init/ms-init; disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
>> Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2020-04-01 20:53:23 CEST; 6s ago
>> Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
>> Process: 23595 ExecStart=/usr/lib/MailScanner/init/ms-init start (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
>> 
>> Apr 01 20:53:21 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: Starting LSB: MailScanner daemon...
>> Apr 01 20:53:21 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: MailScanner starting ...
>> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: Can't locate Filesys/Df.pm in @INC (you may
>> need to install the Filesys::Df module) (@INC con>
>> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com ms-init[23595]: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>> /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 88.
>> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: mailscanner.service: Control process exited,
>> code=exited status=1
>> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: mailscanner.service: Failed with result
>> 'exit-code'.
>> Apr 01 20:53:23 mg-mailscanner.test.com systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: MailScanner daemon.
> 
> Try running
> 
> sudo ms-configure
> 
> That should install all the required Perl modules.
> 
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr  4 16:46:32 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 16:46:32 +0000
Subject: targeted spamscore for mails
Message-ID: <57298690a8f2d55cb2a31ffaf391cd7f@mmarzouki.de>

hi,

i have a lab with mailscanner as mailscanner and centos8.

i want to test the mails with a score under the "High Scoring Spam Actions" value.
how can i create a mail with only a score from 4?

the gtube string reached a score from 1000. this is to high value.


cheers

---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

MMarzouki

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr  4 16:55:24 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 16:55:24 +0000
Subject: mailscanner as smtpd-proxy
Message-ID: <23bd221e2c63688594e4cde1459e3daf@mmarzouki.de>

hi,

it is possible to use mailscanner as smtpd-proxy in postfix like amavisd?
currently the state is, that postfix accept a mail with SMTP-Code 250 and hold the mail in his queue.

i have the whish, to scan and reject with the SMTP-Code 5XX if a mail is a spam or have malware content before postfix confirm the message with 250.

this setup call smtp-proxy in amavisd. the opposite setup call content-filter.

does the smtp-proxy setup exist for mailscanner too?

the big advantage is, that i dont need to confirm a mail first with 250 and in a case of spam to create a bounce to inform the sender, that his mail is not accepted. 


cheers

---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

MMarzouki

From Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it  Sat Apr  4 16:56:21 2020
From: Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it (Antony Stone)
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:56:21 +0200
Subject: targeted spamscore for mails
In-Reply-To: <57298690a8f2d55cb2a31ffaf391cd7f@mmarzouki.de>
References: <57298690a8f2d55cb2a31ffaf391cd7f@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <202004041856.21964.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>

On Saturday 04 April 2020 at 18:46:32, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:

> i want to test the mails with a score under the "High Scoring Spam Actions"
> value. how can i create a mail with only a score from 4?
> 
> the gtube string reached a score from 1000. this is too high value.

This is not really a mailscanner question - more of  spamassassin one, since 
it's spamassassin which is detecting gtube and assigning a score to it, which 
maillscanner is then simply interpreting.

Adjust the value for gtube in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with something like:

score GTUBE 4.0


Regards,


Antony.

-- 
I thought of going into banking, until I lost interest.

                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC me.

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr  4 17:01:24 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 17:01:24 +0000
Subject: inform the sender for High Scoring Spam Actions
Message-ID: <35df8a69a63f12d6ee4e0e09a558de28@mmarzouki.de>

hi,

which option i have to inform the sender when his mail reached the "High Scoring Spam Actions"?

i found only this possibility:

https://www.mailscanner.info/MailScanner.conf.index.html#High%20Scoring%20Spam%20Actions

but i need a option like bounce or "notificat the senders".

i think a good solution for this problem is the smtpd-proxy setup. please see my other mail with the subject : mailscanner as smtpd-proxy


cheers

---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

MMarzouki

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr  4 17:08:23 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 17:08:23 +0000
Subject: targeted spamscore for mails
In-Reply-To: <202004041856.21964.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
References: <202004041856.21964.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
 <57298690a8f2d55cb2a31ffaf391cd7f@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <87b87eb7836f331d3dc5fb5600fd5487@mmarzouki.de>

yes this was the solution.

thanks

cheers

---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

Support-Team
MMarzouki

4. April 2020 18:56, "Antony Stone" <Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it> schrieb:

> On Saturday 04 April 2020 at 18:46:32, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> 
>> i want to test the mails with a score under the "High Scoring Spam Actions"
>> value. how can i create a mail with only a score from 4?
>> 
>> the gtube string reached a score from 1000. this is too high value.
> 
> This is not really a mailscanner question - more of spamassassin one, since
> it's spamassassin which is detecting gtube and assigning a score to it, which
> maillscanner is then simply interpreting.
> 
> Adjust the value for gtube in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with something like:
> 
> score GTUBE 4.0
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Antony.
> 
> --
> I thought of going into banking, until I lost interest.
> 
> Please reply to the list;
> please *don't* CC me.
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

From mark at msapiro.net  Sat Apr  4 17:11:21 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 10:11:21 -0700
Subject: inform the sender for High Scoring Spam Actions
In-Reply-To: <35df8a69a63f12d6ee4e0e09a558de28@mmarzouki.de>
References: <35df8a69a63f12d6ee4e0e09a558de28@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <2e226637-cc2d-7546-7d63-7cc77aaa1e89@msapiro.net>

On 4/4/20 10:01 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> hi,
> 
> which option i have to inform the sender when his mail reached the "High Scoring Spam Actions"?
> 
> i found only this possibility:
> 
> https://www.mailscanner.info/MailScanner.conf.index.html#High%20Scoring%20Spam%20Actions
> 
> but i need a option like bounce or "notificat the senders".


I think this is a very bad idea. Most high scoring spam *should* be
actual spam, probably with a spoofed sender. If you can't reject this
mail at incoming SMTP time (not possible with current MailScanner), it
is best to not respond to the purported sender in any way.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr  4 17:15:04 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 17:15:04 +0000
Subject: inform the sender for High Scoring Spam Actions
In-Reply-To: <2e226637-cc2d-7546-7d63-7cc77aaa1e89@msapiro.net>
References: <2e226637-cc2d-7546-7d63-7cc77aaa1e89@msapiro.net>
 <35df8a69a63f12d6ee4e0e09a558de28@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <7a99e61ecbf5defad974566675ee07b1@mmarzouki.de>

yes this is a bad idea. but in some countrys like germany it is forbidden to secretly delete a mail.
the other possibility is to notify the recipient, but i dont want to sent the recipient every time a mail, with the notify that i blocked a spam for him.

is there any other solution?


kind regards

---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

Support
MMarzouki

4. April 2020 19:11, "Mark Sapiro" <mark at msapiro.net> schrieb:

> On 4/4/20 10:01 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>> 
>> which option i have to inform the sender when his mail reached the "High Scoring Spam Actions"?
>> 
>> i found only this possibility:
>> 
>> https://www.mailscanner.info/MailScanner.conf.index.html#High Scoring Spam Actions
>> 
>> but i need a option like bounce or "notificat the senders".
> 
> I think this is a very bad idea. Most high scoring spam *should* be
> actual spam, probably with a spoofed sender. If you can't reject this
> mail at incoming SMTP time (not possible with current MailScanner), it
> is best to not respond to the purported sender in any way.
> 
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

From thom at vdb.nl  Sat Apr  4 17:20:22 2020
From: thom at vdb.nl (Thom van der Boon)
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 19:20:22 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: inform the sender for High Scoring Spam Actions
In-Reply-To: <2e226637-cc2d-7546-7d63-7cc77aaa1e89@msapiro.net>
References: <35df8a69a63f12d6ee4e0e09a558de28@mmarzouki.de>
 <2e226637-cc2d-7546-7d63-7cc77aaa1e89@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <438398930.117604.1586020822387.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>

Mark, 

I totally agree with you. 

But it is a useful option for countries (f.e. Germany) where it is required by law to notify the sender when a message is not being delivered. 

Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards, 


Thom van der Boon 
E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl 


Van: "Mark Sapiro" <mark at msapiro.net> 
Aan: "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> 
Verzonden: Zaterdag 4 april 2020 19:11:21 
Onderwerp: Re: inform the sender for High Scoring Spam Actions 

On 4/4/20 10:01 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote: 
> hi, 
> 
> which option i have to inform the sender when his mail reached the "High Scoring Spam Actions"? 
> 
> i found only this possibility: 
> 
> https://www.mailscanner.info/MailScanner.conf.index.html#High%20Scoring%20Spam%20Actions 
> 
> but i need a option like bounce or "notificat the senders". 


I think this is a very bad idea. Most high scoring spam *should* be 
actual spam, probably with a spoofed sender. If you can't reject this 
mail at incoming SMTP time (not possible with current MailScanner), it 
is best to not respond to the purported sender in any way. 

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, 
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan 


-- 
MailScanner mailing list 
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200404/fa8d9367/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Sat Apr  4 17:22:33 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 10:22:33 -0700
Subject: mailscanner as smtpd-proxy
In-Reply-To: <23bd221e2c63688594e4cde1459e3daf@mmarzouki.de>
References: <23bd221e2c63688594e4cde1459e3daf@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <9bf67c5b-280d-ed18-b83b-caf15f999829@msapiro.net>

On 4/4/20 9:55 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> hi,
> 
> it is possible to use mailscanner as smtpd-proxy in postfix like amavisd?
> currently the state is, that postfix accept a mail with SMTP-Code 250 and hold the mail in his queue.
> 
> i have the whish, to scan and reject with the SMTP-Code 5XX if a mail is a spam or have malware content before postfix confirm the message with 250.


This is currently a work in progress in MailScanner, but we aren't there
yet. Recent MailScanner can be configured with Postfix as an smtpd
milter, but in almost all cases, the milter 'discards' the message and
passes it to MailScanner which processes it and if accepted, resubmits
it to Postfix.

The milter could actually invoke the MailScanner process on the message
but doesn't in order to avoid a potentially log running process.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr  4 18:05:37 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (Support-MMarzouki)
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 20:05:37 +0200
Subject: inform the sender for High Scoring Spam Actions
In-Reply-To: <438398930.117604.1586020822387.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>
References: <35df8a69a63f12d6ee4e0e09a558de28@mmarzouki.de>
 <2e226637-cc2d-7546-7d63-7cc77aaa1e89@msapiro.net>
 <438398930.117604.1586020822387.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>
Message-ID: <B096D6E7-760B-4466-BD29-84D6EF12D24A@mmarzouki.de>

Thom,

yes this is the reason. In germany it's required to inform the sender or the recipient that the message is blocked.
So now i understand that the possibilty to notify only the sender doesn't exist.

So i will use the exists notify option to inform the recipient.

maybe it is a case for a new Option in mailscanner for the users like in germany :)

Kind regards

Am 4. April 2020 19:20:22 MESZ schrieb Thom van der Boon <thom at vdb.nl>:
>Mark, 
>
>I totally agree with you. 
>
>But it is a useful option for countries (f.e. Germany) where it is
>required by law to notify the sender when a message is not being
>delivered. 
>
>Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards, 
>
>
>Thom van der Boon 
>E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl 
>
>
>Van: "Mark Sapiro" <mark at msapiro.net> 
>Aan: "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> 
>Verzonden: Zaterdag 4 april 2020 19:11:21 
>Onderwerp: Re: inform the sender for High Scoring Spam Actions 
>
>On 4/4/20 10:01 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote: 
>> hi, 
>> 
>> which option i have to inform the sender when his mail reached the
>"High Scoring Spam Actions"? 
>> 
>> i found only this possibility: 
>> 
>>
>https://www.mailscanner.info/MailScanner.conf.index.html#High%20Scoring%20Spam%20Actions
>
>> 
>> but i need a option like bounce or "notificat the senders". 
>
>
>I think this is a very bad idea. Most high scoring spam *should* be 
>actual spam, probably with a spoofed sender. If you can't reject this 
>mail at incoming SMTP time (not possible with current MailScanner), it 
>is best to not respond to the purported sender in any way. 
>
>-- 
>Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, 
>San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan 
>
>
>-- 
>MailScanner mailing list 
>mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
>http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner 

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Ger?t mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200404/554d2e5f/attachment.html>

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr  4 18:26:50 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (Support-MMarzouki)
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 20:26:50 +0200
Subject: mailscanner as smtpd-proxy
In-Reply-To: <9bf67c5b-280d-ed18-b83b-caf15f999829@msapiro.net>
References: <23bd221e2c63688594e4cde1459e3daf@mmarzouki.de>
 <9bf67c5b-280d-ed18-b83b-caf15f999829@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <012B0B69-7BFA-46BF-AA71-AE549CCEC68A@mmarzouki.de>

Mark,

Is there an approximate release date for this function in mailscanner?

