From garry at glendown.de  Fri Dec  8 08:08:30 2017
From: garry at glendown.de (Garry Glendown)
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:08:30 +0100
Subject: Postfix & vacation notice
Message-ID: <76983855-37bd-28ff-2b2f-f673a19294f2@glendown.de>

Hi,

on an installation with Postfix as MTA I have Mailscanner running, so
far without any problems. As MS is being used to add signatures to
outgoing mails, we noticed that on vacation notices no signatures were
attached - which is caused by the fact that Postfix automatically
generates the notice and sends it without going through the "regular"
queueing of the message ... is there any way of fixing this?

Thanks, -garry

-- 
PGP Fingerprint: A79F A33F 5B13 BEB7 A51D 274F F99C 3AE2 4BCB 7015


From Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it  Fri Dec  8 09:03:34 2017
From: Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it (Antony Stone)
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:03:34 +0100
Subject: Postfix & vacation notice
In-Reply-To: <76983855-37bd-28ff-2b2f-f673a19294f2@glendown.de>
References: <76983855-37bd-28ff-2b2f-f673a19294f2@glendown.de>
Message-ID: <201712081003.34824.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>

On Friday 08 December 2017 at 09:08:30, Garry Glendown wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> on an installation with Postfix as MTA I have Mailscanner running, so
> far without any problems. As MS is being used to add signatures to
> outgoing mails, we noticed that on vacation notices no signatures were
> attached - which is caused by the fact that Postfix automatically
> generates the notice and sends it without going through the "regular"
> queueing of the message ... is there any way of fixing this?

Get the "other" instance of Postfix (ie: the one putting the mails into the 
queue directory for MailScanner to process) to generate the messages, instead 
of the one doing the delivery?


Antony.

-- 
I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way 
is to make it so simple that there are _obviously_ no deficiencies, and the 
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no _obvious_ 
deficiencies.

 - C A R Hoare

                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC me.

From mark at msapiro.net  Fri Dec  8 17:45:38 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:45:38 -0800
Subject: Postfix & vacation notice
In-Reply-To: <201712081003.34824.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
References: <76983855-37bd-28ff-2b2f-f673a19294f2@glendown.de>
 <201712081003.34824.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
Message-ID: <097bc61b-a3e2-63e6-0ec9-973b8a55b132@msapiro.net>

On 12/08/2017 01:03 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
> 
> Get the "other" instance of Postfix (ie: the one putting the mails into the 
> queue directory for MailScanner to process) to generate the messages, instead 
> of the one doing the delivery?


Unlike Sendmail, there's typically only one Postfix instance with
MailScanner. Incoming mail is placed in the hold queue and MailScanner
picks it up, processes it and requeues it in the incoming queue. See
<https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/>.

You would need to get Postfix to put the vacation notice in the hold
queue instead of sending it. I don't offhand know how to do that if it
is even possible.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Tue Dec 12 05:38:44 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 05:38:44 +0000
Subject: [Question] missing components during the installation
Message-ID: <6d521b4037a64bdab96ffb7c78d0c6b7@rcst.com.au>

Hi all,

I am testing the MailScanner (v5.0.6-5) at the moment. The installation went well successfully although I could see few warning messages. I understand it is not really important but I would still like to ask. I am using Debian Jessie by the way.


  1.  So, I can see the following message from the installation log:

Package unrar is not available, but is referred to by another package.

This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or

is only available from another source



E: Package 'unrar' has no installation candidate

I believe adding non-free repository will fix this but are there any alternatives I can use?


  1.  During the Perl module installation, I could see the following messages:

optional module missing: Geo::IP

optional module missing: Net::Patricia

optional binary missing or nonfunctional: fetch

So, I think I can install first two missing modules (libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl). However, I cannot find a package that has fetch binary. Can someone please help me about this? Is this another Perl module?



Other than those, I think it's all good. Hopefully, this clarifies my situation. Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 - The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/ad6e6508/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/ad6e6508/attachment.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Tue Dec 12 22:01:01 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:01:01 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
Message-ID: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>

Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 - The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/f2d4d748/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/f2d4d748/attachment.jpg>

From iversons at rushville.k12.in.us  Tue Dec 12 22:14:55 2017
From: iversons at rushville.k12.in.us (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:14:55 -0500
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it
> looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log
> message.
>
>
>
> Test Summary Report
>
> -------------------
>
> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>
>   Failed tests:  1-2
>
>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>
> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>
> Result: FAIL
>
> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>
> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>
> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
> --force to force install it.
>
>
>
> I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
> --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>
>
>
> What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this?
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
>
> *Eoin Kim*
>
> Systems Administrator
>
>
>
> *RCS Telecommunications *
>
> Level 1 ? The Annexe
>
> 133 Mary Street
>
> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
>
> Office:   07 3228 0843
>
> Mobile: 0419 726 231
>
>
>
> [image: RCST logo drop shadow]
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/0c1902e3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/0c1902e3/attachment.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Tue Dec 12 22:18:03 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:18:03 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$ uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner




--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/2fd799cc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD000.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: ~WRD000.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/2fd799cc/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/2fd799cc/attachment-0001.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Tue Dec 12 22:22:54 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:22:54 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/6c21b583/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/6c21b583/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/6c21b583/attachment-0001.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Tue Dec 12 23:09:11 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 23:09:11 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>

Hi Shawn,

My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So, here?s what I did step by step:

  1.  Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
  2.  Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl
  3.  Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
  4.  Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.

--> Working on Digest::SHA1
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
1 distribution installed
Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...

--> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
FAIL

It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/c9fd4b0e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/c9fd4b0e/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171212/c9fd4b0e/attachment-0003.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Wed Dec 13 01:12:03 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:12:03 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>

Hi Shawn,

I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is missing.

#Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or App::cpanminus in unattended install
    perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
        clear
        echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
        timewait 1
        if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
            perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
        else
            cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
        fi
    fi

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So, here?s what I did step by step:

  1.  Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
  2.  Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl
  3.  Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
  4.  Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.

--> Working on Digest::SHA1
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
1 distribution installed
Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...

--> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
FAIL

It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/5be4cea2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/5be4cea2/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/5be4cea2/attachment-0001.jpg>

From iversons at rushville.k12.in.us  Wed Dec 13 12:05:25 2017
From: iversons at rushville.k12.in.us (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 07:05:25 -0500
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>

Eoin,

If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the
prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Shawn,
>
>
>
> I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is
> missing.
>
>
>
> #Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or
> App::cpanminus in unattended install
>
>     perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
>
>     if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>
>         clear
>
>         echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
>
>         timewait 1
>
>         if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
>
>             perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
>
>         else
>
>             cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
>
>         fi
>
>     fi
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=
> rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
>
>
> My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So,
> here?s what I did step by step:
>
>    1. Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo
>    apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>    2. Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl,
>    libnet-patricia-perl
>    3. Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
>    4. Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>    --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>
>
>
> During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.
>
>
>
> --> Working on Digest::SHA1
>
> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz
> ... OK
>
> Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>
> Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>
> Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
>
> 1 distribution installed
>
> Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...
>
>
>
> --> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
>
> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/
> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
>
> Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
>
> Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing
> Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log
> for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
>
> FAIL
>
>
>
> It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the
> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.
>
>
>
> Test Summary Report
>
> -------------------
>
> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>
>   Failed tests:  1-2
>
>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>
> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>
> Result: FAIL
>
> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>
> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>
> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
> --force to force install it.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+
> eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Sorry for flying emails but I used this file -
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz
>
>
>
> I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+
> eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Thanks Shawn,
>
>
>
> I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get
> update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>
>
>
> sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$ uname -a
>
> Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2
> (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+
> eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Eoin,
>
>
>
> I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it
> looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log
> message.
>
>
>
> Test Summary Report
>
> -------------------
>
> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>
>   Failed tests:  1-2
>
>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>
> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>
> Result: FAIL
>
> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>
> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>
> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
> --force to force install it.
>
>
>
> I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
> --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>
>
>
> What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this?
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
>
> *Eoin Kim*
>
> Systems Administrator
>
>
>
> *RCS Telecommunications *
>
> Level 1 ? The Annexe
>
> 133 Mary Street
>
> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
>
> Office:   07 3228 0843
>
> Mobile: 0419 726 231
>
>
>
> [image: RCST logo drop shadow]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>
> Director of Technology
>
> Rush County Schools
>
> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/104b9010/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/104b9010/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/104b9010/attachment-0001.jpg>

From thom at vdb.nl  Wed Dec 13 20:34:54 2017
From: thom at vdb.nl (Thom van der Boon)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:34:54 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Max Spam Check Size
Message-ID: <244758119.648666.1513197294202.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>

Hi 

I am currently experiencing quite some spam messages which are not caught by MailScanner (about one every 5 minutes) because of the "Max Spam Check Size" parameter in MailScanner.conf 

# Spammers do not have the power to send out huge messages to everyone as 
# it costs them too much (more smaller messages makes more profit than less 
# very large messages). So if a message is bigger than a certain size, it 
# is highly unlikely to be spam. Limiting this saves a lot of time checking 
# huge messages. 
# Disable this option by setting it to a huge value. 
# This is measured in bytes. 
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset. 
Max Spam Check Size = 200k 

After reviewing the log files, all messages which are uncaught have a size between 200k and 225k (most arround 215k) and look to be targeted to get past a MailScanner installation 

I would suggest to set the new default value for this parameter from 200k to at least 300k in a future MailScanner version. 


Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards, 


Thom van der Boon 
E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl 



===== 



Thom.H. van der Boon b.v. 
Transito 4 
6909 DA Babberich 
Tel.: +31 (0)88 4272727 
Fax: +31 (0)88 4272789 
Home Page: http://www.vdb.nl/ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/93af8c95/attachment.html>

From Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it  Wed Dec 13 20:43:42 2017
From: Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it (Antony Stone)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:43:42 +0100
Subject: Max Spam Check Size
In-Reply-To: <244758119.648666.1513197294202.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>
References: <244758119.648666.1513197294202.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>
Message-ID: <201712132143.42214.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>

On Wednesday 13 December 2017 at 21:34:54, Thom van der Boon wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I am currently experiencing quite some spam messages which are not caught
> by MailScanner (about one every 5 minutes) because of the "Max Spam Check
> Size" parameter in MailScanner.conf

> After reviewing the log files, all messages which are uncaught have a size
> between 200k and 225k (most arround 215k) and look to be targeted to get
> past a MailScanner installation

Would you care to pastebin a sample of such spam (I'm asuming they all 
resemble one another, and aren't completely different messages which happen to 
share a common size range) so the rest of us can see whether we're seeing 
similar stuff?


Thanks,


Antony.

-- 
"If I've told you once, I've told you a million times - stop exaggerating!"

                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC me.

