Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner

Jerry Benton jerry.benton at mailborder.com
Mon Jun 20 21:41:07 UTC 2016


FWIW - unless you are using multiple gateways transporting mail
between one another and trying to save a few cycles on spam scanning,
you should just turn watermarking off.


-
Jerry Benton
www.mailborder.com
+1 - 844-436-6245


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Benton <jerry.benton at mailborder.com>
Reply: Jerry Benton <jerry.benton at mailborder.com>
Date: June 20, 2016 at 5:37:55 PM
To: MailScanner Discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Subject:  RE: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner

> Treat Invalid Watermarks With No Sender as Spam = nothing
>
>
>
> -
> Jerry Benton
> www.mailborder.com
> +1 - 844-436-6245
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Parsons
> Reply: MailScanner Discussion
> Date: June 20, 2016 at 5:34:42 PM
> To: MailScanner Discussion
> Subject: RE: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner
>
> > Thanks Jerry so you are saying to change
> >
> > Check Watermarks With No Sender = yes
> > to
> > Check Watermarks With No Sender = no
> > ?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info]
> > On Behalf Of Jerry Benton
> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 2:29 PM
> > To: MailScanner Discussion
> > Subject: Re: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner
> >
> > Set watermarking actions for empty sender to “nothing”.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Jerry Benton
> > www.mailborder.com
> > +1 - 844-436-6245
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philip Parsons
> > Reply: MailScanner Discussion
> > Date: June 20, 2016 at 5:26:00 PM
> > To: MailScanner Discussion
> > Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner
> >
> > > For us it is important to receive them. The Domain is already whitelisted. And it gets
> > > tagged as
> > >
> > > spam(no watermark or sender address)
> > >
> > > Any one got an idea.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > > Philip Parsons
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > MailScanner mailing list
> > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > MailScanner mailing list
> > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > MailScanner mailing list
> > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner
> >
> >
>


More information about the MailScanner mailing list