MailScanner rules problem

Jim Creason jim at shout.net
Wed Mar 14 20:40:53 UTC 2018


You don't have a wildcard asterisk before the @ in your rules, adding 
that would fix it, I believe.


On 3/14/2018 3:21 PM, nilton at hgnet.com.br wrote:
>
> Hi List
>
> This is my first post here, so I'm sorry for my blunders. Sorry also 
> for my very bad english.
>
> I have a new installation of MailScanner with Postfix and Mysql and I 
> am seeing a serious problem that I have not been able to solve yet and 
> I need your help:
>
> Ubuntu 16.04 + MailScanner 5.0.7-2 + Postfix 3.1.0-3 + MySQL 5.7.21
>
> Everything works fine except for one detail. All rules related to 
> domains hosted on this mailserver are ignored by MailScanner.
>
> Look this:
>
> Local domains:
> domain1.com.br
> domain2.com.br
> domain3.com.br
>
> ----------------
> MailScanner.com
> Archive Mail = %rules-dir%/archive.rules
> Spam Actions = %rules-dir%/archive-spam.rules
> Required SpamAssassin Score = %rules-dir%/score.rules
> Is Definitely Not Spam = %rules-dir%/spam.whitelist.rules
> -----------------
>
> archive.rules
> FromOrTo:      @domain2.com.br monitor at domain2.com.br
> FromOrTo:      @domain3.com.br monitor at domain3.com.br
> FromOrTo:      default monitor at X-Domain1-MailScanner-To:.com.br
>
> The rules for domin2.com.br and domain3.com.br are ignored by 
> Mailscanner and all messages follow default rules.
> ----------------
>
> archive-spam.rules
> To:     @domain2.com.br     forward spam at domain2.com.br delete header 
> "X-Spam-Status: Yes"
> To:     @domain3.com.br     forward spam at domain3.com.br delete header 
> "X-Spam-Status: Yes"
> From:   default             forward 
> spam at X-Domain1-MailScanner-To:.com.br delete header "X-Spam-Status: Yes"
>
> In the same way, the rules for domin2.com.br and domain3.com.br are 
> ignored by Mailscanner and all the messages follow default rules.
> --------------------
>
> score.rules
> To:       @domain2.com.br                  8.0
> To:       @domain3.com.br                  9.0
> To:       default                                      5.0
>
> All messages for domain2.com and domain3.com are cached or not based 
> on default score 5.0.
> ------------------
>
> spam.whitelist.rules
> From:     @domain1.com.br             yes
> From:     @domain2.com.br             yes
> From:     @domain3.com.br             yes
> From:     @google.com                 yes
> FromOrTo: default                     no
>
> Interestingly the "From:" rules even for local domains are recognized 
> by MailScanner.
> Thus, it is possible to conclude that only the rules that contain 
> "To:" only for local domains do not work.
> ----------------------
>
> Notice the message header below that X-Domain1-MailScanner-To: It is 
> empty, but X-Domain1-MailScanner-From: is not empty.
>
> Return-Path: <usertmp at Domain1.com.br>
> Delivered-To: usertmp at Domain1.com.br
> X-Spam-Status: No
> X-Domain1-MailScanner-To:
> X-Domain1-MailScanner-From: usertmp at Domain1.com.br
> X-Domain1-MailScanner-SpamCheck: não spam (está em uma lista branca),
>     SpamAssassin (escore=0.4, requerido 4, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00,
>     BR_SAVED_URI 1.50, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10,
>     DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10)
> X-Domain1-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-Domain1-MailScanner-ID: B6EBB14201A.AE9C1
> X-Domain1-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
> information
> Received: from webmail.Domain1.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>     by mx1.Domain1.net.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EBB14201A