From thom at vdb.nl  Wed Dec 13 21:02:32 2017
From: thom at vdb.nl (Thom van der Boon)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:02:32 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Max Spam Check Size
In-Reply-To: <201712132143.42214.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
References: <244758119.648666.1513197294202.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>
 <201712132143.42214.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
Message-ID: <2129750295.648854.1513198952856.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>

Hi, 

All spam is copier/Multifunctional or invoice related 


Dec 13 16:56:47 mail MailScanner[3834]: Message CF27C20D53.A51AA from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.nl) to basecamp.nl is too big for spam checks (214959 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 16:58:09 mail MailScanner[2970]: Message ED3EB20D3F.A88E7 from 176.13.233.133 (copier at domain.eu) to domain.eu is too big for spam checks (214724 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 16:59:41 mail MailScanner[2970]: Message 4849720D3F.A8816 from 110.172.163.179 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214691 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 17:04:37 mail MailScanner[2970]: Message DEF3B20D3F.A5D67 from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214888 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 17:15:01 mail MailScanner[4134]: Message A9C9A20D3F.A393A from 89.25.31.28 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214698 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 17:21:14 mail MailScanner[4005]: Message 540FE20D3F.AEE35 from 189.210.117.137 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214864 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 17:39:26 mail MailScanner[3127]: Message CB8F720D53.A312A from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.net) to domain.net is too big for spam checks (215035 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 17:54:40 mail MailScanner[4617]: Message 54DAB20D53.A8091 from 37.47.229.229 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214877 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 17:57:59 mail MailScanner[4738]: Message CE17220D53.AF738 from 202.84.45.219 (copier at domain.net) to domain.net is too big for spam checks (214786 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 17:59:21 mail MailScanner[4738]: Message 2264F20D53.A7D19 from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.eu) to domain.eu is too big for spam checks (214860 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 18:16:41 mail MailScanner[4134]: Message AAB0D21667.A71F6 from 171.233.171.251 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214711 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 18:17:11 mail MailScanner[4005]: Message 99A1821667.A92BF from 176.63.29.102 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214880 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 18:56:05 mail MailScanner[4617]: Message EC95C20D53.A8CAB from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214864 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:14:48 mail MailScanner[5409]: Message 512F220D53.AF28C from 207.248.63.90 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214792 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:20:21 mail MailScanner[5409]: Message 6920C2046F.A09D9 from 117.2.35.204 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214682 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:24:25 mail MailScanner[4617]: Message D1700202B3.A7F9E from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.nl) to basecamp.nl is too big for spam checks (215028 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:35:51 mail MailScanner[4617]: Message 0CBF2202B3.A86F1 from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214886 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:44:23 mail MailScanner[5409]: Message EE48C202B3.A7824 from 84.215.234.197 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214852 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:47:05 mail MailScanner[4617]: Message DAD11202B3.ABEF9 from 42.113.161.32 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214672 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:57:20 mail MailScanner[4738]: Message ACDE1202B3.ABFD0 from 171.61.234.53 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214877 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 19:59:48 mail MailScanner[5409]: Message 2CB60202B3.A18C4 from 147.236.232.253 (copier at domain.de) to domain-in.de is too big for spam checks (214775 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 20:04:56 mail MailScanner[5409]: Message 8D3BF2029A.ABC89 from 181.168.144.20 (copier at domain.net) to domain.net is too big for spam checks (214836 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 20:09:50 mail MailScanner[5873]: Message 76E5E2029A.AD1D5 from 1.52.38.2 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214642 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 20:43:18 mail MailScanner[5409]: Message E966420D3F.AA8FD from 171.234.152.170 (copier at domain.eu) to domain.eu is too big for spam checks (214684 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 20:46:01 mail MailScanner[5687]: Message 81FDE2028C.A7B2D from 82.192.71.78 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214907 > 200000 bytes) 
Dec 13 20:50:32 mail MailScanner[7956]: Message 06BFA20277.A2CFB from 109.99.145.86 (copier at domain.nl) to domain.nl is too big for spam checks (214680 > 200000 bytes) 

Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards, 


Thom van der Boon 
E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl 



===== 



Thom.H. van der Boon b.v. 
Transito 4 
6909 DA Babberich 
Tel.: +31 (0)88 4272727 
Fax: +31 (0)88 4272789 
Home Page: http://www.vdb.nl/ 


Van: "Antony Stone" <Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it> 
Aan: "MailScanner Discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> 
Verzonden: Woensdag 13 december 2017 21:43:42 
Onderwerp: Re: Max Spam Check Size 

On Wednesday 13 December 2017 at 21:34:54, Thom van der Boon wrote: 

> Hi 
> 
> I am currently experiencing quite some spam messages which are not caught 
> by MailScanner (about one every 5 minutes) because of the "Max Spam Check 
> Size" parameter in MailScanner.conf 

> After reviewing the log files, all messages which are uncaught have a size 
> between 200k and 225k (most arround 215k) and look to be targeted to get 
> past a MailScanner installation 

Would you care to pastebin a sample of such spam (I'm asuming they all 
resemble one another, and aren't completely different messages which happen to 
share a common size range) so the rest of us can see whether we're seeing 
similar stuff? 


Thanks, 


Antony. 

-- 
"If I've told you once, I've told you a million times - stop exaggerating!" 

Please reply to the list; 
please *don't* CC me. 


-- 
MailScanner mailing list 
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/b0b4e132/attachment.html>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Wed Dec 13 21:44:41 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:44:41 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <d4afd842efb640b9b76bfff485f8bc6b@rcst.com.au>

Oh,

It looks like the message size was too big. I extracted the SpamAssassin installation part only. It seems successful for me. Also, I?d like to ask this question. During the MailScanner .deb package installation, I can see the following message:

ERROR: /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log is locked by another process

Is this a normal behaviour?

Eoin

From: Eoin Kim
Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi Shawn,

I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is missing.

#Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or App::cpanminus in unattended install
    perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
        clear
        echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
        timewait 1
        if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
            perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
        else
            cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
        fi
    fi

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim<mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Beoin.kim>=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So, here?s what I did step by step:

  1.  Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
  2.  Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl
  3.  Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
  4.  Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.

--> Working on Digest::SHA1
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
1 distribution installed
Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...

--> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
FAIL

It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com<http://mx1.bne.lab.boof.com> 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/738b35f8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/738b35f8/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/738b35f8/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mailscanner-install.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 74190 bytes
Desc: mailscanner-install.log
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/738b35f8/attachment-0001.obj>

From mailinglists at feedmebits.nl  Wed Dec 13 22:33:45 2017
From: mailinglists at feedmebits.nl (Maarten)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:33:45 +0100
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
Message-ID: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>

Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does
postfix.org advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on the
postfix website:

mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This
software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files
directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The
mailscanner authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API or
protocol.

When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get lost
as in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, and that
it's safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that that uses
the SMTP proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I wouldn't know if
this is true or how to know if any mails every got lost(is there a way
to know of having lost mails), but have there ever been talks between
postfix devs and mailscanner devs about this?



From jerry.benton at mailborder.com  Wed Dec 13 22:36:54 2017
From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:36:54 -0500
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
Message-ID: <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>

Because MailScanner does not use a proper milter for Postfix. Instead, it
gets the email from a hold directory and drops it back in the Postfix queue.


This is how it is supposed to work:

Postfix > milter > hold > scan > injection to Postfix > delivery


This is how it actually works:

Postfix > hold > scan > drop into Postfix


Technically, this is incorrect. 


--
Jerry Benton
www.mailborder.com
+1   (843) 800-8605
+44 (020) 3883-8605


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.in
fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:34
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: postfix and mailscanner

Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does
postfix.org advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on the
postfix website:

mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This
software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files
directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The mailscanner
authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API or protocol.

When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get lost as
in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, and that it's
safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that that uses the SMTP
proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I wouldn't know if this is true or
how to know if any mails every got lost(is there a way to know of having
lost mails), but have there ever been talks between postfix devs and
mailscanner devs about this?




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



From mark at msapiro.net  Wed Dec 13 22:45:12 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:45:12 -0800
Subject: Max Spam Check Size
In-Reply-To: <244758119.648666.1513197294202.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>
References: <244758119.648666.1513197294202.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>
Message-ID: <400c068a-a110-54d3-0091-6996f5d773e2@msapiro.net>

On 12/13/2017 12:34 PM, Thom van der Boon wrote:
> 
> After reviewing the log files, all messages which are uncaught have a
> size between 200k and 225k (most arround 215k) and look to be targeted
> to get past a MailScanner installation
> 
> I would suggest to set the new default value for this parameter from
> 200k to at least 300k in a future MailScanner version.


I agree that there is now much spam that is larger than 200K bytes,
however if you are correct that it is targeted to be just over the
MailScanner default limit, raising the default limit will just provoke
the spammers to raise their message size and it would be better for
individual sites to raise the limit on their own.

On the other hand, I'm skeptical that this observation is more than a
coincidence, and I think a 500K default limit might make more sense.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Wed Dec 13 21:32:00 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:32:00 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>

Hi Shawn,

The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi Shawn,

I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is missing.

#Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or App::cpanminus in unattended install
    perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
        clear
        echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
        timewait 1
        if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
            perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
        else
            cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
        fi
    fi

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim<mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Beoin.kim>=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So, here?s what I did step by step:

  1.  Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
  2.  Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl
  3.  Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
  4.  Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.

--> Working on Digest::SHA1
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
1 distribution installed
Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...

--> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
FAIL

It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com<http://mx1.bne.lab.boof.com> 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner




--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/1b58ed61/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD000.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: ~WRD000.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/1b58ed61/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/1b58ed61/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mailscanner-install.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 440943 bytes
Desc: mailscanner-install.log
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/1b58ed61/attachment-0001.obj>

From mark at msapiro.net  Wed Dec 13 22:50:58 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:50:58 -0800
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <050ca77c-b891-71ca-f692-692d54ed1f95@msapiro.net>

On 12/13/2017 01:32 PM, Eoin Kim wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> ?
> 
> The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this
> is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.
> 
> ?
> 
> Eoin
> 
> ?
> 
> *From:*MailScanner
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info]
> *On Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
> 
> ?
> 
> Eoin,
> 
> ?
> 
> If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the
> prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?
> 
> ?
> 
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au
> <mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Shawn,
> 
>     ?
> 
>     I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is
>     missing.
> 
>     ?
> 
>     #Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or
>     App::cpanminus in unattended install
> 
>     ??? perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
> 
>     ??? if [ $? != 0 ]; then
> 
>     ??????? clear
> 
>     ??????? echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
> 
>     ??????? timewait 1
> 
>     ??????? if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
> 
>     ??????????? perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
> 
>     ??????? else
> 
>     ??????????? cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
> 
>     ??????? fi
> 
>     ??? fi
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Eoin
> 
>     ?
> 
>     *From:*MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim
>     <mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Beoin.kim>=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
>     *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
>     *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Hi Shawn,
> 
>     ?
> 
>     My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So,
>     here?s what I did step by step:
> 
>      1. Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update &&
>         sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>      2. Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl,
>         libnet-patricia-perl
>      3. Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
>      4. Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>         --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
> 
>     ?
> 
>     During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.
> 
>     ?
> 
>     --> Working on Digest::SHA1
> 
>     Fetching
>     http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
> 
>     Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
> 
>     Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
> 
>     Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
> 
>     1 distribution installed
> 
>     Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...
> 
>     ?
> 
>     --> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
> 
>     Fetching
>     http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz
>     ... OK
> 
>     Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
> 
>     Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing
>     Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>     /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>     --force to force install it.
> 
>     FAIL
> 
>     ?
> 
>     It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the
>     /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this
>     shows.
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Test Summary Report
> 
>     -------------------
> 
>     t/sa_compile.t????????????????? (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
> 
>     ? Failed tests:? 1-2
> 
>     ? Non-zero exit status: 2
> 
>     ? Parse errors: Bad plan.? You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
> 
>     Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr? 0.09 sys +
>     67.79 cusr? 5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
> 
>     Result: FAIL
> 
>     Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
> 
>     Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
> 
>     make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
> 
>     -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>     /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>     --force to force install it.
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Eoin
> 
>     ?
> 
>     *From:*MailScanner
>     [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info]
>     *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
>     *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
>     *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Sorry for flying emails but I used this file -
>     https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz
> 
>     ?
> 
>     I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Eoin
> 
>     ?
> 
>     *From:*MailScanner
>     [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info]
>     *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
>     *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
>     *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Thanks Shawn,
> 
>     ?
> 
>     I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo
>     apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
> 
>     ?
> 
>     sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$
>     <mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$>
>     uname -a
> 
>     Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com <http://mx1.bne.lab.boof.com>
>     3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Thanks again.
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Eoin
> 
>     ?
> 
>     *From:*MailScanner
>     [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info]
>     *On Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
>     *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
>     *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Eoin,
> 
>     ?
> 
>     I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.
> 
>     ?
> 
>     On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au
>     <mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
> 
>         Hi all,
> 
>         ?
> 
>         I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian
>         Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed.
>         Below is the end of log message.
> 
>         ?
> 
>         Test Summary Report
> 
>         -------------------
> 
>         t/sa_compile.t????????????????? (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
> 
>         ? Failed tests:? 1-2
> 
>         ? Non-zero exit status: 2
> 
>         ? Parse errors: Bad plan.? You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
> 
>         Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr? 0.09 sys +
>         67.79 cusr? 5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
> 
>         Result: FAIL
> 
>         Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
> 
>         Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
> 
>         make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
> 
>         -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>         /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry
>         with --force to force install it.
> 
>         ?
> 
>         I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix
>         --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
> 
>         ?
> 
>         What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify
>         this? Thanks a lot.
> 
>         ?
> 
>         *Eoin Kim*
> 
>         Systems Administrator
> 
>         ?
> 
>         *RCS Telecommunications *
> 
>         Level 1 ? The Annexe
> 
>         133 Mary Street
> 
>         Brisbane, QLD, 4000
> 
>         Office:?? 07 3228 0843
> 
>         Mobile:?0419 726 231
> 
>         ?
> 
>         RCST logo drop shadow
> 
>         ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         --
>         MailScanner mailing list
>         mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>         <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>         http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> 
> 
>     ?
> 
>     -- 
> 
>     Shawn Iverson, CETL
> 
>     Director of Technology
> 
>     Rush County Schools
> 
>     765-932-3901 x1171 <tel:(765)%20932-3901>
> 
>     iversons at rushville.k12.in.us <mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>
> 
>     ?
> 
>     Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     --
>     MailScanner mailing list
>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> 
> 
> ?
> 
> -- 
> 
> Shawn Iverson, CETL
> 
> Director of Technology
> 
> Rush County Schools
> 
> 765-932-3901 x1171
> 
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us <mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>
> 
> ?
> 
> Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From mark at msapiro.net  Wed Dec 13 22:57:25 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:57:25 -0800
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <050ca77c-b891-71ca-f692-692d54ed1f95@msapiro.net>
References: <050ca77c-b891-71ca-f692-692d54ed1f95@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <40af3e81-4c69-b3a4-2563-aa8bec5f7330@msapiro.net>

Mark Sapiro wrote:

> On 12/13/2017 01:32 PM, Eoin Kim wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>> 
...

