[Question] RE: sending warning message

Wed Jan 25 13:53:18 UTC 2017

I believe it should be a lot easier with sendmail, I could help a bit more if that were the case.

Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital
+1 (440) 253-9789 <tel:+1 (440) 253-9789> | +507 6781-9505 <tel:+507 6781-9505> | Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa <mailto:alex at vidadigital.com.pa> | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ <http://vidadigital.com.pa/> | Skype:alexneuman <https://webapp.wisestamp.com/sig_iframe?origin=mac-mail&signature_id=5234486814965760&t=0.4486080201114071#> | wiseintro.co/alexneuman 
 <http://facebook.com/vidadigital>  <http://pa.linkedin.com/in/alexneuman>  <http://twitter.com/alexneuman>  <http://pinterest.com/vidadigital>  <http://youtube.com/user/reliantpty>  <http://instagram.com/vidadigital>  <http://vidadigital.com.pa.wordpress.com/>  <http://amazon.com/?tag=vidadigi-20>  <http://skype:alexneuman/?call&topic=Signature>  <http://whatsapp//send?text=Hello>  <http://wiseintro.co/alexneuman>

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:54 AM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
> 
> Hey Glenn,
> 
> Thanks. I have been thinking about this for almost the whole day but doesn't look easy at my skill level. I need more time to think. Cheers.
> 
> Eoin Kim
> Systems Administrator
>  
> RCS Telecommunications 
> Level 1, 133 Mary Street
> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
> Office: 07 3228 0843
> Mobile: 0419 726 231
> Email: eoin.kim at rcst.com.au <mailto:eoin.kim at rcst.com.au>
> 
> From: MailScanner <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info> on behalf of Glenn Steen <glenn.steen at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2017 7:12 PM
> To: MailScanner Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Question] RE: sending warning message
>  
> Hello Eoin,
> 
> Remeber that the handling of the recipient part, the FromOrTo thing in this case, only looks at the first recipient in multi-recipient mails. You need configure your mta (incoming, in case you use a multi-mta setup... For Postfix, the split will happen too late, in a single instance setup, so you need find/use my very old "two-instance-split-per/recipient" wiki article... if at all possible... or DIY;-)) to split incoming e-mails/recipient.
> 
> Cheers!
> -- 
> -- Glenn
> 
> 2017-01-25 5:22 GMT+01:00 Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au <mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>>:
> Hello Mark,
> 
> That is a good question indeed.
>     - First option is definitely not desired.
>     - Second option looks okay but I guess the other way (From the Internet to my company) will be affected as well. I mean it will affect my scenario #2.
>     - Third option means dropping the email without any notification?
> 
> It is a good question but very hard to determine. Let me think about it. Thanks a lot.
> 
> Eoin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim <mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Beoin.kim>=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info <mailto:rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2017 2:13 PM
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
> Subject: Re: [Question] RE: sending warning message
> 
> On 01/24/2017 07:54 PM, Eoin Kim wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your message. Yes, you are right. At the moment, the receiver gets an email with an attachment (%org-name%-Attachment-Warning.txt). What I want to achieve is sending the message to the sender only because it's a sender's fault (e.g. double extension filename). So, it's a bit difficult to explain with my limited English but for example, when a company user sends an email with double extension filename attachment, then:
> >
> >     MailScanner: hey, you are doing a bad thing (to sender)
> >     MailScanner: hey, he is doing a bad thing to you (to receiver)
> >
> > So, I don't want the second thing to happen. Is it possible? Thanks.
> 
> 
> What do you want the recipient to get?
> 
> 1) A message as sent by the sender with no alteration.
> 2) A message with the attachment removed with no indication or explanation of that
> 3) Nothing at all.
> 
> I'm not really sure if any of those options can be accomplished. My previous suggestion to use a Scan Messages rule set to not scan outbound mail will accomplish 1), but won't notify the sender.
> 
> In any case, once you clarify what you want the recipient to receive if anything, I'll think about ways to accomplish it.
> 
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net <mailto:mark at msapiro.net>>        The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
> 
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner <http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner <http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- Glenn
> email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
> work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
> 
> 
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20170125/0d721775/attachment.html>