Cheers

Am 4. April 2020 19:22:33 MESZ schrieb Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>:
>On 4/4/20 9:55 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
>> hi,
>> 
>> it is possible to use mailscanner as smtpd-proxy in postfix like
>amavisd?
>> currently the state is, that postfix accept a mail with SMTP-Code 250
>and hold the mail in his queue.
>> 
>> i have the whish, to scan and reject with the SMTP-Code 5XX if a mail
>is a spam or have malware content before postfix confirm the message
>with 250.
>
>
>This is currently a work in progress in MailScanner, but we aren't
>there
>yet. Recent MailScanner can be configured with Postfix as an smtpd
>milter, but in almost all cases, the milter 'discards' the message and
>passes it to MailScanner which processes it and if accepted, resubmits
>it to Postfix.
>
>The milter could actually invoke the MailScanner process on the message
>but doesn't in order to avoid a potentially log running process.
>
>-- 
>Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
>San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
>-- 
>MailScanner mailing list
>mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Ger?t mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200404/4ad88552/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Sat Apr  4 23:10:05 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 16:10:05 -0700
Subject: mailscanner as smtpd-proxy
In-Reply-To: <012B0B69-7BFA-46BF-AA71-AE549CCEC68A@mmarzouki.de>
References: <23bd221e2c63688594e4cde1459e3daf@mmarzouki.de>
 <9bf67c5b-280d-ed18-b83b-caf15f999829@msapiro.net>
 <012B0B69-7BFA-46BF-AA71-AE549CCEC68A@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <eaf2dea2-9bf2-6ff8-71c3-3b14076113f5@msapiro.net>

On 4/4/20 11:26 AM, Support-MMarzouki wrote:
> Mark,
> 
> Is there an approximate release date for this function in mailscanner?


The milter for interfacing Mailman with Postfix has been available and
working well since MailScanner 5.1.3-1. See
<https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/blob/master/changelog>.

There is no current plan or schedule for enhancing the milter to invoke
MailScanner during Postfix SMTP time.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sun Apr  5 16:32:50 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 16:32:50 +0000
Subject: Notices From option
Message-ID: <ecce5aeb3642e8d03fd08f4497c0dc7a@mmarzouki.de>

hi,

i changed the "Notices From" and "Local Postmaster" option to change the name in the FROM field to notify a user.

example:

Notices From = Postmaster
Local Postmaster = notify at domain.com

Mailheader FROM field should: Postmaster <notify at domain.com>

but only the "Local Postmaster" was changed, not the "Notices From". they keep the default value of "MailScanner".

current state:

MailScanner <notify at domain.com>

i restart mailscanner after every change.

do i have a mistake?



Thanks a lot


kind regards

---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

Support
MMarzouki

From mark at msapiro.net  Sun Apr  5 19:27:08 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:27:08 -0700
Subject: Notices From option
In-Reply-To: <ecce5aeb3642e8d03fd08f4497c0dc7a@mmarzouki.de>
References: <ecce5aeb3642e8d03fd08f4497c0dc7a@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <f7b2dcd7-ff79-8839-2af8-504e908a8f10@msapiro.net>

On 4/5/20 9:32 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> hi,
> 
> i changed the "Notices From" and "Local Postmaster" option to change the name in the FROM field to notify a user.
...
> but only the "Local Postmaster" was changed, not the "Notices From". they keep the default value of "MailScanner".


I'm not certain, but I think "Notices From" only is effective for
notices sent by /usr/sbin/ms-msg-alert.

If you look in MailScanner's reports directory for your language(s)
(default /usr/share/MailScanner/reports/en) you'll see it contains files
named languages.conf and languages.conf.strings. You could try editing
the definition of PostmasterName in those files.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From support at mmarzouki.de  Mon Apr  6 13:11:36 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:11:36 +0000
Subject: Notices From option
In-Reply-To: <f7b2dcd7-ff79-8839-2af8-504e908a8f10@msapiro.net>
References: <f7b2dcd7-ff79-8839-2af8-504e908a8f10@msapiro.net>
 <ecce5aeb3642e8d03fd08f4497c0dc7a@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <b55ba7d6ff073509a6588b06ee7cf2e5@mmarzouki.de>

hi mark,

the change of "PostmasterName" doesn't change the FROM field.
it was the option "MailScanner". the default was "MailScanner = MailScanner". 
i changed it to "MailScanner = NICKNAME"

the result of the option "MailScanner = NICKNAME" and "Local Postmaster = notify at domain.de" is:

"NICKNAME" <notify at domain.de>

but i think the documentation of "NOTICES FROM" is a little bit confusing.



#####

The visible part of the email address used in the "From:" line of the
notices. The <user at domain> part of the email address is set to the
"Local Postmaster" setting.
https://www.mailscanner.info/MailScanner.conf.index.html#Notices%20From

#####

where can i find the clue for next time to change the "MailScanner = MailScanner" option to change the FROM in the mailheader?


many thanks for your support.


cheers



---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

Support
MMarzouki

5. April 2020 21:27, "Mark Sapiro" <mark at msapiro.net> schrieb:

> On 4/5/20 9:32 AM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>> 
>> i changed the "Notices From" and "Local Postmaster" option to change the name in the FROM field to
>> notify a user.
> 
> ...
>> but only the "Local Postmaster" was changed, not the "Notices From". they keep the default value of
>> "MailScanner".
> 
> I'm not certain, but I think "Notices From" only is effective for
> notices sent by /usr/sbin/ms-msg-alert.
> 
> If you look in MailScanner's reports directory for your language(s)
> (default /usr/share/MailScanner/reports/en) you'll see it contains files
> named languages.conf and languages.conf.strings. You could try editing
> the definition of PostmasterName in those files.
> 
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

From lee.iitb at gmail.com  Tue Apr  7 06:49:32 2020
From: lee.iitb at gmail.com (Thomas Stephen Lee)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:19:32 +0530
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 message
Message-ID: <CAG7s96VKH+MjBh8=T8w92T8Gd8BHOSvoU5mYMFqGbfvniebw9Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

While Testing a CentOS 8.1 installation.

I get the following messages from MailScanner 5.2.2

-----------------------
which: no sa-compile in
(/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/sbin)
which: no re2c in
(/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/sbin)
-----------------------

What is the matter ?

thanks

---
Lee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200407/dab76eec/attachment.html>

From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk  Tue Apr  7 12:56:06 2020
From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (Michael Young)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 13:56:06 +0100 (BST)
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 message
In-Reply-To: <CAG7s96VKH+MjBh8=T8w92T8Gd8BHOSvoU5mYMFqGbfvniebw9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG7s96VKH+MjBh8=T8w92T8Gd8BHOSvoU5mYMFqGbfvniebw9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.22.394.2004071352190.4699@dhcp-10-248-0-33>

On Tue, 7 Apr 2020, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> While Testing a CentOS 8.1 installation.
> 
> I get the following messages from MailScanner 5.2.2
> 
> -----------------------
> which: no sa-compile in
> (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/sbin)
> which: no re2c in
> (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/sbin)
> -----------------------

It sounds like you are missing some packages. sa-compile is part of the 
spamassassin package, and I would expect re2c to be in the re2c package, 
though I didn't see one for CentOS 8 (though EPEL7 has one for 7).

 	Michael Young

From aneck at hosttech.ch  Tue Apr  7 11:50:58 2020
From: aneck at hosttech.ch (Alexander Neck)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 11:50:58 +0000
Subject: MailScanner-processes uses up all RAM
Message-ID: <a106e87a8fa44527921dfcd65b240e36@hosttech.ch>

Dear Mailing-List-Members,

We're using MailScanner for  a few years now. Since a short while, we experience MailScanner-processes that use up all the memory and then even force the system to start swapping.
We did not manage to isolate the error/Source of the Error, from checking with lsof/strace.

If checked with strace, there are only hundreds of the following Info's:

brk(0x6e15b3000) = 0x6e15b3000
brk(0x6e15d4000) = 0x6e15d4000
brk(0x6e15f5000) = 0x6e15f5000
brk(0x6e1616000) = 0x6e1616000 they go on an on....

If checked with lsof, it's always a MailScanner-process in Status :waiting:, but there is no info, what it's waiting for, neither can I find any errors on the system, regarding this problem.


Did any of you, experience something similar? Does anyone know how to get more Information about the Error/Problem?

Best Regards,
Alexander Neck


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200407/0096ba13/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Apr  7 19:13:05 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:13:05 -0400
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 message
Message-ID: <2f0e5aa1-ed3d-f431-4c04-235c28b8773f@summitgrid.com>

Hi, I'm looking into this.  re2c is in a different repo now "CentOS 8
PowerTools."  Looking into why sa-compile is missing...

-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200407/408a998d/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Apr  7 19:27:43 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:27:43 -0400
Subject: MailScanner-processes uses up all RAM
In-Reply-To: <a106e87a8fa44527921dfcd65b240e36@hosttech.ch>
References: <a106e87a8fa44527921dfcd65b240e36@hosttech.ch>
Message-ID: <0a3de1a6-0822-55d2-c95d-f444b896211f@summitgrid.com>

This is odd, because the child processes should recycle periodically.

The default is to...

Restart Every = 7200

waiting is short for "waiting for messages"

What version of MailScanner?

On 4/7/20 7:50 AM, Alexander Neck wrote:
>
> Dear Mailing-List-Members,
>
> We?re using MailScanner for? a few years now. Since a short while, we 
> experience MailScanner-processes that use up all the memory and then 
> even force the system to start swapping.
>
> We did not manage to isolate the error/Source of the Error, from 
> checking with lsof/strace.
>
> If checked with strace, there are only hundreds of the following Info?s:
>
> brk(0x6e15b3000) = 0x6e15b3000
> brk(0x6e15d4000) = 0x6e15d4000
> brk(0x6e15f5000) = 0x6e15f5000
> brk(0x6e1616000) = 0x6e1616000 they go on an on?.
>
> If checked with lsof, it?s always a MailScanner-process in Status 
> :waiting:, but there is no info, what it?s waiting for, neither can I 
> find any errors on the system, regarding this problem.
>
> Did any of you, experience something similar? Does anyone know how to 
> get more Information about the Error/Problem?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Alexander Neck
>
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200407/89fa6821/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Apr  7 21:03:20 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:03:20 -0400
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 message
In-Reply-To: <2f0e5aa1-ed3d-f431-4c04-235c28b8773f@summitgrid.com>
References: <2f0e5aa1-ed3d-f431-4c04-235c28b8773f@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <909bd683-76b9-46da-288e-eb108d28b1c6@summitgrid.com>

Ok, more on this....CentOS 8 has a rpm of spamassassin that appears to 
not include sa-compile.

I'm going to address this in the next update.


On 4/7/20 3:13 PM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking into this.  re2c is in a different repo now "CentOS 8
> PowerTools."  Looking into why sa-compile is missing...
> -- 
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200407/ace661d5/attachment.html>

From lee.iitb at gmail.com  Wed Apr  8 02:44:21 2020
From: lee.iitb at gmail.com (Thomas Stephen Lee)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:14:21 +0530
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 message
In-Reply-To: <909bd683-76b9-46da-288e-eb108d28b1c6@summitgrid.com>
References: <2f0e5aa1-ed3d-f431-4c04-235c28b8773f@summitgrid.com>
 <909bd683-76b9-46da-288e-eb108d28b1c6@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7s96Uhtpp7XoDd6NQ4487mT=TO0KPAg9RfjcPh9OUQ3auedg@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you very much.