Sorry for the noise. My fumble fingers apologize for the repost.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it  Wed Dec 13 22:58:49 2017
From: Antony.Stone at mailscanner.open.source.it (Antony Stone)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:58:49 +0100
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
Message-ID: <201712132358.50149.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>

On Wednesday 13 December 2017 at 23:36:54, Jerry Benton wrote:

> Because MailScanner does not use a proper milter for Postfix. Instead, it
> gets the email from a hold directory and drops it back in the Postfix
> queue.
> 
> 
> This is how it is supposed to work:
> 
> Postfix > milter > hold > scan > injection to Postfix > delivery
> 
> 
> This is how it actually works:
> 
> Postfix > hold > scan > drop into Postfix
> 
> 
> Technically, this is incorrect.

That's how it works with sendmail and Exim, too, so why do the postfix people 
say that this "will result in corruption or loss of mail"?

Has this been verified?


Antony.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.i
> n fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:34
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: postfix and mailscanner
> 
> Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does
> postfix.org advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on the
> postfix website:
> 
> mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This
> software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files
> directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The mailscanner
> authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API or protocol.
> 
> When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get lost as
> in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, and that it's
> safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that that uses the SMTP
> proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I wouldn't know if this is true or
> how to know if any mails every got lost(is there a way to know of having
> lost mails), but have there ever been talks between postfix devs and
> mailscanner devs about this?

-- 
The first fifty percent of an engineering project takes ninety percent of the 
time, and the remaining fifty percent takes another ninety percent of the time.

                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC me.

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Wed Dec 13 23:00:05 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:00:05 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <40af3e81-4c69-b3a4-2563-aa8bec5f7330@msapiro.net>
References: <050ca77c-b891-71ca-f692-692d54ed1f95@msapiro.net>
 <40af3e81-4c69-b3a4-2563-aa8bec5f7330@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <71c528d048bf4c638fe1865e12a7e524@rcst.com.au>

G'day Mark,

My bad, will cancel from next time. I tried to cancel via the link but it looks like already done by someone. Cheers.

Eoin

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro
Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 8:57 AM
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Mark Sapiro wrote:

> On 12/13/2017 01:32 PM, Eoin Kim wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>> 
...

Sorry for the noise. My fumble fingers apologize for the repost.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan


-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner


From jerry.benton at mailborder.com  Wed Dec 13 23:01:25 2017
From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:01:25 -0500
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <201712132358.50149.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
 <201712132358.50149.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
Message-ID: <01fa01d37466$4d47e580$e7d7b080$@mailborder.com>

Technically, it could because when putting back into the Postfix system you
are dropping it into a directory and not feeding it back in through and
outgoing milter. I have never seen it happen, but it is technically
possible. 


--
Jerry Benton
www.mailborder.com
+1   (843) 800-8605
+44 (020) 3883-8605


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.in
fo] On Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:59
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: Re: postfix and mailscanner

On Wednesday 13 December 2017 at 23:36:54, Jerry Benton wrote:

> Because MailScanner does not use a proper milter for Postfix. Instead, 
> it gets the email from a hold directory and drops it back in the 
> Postfix queue.
> 
> 
> This is how it is supposed to work:
> 
> Postfix > milter > hold > scan > injection to Postfix > delivery
> 
> 
> This is how it actually works:
> 
> Postfix > hold > scan > drop into Postfix
> 
> 
> Technically, this is incorrect.

That's how it works with sendmail and Exim, too, so why do the postfix
people say that this "will result in corruption or loss of mail"?

Has this been verified?


Antony.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscan
> ner.i
> n fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:34
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: postfix and mailscanner
> 
> Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does 
> postfix.org advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on the 
> postfix website:
> 
> mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This 
> software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files 
> directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The 
> mailscanner authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API or
protocol.
> 
> When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get 
> lost as in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, 
> and that it's safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that 
> that uses the SMTP proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I wouldn't 
> know if this is true or how to know if any mails every got lost(is 
> there a way to know of having lost mails), but have there ever been 
> talks between postfix devs and mailscanner devs about this?

--
The first fifty percent of an engineering project takes ninety percent of
the time, and the remaining fifty percent takes another ninety percent of
the time.

                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC
me.


--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



From mailinglists at feedmebits.nl  Wed Dec 13 23:12:03 2017
From: mailinglists at feedmebits.nl (Maarten)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:12:03 +0100
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <01fa01d37466$4d47e580$e7d7b080$@mailborder.com>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
 <201712132358.50149.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
 <01fa01d37466$4d47e580$e7d7b080$@mailborder.com>
Message-ID: <bd6e032f-dcb9-1821-c856-824b90bce067@feedmebits.nl>

How would you be able to tell if this every happened?


On 12/14/2017 12:01 AM, Jerry Benton wrote:
> Technically, it could because when putting back into the Postfix system you
> are dropping it into a directory and not feeding it back in through and
> outgoing milter. I have never seen it happen, but it is technically
> possible. 
>
>
> --
> Jerry Benton
> www.mailborder.com
> +1   (843) 800-8605
> +44 (020) 3883-8605
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.in
> fo] On Behalf Of Antony Stone
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:59
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: Re: postfix and mailscanner
>
> On Wednesday 13 December 2017 at 23:36:54, Jerry Benton wrote:
>
>> Because MailScanner does not use a proper milter for Postfix. Instead, 
>> it gets the email from a hold directory and drops it back in the 
>> Postfix queue.
>>
>>
>> This is how it is supposed to work:
>>
>> Postfix > milter > hold > scan > injection to Postfix > delivery
>>
>>
>> This is how it actually works:
>>
>> Postfix > hold > scan > drop into Postfix
>>
>>
>> Technically, this is incorrect.
> That's how it works with sendmail and Exim, too, so why do the postfix
> people say that this "will result in corruption or loss of mail"?
>
> Has this been verified?
>
>
> Antony.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner
>> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscan
>> ner.i
>> n fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:34
>> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> Subject: postfix and mailscanner
>>
>> Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does 
>> postfix.org advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on the 
>> postfix website:
>>
>> mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This 
>> software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files 
>> directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The 
>> mailscanner authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API or
> protocol.
>> When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get 
>> lost as in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, 
>> and that it's safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that 
>> that uses the SMTP proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I wouldn't 
>> know if this is true or how to know if any mails every got lost(is 
>> there a way to know of having lost mails), but have there ever been 
>> talks between postfix devs and mailscanner devs about this?
> --
> The first fifty percent of an engineering project takes ninety percent of
> the time, and the remaining fifty percent takes another ninety percent of
> the time.
>
>                                                    Please reply to the list;
>                                                          please *don't* CC
> me.
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>


From jerry.benton at mailborder.com  Wed Dec 13 23:14:17 2017
From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:14:17 -0500
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <bd6e032f-dcb9-1821-c856-824b90bce067@feedmebits.nl>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
 <201712132358.50149.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
 <01fa01d37466$4d47e580$e7d7b080$@mailborder.com>
 <bd6e032f-dcb9-1821-c856-824b90bce067@feedmebits.nl>
Message-ID: <01fb01d37468$19773560$4c65a020$@mailborder.com>

You would see corrupted email in Postfix's /var/spool/postfix/corrupt/
directory. Now that I think about it, I have seen corrupted emails before,
but I don't know if that was due to MailScanner or not. 


--
Jerry Benton
www.mailborder.com
+1   (843) 800-8605
+44 (020) 3883-8605


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.in
fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 18:12
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: Re: postfix and mailscanner

How would you be able to tell if this every happened?


On 12/14/2017 12:01 AM, Jerry Benton wrote:
> Technically, it could because when putting back into the Postfix 
> system you are dropping it into a directory and not feeding it back in 
> through and outgoing milter. I have never seen it happen, but it is 
> technically possible.
>
>
> --
> Jerry Benton
> www.mailborder.com
> +1   (843) 800-8605
> +44 (020) 3883-8605
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscan
> ner.in
> fo] On Behalf Of Antony Stone
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:59
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: Re: postfix and mailscanner
>
> On Wednesday 13 December 2017 at 23:36:54, Jerry Benton wrote:
>
>> Because MailScanner does not use a proper milter for Postfix. 
>> Instead, it gets the email from a hold directory and drops it back in 
>> the Postfix queue.
>>
>>
>> This is how it is supposed to work:
>>
>> Postfix > milter > hold > scan > injection to Postfix > delivery
>>
>>
>> This is how it actually works:
>>
>> Postfix > hold > scan > drop into Postfix
>>
>>
>> Technically, this is incorrect.
> That's how it works with sendmail and Exim, too, so why do the postfix 
> people say that this "will result in corruption or loss of mail"?
>
> Has this been verified?
>
>
> Antony.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner
>> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailsca
>> n
>> ner.i
>> n fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:34
>> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> Subject: postfix and mailscanner
>>
>> Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does 
>> postfix.org advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on 
>> the postfix website:
>>
>> mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This 
>> software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files 
>> directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The 
>> mailscanner authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API 
>> or
> protocol.
>> When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get 
>> lost as in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, 
>> and that it's safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that 
>> that uses the SMTP proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I 
>> wouldn't know if this is true or how to know if any mails every got 
>> lost(is there a way to know of having lost mails), but have there 
>> ever been talks between postfix devs and mailscanner devs about this?
> --
> The first fifty percent of an engineering project takes ninety percent 
> of the time, and the remaining fifty percent takes another ninety 
> percent of the time.
>
>                                                    Please reply to the
list;
>                                                          please 
> *don't* CC me.
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



From mark at msapiro.net  Wed Dec 13 23:36:38 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:36:38 -0800
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <201712132358.50149.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
 <201712132358.50149.Antony.Stone@mailscanner.open.source.it>
Message-ID: <7655fadb-871e-d780-7f9a-01d54da674b3@msapiro.net>

On 12/13/2017 02:58 PM, Antony Stone wrote:
> 
> That's how it works with sendmail and Exim, too, so why do the postfix people 
> say that this "will result in corruption or loss of mail"?
> 
> Has this been verified?


I have never seen lost mail. If you look at mail logs you will see that
mail arrives and Postfix puts it in 'hold'. Then MailScanner picks it up
and processes it and may decide to do things other than send it, but if
MailScanner wants to send it , it logs a 'requeue' to 'incoming' and
then Postfix picks it up and sends it.

This is a typical sequence where MailScanner doesn't forward the message
(maybe just quarantines it) Some domains elided to get past outgoing
MailScanner.

> Dec 10 06:51:23 sbh16 postfix/cleanup[1564]: AB06E11E00AA: hold: header Received: from xxx (unknown [195.110.8.16])??by sbh16.songbird.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB06E11E00AA??for <gpc-talk-bounces at grizz.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 06:51:23 -0800 (PST) from unknown[195.110.8.16]; from=<24627-23098-114862-4267-gpc+2Dtalk+2Dbounces=grizz.org at xxx> to=<gpc-talk-bounces at grizz.org> proto=ESMTP helo=<xxx>
> Dec 10 06:51:23 sbh16 postfix/cleanup[1564]: AB06E11E00AA: message-id=<xkzo9tw76j4sneie-vb39shkcs08ecdeb-5a3a-1c0ae at xxx>
> Dec 10 06:51:24 sbh16 postfix/smtpd[1560]: disconnect from unknown[195.110.8.16] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=5
> Dec 10 06:51:24 sbh16 MailScanner[32550]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 9709 bytes
> Dec 10 06:51:24 sbh16 MailScanner[32550]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> Dec 10 06:51:24 sbh16 MailScanner[32550]: Expired 3 records from the SpamAssassin cache
> Dec 10 06:51:25 sbh16 MailScanner[32550]: Spam Checks: Found 1 spam messages
> Dec 10 06:51:25 sbh16 MailScanner[32550]: Deleted 1 messages from processing-database

and here's a sequence where MailScanner has disarmed a web bug but
delivered the message.

