MCP checks

Shawn Iverson iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
Tue Sep 20 01:29:01 UTC 2016


Found the problem...

Sep 19 21:23:15.618 [21238] dbg: config: mkdir
/var/spool/postfix/.spamassassin failed: mkdir
/var/spool/postfix/.spamassassin: Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1902

I created the /var/spool/postfix/.spamassassin directory and MCP started
working.


On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
> wrote:

> Same here.  Starting but not triggering...doing some debugging now...
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Shawn Iverson <
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us> wrote:
>
>> Doh!  I have my logging off...digging some more...
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Jerry Benton <
>> jerry.benton at mailborder.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I see it being called and run, it just is not triggering.
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Jerry Benton
>>> www.mailborder.com
>>> +1 - 844-436-6245
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Shawn Iverson <iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>
>>> Reply: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> Date: September 19, 2016 at 6:07:00 PM
>>> To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>>> Subject:  Re: MCP checks
>>>
>>> > I do not see MCP being called. I should at least see the following in
>>> the
>>> > maillog:
>>> >
>>> > MCP Checks: Starting
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Shawn Iverson > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Confirmed issue with MCP.
>>> > >
>>> > > I cannot get MCP to fire either.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Jerry Benton > > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Yes. The latest.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -
>>> > >> Jerry Benton
>>> > >> www.mailborder.com
>>> > >> +1 - 844-436-6245
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> From: Shawn Iverson
>>> > >> Reply: MailScanner Discussion
>>> > >> Date: September 19, 2016 at 4:56:27 PM
>>> > >> To: MailScanner Discussion
>>> > >> Subject: Re: MCP checks
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > I'll runs some tests. 5.0.3-7, right?
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Jerry Benton
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > Similar settings on my lab server. Not working =/
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > This sucks.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > -
>>> > >> > > Jerry Benton
>>> > >> > > www.mailborder.com
>>> > >> > > +1 - 844-436-6245
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> > > From: Peter H. Lemieux
>>> > >> > > Reply: MailScanner Discussion
>>> > >> > > Date: September 19, 2016 at 4:38:16 PM
>>> > >> > > To: MailScanner Discussion
>>> > >> > > Subject: Re: MCP checks
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > # this contains the usual list of addresses to check or not
>>> to check
>>> > >> > > > MCP Checks = /etc/MailScanner/rules/mcp_checks.rules
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > First Check = MCP
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > MCP Required SpamAssassin Score = 5
>>> > >> > > > MCP High SpamAssassin Score = 9
>>> > >> > > > MCP Error Score = 1
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > # we use "PHI" for "patient health information"
>>> > >> > > > MCP Header = X-XXCHC-PHI-Monitor:
>>> > >> > > > Non MCP Actions = deliver
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > MCP Actions = store-nonmcp
>>> > >> > > > High Scoring MCP Actions = store-mcp
>>> > >> > > > Bounce MCP As Attachment = no
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > MCP Modify Subject = no
>>> > >> > > > MCP Subject Text =
>>> > >> > > > High Scoring MCP Modify Subject = no
>>> > >> > > > High Scoring MCP Subject Text = {PHI}
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > Is Definitely MCP = no
>>> > >> > > > Is Definitely Not MCP = no
>>> > >> > > > Definite MCP Is High Scoring = no
>>> > >> > > > Always Include MCP Report = yes
>>> > >> > > > Detailed MCP Report = yes
>>> > >> > > > Include Scores In MCP Report = yes
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > In /etc/MailScanner/mcp I have rulesets like this one:
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > File: /etc/MailScanner/mcp/20_Numbers_and_Codes.cf
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > ### Patient Identification Codes
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > header SUBJ_XXID1 Subject =~ /\b005[4-8]\d{4}\b/
>>> > >> > > > describe SUBJ_XXID1 XXCHC Patient ID with 0054-8 in Subject
>>> Header
>>> > >> > > > score SUBJ_XXID1 10
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > header SUBJ_XXID2 Subject =~ /\b1005[89]\d+\b/
>>> > >> > > > describe SUBJ_XXID2 XXCHC Patient ID with 10058-9 in Subject
>>> Header
>>> > >> > > > score SUBJ_XXID2 10
