xserverlinux at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 03:12:05 UTC 2019
El dom., 25 ago. 2019 a las 19:20, Mark Sapiro (<mark at msapiro.net>) escribió:
> I don't think there will be any significant difference between
> communicating with clamd via a TCP vs. a unix socket. The bulk of the
> time should be in the clamd process itself, not in communication.
> Normally, there is less overhead in communicating via a unix socket, but
> I don't think this is going to be significant,
> Anyway, I was suggesting you configure clamd and MailScanner to use a
> unix socket and not TCP. It seemed your issue might have been that
> MailScanner was trying to use the unix socket but clamd was listening on
> a TCP port.
More information about the MailScanner