> Dec 10 07:23:11 sbh16 postfix/cleanup[2738]: 25E7011E00AA: hold: header Received: from mail68.sea31.mcsv.net (mail68.sea31.mcsv.net [148.105.11.68])??by sbh16.songbird.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E7011E00AA??for <mark at msapiro.net>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:23:11 -0800 (PST) from mail68.sea31.mcsv.net[148.105.11.68]; from=<bounce-mc.us3_26220743.447333-mark=msapiro.net at mail68.sea31.mcsv.net> to=<mark at msapiro.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail68.sea31.mcsv.net>
> Dec 10 07:23:11 sbh16 postfix/cleanup[2738]: 25E7011E00AA: message-id=<db088e2fe4b36d883bb5c738c.3ab7989af6.20171210150720.6e1689ce64.6688e039 at mail68.sea31.mcsv.net>
> Dec 10 07:23:11 sbh16 opendkim[1920]: 25E7011E00AA: signature=r+iJbEQD domain=mail68.sea31.mcsv.net selector=k1 result="no signature error"
> Dec 10 07:23:11 sbh16 opendkim[1920]: 25E7011E00AA: DKIM verification successful
> Dec 10 07:23:11 sbh16 opendkim[1920]: 25E7011E00AA: s=k1 d=mail68.sea31.mcsv.net SSL
> Dec 10 07:23:11 sbh16 postfix/smtpd[2735]: disconnect from mail68.sea31.mcsv.net[148.105.11.68] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=5
> Dec 10 07:23:16 sbh16 MailScanner[2322]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 113205 bytes
> Dec 10 07:23:16 sbh16 MailScanner[2322]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 MailScanner[2322]: Content Checks: Detected and have disarmed web bug tags in HTML message in 25E7011E00AA.AE29E from bounce-mc.us3_26220743.447333-mark=msapiro.net at mail68.sea31.mcsv.net
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 MailScanner[2322]: Requeue: 25E7011E00AA.AE29E to EFAF711E0114
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 MailScanner[2322]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 postfix/qmgr[2800]: EFAF711E0114: from=<bounce-mc.us3_26220743.447333-mark=msapiro.net at mail68.sea31.mcsv.net>, size=112060, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 MailScanner[2322]: Deleted 1 messages from processing-database
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 postfix/local[2750]: EFAF711E0114: to=<mark at sbh16.songbird.com>, orig_to=<mark at msapiro.net>, relay=local, delay=7.8, delays=7.8/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 postfix/qmgr[2800]: EFAF711E0114: removed

I suppose one could write some kind of script to ignore 'normal
sequences like

> Dec 10 07:23:11 sbh16 postfix/cleanup[2738]: 25E7011E00AA: hold: header Received: ...
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 MailScanner[2322]: Requeue: 25E7011E00AA.AE29E to EFAF711E0114
> Dec 10 07:23:18 sbh16 postfix/qmgr[2800]: EFAF711E0114: from=...

or

> Dec 10 06:51:23 sbh16 postfix/cleanup[1564]: AB06E11E00AA: hold: header Received: ...

followed by messages like

> Dec 10 06:51:25 sbh16 MailScanner[32550]: Spam Checks: Found 1 spam messages

or things like 'Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses' and/or 'Saved entire
message to'

and see if there are any others.

Years ago, when I first started using MailScanner, I saw rare
occurrences of duplicate messages and I reduced the number of
MailScanner children from five to one, and haven't seen any problems
since. To the best of my knowledge, I've never seen MailScanner lose a
message.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From iversons at rushville.k12.in.us  Wed Dec 13 23:49:57 2017
From: iversons at rushville.k12.in.us (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:49:57 -0500
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
Message-ID: <CABu_8zLudr66TiXSRoy=+mddCn0br0pX4HCsP1g8PYq5HGiPuQ@mail.gmail.com>

For anyone curious, I am researching creating a mailscanner milter for
postfix.  I have gotten as far to conclude it is possible and that it might
bring additional functionality when using postfix and mailscanner
together.  For example, it would be possible to reject a message for
various reasons and still have detailed reports on the messages.  It would
also be possible to have more granular whitelisting capabilities (virus
scan only, spam scan only, no scan, etc.).  It is a ways off, but I've been
looking at milter code on various things for a while.

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Jerry Benton <jerry.benton at mailborder.com>
wrote:

> Because MailScanner does not use a proper milter for Postfix. Instead, it
> gets the email from a hold directory and drops it back in the Postfix
> queue.
>
>
> This is how it is supposed to work:
>
> Postfix > milter > hold > scan > injection to Postfix > delivery
>
>
> This is how it actually works:
>
> Postfix > hold > scan > drop into Postfix
>
>
> Technically, this is incorrect.
>
>
> --
> Jerry Benton
> www.mailborder.com
> +1 (843) 800-8605
> +44 (020) 3883-8605
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com@
> lists.mailscanner.in
> fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:34
> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: postfix and mailscanner
>
> Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does
> postfix.org advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on the
> postfix website:
>
> mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This
> software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files
> directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The mailscanner
> authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API or protocol.
>
> When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get lost as
> in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, and that it's
> safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that that uses the SMTP
> proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I wouldn't know if this is true or
> how to know if any mails every got lost(is there a way to know of having
> lost mails), but have there ever been talks between postfix devs and
> mailscanner devs about this?
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/0dc30612/attachment.html>

From jerry.benton at mailborder.com  Thu Dec 14 00:05:19 2017
From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:05:19 -0500
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zLudr66TiXSRoy=+mddCn0br0pX4HCsP1g8PYq5HGiPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
 <CABu_8zLudr66TiXSRoy=+mddCn0br0pX4HCsP1g8PYq5HGiPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <023601d3746f$3afe42d0$b0fac870$@mailborder.com>

It is possible. I have written one for Mailborder v5 in PHP. I have gone so far as to write an entire new scanning engine in C and PHP as well for Mailborder v5. The milter won?t work with MailScanner because it is designed to work with the upcoming Mailborder scan engine, but I can share some information to help build a MailScanner milter. 

 

 

--

Jerry Benton

 <http://www.mailborder.com/> www.mailborder.com
+1   (843) 800-8605

+44 (020) 3883-8605



 

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 18:50
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: Re: postfix and mailscanner

 

For anyone curious, I am researching creating a mailscanner milter for postfix.  I have gotten as far to conclude it is possible and that it might bring additional functionality when using postfix and mailscanner together.  For example, it would be possible to reject a message for various reasons and still have detailed reports on the messages.  It would also be possible to have more granular whitelisting capabilities (virus scan only, spam scan only, no scan, etc.).  It is a ways off, but I've been looking at milter code on various things for a while.

 

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Jerry Benton <jerry.benton at mailborder.com <mailto:jerry.benton at mailborder.com> > wrote:

Because MailScanner does not use a proper milter for Postfix. Instead, it
gets the email from a hold directory and drops it back in the Postfix queue.


This is how it is supposed to work:

Postfix > milter > hold > scan > injection to Postfix > delivery


This is how it actually works:

Postfix > hold > scan > drop into Postfix


Technically, this is incorrect.


--
Jerry Benton
www.mailborder.com <http://www.mailborder.com> 
+1 (843) 800-8605 <tel:%2B1%20%20%20%28843%29%20800-8605> 
+44 (020) 3883-8605 <tel:%2B44%20%28020%29%203883-8605> 


-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton <mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Bjerry.benton> =mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.in <mailto:mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.in> 
fo] On Behalf Of Maarten
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 17:34
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> >
Subject: postfix and mailscanner

Don't want to start a flame war here, but just a question, why does
postfix.org <http://postfix.org>  advise against using mailscanner? Saw the following on the
postfix website:

mailscanner: system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. WARNING: This
software uses unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files
directly. This will result in corruption or loss of mail. The mailscanner
authors have sofar refused to discuss a proper access API or protocol.

When reading through mailinglists it seems that some mails can get lost as
in how mailscanner handles mail from the postfix mailqueue, and that it's
safer to use one of the virus/spam/content filters that that uses the SMTP
proxy interface or the Milter Interface. I wouldn't know if this is true or
how to know if any mails every got lost(is there a way to know of having
lost mails), but have there ever been talks between postfix devs and
mailscanner devs about this?




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner





 

-- 

Shawn Iverson, CETL

Director of Technology

Rush County Schools

765-932-3901 x1171

iversons at rushville.k12.in.us <mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> 

 

  <https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ>   <https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171213/5056ac90/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Thu Dec 14 00:21:51 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:21:51 -0800
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zLudr66TiXSRoy=+mddCn0br0pX4HCsP1g8PYq5HGiPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
 <CABu_8zLudr66TiXSRoy=+mddCn0br0pX4HCsP1g8PYq5HGiPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bcc0672e-8b7f-a324-098a-304b2a17046e@msapiro.net>

On 12/13/2017 03:49 PM, Shawn Iverson wrote:
> For anyone curious, I am researching creating a mailscanner milter for
> postfix.? I have gotten as far to conclude it is possible and that it
> might bring additional functionality when using postfix and mailscanner
> together.? For example, it would be possible to reject a message for
> various reasons and still have detailed reports on the messages.


I think this is great Shawn. The ability to reject mail at incoming SMTP
time is the one single thing that I find lacking in MailScanner.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Thu Dec 14 02:01:46 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:01:46 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>

Hi Shawn,

Just wonder if you require further information regarding this. Thanks.

Eoin

From: Eoin Kim
Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi Shawn,

I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is missing.

#Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or App::cpanminus in unattended install
    perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
        clear
        echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
        timewait 1
        if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
            perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
        else
            cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
        fi
    fi

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim<mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Beoin.kim>=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So, here?s what I did step by step:

  1.  Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
  2.  Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl
  3.  Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
  4.  Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.

--> Working on Digest::SHA1
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
1 distribution installed
Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...

--> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
FAIL

It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com<http://mx1.bne.lab.boof.com> 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/54a6a023/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/54a6a023/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/54a6a023/attachment-0003.jpg>

From manuel at palachuk.com  Thu Dec 14 16:00:39 2017
From: manuel at palachuk.com (=?utf-8?Q?Manuel_Palachuk?=)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:00:39 -0500
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by mailscanner
Message-ID: <kcim.5a32a027.18d8.3b8426396809c1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>

Hello,



I have several domains in postfix and all are sending and receiving email fine.

Mailscanner is installed with a very standard setup with basic install as indicated on the mailscanner setup page.

i see inbound email in mail.log being scanned by mailscanner, and is tagging emails as it should for all domains except one.



One domain is receiving large numbers of spam emails and it appears that mailscanner is not tagging those emails as it does for all other domains.

The emails are blatant spam that always gets tagged for other recipient domains.



how do I troubleshoot one domain not having it's emails tagged?



Thank you





Manuel Palachuk <mailto:Manuel at Palachuk.com?subject=Let%27s%20get%20to%20the%20next%20level%21>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/bb8beb2f/attachment.html>

From jerry.benton at mailborder.com  Thu Dec 14 18:17:19 2017
From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:17:19 -0500
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by
 mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <kcim.5a32a027.18d8.3b8426396809c1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>
References: <kcim.5a32a027.18d8.3b8426396809c1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>
Message-ID: <004401d37507$c75f2a80$561d7f80$@mailborder.com>

Is that domain actually going through the server? Unless you have configured it to do so, it is not going to pick and choose what it decides to scan for destination domains. 

 

 

--

Jerry Benton

 <http://www.mailborder.com/> www.mailborder.com
+1   (843) 800-8605

+44 (020) 3883-8605



 

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+jerry.benton=mailborder.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Manuel Palachuk via MailScanner
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 11:01
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Cc: Manuel Palachuk <manuel at palachuk.com>
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by mailscanner

 

Hello,

 

I have several domains in postfix and all are sending and receiving email fine.

Mailscanner is installed with a very standard setup with basic install as indicated on the mailscanner setup page.

i see inbound email in mail.log being scanned by mailscanner, and is tagging emails as it should for all domains except one.