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > header SUBJ_XXID3 Subject =~ /\b1006[0123]\d+\b/
>>> > >> > > > describe SUBJ_XXID3 XXCHC Patient ID with 10060-63 in Subject
>>> Header
>>> > >> > > > score SUBJ_XXID3 10
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > header SUBJ_XXID4 Subject =~ /\b00000\d{3}\b/
>>> > >> > > > describe SUBJ_XXID4 Possible XXCHC Patient ID in Subject
>>> Header
>>> > >> > > > score SUBJ_XXID4 5
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > # They use some pretty generic patient IDs like 00001234.
>>> > >> > > > header SUBJ_XXID5 Subject =~ /\b0000\d{4}\b/
>>> > >> > > > describe SUBJ_XXID5 Possible XXCHC Patient ID in Subject
>>> Header
>>> > >> > > > score SUBJ_XXID5 5
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > header SUBJ_SSN1 Subject =~ /\b\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4}\b/
>>> > >> > > > describe SUBJ_SSN1 Likely Social Security Number in Subject
>>> Header
>>> > >> > > > score SUBJ_SSN1 10
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > [etc.]
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > A score of ten results in the message being quarantined and a
>>> notice
>>> > >> > > > sent to the administrator and the message sender. A score of
>>> five
>>> > >> sends
>>> > >> > > > notices but permits the message to be sent to its recipient.
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > Hope this helps, Jerry!
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > Peter
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > On 09/19/2016 03:21 PM, Jerry Benton wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > What do your settings look like?
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > -
>>> > >> > > > > Jerry Benton
>>> > >> > > > > www.mailborder.com
>>> > >> > > > > +1 - 844-436-6245
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> > > > > From: Peter H. Lemieux
>>> > >> > > > > Reply: MailScanner Discussion
>>> > >> > > > > Date: September 19, 2016 at 3:18:27 PM
>>> > >> > > > > To: MailScanner Discussion
>>> > >> > > > > Subject: Re: MCP checks
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >> I do, but I'm using 4.85,2. We use MCP at a health center
>>> to
>>> > >> intercept
>>> > >> > > > >> outbound messages that may contain "patient health
>>> information"
>>> > >> as
>>> > >> > > > >> defined by the US HIPAA laws. Works as advertised.
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >> I haven't tried version 5 yet so I can't help with that.
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >> Peter
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >> On 09/19/2016 02:51 PM, Jerry Benton wrote:
>>> > >> > > > >>> Anyone using MCP? I can’t seem to get it to fire on any
>>> rules,
>>> > >> but
>>> > >> > > the
>>> > >> > > > >>> same rules will fire in regular spamassassin checks.
>>> > >> > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > >>> -
>>> > >> > > > >>> Jerry Benton
>>> > >> > > > >>> www.mailborder.com
>>> > >> > > > >>> +1 - 844-436-6245
>>> > >> > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >> --
>>> > >> > > > >> MailScanner mailing list
>>> > >> > > > >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> > >> > > > >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > --
>>> > >> > > > MailScanner mailing list
>>> > >> > > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> > >> > > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > --
>>> > >> > > MailScanner mailing list
>>> > >> > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> > >> > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> > Shawn Iverson
>>> > >> > Director of Technology
>>> > >> > Rush County Schools
>>> > >> > 765-932-3901 x271
>>> > >> > iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> > MailScanner mailing list
>>> > >> > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> > >> > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> MailScanner mailing list
>>> > >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> > >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Shawn Iverson
>>> > > Director of Technology
>>> > > Rush County Schools
>>> > > 765-932-3901 x271
>>> > > iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Shawn Iverson
>>> > Director of Technology
>>> > Rush County Schools
>>> > 765-932-3901 x271
>>> > iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > MailScanner mailing list
>>> > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> MailScanner mailing list
>>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn Iverson
>> Director of Technology
>> Rush County Schools
>> 765-932-3901 x271
>> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shawn Iverson
> Director of Technology
> Rush County Schools
> 765-932-3901 x271
> iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn Iverson
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x271
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20160919/f0059d93/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the MailScanner mailing list