--
Lee

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:33 AM Shawn Iverson via MailScanner <
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> wrote:

> Ok, more on this....CentOS 8 has a rpm of spamassassin that appears to not
> include sa-compile.
>
> I'm going to address this in the next update.
>
>
> On 4/7/20 3:13 PM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm looking into this.  re2c is in a different repo now "CentOS 8
> PowerTools."  Looking into why sa-compile is missing...
>
> --
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200408/3acccbe7/attachment.html>

From lee.iitb at gmail.com  Wed Apr  8 03:10:07 2020
From: lee.iitb at gmail.com (Thomas Stephen Lee)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:40:07 +0530
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 and clamav
Message-ID: <CAG7s96W4ytP+p99nGwuZtONXF4Ac2EwY7u7=aOrdqgMQ8KDBMw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On the CentOS 8.1 Test server I have

clamav

-----------------------------------------
clamav-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
clamav-lib-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
clamav-filesystem-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.0.1-5.el8.noarch
clamav-data-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
clamav-update-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
-----------------------------------------

but hen I do MailScanner --lint

the output is-

-------------------------------------
Found these virus scanners installed:

-------------------------------------

the list is empty.

What should I do to get MailScanner to auto detect clamav ?

Note: MailScanner version - 5.2.2

thanks

--
Lee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200408/12f545bb/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Wed Apr  8 11:07:44 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:07:44 -0400
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 and clamav
In-Reply-To: <CAG7s96W4ytP+p99nGwuZtONXF4Ac2EwY7u7=aOrdqgMQ8KDBMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG7s96W4ytP+p99nGwuZtONXF4Ac2EwY7u7=aOrdqgMQ8KDBMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <533655f7-0efe-062a-4bff-73c3461a3929@summitgrid.com>

Modify this value to the following in MailScanner.conf

Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock

On 4/7/20 11:10 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the CentOS 8.1 Test server I have
>
> clamav
>
> -----------------------------------------
> clamav-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
> clamav-lib-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
> clamav-filesystem-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
> clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.0.1-5.el8.noarch
> clamav-data-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
> clamav-update-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
> -----------------------------------------
>
> but hen I do MailScanner --lint
>
> the output is-
>
> -------------------------------------
> Found these virus scanners installed:
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> the list is empty.
>
> What should I do to get MailScanner to auto detect clamav ?
>
> Note: MailScanner version - 5.2.2
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Lee
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200408/bb5a3a59/attachment.html>

From lee.iitb at gmail.com  Wed Apr  8 13:26:24 2020
From: lee.iitb at gmail.com (Thomas Stephen Lee)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:56:24 +0530
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 and clamav
In-Reply-To: <533655f7-0efe-062a-4bff-73c3461a3929@summitgrid.com>
References: <CAG7s96W4ytP+p99nGwuZtONXF4Ac2EwY7u7=aOrdqgMQ8KDBMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <533655f7-0efe-062a-4bff-73c3461a3929@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7s96UNXHyoxxet39oYTWEK-3ApCHWXaZHYC+0x6uyVZd9kkg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Shawn ,

did

$ dnf install clamd
$ systemctl enable clamd at .service

and made

Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
in MailScanner.conf

but MailScanner --lint says

Warning: no virus scanners found via auto select at
/usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SweepViruses.pm line 253.

thanks

--
Lee

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:38 PM Shawn Iverson via MailScanner <
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> wrote:

> Modify this value to the following in MailScanner.conf
>
> Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
>
> On 4/7/20 11:10 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On the CentOS 8.1 Test server I have
>
> clamav
>
> -----------------------------------------
> clamav-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
> clamav-lib-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
> clamav-filesystem-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
> clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.0.1-5.el8.noarch
> clamav-data-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
> clamav-update-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
> -----------------------------------------
>
> but hen I do MailScanner --lint
>
> the output is-
>
> -------------------------------------
> Found these virus scanners installed:
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> the list is empty.
>
> What should I do to get MailScanner to auto detect clamav ?
>
> Note: MailScanner version - 5.2.2
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Lee
>
> --
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200408/89547b07/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Wed Apr  8 14:33:13 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:33:13 -0400
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 and clamav
In-Reply-To: <CAG7s96UNXHyoxxet39oYTWEK-3ApCHWXaZHYC+0x6uyVZd9kkg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG7s96W4ytP+p99nGwuZtONXF4Ac2EwY7u7=aOrdqgMQ8KDBMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <533655f7-0efe-062a-4bff-73c3461a3929@summitgrid.com>
 <CAG7s96UNXHyoxxet39oYTWEK-3ApCHWXaZHYC+0x6uyVZd9kkg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <72e5a501-3821-c508-6273-1546280988f5@summitgrid.com>

Make sure that mtagroup can access the socket.

On 4/8/20 9:26 AM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> Hi Shawn ,
>
> did
>
> $ dnf install clamd
> $ systemctl enable clamd at .service
>
> and made
>
> Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
> in MailScanner.conf
>
> but MailScanner --lint says
>
> Warning: no virus scanners found via auto select at 
> /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SweepViruses.pm line 253.
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Lee
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:38 PM Shawn Iverson via MailScanner 
> <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
> <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>> wrote:
>
>     Modify this value to the following in MailScanner.conf
>
>     Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
>
>     On 4/7/20 11:10 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     On the CentOS 8.1 Test server I have
>>
>>     clamav
>>
>>     -----------------------------------------
>>     clamav-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>>     clamav-lib-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>>     clamav-filesystem-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
>>     clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.0.1-5.el8.noarch
>>     clamav-data-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
>>     clamav-update-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>>     -----------------------------------------
>>
>>     but hen I do MailScanner --lint
>>
>>     the output is-
>>
>>     -------------------------------------
>>     Found these virus scanners installed:
>>
>>     -------------------------------------
>>
>>     the list is empty.
>>
>>     What should I do to get MailScanner to auto detect clamav ?
>>
>>     Note: MailScanner version - 5.2.2
>>
>>     thanks
>>
>>     --
>>     Lee
>>
>     -- 
>
>     Shawn Iverson
>     shawniverson at summitgrid.com <mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
>
>
>     -- 
>     MailScanner mailing list
>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200408/6b940f6e/attachment.html>

From lee.iitb at gmail.com  Wed Apr  8 23:25:47 2020
From: lee.iitb at gmail.com (Thomas Stephen Lee)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 04:55:47 +0530
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 and clamav
In-Reply-To: <72e5a501-3821-c508-6273-1546280988f5@summitgrid.com>
References: <CAG7s96W4ytP+p99nGwuZtONXF4Ac2EwY7u7=aOrdqgMQ8KDBMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <533655f7-0efe-062a-4bff-73c3461a3929@summitgrid.com>
 <CAG7s96UNXHyoxxet39oYTWEK-3ApCHWXaZHYC+0x6uyVZd9kkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <72e5a501-3821-c508-6273-1546280988f5@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7s96Wvxuc8HYuJMwYUjPM=HvMJRUYnyBpoJM+oCdngV0NLdw@mail.gmail.com>

No luck.

$ ls -al /run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
srw-rw----. 1 clamscan mtagroup 0 Apr  9 04:41 /run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock

Note: SELinux is in permissive mode.

thanks.

--
Lee

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:03 PM Shawn Iverson <shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
wrote:

> Make sure that mtagroup can access the socket.
> On 4/8/20 9:26 AM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>
> Hi Shawn ,
>
> did
>
> $ dnf install clamd
> $ systemctl enable clamd at .service
>
> and made
>
> Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
> in MailScanner.conf
>
> but MailScanner --lint says
>
> Warning: no virus scanners found via auto select at
> /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SweepViruses.pm line 253.
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Lee
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:38 PM Shawn Iverson via MailScanner <
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> wrote:
>
>> Modify this value to the following in MailScanner.conf
>>
>> Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
>>
>> On 4/7/20 11:10 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On the CentOS 8.1 Test server I have
>>
>> clamav
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> clamav-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>> clamav-lib-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>> clamav-filesystem-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
>> clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.0.1-5.el8.noarch
>> clamav-data-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
>> clamav-update-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>> -----------------------------------------
>>
>> but hen I do MailScanner --lint
>>
>> the output is-
>>
>> -------------------------------------
>> Found these virus scanners installed:
>>
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> the list is empty.
>>
>> What should I do to get MailScanner to auto detect clamav ?
>>
>> Note: MailScanner version - 5.2.2
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> --
>> Lee
>>
>> --
>>
>> Shawn Iverson
>> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> --
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200409/0bbc0f90/attachment.html>

From yuwang at cs.fsu.edu  Thu Apr  9 15:26:47 2020
From: yuwang at cs.fsu.edu (James Yu Wang)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:26:47 +0000
Subject: Remove clickable hyperlinks in email body
Message-ID: <470b4ea874d24d38ab428e53d0bbb79f@EXCH1.cs.fsu.edu>

Hello,

Is there a way to remove clickable hyperlinks in message body and still keep the whole message in HTML format? Right now we convert all HTML to Text format. Some emails are hard to read in text mode.

MailScanner Version: 5.1.3
SpamAssassin Version: 3.4.0

Thanks,

James
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200409/9feb3e42/attachment.html>

From mailscanner at replies.cyways.com  Thu Apr  9 17:03:40 2020
From: mailscanner at replies.cyways.com (Peter H. Lemieux)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:03:40 -0400
Subject: Remove clickable hyperlinks in email body
In-Reply-To: <470b4ea874d24d38ab428e53d0bbb79f@EXCH1.cs.fsu.edu>
References: <470b4ea874d24d38ab428e53d0bbb79f@EXCH1.cs.fsu.edu>
Message-ID: <090d4582-c718-db1e-9388-5f383dceb91d@replies.cyways.com>

This kind of thing is better handled by procmail, a replacement mail 
delivery agent that allows you to create mail-handling "recipes."  One 
type of recipe is a filter that can be applied to the text of a message. 
  Here's a simple filter I wrote that uses sed to disarm links by 
replacing the "<a" and "/a>" tags with "<axxx" and "/xxxa" respectively.

:0f
| sed 's%<a%<xxxa%g' | sed 's%/a>%/xxxa%g'

The :0 denotes the beginning of a recipe, and the "f" switch tells it 
act as a filter.  The message is passed through the two sed instances 
then delivered normally.

You can install procmail using your system's package manager, if you do 
not have it already.  You can place system-wide recipes in the file 
called /etc/procmailrc, and they will be applied to every delivered 
message.  Users can have their own individual .procmailrc files as well.

https://linux.die.net/man/5/procmailrc - documentation for writing 
recipes; very extensive and dense

https://linux.die.net/man/5/procmailex - much easier introduction 
through the use of common examples

Peter


On 4/9/20 11:26 AM, James Yu Wang wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Is there a way to remove clickable hyperlinks in message body and still 
> keep the whole message in HTML format? Right now we convert all HTML to 
> Text format. Some emails are hard to read in text mode.

From it at festa.bg  Thu Apr  9 19:42:21 2020
From: it at festa.bg (Valentin Laskov)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 22:42:21 +0300
Subject: Remove clickable hyperlinks in email body
In-Reply-To: <470b4ea874d24d38ab428e53d0bbb79f@EXCH1.cs.fsu.edu>
References: <470b4ea874d24d38ab428e53d0bbb79f@EXCH1.cs.fsu.edu>
Message-ID: <18edbcfa-cbc5-8843-8252-7c655fd3f9b9@festa.bg>

This may be done in custom rule in MailScanner, I think

/usr/share/MailScanner/perl/custom/CustomAction.pm


?? 9.04.20 ?. ? 18:26 ?., James Yu Wang ??????:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to remove clickable hyperlinks in message body and 
> still keep the whole message in HTML format? Right now we convert all 
> HTML to Text format. Some emails are hard to read in text mode.
>
> MailScanner Version: 5.1.3
>
> SpamAssassin Version: 3.4.0
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
>
-- 
????????!

