About AntiVirus load time

[Shawn Iverson]

What do you get if you use clamd instead?

On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:29 PM Nicola Piazzi <Nicola.Piazzi at gruppocomet.it>
wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
> I found that antivirus scanning, 4 example clamscan, takes a long time and
> cpu to load it and less 4 scan file
>
> This is an example :
>
> time /usr/bin/clamscan --database /var/lib/clamav3
> /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20181214/nonspam/1595B20064.A5116
> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
>
> Known viruses: 6899927
>
> Engine version: 0.100.2
>
> Scanned directories: 0
>
> Scanned files: 1
>
> Infected files: 0
>
> Data scanned: 0.00 MB
>
> Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
>
> Time: 15.838 sec (0 m 15 s)
>
>
>
> real    0m15.843s
>
> user    0m14.934s
>
> sys     0m0.905s
>
>
>
> So it takes 15 secs of cpu to do a scan of a single email, sigh
> If i scan entire dir it take a little bit more, so the time is spent to
> load libraries itself
>
> Is possible to have it in memory so we can do it faster and less cpu
> expensive ?
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>

-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 option 7
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20181228/315e12b4/attachment.html>