 

One domain is receiving large numbers of spam emails and it appears that mailscanner is not tagging those emails as it does for all other domains.

The emails are blatant spam that always gets tagged for other recipient domains.

 

how do I troubleshoot one domain not having it's emails tagged?

 

Thank you

 

Manuel Palachuk <mailto:Manuel at Palachuk.com?subject=Let%27s%20get%20to%20the%20next%20level%21> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/bcbd3180/attachment.html>

From kevin.miller at juneau.org  Thu Dec 14 18:22:00 2017
From: kevin.miller at juneau.org (Kevin Miller)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:22:00 +0000
Subject: postfix and mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zLudr66TiXSRoy=+mddCn0br0pX4HCsP1g8PYq5HGiPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <40ecb8f5-7bb6-1810-70a3-31df268ed267@feedmebits.nl>
 <01f401d37462$e0a122f0$a1e368d0$@mailborder.com>
 <CABu_8zLudr66TiXSRoy=+mddCn0br0pX4HCsP1g8PYq5HGiPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e4339e29741d45738f637e13268c94e7@City-Exch-DB2.cbj.local>

I vaguely recall some discussion about that from probably 10 or more years ago.  IIRC, Jules? steered away from that sort of approach, as it was called for each message.  He specifically designed MailScanner to work on batches for more efficiency.  I have no idea where the bell curve falls between the two.  With a low level volume it probably doesn?t make much difference but with a very large number of messages coming in there?s probably some efficiencies to be gained.  But with today?s hardware and memory available, it may be a wash.

I run MailScanner and Postfix and have never had a problem (that I know of).  I also reject a lot of mail at MTA time via greylisting, RBLs, SPF, and lack of full circle reverse DNS.  That means, of course, that if one of my users asked if mail was mis-identified as spam that I have to first check MailScanner (via the Mailwtch interface) and if I don?t see it there, jump onto the CLI and grep mail.log for filtered mail.  No biggie, but one stop shopping would be a welcome addition?

...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 307357

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+kevin.miller=juneau.org at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 2:50 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion
Subject: Re: postfix and mailscanner

For anyone curious, I am researching creating a mailscanner milter for postfix.  I have gotten as far to conclude it is possible and that it might bring additional functionality when using postfix and mailscanner together.  For example, it would be possible to reject a message for various reasons and still have detailed reports on the messages.  It would also be possible to have more granular whitelisting capabilities (virus scan only, spam scan only, no scan, etc.).  It is a ways off, but I've been looking at milter code on various things for a while.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/b03d244c/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Thu Dec 14 18:55:00 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:55:00 -0800
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by
 mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <kcim.5a32a027.18d8.3b8426396809c1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>
References: <kcim.5a32a027.18d8.3b8426396809c1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>
Message-ID: <15c4ebf0-512f-9ac2-54df-8d11eb0ae2d7@msapiro.net>

On 12/14/2017 08:00 AM, Manuel Palachuk via MailScanner wrote:
> 
> One domain is receiving large numbers of spam emails and it appears that
> mailscanner is not tagging those emails as it does for all other domains.
> 
> The emails are blatant spam that always gets tagged for other recipient
> domains.


Do you have any rulesets configured for settings like Scan Messages or
Spam Checks?


-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From iversons at rushville.k12.in.us  Thu Dec 14 19:06:28 2017
From: iversons at rushville.k12.in.us (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:06:28 -0500
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
 <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <CABu_8zKnBcFA=MgFeY1Xz-u4dJKNJATdZj5HMpDfrg8+5_Q+HQ@mail.gmail.com>

Not yet, I am going to look into it more this evening.  I am thinking cpanm
not doing a force may be the culprit as you suggest.  It is only called
when using the flags to automate cpan perl module compilation.  SA tests
can fail for stupid reasons that won't actually affect the installation.

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Shawn,
>
>
>
> Just wonder if you require further information regarding this. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* Eoin Kim
> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
>
>
> The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this
> is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+
> eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Eoin,
>
>
>
> If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the
> prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
>
>
> I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is
> missing.
>
>
>
> #Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or
> App::cpanminus in unattended install
>
>     perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
>
>     if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>
>         clear
>
>         echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
>
>         timewait 1
>
>         if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
>
>             perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
>
>         else
>
>             cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
>
>         fi
>
>     fi
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=
> rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
>
>
> My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So,
> here?s what I did step by step:
>
>    1. Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo
>    apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>    2. Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl,
>    libnet-patricia-perl
>    3. Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
>    4. Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>    --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>
>
>
> During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.
>
>
>
> --> Working on Digest::SHA1
>
> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz
> ... OK
>
> Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>
> Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>
> Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
>
> 1 distribution installed
>
> Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...
>
>
>
> --> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
>
> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/
> Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
>
> Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
>
> Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing
> Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log
> for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
>
> FAIL
>
>
>
> It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the
> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.
>
>
>
> Test Summary Report
>
> -------------------
>
> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>
>   Failed tests:  1-2
>
>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>
> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>
> Result: FAIL
>
> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>
> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>
> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
> --force to force install it.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+
> eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Sorry for flying emails but I used this file -
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz
>
>
>
> I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+
> eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Thanks Shawn,
>
>
>
> I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get
> update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>
>
>
> sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$ uname -a
>
> Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2
> (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
>
> Eoin
>
>
>
> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+
> eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>
>
>
> Eoin,
>
>
>
> I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it
> looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log
> message.
>
>
>
> Test Summary Report
>
> -------------------
>
> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>
>   Failed tests:  1-2
>
>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>
> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>
> Result: FAIL
>
> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>
> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>
> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
> --force to force install it.
>
>
>
> I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
> --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>
>
>
> What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this?
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
>
> *Eoin Kim*
>
> Systems Administrator
>
>
>
> *RCS Telecommunications *
>
> Level 1 ? The Annexe
>
> 133 Mary Street
>
> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
>
> Office:   07 3228 0843
>
> Mobile: 0419 726 231
>
>
>
> [image: RCST logo drop shadow]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>
> Director of Technology
>
> Rush County Schools
>
> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>
> Director of Technology
>
> Rush County Schools
>
> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/d09d7f0a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/d09d7f0a/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171214/d09d7f0a/attachment-0001.jpg>

From manuel at palachuk.com  Fri Dec 15 18:19:24 2017
From: manuel at palachuk.com (=?utf-8?Q?Manuel_Palachuk?=)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:19:24 -0500
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by
 mailscanner
Message-ID: <kcim.5a34122c.5b3e.6df8682d4c54c74b@email.mp-intnl.com>

Hello again,



Jerry,



This is where the MailScanner noob decided to get some help. :)

I do believe that domain is being scanned in and outbound email for all domains ins including domainX (the one that is not having it's email subjects tagged as spam).

I verified both inbound and outbound emails have the MailScanner footer embedded in the email.



As to whether the mailscanner is "configured", again, I followed the basic instructions from the Postfix Quickstart and it just worked.

My understanding was that if it comes into Postfix, MailScanner is going to scan it.

---



Mark,



I verified both of these settings:

Virus Scanning = yes
Scan Messages = yes



No filename nor ruleset referenced.



I've included the output of MailScanner -lint below. Everything seems to be working fine there.



Thank you for taking the time.



Manuel Palachuk

Manuel at Palachuk.com

=================



# MailScanner -lint
Trying to setlogsock(unix)

Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf
Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README
Read 1500 hostnames from the phishing whitelist
Read 12814 hostnames from the phishing blacklists

Checking version numbers...
Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.0.6) is correct.

Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct.
MailScanner setting GID to? (120)
MailScanner setting UID to? (115)

Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)...
Using SpamAssassin results cache
Connected to SpamAssassin cache database
SpamAssassin reported no errors.
Auto: Found virus scanners: clamd
Connected to Processing Attempts Database
Created Processing Attempts Database successfully
There are 0 messages in the Processing Attempts Database
Using locktype = posix
MailScanner.conf says "Virus Scanners = auto"
Found these virus scanners installed: clamd
===========================================================================
Filename Checks: Windows/DOS Executable (1 eicar.com)
Other Checks: Found 1 problems
Virus and Content Scanning: Starting
Clamd::INFECTED:: Eicar-Test-Signature :: ./1/eicar.com
Virus Scanning: Clamd found 1 infections
Infected message 1 came from 10.1.1.1
Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses
===========================================================================
Virus Scanner test reports:Clamd
 said "eicar.com was infected: Eicar-Test-Signature"

If any of your virus scanners (clamd)
are not listed there, you should check that they are installed correctly
and that MailScanner is finding them correctly via its virus.scanners.conf.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/0af16215/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Fri Dec 15 18:42:28 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:42:28 -0800
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by
 mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <kcim.5a34122c.5b3e.6df8682d4c54c74b@email.mp-intnl.com>
References: <kcim.5a34122c.5b3e.6df8682d4c54c74b@email.mp-intnl.com>
Message-ID: <da499f93-fbcb-5638-f205-48a34e6d11ff@msapiro.net>

On 12/15/2017 10:19 AM, Manuel Palachuk via MailScanner wrote:
> 
> I verified both of these settings:
> 
> Virus Scanning = yes
> Scan Messages = yes


Find a message arriving for the one domain in the mail log. Then grep
the log for the Postfix queue ID of that message. What is the result?

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From iversons at rushville.k12.in.us  Fri Dec 15 21:32:54 2017
From: iversons at rushville.k12.in.us (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:32:54 -0500
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zKnBcFA=MgFeY1Xz-u4dJKNJATdZj5HMpDfrg8+5_Q+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
 <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zKnBcFA=MgFeY1Xz-u4dJKNJATdZj5HMpDfrg8+5_Q+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABu_8zJ_0_miKUrwX5ZF2suVwDiKQD_ww18esWSUXKdC0wRXTg@mail.gmail.com>

Follow up on this...

I installed on Debian 8 and MailScanner with and without the flags and
spamassassin installed successfully.

I did get the two dubious test failures each way, but spamassassin
successfully compiled and installed.

My MailScanner --lint test shows good.

SpamAssassin reported no errors.


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
> wrote:

> Not yet, I am going to look into it more this evening.  I am thinking
> cpanm not doing a force may be the culprit as you suggest.  It is only
> called when using the flags to automate cpan perl module compilation.  SA
> tests can fail for stupid reasons that won't actually affect the
> installation.
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>>
>>
>> Just wonder if you require further information regarding this. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Eoin Kim
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>>
>>
>> The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this
>> is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin,
>>
>>
>>
>> If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the
>> prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>>
>>
>> I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is
>> missing.
>>
>>
>>
>> #Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or
>> App::cpanminus in unattended install
>>
>>     perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
>>
>>     if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>>
>>         clear
>>
>>         echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
>>
>>         timewait 1
>>
>>         if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
>>
>>             perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
>>
>>         else
>>
>>             cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
>>
>>         fi
>>
>>     fi
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=
>> rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>>
>>
>> My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So,
>> here?s what I did step by step:
>>
>>    1. Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo
>>    apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>>    2. Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl,
>>    libnet-patricia-perl
>>    3. Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
>>    4. Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>>    --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>>
>>
>>
>> During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.
>>
>>
>>
>> --> Working on Digest::SHA1
>>
>> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz
>> ... OK
>>
>> Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>>
>> Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>>
>> Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
>>
>> 1 distribution installed
>>
>> Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...
>>
>>
>>
>> --> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
>>
>> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Ma
>> il-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
>>
>> Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
>>
>> Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing
>> Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log
>> for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
>>
>> FAIL
>>
>>
>>
>> It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the
>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.
>>
>>
>>
>> Test Summary Report
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>>
>>   Failed tests:  1-2
>>
>>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>>
>>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>>
>> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
>> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>>
>> Result: FAIL
>>
>> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>>
>> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>>
>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>>
>> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>> --force to force install it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry for flying emails but I used this file -
>> https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz
>>
>>
>>
>> I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Shawn,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get
>> update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>>
>>
>>
>> sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$ uname
>> -a
>>
>> Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2
>> (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it
>> looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log
>> message.
>>
>>
>>
>> Test Summary Report
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>>
>>   Failed tests:  1-2
>>
>>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>>
>>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>>
>> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
>> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>>
>> Result: FAIL
>>
>> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>>
>> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>>
>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>>
>> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>> --force to force install it.
>>
>>
>>
>> I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>> --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>>
>>
>>
>> What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this?
>> Thanks a lot.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Eoin Kim*
>>
>> Systems Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> *RCS Telecommunications *
>>
>> Level 1 ? The Annexe
>>
>> 133 Mary Street
>>
>> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
>>
>> Office:   07 3228 0843
>>
>> Mobile: 0419 726 231
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: RCST logo drop shadow]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>>
>> Director of Technology
>>
>> Rush County Schools
>>
>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>>
>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>>
>> Director of Technology
>>
>> Rush County Schools
>>
>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>>
>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shawn Iverson, CETL
> Director of Technology
> Rush County Schools
> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/04b20fdf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/04b20fdf/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/04b20fdf/attachment-0001.jpg>

From iversons at rushville.k12.in.us  Fri Dec 15 21:34:18 2017
From: iversons at rushville.k12.in.us (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:34:18 -0500
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zJ_0_miKUrwX5ZF2suVwDiKQD_ww18esWSUXKdC0wRXTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
 <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zKnBcFA=MgFeY1Xz-u4dJKNJATdZj5HMpDfrg8+5_Q+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABu_8zJ_0_miKUrwX5ZF2suVwDiKQD_ww18esWSUXKdC0wRXTg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABu_8zKH2T=Li1ffzQGGpoW=KiiToqA6NDvuYbLAgABYbW3-WQ@mail.gmail.com>

Despite that, I am going to add --force to cpanm in install.sh, just to
improve the chances of a successful install.