>     for <usertmp at Domain1.com.br>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:18:51 -0300 (-03)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=Domain1.com.br;
>     s=default; t=1521044331; bh=w9NEcM38aPoJUJrmljw+GCJaBSw=;
>     h=Date:From:To:Subject;
> b=164tD2Zhn2gvABzES+a+cpd/lZG8QHFaBb8B53JMPXbjbGVgTLIV8oH7dILByLLHV
>  c4W1EIgZ865H+m5BulZvekDY1gRg6E5dlkXjTp5M6CfNFbEyoV9rJUp4hs3civ/4Fq
>  hbRBSIxuEmoEEdsjiPrkApczoGOWxL+7PCLOfHKiiBc8MlEnr7dPI8kve8dOMgOKXR
>  NWz0H4qK6W+XUAIAHWSWryxWMnb6vkSafF/CxSN9W2hhjtFuqt5GhqFhOA+xxnLviQ
>  FdbyGg4W468XGYPsJppj8wSuVhQ7FzsuKFaM2X44oXcEGQV62HmpRpwfZyk77A4ue8
>      8TxnOVTxrogdg==
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
>  format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:18:51 -0300
> From: usertmp at Domain1.com.br
> To: usertmp at Domain1.com.br
> -------------------------
>
>
> On the other server where everything works fine.
> From - Wed Mar 14 13:19:49 2018
> X-Account-Key: account27
> X-UIDL: 000001925a9d6bca
> X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
> X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
> X-Mozilla-Keys:
> Return-Path: <nilton at exemplo2.com.br>
> Delivered-To: nilton at exemplo2.com.br
> X-Spam-Status: No
> X-HGnet-MailScanner-To:
> X-HGnet-MailScanner-From: nilton at exemplo2.com.br
> X-HGnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: não spam (está em uma lista branca),
>     SpamAssassin (escore=0.4, requerido 4, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00,
>     BR_SAVED_URI 1.50, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10,
>     DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10)
> X-HGnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-HGnet-MailScanner-ID: B6EBB14201A.AE9C1
> X-HGnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
> information
> Received: from webmail.exemplo2.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>     by mx1.hgnet.net.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EBB14201A
>     for <nilton at exemplo2.com.br>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:18:51 -0300 (-03)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=exemplo2.com.br;
>     s=default; t=1521044331; bh=w9NEcM38aPoJUJrmljw+GCJaBSw=;
>     h=Date:From:To:Subject;
> b=164tD2Zhn2gvABzES+a+cpd/lZG8QHFaBb8B53JMPXbjbGVgTLIV8oH7dILByLLHV
>  c4W1EIgZ865H+m5BulZvekDY1gRg6E5dlkXjTp5M6CfNFbEyoV9rJUp4hs3civ/4Fq
>  hbRBSIxuEmoEEdsjiPrkApczoGOWxL+7PCLOfHKiiBc8MlEnr7dPI8kve8dOMgOKXR
>  NWz0H4qK6W+XUAIAHWSWryxWMnb6vkSafF/CxSN9W2hhjtFuqt5GhqFhOA+xxnLviQ
>  FdbyGg4W468XGYPsJppj8wSuVhQ7FzsuKFaM2X44oXcEGQV62HmpRpwfZyk77A4ue8
>      8TxnOVTxrogdg==
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
>  format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:18:51 -0300
> From: nilton at exemplo2.com.br
> To: nilton at exemplo2.com.br
>
> -----------------
>
> MailScanner or Postfix? There is a possibility that the problem is in 
> the way postfix is constructing the header, but I do not know how to 
> debug it.
>
> Thank you for your help on this.
>
> HGnet - A solução em TI.
> <www.hgnet.com.br>
> A Solução em TI
> 	
> *
> Nilton Godoi*
> Fones:   +55 11 3582-2746  3582-2756
> Celular: +55 11  98191-0001
> www.hgnet.com.br
>
>
>
> -- 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv�rus e
> acredita-se estar livre de perigo.
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20180314/4d5a29b5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hgnet_100.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6777 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20180314/4d5a29b5/attachment.png>


More information about the MailScanner mailing list