Is it possible to
Philip Parsons
pparsons at techeez.com
Fri Sep 2 16:14:18 UTC 2016
Update:
The removal of all of the Securiteinfo and the Sanesecurity seems for now to have fixed it up. No I have to figure out which one is causing the issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Philip Parsons
Sent: September 2, 2016 7:15 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject: Re: Is it possible to
Thanks for this. The question has been asked on the other lists multiple times they point out that the log entries states "MailScanner has detected a possible denial of service attack." So they say it is a MailScanner problem. I know have 3 customers with the same problem. Have not remove all the extra databases yet getting to that today.
Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling.
> On Sep 2, 2016, at 12:28 AM, Steve Basford <steveb_clamav at sanesecurity.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, September 2, 2016 2:06 am, Philip Parsons wrote:
>> I believe I am using all of them. I have removed some and tried that
>> but I think I it is a good Idea to remove then all I will try it with
>> nothing just clamav databases. The funny thing is I now have a
>> second system different customer that is also having the same issue.
>> This is all related to these .zip files
>
> Note: might be an idea to move this off-list or to clamav-users or to
> sanesecurity list but for now....
>
> This is a slightly unfair test but I scanned a small file with each
> database and all returned an OK but here are the timings for each database...
>
> If you are using any of the ones marked [Possible Performance Issue]
> then removed them first and see what happens.
>
> Securiteinfo:
>
> spam_marketing.ndb 230250 ms [Possible Performance Issue]
> javascript.ndb 23109 ms [Possible Performance Issue]
> securiteinfo.hdb 11781 ms [Possible Performance Issue]
> securiteinfoascii.hdb 1532 ms
> securiteinfohtml.hdb 1469 ms
>
> Sanesecurity mirrored:
>
> scamnailer.ndb 8547 ms
> phish.ndb 4750 ms
> junk.ndb 2391 ms
> spear.ndb 1985 ms
> phishtank.ndb 1844 ms
> scam.ndb 1641 ms
> badmacro.ndb 1500 ms
> winnow_phish_complete.ndb 1484 ms
> winnow_phish_complete_url.ndb 1484 ms
> jurlbl.ndb 1391 ms
> winnow_malware_links.ndb 1344 ms
> jurlbla.ndb 1313 ms
> blurl.ndb 1313 ms
> porcupine.ndb 1296 ms
> foxhole_filename.cdb 1282 ms
> bofhland_malware_attach.hdb 1266 ms
> foxhole_all.cdb 1266 ms
> foxhole_generic.cdb 1266 ms
> lott.ndb 1266 ms
> winnow_extended_malware.hdb 1266 ms
> winnow_malware.hdb 1266 ms
> winnow_spam_complete.ndb 1266 ms
> bofhland_phishing_URL.ndb 1265 ms
> bofhland_cracked_URL.ndb 1250 ms
> bofhland_malware_URL.ndb 1250 ms
> crdfam.clamav.hdb 1250 ms
> doppelstern.ndb 1250 ms
> doppelstern-phishtank.ndb 1250 ms
> rogue.hdb 1250 ms
> spam.ldb 1250 ms
> spamattach.hdb 1250 ms
> spamimg.hdb 1250 ms
> spearl.ndb 1250 ms
> winnow.attachments.hdb 1250 ms
> winnow_bad_cw.hdb 1250 ms
> winnow.complex.patterns.ldb 1235 ms
> doppelstern.hdb 1234 ms
> foxhole_js.cdb 1234 ms
> winnow_extended_malware_links.ndb 1234 ms
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
> Web : sanesecurity.com
> Blog: sanesecurity.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @sanesecurity
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list