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
> wrote:

> Follow up on this...
>
> I installed on Debian 8 and MailScanner with and without the flags and
> spamassassin installed successfully.
>
> I did get the two dubious test failures each way, but spamassassin
> successfully compiled and installed.
>
> My MailScanner --lint test shows good.
>
> SpamAssassin reported no errors.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Shawn Iverson <
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> wrote:
>
>> Not yet, I am going to look into it more this evening.  I am thinking
>> cpanm not doing a force may be the culprit as you suggest.  It is only
>> called when using the flags to automate cpan perl module compilation.  SA
>> tests can fail for stupid reasons that won't actually affect the
>> installation.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just wonder if you require further information regarding this. Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Eoin Kim
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this
>>> is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the
>>> prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is
>>> missing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> #Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or
>>> App::cpanminus in unattended install
>>>
>>>     perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
>>>
>>>     if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>>>
>>>         clear
>>>
>>>         echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
>>>
>>>         timewait 1
>>>
>>>         if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
>>>
>>>             perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
>>>
>>>         else
>>>
>>>             cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
>>>
>>>         fi
>>>
>>>     fi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=
>>> rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So,
>>> here?s what I did step by step:
>>>
>>>    1. Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo
>>>    apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>>>    2. Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl,
>>>    libnet-patricia-perl
>>>    3. Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
>>>    4. Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>>>    --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --> Working on Digest::SHA1
>>>
>>> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.ta
>>> r.gz ... OK
>>>
>>> Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>>>
>>> Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>>>
>>> Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
>>>
>>> 1 distribution installed
>>>
>>> Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
>>>
>>> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Ma
>>> il-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
>>>
>>> Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
>>>
>>> Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing
>>> Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log
>>> for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
>>>
>>> FAIL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the
>>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this
>>> shows.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Test Summary Report
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>>>
>>>   Failed tests:  1-2
>>>
>>>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>>>
>>>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>>>
>>> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
>>> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>>>
>>> Result: FAIL
>>>
>>> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>>>
>>> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>>>
>>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>>>
>>> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>>> --force to force install it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for flying emails but I used this file -
>>> https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Shawn,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get
>>> update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$ uname
>>> -a
>>>
>>> Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2
>>> (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eoin,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and
>>> it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log
>>> message.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Test Summary Report
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>>>
>>>   Failed tests:  1-2
>>>
>>>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>>>
>>>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>>>
>>> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
>>> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>>>
>>> Result: FAIL
>>>
>>> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>>>
>>> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>>>
>>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>>>
>>> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>>> --force to force install it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>>> --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this?
>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Eoin Kim*
>>>
>>> Systems Administrator
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *RCS Telecommunications *
>>>
>>> Level 1 ? The Annexe
>>>
>>> 133 Mary Street
>>>
>>> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
>>>
>>> Office:   07 3228 0843
>>>
>>> Mobile: 0419 726 231
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: RCST logo drop shadow]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>>>
>>> Director of Technology
>>>
>>> Rush County Schools
>>>
>>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>>>
>>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>>>
>>> Director of Technology
>>>
>>> Rush County Schools
>>>
>>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>>>
>>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>> Director of Technology
>> Rush County Schools
>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shawn Iverson, CETL
> Director of Technology
> Rush County Schools
> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/c724ad10/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/c724ad10/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/c724ad10/attachment-0003.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Fri Dec 15 21:37:40 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:37:40 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zKH2T=Li1ffzQGGpoW=KiiToqA6NDvuYbLAgABYbW3-WQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
 <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zKnBcFA=MgFeY1Xz-u4dJKNJATdZj5HMpDfrg8+5_Q+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABu_8zJ_0_miKUrwX5ZF2suVwDiKQD_ww18esWSUXKdC0wRXTg@mail.gmail.com>,
 <CABu_8zKH2T=Li1ffzQGGpoW=KiiToqA6NDvuYbLAgABYbW3-WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ll5robxhkvkgpqck7tyhq68l.1513373858583@email.android.com>

Hi Shawn,

What about the log message? Did it show the same as my case even though the installation was okay with flags? Cheers.

Eoin

Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> wrote:



Despite that, I am going to add --force to cpanm in install.sh, just to improve the chances of a successful install.

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>> wrote:
Follow up on this...

I installed on Debian 8 and MailScanner with and without the flags and spamassassin installed successfully.

I did get the two dubious test failures each way, but spamassassin successfully compiled and installed.

My MailScanner --lint test shows good.

SpamAssassin reported no errors.


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>> wrote:
Not yet, I am going to look into it more this evening.  I am thinking cpanm not doing a force may be the culprit as you suggest.  It is only called when using the flags to automate cpan perl module compilation.  SA tests can fail for stupid reasons that won't actually affect the installation.

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi Shawn,

Just wonder if you require further information regarding this. Thanks.

Eoin

From: Eoin Kim
Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi Shawn,

I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is missing.

#Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or App::cpanminus in unattended install
    perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
        clear
        echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
        timewait 1
        if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
            perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
        else
            cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
        fi
    fi

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim<mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Beoin.kim>=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So, here?s what I did step by step:

  1.  Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
  2.  Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl
  3.  Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
  4.  Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.

--> Working on Digest::SHA1
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
1 distribution installed
Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...

--> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
FAIL

It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com<http://mx1.bne.lab.boof.com> 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner





--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ][https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ]



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ][https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ]



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ][https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/0bca8afd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/0bca8afd/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/0bca8afd/attachment-0001.jpg>

From iversons at rushville.k12.in.us  Fri Dec 15 22:29:43 2017
From: iversons at rushville.k12.in.us (Shawn Iverson)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:29:43 -0500
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <ll5robxhkvkgpqck7tyhq68l.1513373858583@email.android.com>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
 <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zKnBcFA=MgFeY1Xz-u4dJKNJATdZj5HMpDfrg8+5_Q+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABu_8zJ_0_miKUrwX5ZF2suVwDiKQD_ww18esWSUXKdC0wRXTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABu_8zKH2T=Li1ffzQGGpoW=KiiToqA6NDvuYbLAgABYbW3-WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ll5robxhkvkgpqck7tyhq68l.1513373858583@email.android.com>
Message-ID: <CABu_8zKqw=AL6rfb1rDmrQmTeGwmvakx0xmEJNuX2MX=PyF4Dg@mail.gmail.com>

t/sa_check_spamd.t ................ ok
# Failed test 1 in t/sa_compile.t at line 149
        Not found: FOO =  check: tests=FOO  at t/sa_compile.t line 150.
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 755
'/root/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1-mWwPC3/t/log/d.sa_compile/inst.basic/
foo//local/bin/sa-compile --keep-tmps' failed: DIED, signal 127
(fffffffffffffff
f) at t/SATest.pm line 991.
t/sa_compile.t ....................
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 5/5 subtests
t/sha1.t .......................... ok


On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Shawn,
>
> What about the log message? Did it show the same as my case even though the installation was okay with flags? Cheers.
>
> Eoin
>
> Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> wrote:
>
>
> Despite that, I am going to add --force to cpanm in install.sh, just to
> improve the chances of a successful install.
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Shawn Iverson <
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> wrote:
>
>> Follow up on this...
>>
>> I installed on Debian 8 and MailScanner with and without the flags and
>> spamassassin installed successfully.
>>
>> I did get the two dubious test failures each way, but spamassassin
>> successfully compiled and installed.
>>
>> My MailScanner --lint test shows good.
>>
>> SpamAssassin reported no errors.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Shawn Iverson <
>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Not yet, I am going to look into it more this evening.  I am thinking
>>> cpanm not doing a force may be the culprit as you suggest.  It is only
>>> called when using the flags to automate cpan perl module compilation.  SA
>>> tests can fail for stupid reasons that won't actually affect the
>>> installation.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just wonder if you require further information regarding this. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Eoin Kim
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
>>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if
>>>> this is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
>>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the
>>>> prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is
>>>> missing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or
>>>> App::cpanminus in unattended install
>>>>
>>>>     perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
>>>>
>>>>     if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>>>>
>>>>         clear
>>>>
>>>>         echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
>>>>
>>>>         timewait 1
>>>>
>>>>         if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
>>>>
>>>>             perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
>>>>
>>>>         else
>>>>
>>>>             cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
>>>>
>>>>         fi
>>>>
>>>>     fi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=
>>>> rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] *On Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
>>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So,
>>>> here?s what I did step by step:
>>>>
>>>>    1. Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update &&
>>>>    sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>>>>    2. Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl,
>>>>    libnet-patricia-perl
>>>>    3. Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
>>>>    4. Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>>>>    --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --> Working on Digest::SHA1
>>>>
>>>> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.ta
>>>> r.gz ... OK
>>>>
>>>> Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>>>>
>>>> Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
>>>>
>>>> Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
>>>>
>>>> 1 distribution installed
>>>>
>>>> Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
>>>>
>>>> Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Ma
>>>> il-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
>>>>
>>>> Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
>>>>
>>>> Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing
>>>> Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log
>>>> for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
>>>>
>>>> FAIL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the
>>>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this
>>>> shows.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Test Summary Report
>>>>
>>>> -------------------
>>>>
>>>> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>>>>
>>>>   Failed tests:  1-2
>>>>
>>>>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>>>>
>>>>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>>>>
>>>> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
>>>> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>>>>
>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>>
>>>> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>>>>
>>>> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>>>>
>>>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>>>>
>>>> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>>>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>>>> --force to force install it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
>>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for flying emails but I used this file -
>>>> https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Eoin Kim
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
>>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>>> *Subject:* RE: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Shawn,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get
>>>> update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$
>>>> uname -a
>>>>
>>>> Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2
>>>> (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eo
>>>> in.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info
>>>> <mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Shawn Iverson
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
>>>> *To:* MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: SpamAssassin installation failure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eoin,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and
>>>> it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log
>>>> message.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Test Summary Report
>>>>
>>>> -------------------
>>>>
>>>> t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
>>>>
>>>>   Failed tests:  1-2
>>>>
>>>>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>>>>
>>>>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
>>>>
>>>> Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79
>>>> cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
>>>>
>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>>
>>>> Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
>>>>
>>>> Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>>>>
>>>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>>>>
>>>> -> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See
>>>> /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with
>>>> --force to force install it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y
>>>> --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this?
>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Eoin Kim*
>>>>
>>>> Systems Administrator
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *RCS Telecommunications *
>>>>
>>>> Level 1 ? The Annexe
>>>>
>>>> 133 Mary Street
>>>>
>>>> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
>>>>
>>>> Office:   07 3228 0843
>>>>
>>>> Mobile: 0419 726 231
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: RCST logo drop shadow]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>>>>
>>>> Director of Technology
>>>>
>>>> Rush County Schools
>>>>
>>>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>>>>
>>>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>>>>
>>>> Director of Technology
>>>>
>>>> Rush County Schools
>>>>
>>>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>>>>
>>>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: Image removed by sender.][image: Image removed by sender.]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>>> Director of Technology
>>> Rush County Schools
>>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn Iverson, CETL
>> Director of Technology
>> Rush County Schools
>> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shawn Iverson, CETL
> Director of Technology
> Rush County Schools
> 765-932-3901 x1171 <(765)%20932-3901>
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/397d38a0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/397d38a0/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/397d38a0/attachment-0003.jpg>

From manuel at palachuk.com  Fri Dec 15 23:36:41 2017
From: manuel at palachuk.com (=?utf-8?Q?Manuel_Palachuk?=)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:36:41 -0500
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by mailscanner
Message-ID: <kcim.5a345c89.7cc4.7d6f074c7b08b351@email.mp-intnl.com>

Hello again,




> Find a message arriving for the one domain in the mail log. Then grep
> the log for the Postfix queue ID of that message. What is the result?



