MailScanner-5.0.0-2 runlevel priority
Shawn Iverson
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
Mon May 9 22:30:23 UTC 2016
Yes, 80 20 would be ideal
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> wrote:
> On 5/9/16 2:22 PM, Jerry Benton wrote:
> > Whenever you think it should stop. I can change it to 80 20.
>
>
> Normally you stop things in the reverse order of starting them so if
> something starts at nn, it stops at 100-nn, but we may want to wait for
> the OP to chime in.
>
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
--
Shawn Iverson
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
765-932-3901 x271
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20160509/f0c27cac/attachment.html>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list