MailScanner: Message attempted to kill MailScanner

[Antony Stone]

On Monday 06 August 2018 at 14:13:03, DobriL Dobrilov wrote:

> Until now the Mail Server was with old postfix and MailScanner 4.79. I
> migrated to new server with MailScanner 5.0.7. MS config is same as
> before.

Maybe someone with more knowledge than of any configuration differences ebtween 
those version can comment on just keeping the same configuration file...

> From webmail I can send messages out of my domain without problems.

So, what *does* cause the problem?

Your original email said "All emails sent from my webmail to same domain 
cannot be processes by mailscanner."

> Msg from webmail
> Received: from mail.stanga.net (localhost [IPv6:::1])
>      by mail.stanga.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8990B62C7F
>      for <dobril at stanga.net>; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:33:37 +0300 (EEST)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=stanga.net; s=mail;
>      t=1533555217; bh=mZ+uaN6Z/8N6WGVqk2wnIiNbWhm5wweetthyGV+rcTs=;
>      h=Date:From:To:Subject;
>      b=ex87f2OAPGbMz0sU6XWbhYCD03Et+mEjtKr925BfRPT5HgYLDlL8HqB+ZrCXHJwYF
>       YeklCaEhAz5eGuRaDcJThrwidzLyqdC8pAErnLbc49SmF0HIafTMMmnqxkhRqYefqz
>       EKNjrsrHGMMqNKqMUApcumMBXGt8zKEXw/S9HlrE=
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=_75de8e069c6b4423276ecc8efe3eaa14"
> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 14:33:37 +0300
> From: Dobril Dobrilov <dobril at stanga.net>
> To: dobril at stanga.net
> Subject: Test2
> Organization: StangaOne1
> Message-ID: <e836f2d9d2be88a49da5da675eba919e at stanga.net>
> X-Sender: dobril at stanga.net
> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.7
> 
> Msg from Mail Client
> Received: from DL (unknown [192.168.0.222])
>      (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
>      (No client certificate requested)
>      by mail.stanga.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1BD62C84
>      for <dobril at stanga.net>; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:11:28 +0300 (EEST)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=stanga.net; s=mail;
>      t=1533557488; bh=PuTju5S6EPeO7sbRMZ/5jISvR+vw7+9AwwsxuKLvTZ8=;
>      h=From:To:Subject:Date;
>      b=IcMCXoZ3cdkehwkEMYfCytEDcgduiWi8Bats1ypadvf6hD/Mq/I0s7k6Lc3lBzJpN
>       FNopdMhbJ7HQ1irLN8fyHRvMPFzyCAE3rPZjIDm1Olf23G4E510mYtRvE1A/i1Dt0a
>       rHJVnjxltdYZ6+aaENwzE/oXaaO1XSW1zaSciN6k=
> From: "DobriL Dobrilov" <dobril at stanga.net>
> To: "'DobriL Dobrilov'" <dobril at stanga.net>
> Subject: Test
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:11:34 +0300
> Message-ID: <00f901d42d7e$9e87dbe0$db9793a0$@stanga.net>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>      boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FA_01D42D97.C3D513E0"
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
> Thread-Index: AdQtfptmFdgLS/d8QKixvWPS7nKlOQ==
> Content-Language: bg
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 000000005234E38E73D4914094E5D7D34B79F6A564F78F00

Is one of the above emails an example which causes the problem and the other 
an example which does not cause the problem (if so, which one is which)?

Or are both the above emails examples which do not cause the problem (in which 
case please send us the headers from one which does cause the problem)?


Regards,


Antony.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+dobril=stanga.net at lists.mailscanner.info] On
> Behalf Of Antony Stone Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 3:01 PM
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: Re: MailScanner: Message attempted to kill MailScanner
> 
> On Monday 06 August 2018 at 13:55:36, DobriL Dobrilov wrote:
> > Some other ideas, because unfortunately this Live system and It’s very
> > critical ?
> 
> When did the problem start happening?
> 
> What changed on the MS server around that time?
> 
> Can you show us full headers of an example email from webmail (which MS
> can't process) and another one to and from the same addresses, but not
> from webmail (which MS processes okay)?
> 
> Antony

-- 
Neurotics build castles in the sky;
Psychotics live in them;
Psychiatrists collect the rent.


                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC me.