For my wifes email address wifename at herdomain.com
# grep --color=auto -iRnH 'DC61852D97' /var/log/mail.log
/var/log/mail.log:91537:Dec 15 14:37:53 email postfix/smtpd[25354]: DC61852D97: client=holding.radardectorformed.club[85.17.22.17]
/var/log/mail.log:91538:Dec 15 14:37:54 email postfix/cleanup[25422]: DC61852D97: hold: header Received: from holding.radardectorformed.club (holding.radardectorformed.club [85.17.22.17])??by email.mp-intnl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC61852D97??for <wifename at herdomain.com>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:37: from holding.radardectorformed.club[85.17.22.17]; from=<Leading.Radar.Detector at holding.radardectorformed.club> to=<wifename at herdomain.com> proto=ESMTP helo=<holding.radardectorformed.club>
/var/log/mail.log:91539:Dec 15 14:37:54 email postfix/cleanup[25422]: DC61852D97: message-id=<1466962219805381-4c69f6f3b2989d30df0f3b071547783a at holding.radardectorformed.club>
/var/log/mail.log:91540:Dec 15 14:37:54 email opendkim[1323]: DC61852D97: holding.radardectorformed.club [85.17.22.17] not internal
/var/log/mail.log:91541:Dec 15 14:37:54 email opendkim[1323]: DC61852D97: not authenticated
/var/log/mail.log:91542:Dec 15 14:37:54 email opendkim[1323]: DC61852D97: no signature data
/var/log/mail.log:91548:Dec 15 14:37:55 email MailScanner[22281]: Requeue: DC61852D97.A36A9 to BFABD52D98


For my email address
root at email:~# grep --color=auto -iRnH '67B4052DF4' /var/log/mail.log
/var/log/mail.log:94113:Dec 15 17:20:15 email MailScanner[27332]: Requeue: C391E52DF2.A0793 to 67B4052DF4
/var/log/mail.log:94115:Dec 15 17:20:15 email postfix/qmgr[17185]: 67B4052DF4: from=<bounce at dontcoldcall.com>, size=10486, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
/var/log/mail.log:94117:Dec 15 17:20:15 email postfix/lmtp[29819]: 67B4052DF4: to=<manuel at palachuk.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:2003, delay=1.4, delays=1.3/0/0.01/0.09, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 manuel at palachuk.com Ok)
/var/log/mail.log:94118:Dec 15 17:20:15 email postfix/qmgr[17185]: 67B4052DF4: removed






Manuel Palachuk


Manuel at Palachuk.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171215/e72373fb/attachment.html>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Sat Dec 16 00:45:50 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:45:50 +0000
Subject: SpamAssassin installation failure
In-Reply-To: <CABu_8zKqw=AL6rfb1rDmrQmTeGwmvakx0xmEJNuX2MX=PyF4Dg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <07f4dc8ea5bf41148575acfe1d9fd165@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zL57xj1AV2DsEGDCZ66hdrBFtbOuAWUEuLWxdHu=EohYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8033afde4524749be627aeb9d4ac342@rcst.com.au>
 <9a79299c4d844ca3afd0101607336e80@rcst.com.au>
 <077cb9fbb23c4321b0a94d34f891a8e6@rcst.com.au>
 <d2a673a54d644a7196892afb89eef8fc@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zJd-R825UdebeM=u2AGo11Xzskye6OFLnN3-=JAGDf6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <518380e5c1a241b68f13b69d2e530517@rcst.com.au>
 <bf8d7c9ba1a74f12a63983bbc2e29c6a@rcst.com.au>
 <CABu_8zKnBcFA=MgFeY1Xz-u4dJKNJATdZj5HMpDfrg8+5_Q+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABu_8zJ_0_miKUrwX5ZF2suVwDiKQD_ww18esWSUXKdC0wRXTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABu_8zKH2T=Li1ffzQGGpoW=KiiToqA6NDvuYbLAgABYbW3-WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ll5robxhkvkgpqck7tyhq68l.1513373858583@email.android.com>,
 <CABu_8zKqw=AL6rfb1rDmrQmTeGwmvakx0xmEJNuX2MX=PyF4Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <y931f1tge1vrb23a3a9cvfy9.1513385148741@email.android.com>

Okay, it looks the same to me. Thanks again for doing that.

Eoin

Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> wrote:



t/sa_check_spamd.t ................ ok
# Failed test 1 in t/sa_compile.t at line 149
        Not found: FOO =  check: tests=FOO  at t/sa_compile.t line 150.
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 755
'/root/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1-mWwPC3/t/log/d.sa_compile/inst.basic/
foo//local/bin/sa-compile --keep-tmps' failed: DIED, signal 127 (fffffffffffffff
f) at t/SATest.pm line 991.
t/sa_compile.t ....................
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 5/5 subtests
t/sha1.t .......................... ok


On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:

Hi Shawn,

What about the log message? Did it show the same as my case even though the installation was okay with flags? Cheers.

Eoin

Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>> wrote:



Despite that, I am going to add --force to cpanm in install.sh, just to improve the chances of a successful install.

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>> wrote:
Follow up on this...

I installed on Debian 8 and MailScanner with and without the flags and spamassassin installed successfully.

I did get the two dubious test failures each way, but spamassassin successfully compiled and installed.

My MailScanner --lint test shows good.

SpamAssassin reported no errors.


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>> wrote:
Not yet, I am going to look into it more this evening.  I am thinking cpanm not doing a force may be the culprit as you suggest.  It is only called when using the flags to automate cpan perl module compilation.  SA tests can fail for stupid reasons that won't actually affect the installation.

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi Shawn,

Just wonder if you require further information regarding this. Thanks.

Eoin

From: Eoin Kim
Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 7:32 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

The installation without flags looks different but I am not sure if this is successful or not. I?ll attach the installation log file. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:05 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

If you install without using the flags for install.sh and answer the prompts, does spamassassin install successfully?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi Shawn,

I checked the install.sh script and it looks like --force options is missing.

#Install SpamaAssassin, use standard cpan in normail install, or App::cpanminus in unattended install
    perldoc -l ${MODSA} >/dev/null 2>&1
    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
        clear
        echo "${MODSA} is missing. Installing via CPAN ..."; echo;
        timewait 1
        if [ $AUTOCPAN -eq 0 ]; then
            perl -MCPAN -e "CPAN::Shell->force(qw(install ${MODSA} ));"
        else
            cpanm --no-interactive ${MODSA}
        fi
    fi

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim<mailto:mailscanner-bounces%2Beoin.kim>=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info>] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 9:09 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Hi Shawn,

My apologies for messy emails but I?d like to make things clear. So, here?s what I did step by step:

  1.  Installed Debian Jessie and upgraded (sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).
  2.  Installed few packages: ca-certificates, libgeo-ip-perl, libnet-patricia-perl
  3.  Downloaded the MailScanner installer.
  4.  Ran the command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

During the procedure, I watched the log and this showed up.

--> Working on Digest::SHA1
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Digest-SHA1-2.13.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Building and testing Digest-SHA1-2.13 ... OK
Successfully installed Digest-SHA1-2.13
1 distribution installed
Mail::SpamAssassin is missing. Installing via CPAN ...

--> Working on Mail::SpamAssassin
Fetching http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KM/KMCGRAIL/SpamAssassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.1.tar.gz ... OK
Configuring Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... OK
Building and testing Mail-SpamAssassin-3.004001 ... ! Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.
FAIL

It kept going and installation finished. And when I looked the /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log file, at the end this shows.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:23 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Sorry for flying emails but I used this file - https://s3.amazonaws.com/msv5/release/MailScanner-5.0.6-5.deb.tar.gz

I didn?t clone Github. Thanks.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eoin Kim
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin installation failure

Thanks Shawn,

I am using the latest kernel for your information (I did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade && sudo reboot).

sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$<mailto:sysadmin at mx1.bne.lab.boof.com:/usr/local/src/MailScanner-5.0.6-5$> uname -a
Linux mx1.bne.lab.boof.com<http://mx1.bne.lab.boof.com> 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-2 (2017-12-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks again.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2017 8:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>>
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin installation failure

Eoin,

I am spinning up a Jessie instance to see if i can reproduce the issue.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to install MailScanner (v.5.0.6-5) on my Debian Jessie and it looks like installing SpamAssassin is failed. Below is the end of log message.

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/sa_compile.t                  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  1-2
  Non-zero exit status: 2
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 5 tests but ran 2.
Files=168, Tests=3014, 333 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.09 sys + 67.79 cusr  5.12 csys = 73.69 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/168 test programs. 2/3014 subtests failed.
Makefile:1582: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
-> FAIL Installing Mail::SpamAssassin failed. See /root/.cpanm/work/1513044980.46831/build.log for details. Retry with --force to force install it.

I used this command - ./install.sh --MTA=postfix --installClamav=Y --installCPAN=Y --ignoreDeps=N --ramdiskSize=0

What is the possible cause of this error and how can I rectify this? Thanks a lot.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by sender.]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner





--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ][https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ]



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ][https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ]



--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171<tel:(765)%20932-3901>
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ][https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ]



--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner





--
Shawn Iverson, CETL
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x1171
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_cy1OZFNIZ0drYVU&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_UitIcHVIWkJVVTl2VGpxVUE0d0FQcHBIRXk4PQ][https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_Zkh4eEs3R01yWXc&revid=0Bw5iD0ToYvs_QWpBK2Y2ajJtYjhOMDRFekZwK2xOamk5Q3Y0PQ]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171216/0f6fbab8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171216/0f6fbab8/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171216/0f6fbab8/attachment-0001.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Sun Dec 17 22:53:12 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:53:12 +0000
Subject: [Question] DMARC check in SpamAssassin
Message-ID: <96619cf84f8544c8b05b0e754682d82c@rcst.com.au>

Hi all,

I wonder if SpamAssassin can do DMARC checking. I can see SPF and DKIM plugins exist but it looks like DMARC doesn't. So, if I want to have the full features of these, should I put all those three in MTA level? Thanks.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 - The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/216a21bf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/216a21bf/attachment.jpg>

From alex at vidadigital.com.pa  Sun Dec 17 23:18:08 2017
From: alex at vidadigital.com.pa (Alex Neuman)
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 18:18:08 -0500
Subject: [Question] DMARC check in SpamAssassin
In-Reply-To: <96619cf84f8544c8b05b0e754682d82c@rcst.com.au>
References: <96619cf84f8544c8b05b0e754682d82c@rcst.com.au>
Message-ID: <CANyE0PrpJ87B8EKpCTOGxgy_k9VBGfBx3aiv4Ra7+m4YnjAWig@mail.gmail.com>

https://blog.laussat.de/2014/05/19/using-dmarc-in-spamassassin/


[image: logo]
*Alex Neuman van der Hans* *Producer/Host**, Vida Digital*
+1 (440) 253-9789 <+1+(440)+253-9789> | +507 6781-9505 <+507+6781-9505> |
Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype:
alexneuman
<http://facebook.com/vidadigital>  <http://pa.linkedin.com/in/alexneuman>
<http://twitter.com/alexneuman>  <http://pinterest.com/vidadigital>
<http://youtube.com/user/reliantpty>  <http://instagram.com/vidadigital>
<http://vidadigital.com.pa.wordpress.com/>
<http://amazon.com/?tag=vidadigi-20>
<http://skype:alexneuman/?call&topic=Signature>
<http://whatsapp//send?text=Hello>

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I wonder if SpamAssassin can do DMARC checking. I can see SPF and DKIM
> plugins exist but it looks like DMARC doesn?t. So, if I want to have the
> full features of these, should I put all those three in MTA level? Thanks.
>
>
>
> *Eoin Kim*
>
> Systems Administrator
>
>
>
> *RCS Telecommunications *
>
> Level 1 ? The Annexe
>
> 133 Mary Street
>
> Brisbane, QLD, 4000
>
> Office:   07 3228 0843
>
> Mobile: 0419 726 231
>
>
>
> [image: RCST logo drop shadow]
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/b78e7071/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/b78e7071/attachment.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Sun Dec 17 23:21:03 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 23:21:03 +0000
Subject: {Spam?} Re: [Question] DMARC check in SpamAssassin
In-Reply-To: <CANyE0PrpJ87B8EKpCTOGxgy_k9VBGfBx3aiv4Ra7+m4YnjAWig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <96619cf84f8544c8b05b0e754682d82c@rcst.com.au>
 <CANyE0PrpJ87B8EKpCTOGxgy_k9VBGfBx3aiv4Ra7+m4YnjAWig@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <086de00fe3964b698250aa212a543d0e@rcst.com.au>

Thanks,

I have already read this. It sounds like this is the most possible way. Cheers.