???????? ??????
???????? ?????????????
"????? ???????" ??
???. "??. ?????????" 48
9000 ??. ?????
???.:   +359 52 669137
GSM: +359 888 669137
Fax:   +359 52 669110

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200409/b084579b/attachment.html>

From yuwang at cs.fsu.edu  Thu Apr  9 22:43:57 2020
From: yuwang at cs.fsu.edu (yuwang)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 18:43:57 -0400
Subject: Remove clickable hyperlinks in email body
In-Reply-To: <090d4582-c718-db1e-9388-5f383dceb91d@replies.cyways.com>
References: <470b4ea874d24d38ab428e53d0bbb79f@EXCH1.cs.fsu.edu>
 <090d4582-c718-db1e-9388-5f383dceb91d@replies.cyways.com>
Message-ID: <96be609103c99e0f563e97a1136303b1@cs.fsu.edu>

Peter,

This is a good suggestion. We do use procmail on our Linux mail 
delivery. We also have Exchange mail delivery but the user base is 
small.

I just did some tests. Replacing "<a href=" with "<" suits our case. It 
allows URL to be displayed but not clickable (don't know why it doesn't 
work on all emails). Users can copy/paste if they want to visit the 
link.

Thank you.

James

On 2020-04-09 13:03, Peter H. Lemieux wrote:
> This kind of thing is better handled by procmail, a replacement mail
> delivery agent that allows you to create mail-handling "recipes."  One
> type of recipe is a filter that can be applied to the text of a
> message.  Here's a simple filter I wrote that uses sed to disarm links
> by replacing the "<a" and "/a>" tags with "<axxx" and "/xxxa"
> respectively.
> 
> :0f
> | sed 's%<a%<xxxa%g' | sed 's%/a>%/xxxa%g'
> 
> The :0 denotes the beginning of a recipe, and the "f" switch tells it
> act as a filter.  The message is passed through the two sed instances
> then delivered normally.
> 
> You can install procmail using your system's package manager, if you
> do not have it already.  You can place system-wide recipes in the file
> called /etc/procmailrc, and they will be applied to every delivered
> message.  Users can have their own individual .procmailrc files as
> well.
> 
> https://linux.die.net/man/5/procmailrc - documentation for writing
> recipes; very extensive and dense
> 
> https://linux.die.net/man/5/procmailex - much easier introduction
> through the use of common examples
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> On 4/9/20 11:26 AM, James Yu Wang wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Is there a way to remove clickable hyperlinks in message body and 
>> still keep the whole message in HTML format? Right now we convert all 
>> HTML to Text format. Some emails are hard to read in text mode.

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Sun Apr 12 14:09:51 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:09:51 -0400
Subject: MailScanner 5.3.1-1 Now Available
Message-ID: <1d61da6e-1644-211a-f2ba-e12beec76bd9@summitgrid.com>

MailScanner 5.3.1-1 is now available.

This update includes a fix to detect DOS attack observed in the wild 
that causes MailScanner to consume all memory.

Special thanks goes to Andrew Colin Kissa for identifying and providing 
the patch to mitigate this attack.

It is strongly recommended that all MailScanner users update to the 
latest version, as well as to address CVEs in older versions of 
SpamAssassin.? The new ms-configure update script will automatically 
take you forward to Spamassassin 3.4.4 with all needed dependencies.

https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds

-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200412/dc28cdc3/attachment.html>

From jan at bojeryd.org  Mon Apr 13 21:01:30 2020
From: jan at bojeryd.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_B=F6jeryd?=)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 23:01:30 +0200
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
Message-ID: <OFC87A5686.5A9CC9E7-ONC1258549.0072BFAE-C1258549.00737FA1@jbdata.org>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200413/a6b605b9/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Apr 14 01:09:50 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:09:50 -0400
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <OFC87A5686.5A9CC9E7-ONC1258549.0072BFAE-C1258549.00737FA1@jbdata.org>
References: <OFC87A5686.5A9CC9E7-ONC1258549.0072BFAE-C1258549.00737FA1@jbdata.org>
Message-ID: <a1927e1a-61ae-2db1-ea21-4524f45b52ba@summitgrid.com>

Hello,

You should have a log /var/log/mailscanner-configuration.log.

It should tell us why.

On 4/13/20 5:01 PM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I upgraded from 5.2.2 a couple of hours ago by
>
> rpm -Uvh MailScanner-5.x.x-x.rhel.noarch.rpm
> /usr/sbin/ms-configure --update
>
> but now Spamassassin has disappeared.
>
> no traces of Spamassasin in /usr/bin
>
> Could anyone please give me some clues what to do.
> Spam is flooding my system.
>
> I'm using Postfix as MTA and running on CentOS7
>
> // Jan Bojeryd, Sweden
>
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200413/012161e8/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Apr 14 01:15:12 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:15:12 -0400
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <a1927e1a-61ae-2db1-ea21-4524f45b52ba@summitgrid.com>
References: <OFC87A5686.5A9CC9E7-ONC1258549.0072BFAE-C1258549.00737FA1@jbdata.org>
 <a1927e1a-61ae-2db1-ea21-4524f45b52ba@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <3d2fa9fc-2253-3a6a-5d14-00e23f41e1dc@summitgrid.com>

Also, so you can protect yourself in the meantime while we troubleshoot...

yum install spamassassin

This will reinstall 3.4.2 for you while we figure out what happened to 
3.4.4.

On 4/13/20 9:09 PM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You should have a log /var/log/mailscanner-configuration.log.
>
> It should tell us why.
>
> On 4/13/20 5:01 PM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I upgraded from 5.2.2 a couple of hours ago by
>>
>> rpm -Uvh MailScanner-5.x.x-x.rhel.noarch.rpm
>> /usr/sbin/ms-configure --update
>>
>> but now Spamassassin has disappeared.
>>
>> no traces of Spamassasin in /usr/bin
>>
>> Could anyone please give me some clues what to do.
>> Spam is flooding my system.
>>
>> I'm using Postfix as MTA and running on CentOS7
>>
>> // Jan Bojeryd, Sweden
>>
>>
> -- 
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200413/a2c73f49/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Apr 14 04:32:59 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:32:59 -0400
Subject: MailScanner 5.3.1-2 Available
Message-ID: <98847a8a-4d1f-8810-59e0-53efa239843a@summitgrid.com>

This is a very minor update to 5.3.1-1 error handling to allow 
spamassassin update attempt to rollback on failure for RHEL and SUSE builds.

Users successfully on 5.3.1-1 do not need to update to 5.3.1-2. The 
MailScanner code base for both are identical.? This update touches 
ms-configure only.

https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds

-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200414/ae570e55/attachment.html>

From jan at bojeryd.org  Tue Apr 14 13:03:42 2020
From: jan at bojeryd.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_B=F6jeryd?=)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:03:42 +0200
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <4c05d4d1-de2c-a43b-8832-0acfb08125fc@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <OFD0E06886.8F311788-ONC125854A.0047BD42-1586869422441@jbdata.org>

Hi again,

 

Sorry for late reply.

I actually came to my senses some time after I sent the first mail and did a ?yum install spamassassin? but it installed the old version again, 3.4.0

 

Attaching my log since I can?t see anything going wrong.

 

// Jan

 

From: Shawn Iverson <shawniverson at summitgrid.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:10 AM
To: "Jan B?jeryd" <jan at bojeryd.org>
Subject: Re: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin

 

Hello,

 

You should have a log /var/log/mailscanner-configuration.log.

 

It should tell us why.

 

On 4/13/20 5:01 PM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:

Hi all, 

I upgraded from 5.2.2 a couple of hours ago by 

rpm -Uvh MailScanner-5.x.x-x.rhel.noarch.rpm
/usr/sbin/ms-configure --update 

but now Spamassassin has disappeared. 

no traces of Spamassasin in /usr/bin 

Could anyone please give me some clues what to do. 


Spam is flooding my system. 

I'm using Postfix as MTA and running on CentOS7 

// Jan Bojeryd, Sweden 





 
 

-- 
  <http://mailserver.summitgrid.org/logo_text_sig.png> 
Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com <mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com> 

?
-- 
Meddelandet har kontrollerats mot virus 
samt skadligt inneh?ll av  <https://mailwatch.jbdata.org/> MailScanner 
och f?rmodas vara s?kert. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200414/c502796f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mailscanner-configuration.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 18971 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200414/c502796f/attachment.obj>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Tue Apr 14 13:09:17 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:09:17 -0400
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <OFD0E06886.8F311788-ONC125854A.0047BD42-1586869422441@jbdata.org>
References: <OFD0E06886.8F311788-ONC125854A.0047BD42-1586869422441@jbdata.org>
Message-ID: <b62bc48a-fc87-1ea6-1563-636df59622bd@summitgrid.com>

Can you do me a favor and try the 5.3.1-2 rpm when you get a chance?

On 4/14/20 9:03 AM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
> I actually came to my senses some time after I sent the first mail and 
> did a ?yum install spamassassin? but it installed the old version 
> again, 3.4.0
>
> Attaching my log since I can?t see anything going wrong.
>
> // Jan
>
> *From:*Shawn Iverson <shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:10 AM
> *To:* "Jan B?jeryd" <jan at bojeryd.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
>
> Hello,
>
> You should have a log /var/log/mailscanner-configuration.log.
>
> It should tell us why.
>
> On 4/13/20 5:01 PM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I upgraded from 5.2.2 a couple of hours ago by
>
>     rpm -Uvh MailScanner-5.x.x-x.rhel.noarch.rpm
>     /usr/sbin/ms-configure --update
>
>     but now Spamassassin has disappeared.
>
>     no traces of Spamassasin in /usr/bin
>
>     Could anyone please give me some clues what to do.
>
>
>     Spam is flooding my system.
>
>     I'm using Postfix as MTA and running on CentOS7
>
>     // Jan Bojeryd, Sweden
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com <mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
>
> ?
> -- 
> Meddelandet har kontrollerats mot virus
> samt skadligt inneh?ll av *MailScanner* <https://mailwatch.jbdata.org/>
> och f?rmodas vara s?kert.
>
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200414/e7c29720/attachment.html>

From jan at bojeryd.org  Wed Apr 15 15:02:22 2020
From: jan at bojeryd.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_B=F6jeryd?=)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:02:22 +0200
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <mailman.0.1586952002.4157.mailscanner@lists.mailscanner.info>
Message-ID: <OF63395FC1.8C3A876D-ONC125854B.00529907-1586962942187@jbdata.org>

Sorry to tell you this but it didn?t work as it was supposed to.

The SpamAssassin files were deleted this time as well.

Attaching the log

 

// Jan

[Digest Subject changed and quote of entire digest removed by moderator]


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mailscanner-configuration.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 14809 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200415/093d6bc3/attachment.obj>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Wed Apr 15 15:32:22 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:32:22 -0400
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <OF63395FC1.8C3A876D-ONC125854B.00529907-1586962942187@jbdata.org>
References: <OF63395FC1.8C3A876D-ONC125854B.00529907-1586962942187@jbdata.org>
Message-ID: <ce309e4b-9022-7d8d-b681-ee5003acaa34@summitgrid.com>

Please do me a favor and execute this:

cpan -i Mail::SpamAssassin

Send me the output.

On 4/15/20 11:02 AM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
> Sorry to tell you this but it didn?t work as it was supposed to.
>
> The SpamAssassin files were deleted this time as well.
>
> Attaching the log
>
>   
>
> // Jan
>
> [Digest Subject changed and quote of entire digest removed by moderator]
>
>
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200415/8aa76e40/attachment.html>

From jan at bojeryd.org  Wed Apr 15 18:54:47 2020
From: jan at bojeryd.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_B=F6jeryd?=)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:54:47 +0200
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
Message-ID: <OF7101549A.7D03130F-ONC125854B.0067E05C-1586976887286@jbdata.org>


This time the command seems to work.
And MailScanner seems to be happy as well.
Cheers // Jan

[root at mta opt]# cpan -i Mail::SpamAssassin
Reading '/root/.cpan/Metadata'
  Database was generated on Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:17:03 GMT
CPAN: LWP::UserAgent loaded ok (v6.05)
Fetching with LWP:
http://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz
CPAN: YAML loaded ok (v0.84)
Reading '/root/.cpan/sources/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz'
CPAN: Compress::Zlib loaded ok (v2.093)
............................................................................DONE

Fetching with LWP:
http://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/02packages.details.txt.gz
Reading '/root/.cpan/sources/modules/02packages.details.txt.gz'
  Database was generated on Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:03 GMT
............................................................................DONE

Fetching with LWP:
http://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/03modlist.data.gz
Reading '/root/.cpan/sources/modules/03modlist.data.gz'
DONE
Writing /root/.cpan/Metadata
CPAN: Module::CoreList loaded ok (v5.20200320)
Mail::SpamAssassin is up to date (3.004004).
[root at mta opt]#

From: mailscanner-request at lists.mailscanner.info
<mailscanner-request at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 2:00 PM
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Subject: MailScanner Digest, Vol 172, Issue 10

Send MailScanner mailing list submissions to
	mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	mailto:mailscanner-request at lists.mailscanner.info

You can reach the person managing the list at
	mailto:mailscanner-owner at lists.mailscanner.info

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MailScanner digest..."