Eoin

From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+eoin.kim=rcst.com.au at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Alex Neuman
Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 9:18 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: {Spam?} Re: [Question] DMARC check in SpamAssassin

https://blog.laussat.de/2014/05/19/using-dmarc-in-spamassassin/


[Image removed by sender. logo]

Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital
+1 (440) 253-9789<tel:+1+(440)+253-9789> | +507 6781-9505<tel:+507+6781-9505> | Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa<mailto:alex at vidadigital.com.pa> | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype: alexneuman
[Image removed by sender.]<http://facebook.com/vidadigital> [Image removed by sender.] <http://pa.linkedin.com/in/alexneuman>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://twitter.com/alexneuman>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://pinterest.com/vidadigital>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://youtube.com/user/reliantpty>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://instagram.com/vidadigital>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://vidadigital.com.pa.wordpress.com/>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://amazon.com/?tag=vidadigi-20>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://skype:alexneuman/?call&topic=Signature>  [Image removed by sender.] <http://whatsapp/send?text=Hello>


On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Eoin Kim <Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au<mailto:Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au>> wrote:
Hi all,

I wonder if SpamAssassin can do DMARC checking. I can see SPF and DKIM plugins exist but it looks like DMARC doesn?t. So, if I want to have the full features of these, should I put all those three in MTA level? Thanks.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 ? The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]




--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/727b6f98/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD000.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: ~WRD000.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/727b6f98/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 344 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/727b6f98/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171217/727b6f98/attachment-0002.jpg>

From Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au  Mon Dec 18 02:27:52 2017
From: Eoin.Kim at rcst.com.au (Eoin Kim)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 02:27:52 +0000
Subject: [Question] default plugins for SpamAssassin
Message-ID: <57cb5d8aa0f74f6186e57f795a3f89f2@rcst.com.au>

Hi all,

Sorry for a huge load of questions but I'd like to know what plugins will be installed by default for SpamAssassin. I actually found this list from the documentation page: https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/spamassassin.html

Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AskDNS
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::BodyEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::FreeMail
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HTMLEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HTTPSMismatch
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HeaderEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ImageInfo
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ReplaceTags
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDetail
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WhiteListSubject

Does this mean they are going to be installed or should I ignore it because the install will be done via CPAN? I am a bit confused with this - CPAN shows SpamAssassin and there is a tarball in apache.org. Are they actually the same package?

I can see this line inside the install.sh file - ARMODAFTERSA+=('Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor');

Is this duplicate or intentionally input? Ah.... I'm lost.

Eoin Kim
Systems Administrator

RCS Telecommunications
Level 1 - The Annexe
133 Mary Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Office:   07 3228 0843
Mobile: 0419 726 231

[RCST logo drop shadow]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171218/a02dd859/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3384 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171218/a02dd859/attachment.jpg>

From manuel at palachuk.com  Tue Dec 19 13:58:21 2017
From: manuel at palachuk.com (=?utf-8?Q?Manuel_Palachuk?=)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:58:21 -0500
Subject: Which rule is stripping off content in the top f messages
Message-ID: <kcim.5a391afd.142a.2279b9171e222e9a@email.mp-intnl.com>

Hello all,


Some emails I receive have the top of the message showing as raw code as if something has been stripped off

I'm trying to figure out which rule. I suspect the one related to replacing webbug but this has not had something replaced, it's been removed.



Top of email: 

function antispam(domain, user, display) { if (!display) display = user + '@' + domain; document.write('' + display + ' <mailto:'+user+'@'+domain+'> ');} var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-17667683-5']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www <http://www> ') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = '//secure.esupport.com/ea/analyze.js'; ga.id = 'UA-17667683-5||0'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();



MailScanner snippet from header:

X-MPI-MailScanner-ID: 1987041A5F.A587D
X-MPI-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MPI-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
X-MPI-MailScanner-From: bounces+549226-1304-manuel=palachuk.com at email.esupport.com
X-Spam-Status: No



Thank you




Manuel Palachuk

ManuelPalachuk.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171219/7918e9b2/attachment.html>

From ajdin at centohost.com  Tue Dec 19 12:40:23 2017
From: ajdin at centohost.com (ajdin)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:40:23 +0100
Subject: Spamassassin doesn't scan mail
Message-ID: <0e76f6c1-03c4-e6ea-73d3-267095b95a68@centohost.com>

Hello,

we try to setup SMTP gateway and mail scanner on VPS but Spamassassin 
doesn't scan mail at all.

Can you please help me to activate Spamassasin to scan email's.


best regards.


From mark at msapiro.net  Tue Dec 19 19:42:39 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:42:39 -0800
Subject: Spamassassin doesn't scan mail
In-Reply-To: <0e76f6c1-03c4-e6ea-73d3-267095b95a68@centohost.com>
References: <0e76f6c1-03c4-e6ea-73d3-267095b95a68@centohost.com>
Message-ID: <e379351d-f5bf-a466-f218-1ffb1e1eaa7b@msapiro.net>

On 12/19/2017 04:40 AM, ajdin wrote:
> 
> we try to setup SMTP gateway and mail scanner on VPS but Spamassassin
> doesn't scan mail at all.
> 
> Can you please help me to activate Spamassasin to scan email's.


What is the output from

sudo MailScanner --lint


-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From maxsec at gmail.com  Tue Dec 19 19:45:47 2017
From: maxsec at gmail.com (Martin Hepworth)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:45:47 +0000
Subject: Spamassassin doesn't scan mail
In-Reply-To: <e379351d-f5bf-a466-f218-1ffb1e1eaa7b@msapiro.net>
References: <0e76f6c1-03c4-e6ea-73d3-267095b95a68@centohost.com>
 <e379351d-f5bf-a466-f218-1ffb1e1eaa7b@msapiro.net>
Message-ID: <CAGDKor+YeOh0xa3GzoHZJfJdHKt56+Y1Ougb-gM9qqyfWLj92w@mail.gmail.com>

Also what instructions have you followed to setup Mailscanner?

Martin

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 at 19:42, Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> wrote:

> On 12/19/2017 04:40 AM, ajdin wrote:
> >
> > we try to setup SMTP gateway and mail scanner on VPS but Spamassassin
> > doesn't scan mail at all.
> >
> > Can you please help me to activate Spamassasin to scan email's.
>
>
> What is the output from
>
> sudo MailScanner --lint
>
>
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> --
-- 
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171219/d4eb1e60/attachment.html>

From mark at msapiro.net  Tue Dec 19 19:46:53 2017
From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:46:53 -0800
Subject: Which rule is stripping off content in the top f messages
In-Reply-To: <kcim.5a391afd.142a.2279b9171e222e9a@email.mp-intnl.com>
References: <kcim.5a391afd.142a.2279b9171e222e9a@email.mp-intnl.com>
Message-ID: <d4efe6ea-1266-41a9-e77e-f1b684736175@msapiro.net>

On 12/19/2017 05:58 AM, Manuel Palachuk via MailScanner wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Some emails I receive have the top of the message showing as raw code as
> if something has been stripped off
> 
> I'm trying to figure out which rule. I suspect the one related to
> replacing webbug but this has not had something replaced, it's been removed.


Typically this is caused by Allow Script Tags
 = disarm

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

From thom at vdb.nl  Tue Dec 19 19:56:36 2017
From: thom at vdb.nl (Thom van der Boon)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:56:36 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Spamassassin doesn't scan mail
In-Reply-To: <0e76f6c1-03c4-e6ea-73d3-267095b95a68@centohost.com>
References: <0e76f6c1-03c4-e6ea-73d3-267095b95a68@centohost.com>
Message-ID: <672024198.708175.1513713396523.JavaMail.zimbra@vdb.nl>

Hi 

Restart both MailScanner and your MTA to make sure that any changes in the configfiles are loaded 

Use "Mailscanner --lint" command to check the config files of mailscanner. 

What MTA do you use? 

If you use Postfix and forget to follow the docs, it will send all messages without being scanned 

https://www.mailscanner.info/# 

Docs > MTA Guides > Your MTA 


Met vriendelijke groet, Best regards, 


Thom van der Boon 
E-Mail: thom at vdb.nl 



===== 



Thom.H. van der Boon b.v. 
Transito 4 
6909 DA Babberich 
Tel.: +31 (0)88 4272727 
Fax: +31 (0)88 4272789 
Home Page: http://www.vdb.nl/ 


Van: "ajdin" <ajdin at centohost.com> 
Aan: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
Verzonden: Dinsdag 19 december 2017 13:40:23 
Onderwerp: Spamassassin doesn't scan mail 

Hello, 

we try to setup SMTP gateway and mail scanner on VPS but Spamassassin 
doesn't scan mail at all. 

Can you please help me to activate Spamassasin to scan email's. 


best regards. 



-- 
MailScanner mailing list 
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171219/312b31a9/attachment.html>

From manuel at palachuk.com  Wed Dec 20 18:24:45 2017
From: manuel at palachuk.com (=?utf-8?Q?Manuel_Palachuk?=)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 13:24:45 -0500
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by mailscanner
Message-ID: <kcim.5a3aaaed.31c1.14227cdf723bd1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>

All,



Thank you for your help on this.



It appears I had been misled as to the actual problem by the ends user. Their emails were in fact getting the subject updated to say Disarmed or spam.

I should have checked myself.

The end users in question really are just getting a lot of legitimate spam (spam below the score as they are not harmful or over markety).

And these don't get marked as spam.

It appears someone has subscribed them to many sites for email and such, but all the emails are clean and not spam.

They wouldn't be removed unless the Spamassasin score was something like 9.



I'm posting this for the next newbie to find.



Thank you all again.



Manuel Palachuk
ManuelPalachuk.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171220/1459adf8/attachment.html>

From maxsec at gmail.com  Wed Dec 20 19:46:41 2017
From: maxsec at gmail.com (Martin Hepworth)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:46:41 +0000
Subject: One domain in my postfix config is not being scanned by
 mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <kcim.5a3aaaed.31c1.14227cdf723bd1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>
References: <kcim.5a3aaaed.31c1.14227cdf723bd1d9@email.mp-intnl.com>
Message-ID: <CAGDKorKz5yh4TsmX71w4WEvNa9asxwR4jAAJRebr74Z7wR0hWg@mail.gmail.com>

Make sure the spamassassin report is always added

https://www.mailscanner.info/MailScanner.conf.index.html#Always%20Include%20SpamAssassin%20Report

Then you can see what is or isn't firing

You normally need a fair of tuning

I'd also recommend turning off auto whitelisting in spamassassin along with
making sure the rbls are setup to run



On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 at 18:33, Manuel Palachuk via MailScanner <
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info> wrote:

> All,
>
>
> Thank you for your help on this.
>
>
> It appears I had been misled as to the actual problem by the ends user.
> Their emails were in fact getting the subject updated to say Disarmed or
> spam.
>
> I should have checked myself.
>
> The end users in question really are just getting a lot of legitimate spam
> (spam below the score as they are not harmful or over markety).
>
> And these don't get marked as spam.
>
> It appears someone has subscribed them to many sites for email and such,
> but all the emails are clean and not spam.
>
> They wouldn't be removed unless the Spamassasin score was something like 9.
>
>
> I'm posting this for the next newbie to find.
>
>
> Thank you all again.
>
>
> Manuel Palachuk
> ManuelPalachuk.com
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> --
-- 
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171220/9e27edec/attachment.html>

From manuel at palachuk.com  Thu Dec 21 15:27:54 2017
From: manuel at palachuk.com (=?utf-8?Q?Manuel_Palachuk?=)
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:27:54 -0500
Subject: Which rule is stripping off content in the top f messages
Message-ID: <kcim.5a3bd2fa.162d.1c450a215e45573b@email.mp-intnl.com>

Thank you Mark, that was it.



Manuel Palachuk

Manuel at Palachuk.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20171221/a269e07b/attachment.html>