--
Meddelandet har kontrollerats mot virus samt skadligt
inneh?ll av MailScanner och f?rmodas vara s?kert.


Send MailScanner mailing list submissions to
	mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	mailto:mailscanner-request at lists.mailscanner.info

You can reach the person managing the list at
	mailto:mailscanner-owner at lists.mailscanner.info

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MailScanner digest..."

--
Meddelandet har kontrollerats mot virus samt skadligt
inneh?ll av MailScanner och f?rmodas vara s?kert.

Today's Topics:

   1. RE: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin (Jan B?jeryd)
   2. Re: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin (Shawn Iverson)

Hi again,

Sorry for late reply.
I actually came to my senses some time after I sent the first mail and did
a ?yum install spamassassin? but it installed the old version again, 3.4.0

Attaching my log since I can?t see anything going wrong.

// Jan

From: Shawn Iverson <mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:10 AM
To: "Jan B?jeryd" <mailto:jan at bojeryd.org>
Subject: Re: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin

Hello,

You should have a log /var/log/mailscanner-configuration.log.

It should tell us why.

On 4/13/20 5:01 PM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
Hi all,

I upgraded from 5.2.2 a couple of hours ago by

rpm -Uvh MailScanner-5.x.x-x.rhel.noarch.rpm
/usr/sbin/ms-configure --update

but now Spamassassin has disappeared.

no traces of Spamassasin in /usr/bin

Could anyone please give me some clues what to do.

Spam is flooding my system.

I'm using Postfix as MTA and running on CentOS7

// Jan Bojeryd, Sweden




--

Shawn Iverson
mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com
?
--
Meddelandet har kontrollerats mot virus
samt skadligt inneh?ll av https://mailwatch.jbdata.org/
och f?rmodas vara s?kert.
Can you do me a favor and try the 5.3.1-2 rpm when you get a chance?
On 4/14/20 9:03 AM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
Hi again,

Sorry for late reply.
I actually came to my senses some time after I sent the first mail and did
a ?yum install spamassassin? but it installed the old version again, 3.4.0

Attaching my log since I can?t see anything going wrong.

// Jan

From: Shawn Iverson mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 3:10 AM
To: "Jan B?jeryd" mailto:jan at bojeryd.org
Subject: Re: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin

Hello,

You should have a log /var/log/mailscanner-configuration.log.

It should tell us why.

On 4/13/20 5:01 PM, Jan B?jeryd wrote:
Hi all,

I upgraded from 5.2.2 a couple of hours ago by

rpm -Uvh MailScanner-5.x.x-x.rhel.noarch.rpm
/usr/sbin/ms-configure --update

but now Spamassassin has disappeared.

no traces of Spamassasin in /usr/bin

Could anyone please give me some clues what to do.

Spam is flooding my system.

I'm using Postfix as MTA and running on CentOS7

// Jan Bojeryd, Sweden




--

Shawn Iverson
mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com
?
--
Meddelandet har kontrollerats mot virus
samt skadligt inneh?ll av https://mailwatch.jbdata.org/
och f?rmodas vara s?kert.




--

Shawn Iverson
mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200415/e9712cc0/attachment.html>

From it at festa.bg  Wed Apr 15 19:36:56 2020
From: it at festa.bg (Valentin Laskov)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 22:36:56 +0300
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <OF7101549A.7D03130F-ONC125854B.0067E05C-1586976887286@jbdata.org>
References: <OF7101549A.7D03130F-ONC125854B.0067E05C-1586976887286@jbdata.org>
Message-ID: <0d8ae0d4-e519-5037-0d6b-128274ea230a@festa.bg>

?? 15.04.20 ?. ? 21:54 ?., Jan B?jeryd ??????:
> And MailScanner seems to be happy as well.

Possibly not enough. :) Try

MailScanner --lint

Regards
Valentin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200415/c538eb82/attachment.html>

From jan at bojeryd.org  Wed Apr 15 22:17:47 2020
From: jan at bojeryd.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_B=F6jeryd?=)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:17:47 +0200
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin 
Message-ID: <OF7E2A7BF7.A8D66995-ONC125854B.007A7622-1586989067647@jbdata.org>



IMHO it seems as if MS is happy with the exception of Pyzor.
Hopefully MS is using version 3.4.4 of SpamAssassin since Mailwatch says
the version is 3.4.0
This is the output from MailScanner --lint:

Trying to setlogsock(unix)
Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf
Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README
Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/minconf.conf
Read 1503 hostnames from the phishing whitelist
Read 7309 hostnames from the phishing blacklists
Config: calling custom init function SQLBlacklist
MailWatch: Starting up MailWatch SQL Blacklist
MailWatch: Read 51 blacklist entries
Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging
MailWatch: Started MailWatch SQL Logging child
Config: calling custom init function SQLWhitelist
MailWatch: Starting up MailWatch SQL Whitelist
MailWatch: Read 11 whitelist entries
Checking version numbers...
Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.3.1) is correct.
Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct.
MailScanner setting GID to (1000)
MailScanner setting UID to (89)
Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)...
Using SpamAssassin results cache
Connected to SpamAssassin cache database
pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response
SpamAssassin reported no errors.
Connected to Processing Attempts Database
Created Processing Attempts Database successfully
There are 0 messages in the Processing Attempts Database
Using locktype = posix
MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = clamd"
Found these virus scanners installed: clamd
===========================================================================
Filename Checks: Blocked Filename Detected (1 eicar.com)
Other Checks: Found 1 problems
Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
Clamd::INFECTED::Win.Test.EICAR_HDB-1 :: ./1/
Virus Scanning: Clamd found 1 infections
Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses
===========================================================================
If any of your virus scanners (clamd)
are not listed there, you should check that they are installed correctly
and that MailScanner is finding them correctly via its virus.scanners.conf.
Config: calling custom end function SQLBlacklist
MailWatch: Closing down MailWatch SQL Blacklist
Config: calling custom end function MailWatchLogging
Config: calling custom end function SQLWhitelist
MailWatch: Closing down MailWatch SQL Whitelist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200416/a6fdea11/attachment.html>

From it at festa.bg  Thu Apr 16 07:20:02 2020
From: it at festa.bg (Valentin Laskov)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:20:02 +0300
Subject: Upgraded to 5.3.1-1 but no more Spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <OFC87A5686.5A9CC9E7-ONC1258549.0072BFAE-C1258549.00737FA1@jbdata.org>
References: <OFC87A5686.5A9CC9E7-ONC1258549.0072BFAE-C1258549.00737FA1@jbdata.org>
Message-ID: <41592caa-0287-24c9-5c02-a91d4bbb107a@festa.bg>

Hi all,

I successfully updated MailScanner on Slackware using 
MailScanner-5.3.1-2.nix.tar.gz
SpamAssassin 3.4.2 remained untouched.
I updated it further.

Regards
Valentin

?? 14.04.20 ?. ? 0:01 ?., Jan B?jeryd ??????:
> Hi all,
>
> I upgraded from 5.2.2 a couple of hours ago by
>
> rpm -Uvh MailScanner-5.x.x-x.rhel.noarch.rpm
> /usr/sbin/ms-configure --update
>
> but now Spamassassin has disappeared.
>
> no traces of Spamassasin in /usr/bin
>
> Could anyone please give me some clues what to do.
> Spam is flooding my system.
>
> I'm using Postfix as MTA and running on CentOS7
>
> // Jan Bojeryd, Sweden
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200416/a8e69429/attachment.html>

From xserverlinux at gmail.com  Thu Apr 16 23:01:29 2020
From: xserverlinux at gmail.com (Rick Gutierrez)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:01:29 -0600
Subject: some file bad content
Message-ID: <CAL_GE3RzMLV9mkHpNzQ6Cbht_dT0hKLzMY7k_fHUJ4HBHaXaKQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi list , I am having some problems with some messages, it classifies
me as bad content and I try to release it and it does not work, I have
looked at some messages in the list but I cannot find any solution.

MailScanner: Very long filenames are good signs of attacks against
Microsoft e-mail packages

any idea?

version of software:

MailWatch Version: 1.2.14
Operating System Version: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
Postfix Version: 2.10.1
MailScanner Version: 5.1.3
ClamAV Version: 0.102.2
SpamAssassin Version: 3.4.4
PHP Version: 7.2.27

-- 
rickygm

http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Captura de Pantalla 2020-04-16 a la(s) 17.00.23.png
Type: image/png
Size: 290735 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200416/d085c2d7/attachment-0001.png>

From mark at msapiro.net  Fri Apr 17 01:00:44 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:00:44 -0700
Subject: some file bad content
In-Reply-To: <CAL_GE3RzMLV9mkHpNzQ6Cbht_dT0hKLzMY7k_fHUJ4HBHaXaKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL_GE3RzMLV9mkHpNzQ6Cbht_dT0hKLzMY7k_fHUJ4HBHaXaKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <18fc25a3-a17c-75b9-45d5-35b998e683f5@msapiro.net>

On 4/16/20 4:01 PM, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi list , I am having some problems with some messages, it classifies
> me as bad content and I try to release it and it does not work, I have
> looked at some messages in the list but I cannot find any solution.


If you are unable to release the mail via MailWatch, it's probably a
MailWatch issue. This is not the list for MailWatch. That's at
<http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mailwatch-users>.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From belle at bazuin.nl  Fri Apr 17 06:57:49 2020
From: belle at bazuin.nl (=?windows-1252?Q?L.P.H._van_Belle?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:57:49 +0200
Subject: some file bad content
In-Reply-To: <CAL_GE3RzMLV9mkHpNzQ6Cbht_dT0hKLzMY7k_fHUJ4HBHaXaKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL_GE3RzMLV9mkHpNzQ6Cbht_dT0hKLzMY7k_fHUJ4HBHaXaKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <vmime.5e99536d.605e.21b7f9fb357ccdbd@ms249-lin-003.rotterdam.bazuin.nl>

Yes,  look in "etc/MailScanner/filename.rules.conf" 

And not to be rude but. : rgrep "Very long filenames" /etc/* 
;-) should have showed it also. 

Note, above is on Debian.. 

Greetz, 

Louis


> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: MailScanner 
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+belle=bazuin.nl at lists.mailscanner.
> info] Namens Rick Gutierrez
> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 april 2020 1:01
> Aan: MailScanner Discussion
> Onderwerp: some file bad content
> 
> Hi list , I am having some problems with some messages, it classifies
> me as bad content and I try to release it and it does not work, I have
> looked at some messages in the list but I cannot find any solution.
> 
> MailScanner: Very long filenames are good signs of attacks against
> Microsoft e-mail packages
> 
> any idea?
> 
> version of software:
> 
> MailWatch Version: 1.2.14
> Operating System Version: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
> Postfix Version: 2.10.1
> MailScanner Version: 5.1.3
> ClamAV Version: 0.102.2
> SpamAssassin Version: 3.4.4
> PHP Version: 7.2.27
> 
> -- 
> rickygm
> 
> http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> 


From marek.gorny at bolix.pl  Fri Apr 17 14:32:40 2020
From: marek.gorny at bolix.pl (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Marek_G=F3rny?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 14:32:40 +0000
Subject: Message attempted to kill MailScanner
Message-ID: <090dd89a6e6d4732ae73f3fb7f8c1b83@BolixEx2.bolix.local>

Hello,
I updated MailScanner from 5.2.2 to 5.3.1 on OpenSUSE 15.2 (ClamAV 0.100.3 and F-Secure)
I noticed some messages like this (I know there was similar case on 5.1.3)
Can you help me how to investigate this:

Our virus detector failed to completely analyse a message you sent:-
Any parts of the message that could not be analysed will not have been delivered.
If you are using Microsoft Outlook, we strongly recommend you change your outgoing message format from "Rich Text" to "HTML" or "Plain Text".
1) Click on the "Tools" menu and choose "Options..."
2) Go to the "Mail Format" tab
3) For message format, select "HTML" or "Plain text"
4) Click OK

The virus detector said this about the message:
Report: Report: MailScanner: Message attempted to kill MailScanner

My config doesn't complain:
# MailScanner --lint
Trying to setlogsock(unix)

Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf
Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README
Read 1503 hostnames from the phishing whitelist
Read 7061 hostnames from the phishing blacklists
Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging
MailWatch: Started MailWatch SQL Logging child

Checking version numbers...
Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.3.1) is correct.

Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct.
MailScanner setting GID to  (51)
MailScanner setting UID to  (51)

Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)...
Using SpamAssassin results cache
Connected to SpamAssassin cache database
SpamAssassin reported no errors.
Connected to Processing Attempts Database
Created Processing Attempts Database successfully
There are 0 messages in the Processing Attempts Database
Using locktype = posix
MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = f-secure clamd"
Found these virus scanners installed: f-secure, clamd
===========================================================================
Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
Virus Scanning: F-Secure found virus EICAR_Test_File
./1/eicar.com.virus: Infected: EICAR_Test_File [FSE]
Virus Scanning: F-Secure found virus Malware.Eicar-Test-Signature
./1/eicar.com.virus: Infected: Malware.Eicar-Test-Signature [Aquarius]
Virus Scanning: F-Secure found 1 infections
Clamd::ERROR:: Can't open file or directory ERROR :: ./1/neicar.com.virus
Clamd::INFECTED::Win.Test.EICAR_HDB-1 :: ./1/
Virus Scanning: Clamd found 2 infections
Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
Virus Scanning: Found 3 viruses
===========================================================================


Best Regards
Marek G?rny


[Bolix]

[BO_Lokalizacja]        [RODO] <https://bolix.pl/pl/page/14>    [Teraz_Polska] <https://bolix.pl/pl/open-file/1098>
[Facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/bolixsa>

UWAGA: Niniejsza korespondencja przeznaczona jest wy??cznie dla osoby lub podmiotu, do kt?rego jest zaadresowana i mo?e zawiera? tre?ci chronione przepisami prawa. Wgl?d w tre?? wiadomo?ci otrzymanej omy?kowo, dalsze jej przekazywanie, rozpowszechnianie lub innego rodzaju wykorzystanie, b?d? podj?cie jakichkolwiek dzia?a? w oparciu o zawarte w niej informacje przez osob? lub podmiot nie b?d?cy adresatem, jest niedozwolone. Odbiorca korespondencji, kt?ry otrzyma? j? omy?kowo, proszony jest o zawiadomienie nadawcy i usuni?cie tego materia?u z komputera.

ATTENTION:  The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, Or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by person or entity other than the intended recipient is not permitted. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

[Las] Prosz? pomy?l o ?rodowisku przed wydrukowaniem tego maila. Please Consider the Environment before printing this Email
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200417/b2b5f25e/attachment.html>

From xserverlinux at gmail.com  Fri Apr 17 15:40:25 2020
From: xserverlinux at gmail.com (Rick Gutierrez)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:40:25 -0600
Subject: some file bad content
In-Reply-To: <vmime.5e99536d.605e.21b7f9fb357ccdbd@ms249-lin-003.rotterdam.bazuin.nl>
References: <CAL_GE3RzMLV9mkHpNzQ6Cbht_dT0hKLzMY7k_fHUJ4HBHaXaKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <vmime.5e99536d.605e.21b7f9fb357ccdbd@ms249-lin-003.rotterdam.bazuin.nl>
Message-ID: <CAL_GE3SNHR+WZbkeLimd8LxoKyf9R66SpMShae-jh9jpzOykjA@mail.gmail.com>

El vie., 17 abr. 2020 a las 0:58, L.P.H. van Belle via MailScanner
(<mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>) escribi?:
>
> Yes,  look in "etc/MailScanner/filename.rules.conf"
>
> And not to be rude but. : rgrep "Very long filenames" /etc/*
> ;-) should have showed it also.
>
> Note, above is on Debian..
>
> Greetz,
>
> Louis
>

I found that option and commented on it, the strange thing is that he
shows the mail is shown in the quarantine, but it does not release it,
I will continue investigating, I will see the list of mailwatch.

regards!



-- 
rickygm

http://gnuforever.homelinux.com

From ci at holmco.de  Wed Apr 22 09:21:18 2020
From: ci at holmco.de (Ralf Cirksena)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:21:18 +0200
Subject: debugging rule files
Message-ID: <06a7d5fb-e65d-a222-c7cc-79b28a128e37@holmco.de>

Hello,

I just noticed that my filetype rules are not used.

How can I find out which filetype rules are used for a particular mail?
The entries in the log file (/var/log/mail.log) just shows something like:

mail MailScanner[8235]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 5814 bytes
mail MailScanner[8235]: Filename Checks: Allowing 1jRBSN-00029D-Iz
msg-8235-2.txt
mail MailScanner[8235]: Filename Checks: Allowing 1jRBSN-00029D-Iz textfile
mail MailScanner[8235]: Filename Checks: Allowing 1jRBSN-00029D-Iz
msg-8235-1.txt
mail MailScanner[8235]: Filetype Checks: Allowing 1jRBSN-00029D-Iz
msg-8235-1.txt
mail MailScanner[8235]: Filetype Checks: Allowing 1jRBSN-00029D-Iz textfile
mail MailScanner[8235]: Filetype Checks: Allowing 1jRBSN-00029D-Iz
msg-8235-2.txt
I'd like to see something like:
checking %rulesdir%/my_filetype_rules.conf checking <rule in rules file>

Thanks.

From lists at Tatorz.com  Wed Apr 22 11:53:53 2020
From: lists at Tatorz.com (Mail Lists)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:53:53 -0400
Subject: Installing on Ubuntu 19
Message-ID: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>

List,

 ??? I've been using MailScanner for a long time, back when all there 
was a tar file for install.

Since the release of the different flavors I have not been able to 
install it on anything. For instance

I am trying to install it on Ubuntu 19 and all I get is this.


sudo dpkg --install MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
dpkg-deb: error: 'MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb' is not a Debian format 
archive
dpkg: error processing archive MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb (--install):
 ?dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 ?MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb


please point me to the nearest readme or doc that I can locate that 
explains my errors.

I also have this happening on Centos 7.


-- 
Brian
-----
Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather @ http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com
Also available Port Clinton Ohio Weather @ http://www.pc-weather.Tatorz.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Wed Apr 22 12:02:52 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 08:02:52 -0400
Subject: Installing on Ubuntu 19
In-Reply-To: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>
References: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>
Message-ID: <7d597a06-34a7-f195-fda3-a15e8cd3b936@summitgrid.com>

Have you verified the hash of the downloaded package?

sha256sum MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb

b4f562da7daa09000e22bada436da11661558b9c1969459f9f9fbdf07ae494af 
MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb

On 4/22/20 7:53 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
> List,
>
> ??? I've been using MailScanner for a long time, back when all there 
> was a tar file for install.
>
> Since the release of the different flavors I have not been able to 
> install it on anything. For instance
>
> I am trying to install it on Ubuntu 19 and all I get is this.
>
>
> sudo dpkg --install MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
> dpkg-deb: error: 'MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb' is not a Debian 
> format archive
> dpkg: error processing archive MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb 
> (--install):
> ?dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> ?MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>
>
> please point me to the nearest readme or doc that I can locate that 
> explains my errors.
>
> I also have this happening on Centos 7.
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200422/c3f051d7/attachment.html>

From lists at Tatorz.com  Wed Apr 22 13:15:02 2020
From: lists at Tatorz.com (Mail Lists)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:15:02 -0400
Subject: Installing on Ubuntu 19
In-Reply-To: <7d597a06-34a7-f195-fda3-a15e8cd3b936@summitgrid.com>
References: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>
 <7d597a06-34a7-f195-fda3-a15e8cd3b936@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <88b046ca-00e9-efb3-25bd-68a6f824e431@Tatorz.com>

On 4/22/20 8:02 AM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
>
> Have you verified the hash of the downloaded package?
>
> sha256sum MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>
> b4f562da7daa09000e22bada436da11661558b9c1969459f9f9fbdf07ae494af 
> MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>
> On 4/22/20 7:53 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
>> List,
>>
>> ??? I've been using MailScanner for a long time, back when all there 
>> was a tar file for install.
>>
>> Since the release of the different flavors I have not been able to 
>> install it on anything. For instance
>>
>> I am trying to install it on Ubuntu 19 and all I get is this.
>>
>>
>> sudo dpkg --install MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>> dpkg-deb: error: 'MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb' is not a Debian 
>> format archive
>> dpkg: error processing archive MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb 
>> (--install):
>> ?dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2
>> Errors were encountered while processing:
>> ?MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>>
>>
>> please point me to the nearest readme or doc that I can locate that 
>> explains my errors.
>>
>> I also have this happening on Centos 7.
>>
>>
> -- 
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
Yes with each download.

-- 
Brian ----- Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather @ 
http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com Also available Port Clinton Ohio 
Weather @ http://www.pc-weather.Tatorz.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200422/e621a6c9/attachment.html>

From yuwang at cs.fsu.edu  Wed Apr 22 13:20:50 2020
From: yuwang at cs.fsu.edu (yuwang)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:20:50 -0400
Subject: Installing on Ubuntu 19
In-Reply-To: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>
References: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>
Message-ID: <0cd61985610c34d04eeacada8f35f712@cs.fsu.edu>

Did you download the signature: MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb.sig and 
verify that the .deb file you downloaded is legit and complete?

The first time I did it, I right clicked and copied the links from this 
page https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds. Then used 
'wget' to download on my CentOS 7 server. When I verify the signature, 
gpg complained the .sig file was not a signature file. I then found out 
'wget' retrieved html pages not the real files. I had to click the links 
on https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds, then copy the 
signature and the link of "Download" button.

James

On 2020-04-22 07:53, Mail Lists wrote:
> List,
> 
> ??? I've been using MailScanner for a long time, back when all there
> was a tar file for install.
> 
> Since the release of the different flavors I have not been able to
> install it on anything. For instance
> 
> I am trying to install it on Ubuntu 19 and all I get is this.
> 
> 
> sudo dpkg --install MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
> dpkg-deb: error: 'MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb' is not a Debian 
> format archive
> dpkg: error processing archive MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb 
> (--install):
> ?dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> ?MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
> 
> 
> please point me to the nearest readme or doc that I can locate that
> explains my errors.
> 
> I also have this happening on Centos 7.
> 
> 
> --
> Brian
> -----
> Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather @ http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com
> Also available Port Clinton Ohio Weather @ 
> http://www.pc-weather.Tatorz.com
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.

From lists at Tatorz.com  Wed Apr 22 13:22:17 2020
From: lists at Tatorz.com (Mail Lists)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:22:17 -0400
Subject: Installing on Ubuntu 19
In-Reply-To: <88b046ca-00e9-efb3-25bd-68a6f824e431@Tatorz.com>
References: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>
 <7d597a06-34a7-f195-fda3-a15e8cd3b936@summitgrid.com>
 <88b046ca-00e9-efb3-25bd-68a6f824e431@Tatorz.com>
Message-ID: <92bd847c-8862-fc9e-81b0-e82c0d8771c9@Tatorz.com>

On 4/22/20 9:15 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 4/22/20 8:02 AM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
>>
>> Have you verified the hash of the downloaded package?
>>
>> sha256sum MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>>
>> b4f562da7daa09000e22bada436da11661558b9c1969459f9f9fbdf07ae494af 
>> MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>>
>> On 4/22/20 7:53 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
>>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Shawn Iverson
>> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, 
>> and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
> Yes with each download.
>
> -- 
> Brian ----- Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather @ 
> http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com Also available Port Clinton Ohio 
> Weather @ http://www.pc-weather.Tatorz.com
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
Now that I am looking, with every download I get different hash but none 
that match whats listed.

-- 
Brian ----- Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather @ 
http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com Also available Port Clinton Ohio 
Weather @ http://www.pc-weather.Tatorz.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200422/dd57b56d/attachment.html>

From lists at Tatorz.com  Wed Apr 22 13:27:08 2020
From: lists at Tatorz.com (Mail Lists)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:27:08 -0400
Subject: Installing on Ubuntu 19
In-Reply-To: <0cd61985610c34d04eeacada8f35f712@cs.fsu.edu>
References: <bcf1a319-bc9a-b0e0-1e60-f1820ff95d16@Tatorz.com>
 <0cd61985610c34d04eeacada8f35f712@cs.fsu.edu>
Message-ID: <0637e63e-c0cd-5d23-80ac-02235715edff@Tatorz.com>

On 4/22/20 9:20 AM, yuwang wrote:
> Did you download the signature: MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb.sig and 
> verify that the .deb file you downloaded is legit and complete?
>
> The first time I did it, I right clicked and copied the links from 
> this page https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds. Then 
> used 'wget' to download on my CentOS 7 server. When I verify the 
> signature, gpg complained the .sig file was not a signature file. I 
> then found out 'wget' retrieved html pages not the real files. I had 
> to click the links on 
> https://github.com/MailScanner/v5/tree/master/builds, then copy the 
> signature and the link of "Download" button.
>
> James
>
> On 2020-04-22 07:53, Mail Lists wrote:
>> List,
>>
>> ??? I've been using MailScanner for a long time, back when all there
>> was a tar file for install.
>>
>> Since the release of the different flavors I have not been able to
>> install it on anything. For instance
>>
>> I am trying to install it on Ubuntu 19 and all I get is this.
>>
>>
>> sudo dpkg --install MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>> dpkg-deb: error: 'MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb' is not a Debian 
>> format archive
>> dpkg: error processing archive MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb 
>> (--install):
>> ?dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2
>> Errors were encountered while processing:
>> ?MailScanner-5.3.1-3.noarch.deb
>>
>>
>> please point me to the nearest readme or doc that I can locate that
>> explains my errors.
>>
>> I also have this happening on Centos 7.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Brian
>> -----
>> Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather @ http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com
>> Also available Port Clinton Ohio Weather @ 
>> http://www.pc-weather.Tatorz.com
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>
Ok, that was it. I downloaded it with my desktop instead of wget and all 
is well. transfered it to my

Ubuntu vm and hash matched and installed.? Thank you.

-- 
Brian ----- Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather @ 
http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com Also available Port Clinton Ohio 
Weather @ http://www.pc-weather.Tatorz.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


From adrian at pa0rda.nl  Wed Apr 22 18:52:38 2020
From: adrian at pa0rda.nl (Adrian van Bloois)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:52:38 +0200
Subject: MS 5.3.1-3 not starting
Message-ID: <20200422185238.GA25258@pa0rda.nl>

Hi,
When I start Mailscanner 5.3.1-3 I get the following error:
MailScanner starting ... 
syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 760, near "elsif"
Global symbol "$message" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 761.
Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 763.
syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 764, near "}"
Global symbol "$iswhitelisted" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 771.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 772.
Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 780.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 783, near "}"
/usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm has too many errors.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.



I replaced Message.pm by that of 5.3.1-1 and that works allright.

Am I doing something wrong?

	Adrian



-- 
	Adri P. van Bloois


"Elegance is not a dispensable luxury but a factor that decides between 
 success and failure."
	Edsger W. Dijkstra

From mark at msapiro.net  Wed Apr 22 23:47:45 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:47:45 -0700
Subject: MS 5.3.1-3 not starting
In-Reply-To: <20200422185238.GA25258@pa0rda.nl>
References: <20200422185238.GA25258@pa0rda.nl>
Message-ID: <0f45e6bb-7516-f7ff-4ba8-8baa212a56e8@msapiro.net>

On 4/22/20 11:52 AM, Adrian van Bloois wrote:
> Hi,
> When I start Mailscanner 5.3.1-3 I get the following error:
> MailScanner starting ... 
> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 760, near "elsif"
> Global symbol "$message" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 761.
> Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 763.
> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 764, near "}"
> Global symbol "$iswhitelisted" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
> Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
> Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 771.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 772.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 780.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
> Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 783, near "}"
> /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm has too many errors.
> Compilation failed in require at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.


This kind of error is often due to missing or extra braces { or }.


> I replaced Message.pm by that of 5.3.1-1 and that works allright.


There is clearly something wrong with your 5.3.1-3 Message.pm, but mine
is OK so yours got garbled somehow in the installation process.


> Am I doing something wrong?


You might try downloading the 5.3.1-3 version from
<https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MailScanner/v5/master/common/usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm>
and comparing it to yours.


-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Thu Apr 23 00:46:24 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:46:24 -0400
Subject: MS 5.3.1-3 not starting
In-Reply-To: <20200422185238.GA25258@pa0rda.nl>
References: <20200422185238.GA25258@pa0rda.nl>
Message-ID: <274ebd45-01ba-8cbf-8f8a-a0cad448fca3@summitgrid.com>

Use the tagged release if you are building from the repo.? The head of 
master has a couple commits that I am working on in it currently, and I 
appear to have let one of my bashisms inside...

On 4/22/20 2:52 PM, Adrian van Bloois wrote:
> Hi,
> When I start Mailscanner 5.3.1-3 I get the following error:
> MailScanner starting ...
> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 760, near "elsif"
> Global symbol "$message" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 761.
> Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 763.
> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 764, near "}"
> Global symbol "$iswhitelisted" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
> Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
> Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 771.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 772.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 780.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
> Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 783, near "}"
> /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm has too many errors.
> Compilation failed in require at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.
>
>
>
> I replaced Message.pm by that of 5.3.1-1 and that works allright.
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> 	Adrian
>
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200422/f2b24bb0/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Thu Apr 23 00:56:56 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:56:56 -0400
Subject: MS 5.3.1-3 not starting
In-Reply-To: <274ebd45-01ba-8cbf-8f8a-a0cad448fca3@summitgrid.com>
References: <20200422185238.GA25258@pa0rda.nl>
 <274ebd45-01ba-8cbf-8f8a-a0cad448fca3@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <7cdc1703-3ae8-b0db-4268-47ae3ddfed3a@summitgrid.com>

I just fixed Message.pm in master.? Indeed a missing mustache :{) .

On 4/22/20 8:46 PM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
>
> Use the tagged release if you are building from the repo.? The head of 
> master has a couple commits that I am working on in it currently, and 
> I appear to have let one of my bashisms inside...
>
> On 4/22/20 2:52 PM, Adrian van Bloois wrote:
>> Hi,
>> When I start Mailscanner 5.3.1-3 I get the following error:
>> MailScanner starting ...
>> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 760, near "elsif"
>> Global symbol "$message" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 761.
>> Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 763.
>> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 764, near "}"
>> Global symbol "$iswhitelisted" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
>> Global symbol "$isauthenticated" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 767.
>> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
>> Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 770.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 771.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 772.
>> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
>> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 775.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
>> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 778.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
>> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 779.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 780.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
>> Global symbol "$rblspamheader" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
>> Global symbol "$RBLsaysspam" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 781.
>> Global symbol "$this" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
>> Global symbol "$rblcounter" requires explicit package name at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 782.
>> syntax error at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm line 783, near "}"
>> /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm has too many errors.
>> Compilation failed in require at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/MailScanner line 105.
>>
>>
>>
>> I replaced Message.pm by that of 5.3.1-1 and that works allright.
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> 	Adrian
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
>
> Shawn Iverson
> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200422/472be265/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Sat Apr 25 15:56:33 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:56:33 -0400
Subject: MailScanner 5.3.2-1 Available
Message-ID: <b78be8f1-ea47-b347-7221-5b977f20cbe7@summitgrid.com>

MailScanner 5.3.2-1 is now available.

Thanks to everyone for their support.

This version includes support for bypassing RBLs when authenticated 
using Exim in addition to some minor fixes to issues found recently.

The relevant setting is:
Spam List Skip If Authenticated


-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200425/d13d15cd/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Sat Apr 25 19:30:26 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:30:26 -0400
Subject: mailscanner as smtpd-proxy
Message-ID: <2bc3b75d-7eaa-d601-2304-2c80c8dd2fcf@summitgrid.com>

Looking back at conversations I missed...

For the sake of my German friends and others, I have decided to write 
the code to invoke MailScanner during the postfix MTA transmission 
phase, despite the performance implications. Stay tuned.

On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 2:27 PM Support-MMarzouki <support at mmarzouki.de> 
wrote:

    Mark,

    Is there an approximate release date for this function in mailscanner?

    Cheers

-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200425/97b29e3b/attachment.html>

From support at mmarzouki.de  Sat Apr 25 21:39:24 2020
From: support at mmarzouki.de (support at mmarzouki.de)
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:39:24 +0000
Subject: mailscanner as smtpd-proxy
In-Reply-To: <2bc3b75d-7eaa-d601-2304-2c80c8dd2fcf@summitgrid.com>
References: <2bc3b75d-7eaa-d601-2304-2c80c8dd2fcf@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <25907a7dcf16b428cdb7ee67d2326a25@mmarzouki.de>

I'm looking forward to 

	Is there an approximate release date?  
---
Mit freundlichen Gr??en

Support
MMarzouki

25. April 2020 21:30, "Shawn Iverson" <shawniverson at summitgrid.com (mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com?to=%22Shawn%20Iverson%22%20<shawniverson at summitgrid.com>)> schrieb:
 Looking back at conversations I missed...  For the sake of my German friends and others, I have decided to write the code to invoke MailScanner during the postfix MTA transmission phase, despite the performance implications. Stay tuned.  On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 2:27 PM Support-MMarzouki <support at mmarzouki.de> (mailto:support at mmarzouki.de) wrote: 
Mark,

Is there an approximate release date for this function in mailscanner?

Cheers 
--

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com (mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200425/f38e0823/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Sat Apr 25 22:18:10 2020
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:18:10 -0700
Subject: MailScanner 5.3.2-1 Available
In-Reply-To: <b78be8f1-ea47-b347-7221-5b977f20cbe7@summitgrid.com>
References: <b78be8f1-ea47-b347-7221-5b977f20cbe7@summitgrid.com>
Message-ID: <17b0bfc8-d28d-128f-d558-7114452f8a09@msapiro.net>

On 4/25/20 8:56 AM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
> MailScanner 5.3.2-1 is now available.
> 
> Thanks to everyone for their support.


I have an issue with this. In particular, Message.pm lines 760-761

>   } elsif (MailScanner::Config::Value('mta') == "exim" && MailScanner::Config::Value('spamlistskipifauthenticated') {
>     if (exists $message->{metadata}->{dv_auth_id}) {

line 760 is missing a ')' and $message is undeclared at line 761. Should
this be

>   } elsif (MailScanner::Config::Value('mta') == "exim" && MailScanner::Config::Value('spamlistskipifauthenticated')) {
>     if (exists $this->{metadata}->{dv_auth_id}) {

With these changes, it works for me, but my mta is postfix so the
$message change to $this isn't tested.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Sat Apr 25 22:52:44 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:52:44 -0400
Subject: MailScanner 5.3.2-1 Available
In-Reply-To: <17b0bfc8-d28d-128f-d558-7114452f8a09@msapiro.net>
References: <b78be8f1-ea47-b347-7221-5b977f20cbe7@summitgrid.com>
 <17b0bfc8-d28d-128f-d558-7114452f8a09@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <695c2edc-bd4a-2751-5ced-f9c5659ed56a@summitgrid.com>

5.3.2-2 is now up on the repo.

I failed to copy my test code into the branch to correct those errors.

On 4/25/20 6:18 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 4/25/20 8:56 AM, Shawn Iverson via MailScanner wrote:
>> MailScanner 5.3.2-1 is now available.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone for their support.
>
> I have an issue with this. In particular, Message.pm lines 760-761
>
>>    } elsif (MailScanner::Config::Value('mta') == "exim" && MailScanner::Config::Value('spamlistskipifauthenticated') {
>>      if (exists $message->{metadata}->{dv_auth_id}) {
> line 760 is missing a ')' and $message is undeclared at line 761. Should
> this be
>
>>    } elsif (MailScanner::Config::Value('mta') == "exim" && MailScanner::Config::Value('spamlistskipifauthenticated')) {
>>      if (exists $this->{metadata}->{dv_auth_id}) {
> With these changes, it works for me, but my mta is postfix so the
> $message change to $this isn't tested.
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200425/f82ba571/attachment.html>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Sat Apr 25 22:58:45 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:58:45 -0400
Subject: mailscanner as smtpd-proxy
In-Reply-To: <25907a7dcf16b428cdb7ee67d2326a25@mmarzouki.de>
References: <2bc3b75d-7eaa-d601-2304-2c80c8dd2fcf@summitgrid.com>
 <25907a7dcf16b428cdb7ee67d2326a25@mmarzouki.de>
Message-ID: <23e6cee3-d6ca-8fe1-fd7d-efccca09f3b9@summitgrid.com>

Not sure yet, I'm studying how to make it work.? The problem is the 
Milter is a round peg, while MailScanner is a square peg. Trying to have 
the Milter fulfill the role of scanning mail during the MTA conversation 
will require some reingineering.? It is not as simple as calling 
MailScanner as-is each time, which would be an absolutely awful approach 
anyway.

On 4/25/20 5:39 PM, support at mmarzouki.de wrote:
> I'm looking forward to
> Is there an approximate release date?
>
> ---
> Mit freundlichen Gr??en
>
> Support
> MMarzouki
>
> 25. April 2020 21:30, "Shawn Iverson" <shawniverson at summitgrid.com 
> <mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com?to=%22Shawn%20Iverson%22%20<shawniverson at summitgrid.com>>> 
> schrieb:
>
>     Looking back at conversations I missed...
>     For the sake of my German friends and others, I have decided to
>     write the code to invoke MailScanner during the postfix MTA
>     transmission phase, despite the performance implications. Stay tuned.
>     On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 2:27 PM Support-MMarzouki
>     <support at mmarzouki.de> <mailto:support at mmarzouki.de> wrote:
>
>         Mark,
>
>         Is there an approximate release date for this function in
>         mailscanner?
>
>         Cheers
>
>     --
>
>     Shawn Iverson
>     shawniverson at summitgrid.com <mailto:shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200425/b1bc378a/attachment.html>

From lee.iitb at gmail.com  Wed Apr 29 04:29:02 2020
From: lee.iitb at gmail.com (Thomas Stephen Lee)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:59:02 +0530
Subject: MailScanner on CentOS 8 and clamav
In-Reply-To: <CAG7s96Wvxuc8HYuJMwYUjPM=HvMJRUYnyBpoJM+oCdngV0NLdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG7s96W4ytP+p99nGwuZtONXF4Ac2EwY7u7=aOrdqgMQ8KDBMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <533655f7-0efe-062a-4bff-73c3461a3929@summitgrid.com>
 <CAG7s96UNXHyoxxet39oYTWEK-3ApCHWXaZHYC+0x6uyVZd9kkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <72e5a501-3821-c508-6273-1546280988f5@summitgrid.com>
 <CAG7s96Wvxuc8HYuJMwYUjPM=HvMJRUYnyBpoJM+oCdngV0NLdw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG7s96XD5AiX8LJv_yMyY+_j49Tygdgx_+j0VSC=jpMLrR10sQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:55 AM Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com>
wrote:

> No luck.
>
> $ ls -al /run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
> srw-rw----. 1 clamscan mtagroup 0 Apr  9 04:41 /run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
>
> Note: SELinux is in permissive mode.
>
> thanks.
>
> --
> Lee
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:03 PM Shawn Iverson <shawniverson at summitgrid.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Make sure that mtagroup can access the socket.
>> On 4/8/20 9:26 AM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shawn ,
>>
>> did
>>
>> $ dnf install clamd
>> $ systemctl enable clamd at .service
>>
>> and made
>>
>> Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
>> in MailScanner.conf
>>
>> but MailScanner --lint says
>>
>> Warning: no virus scanners found via auto select at
>> /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SweepViruses.pm line 253.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> --
>> Lee
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:38 PM Shawn Iverson via MailScanner <
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> wrote:
>>
>>> Modify this value to the following in MailScanner.conf
>>>
>>> Clamd Socket = /var/run/clamd.scan/clamd.sock
>>>
>>> On 4/7/20 11:10 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On the CentOS 8.1 Test server I have
>>>
>>> clamav
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> clamav-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>>> clamav-lib-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>>> clamav-filesystem-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
>>> clamav-unofficial-sigs-7.0.1-5.el8.noarch
>>> clamav-data-0.102.2-4.el8.noarch
>>> clamav-update-0.102.2-4.el8.x86_64
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> but hen I do MailScanner --lint
>>>
>>> the output is-
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------
>>> Found these virus scanners installed:
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------
>>>
>>> the list is empty.
>>>
>>> What should I do to get MailScanner to auto detect clamav ?
>>>
>>> Note: MailScanner version - 5.2.2
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lee
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Shawn Iverson
>>> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> Shawn Iverson
>> shawniverson at summitgrid.com
>>
>
Hi,

I changed the clamav listening socket to different location.
And updated in MailScanner configuration with the new socket path.
Now MailScanner detecting clamd as antivirus.

thanks

--
Lee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200429/01105d54/attachment.html>

From zephyr at flytonet.com  Thu Apr 30 01:02:32 2020
From: zephyr at flytonet.com (=?utf-8?B?5b6u5ZKM55qE6aKo?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:02:32 +0800
Subject: Problem about Filename and Filetype Checking for Specified Domains
Message-ID: <001501d61e8b$08564fd0$1902ef70$@flytonet.com>

Hi,

I want to use filename and filetype checking for specified domains.

 

1.I create a new file (/etc/MailScanner/filescan.rules.conf)

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

From:           127.0.0.1       /etc/MailScanner/filename.rules.conf

FromOrTo:       default         /etc/MailScanner/jau.filename.rules.conf

 

2.Set Filename Rules = %etc-dir%/filescan.rules.conf in the MailScanner.conf

 

3.run the command :MailScanner ?lint,but there are some errors.

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf

Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README

Possible syntax error on line 4 of /etc/MailScanner/filescan.rules.conf at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1671.

Remember to separate fields with tab characters! at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1673.

Possible syntax error on line 5 of /etc/MailScanner/filescan.rules.conf at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1671.

Remember to separate fields with tab characters! at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1673.

Read 1500 hostnames from the phishing whitelist

Read 7763 hostnames from the phishing blacklists

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 

 

I check many times. I am sure that the fields in these files are be separated by tabs,and also check with vi.

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

# File to control which domains get filename checking$

# mail form or to noscan.com will not have filenames checked$

# Allow local to let MailWatch release quarantined files$

From:^I^I127.0.0.1^I/etc/MailScanner/filename.rules.conf$

FromOrTo:^Idefault^I^I/etc/MailScanner/jau.filename.rules.conf$

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 

 

Could anyone tell me how to fix it? Very thanks.

 

zephyr

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200430/4285af93/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5529 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200430/4285af93/attachment.bin>

From zephyr at flytonet.com  Thu Apr 30 05:34:38 2020
From: zephyr at flytonet.com (=?utf-8?B?5b6u5ZKM55qE6aKo?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:34:38 +0800
Subject: FW: Problem about Filename and Filetype Checking for Specified Domains
Message-ID: <001a01d61eb1$0b7d8b30$2278a190$@flytonet.com>

Ruleset file name must end in ".rules". So I change ?%etc-dir%/filescan.rules.conf? to %etc-dir%/filescan.rules?,then restart. Everything is fine.

 

From: ???? <zephyr at flytonet.com> 
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 9:03 AM
To: 'mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info' <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: Problem about Filename and Filetype Checking for Specified Domains

 

Hi,

I want to use filename and filetype checking for specified domains.

 

1.I create a new file (/etc/MailScanner/filescan.rules.conf)

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

From:           127.0.0.1       /etc/MailScanner/filename.rules.conf

FromOrTo:       default         /etc/MailScanner/jau.filename.rules.conf

 

2.Set Filename Rules = %etc-dir%/filescan.rules.conf in the MailScanner.conf

 

3.run the command :MailScanner ?lint,but there are some errors.

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf

Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README

Possible syntax error on line 4 of /etc/MailScanner/filescan.rules.conf at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1671.

Remember to separate fields with tab characters! at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1673.

Possible syntax error on line 5 of /etc/MailScanner/filescan.rules.conf at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1671.

Remember to separate fields with tab characters! at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Config.pm line 1673.

Read 1500 hostnames from the phishing whitelist

Read 7763 hostnames from the phishing blacklists

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 

 

I check many times. I am sure that the fields in these files are be separated by tabs,and also check with vi.

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

# File to control which domains get filename checking$

# mail form or to noscan.com will not have filenames checked$

# Allow local to let MailWatch release quarantined files$

From:^I^I127.0.0.1^I/etc/MailScanner/filename.rules.conf$

FromOrTo:^Idefault^I^I/etc/MailScanner/jau.filename.rules.conf$

<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 

 

Could anyone tell me how to fix it? Very thanks.

 

zephyr

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200430/30f899a8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5529 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200430/30f899a8/attachment.bin>

From hs at schlittermann.de  Thu Apr 30 13:36:10 2020
From: hs at schlittermann.de (Heiko Schlittermann)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:36:10 +0200
Subject: Integration of MailScanner and Exim / a new approach using
 Exim's multiple queues
In-Reply-To: <20200211193026.GF2253@jumper.schlittermann.de>
References: <20200211193026.GF2253@jumper.schlittermann.de>
Message-ID: <20200430133610.GB26885@jumper.schlittermann.de>

Hello Team @Mailscanner,

I'd be happy if you would update the information on MailScanner and
Exim. Exim is meanwhile capable of multiple queues and I brought a setup
into productive use, which makes use of this feature. It greatly
simplyfies the maintenance of Exim, as you do not need multiple
instances anymore.

Heiko Schlittermann via MailScanner <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> (Di 11 Feb 2020 20:30:26 CET):
> I created a new setup and promised to supply a short description.
> See also: https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/Integration-with-MailScanner#mailscanner-and-exim-with-multiple-queues
> This is *not* exactly what I implemented for a customer, so it needs to
> be tested.

Meanwhile I got a third-party report. They followed the instructions and
it seems to work there too.

    Best regards from Dresden/Germany
    Viele Gr??e aus Dresden
    Heiko Schlittermann
--
 SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
 Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
 gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200430/ea954f3f/attachment.sig>

From shawniverson at summitgrid.com  Thu Apr 30 13:39:24 2020
From: shawniverson at summitgrid.com (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:39:24 -0400
Subject: Integration of MailScanner and Exim / a new approach using Exim's
 multiple queues
In-Reply-To: <20200430133610.GB26885@jumper.schlittermann.de>
References: <20200211193026.GF2253@jumper.schlittermann.de>
 <20200430133610.GB26885@jumper.schlittermann.de>
Message-ID: <0867dcde-1bde-ecb5-3019-b19d09c708ae@summitgrid.com>

This is good news.? We'll also test this internally and then plan on 
publishing it.

On 4/30/20 9:36 AM, Heiko Schlittermann via MailScanner wrote:
> Hello Team @Mailscanner,
>
> I'd be happy if you would update the information on MailScanner and
> Exim. Exim is meanwhile capable of multiple queues and I brought a setup
> into productive use, which makes use of this feature. It greatly
> simplyfies the maintenance of Exim, as you do not need multiple
> instances anymore.
>
> Heiko Schlittermann via MailScanner <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> (Di 11 Feb 2020 20:30:26 CET):
>> I created a new setup and promised to supply a short description.
>> See also: https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/Integration-with-MailScanner#mailscanner-and-exim-with-multiple-queues
>> This is *not* exactly what I implemented for a customer, so it needs to
>> be tested.
> Meanwhile I got a third-party report. They followed the instructions and
> it seems to work there too.
>
>      Best regards from Dresden/Germany
>      Viele Gr??e aus Dresden
>      Heiko Schlittermann
> --
>   SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
>   Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
>   gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
>
>
-- 

Shawn Iverson
shawniverson at summitgrid.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20200430/a50e69d3/attachment.html>