From mark at msapiro.net Wed Jun 1 00:02:33 2016 From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro) Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:02:33 -0700 Subject: survey.medallia.com in phishing.bad.sites.conf? In-Reply-To: References: <20160531170817.GA7991@cisunix.unh.edu> <23FA53A4-F950-4F2A-B335-5CF05E782F25@mailborder.com> <20160531185817.GA11260@cisunix.unh.edu> <20160531194444.GA13052@cisunix.unh.edu> Message-ID: <27c1edd1-f6be-4dc5-d48a-cbd6eff077f8@msapiro.net> On 5/31/16 4:53 PM, saifur rahman wrote: > > how do i whitelist a domain in MailScanner? Add it to phishing.safe.sites.custom. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan From saifurcse at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 00:19:47 2016 From: saifurcse at gmail.com (saifur rahman) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:19:47 +0600 Subject: survey.medallia.com in phishing.bad.sites.conf? In-Reply-To: <27c1edd1-f6be-4dc5-d48a-cbd6eff077f8@msapiro.net> References: <20160531170817.GA7991@cisunix.unh.edu> <23FA53A4-F950-4F2A-B335-5CF05E782F25@mailborder.com> <20160531185817.GA11260@cisunix.unh.edu> <20160531194444.GA13052@cisunix.unh.edu> <27c1edd1-f6be-4dc5-d48a-cbd6eff077f8@msapiro.net> Message-ID: Dear Sir, How do i allow double extension for perticular domain in MailScanner? There are certain domains on my server that I do not want MailScanner to scan AT ALL, How do I set this up? Can I configure MailScanner to not check zip/archive files for only one domain? BR Saiful On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 5/31/16 4:53 PM, saifur rahman wrote: > > > > how do i whitelist a domain in MailScanner? > > > Add it to phishing.safe.sites.custom. > > -- > Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > -- *With Regards**,* Md. Sayfur Rahman ( RHCE, MCSE, CCNA, HP-UX) System Administrator Spark Systems Limited -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From saifurcse at gmail.com Wed Jun 1 00:23:33 2016 From: saifurcse at gmail.com (saifur rahman) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:23:33 +0600 Subject: Outbound e-mail through MailScanner : JPG gets corrupted. In-Reply-To: References: <14e9175e994d433083b4f099d088c516@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <3afd735b72f0475887583e548686f679@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <28FB3B13-C0F2-4B4B-8A52-FD8A24B7066A@vidadigital.com.pa> <2b01f06950a94a0f8705b9916010593e@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <441D39B3-61DA-4BB9-963B-FAEA368F456C@vidadigital.com.pa> <62EEF173-CDE3-4807-8D71-D26A6B770C3E@mailborder.com> <372f4f3d46b14958af576d62afb2ab3a@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <76944434-7522-4232-9F57-9DB765EB21BE@mailborder.com> <7217aaf759534903a07316579c5f2696@DC01.meelhuysen.com> Message-ID: Dear Sir, How do i allow double extension for perticular domain in MailScanner? There are certain domains on my server that I do not want MailScanner to scan AT ALL, How do I set this up? Can I configure MailScanner to not check zip/archive files for only one domain? BR Saiful On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Rick Cooper wrote: > But what about the line Use TNEF Contents = replace ? > That was the question and most likely resolution to your issue > > ------------------------------ > *From:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+rcooper= > dwford.com at lists.mailscanner.info] *On Behalf Of *Mark Meelhuysen > *Sent:* Monday, May 30, 2016 12:08 PM > *To:* MailScanner Discussion > *Subject:* RE: Outbound e-mail through MailScanner : JPG gets corrupted. > > Haha, the minute i pressed send i knew i could get that answer J > > I was rather hoping you could tell me what the best practise in this > situation is. Which option can I change best? > > Use TNEF Contents = no does not make a difference. > > Expand TNEF = no does not make a difference > > > > *Van:* MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+mark= > meelhuysen.com at lists.mailscanner.info] *Namens *Jerry Benton > *Verzonden:* maandag 30 mei 2016 17:53 > *Aan:* MailScanner Discussion > *Onderwerp:* Re: Outbound e-mail through MailScanner : JPG gets corrupted. > > > > the answer is staring you in the face. > > - > > Jerry Benton > > www.mailborder.com > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 30, 2016, at 11:46, Mark Meelhuysen wrote: > > Ow oke, my mailscanner.conf : > > > > Expand TNEF = yes > > Use TNEF Contents = replace > > Deliver Unparsable TNEF = no > > TNEF Expander = /usr/bin/tnef --maxsize=100000000 > > TNEF Timeout = 120 > > > > I never changed these values, so i asume they are default. > > > > > > *Van:* MailScanner [ > mailto:mailscanner-bounces+mark=meelhuysen.com at lists.mailscanner.info > ] *Namens > *Jerry Benton > *Verzonden:* maandag 30 mei 2016 17:19 > *Aan:* MailScanner Discussion > *Onderwerp:* Re: Outbound e-mail through MailScanner : JPG gets corrupted. > > > > it is a mail scanner setting > > - > > Jerry Benton > > www.mailborder.com > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 30, 2016, at 11:15, Mark Meelhuysen wrote: > > I lookup it up what that does, but have not set that up manually, so > Exchange is acting standard. > > > > *Van:* MailScanner [ > mailto:mailscanner-bounces+mark=meelhuysen.com at lists.mailscanner.info > ] *Namens > *Jerry Benton > *Verzonden:* maandag 30 mei 2016 16:58 > *Aan:* MailScanner Discussion > *Onderwerp:* Re: Outbound e-mail through MailScanner : JPG gets corrupted. > > > > Are you converting TNEF? > > > - > > Jerry Benton > > www.mailborder.com > > > > > > > > On May 30, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Mark Meelhuysen wrote: > > > > Thats correct : > > > > ? Exchange sends the email directly to the recipient by DNS and > throught the local gateway (so not through MailScanner) : Everything is fine > > ? Exchange sends the email to MailScanner and MailScanner sends > the e-mail to the recipient : Not the message but the pictures get mangled. > > > > *Van:* MailScanner [ > mailto:mailscanner-bounces+mark=meelhuysen.com at lists.mailscanner.info > ] > *Namens *Alex Neuman van der Hans > *Verzonden:* maandag 30 mei 2016 16:50 > *Aan:* MailScanner discussion > *Onderwerp:* Re: Outbound e-mail through MailScanner : JPG gets corrupted. > > > > Should I understand from that that depending on how you configure Exchange > the message either gets mangled or not? > > > > On May 30, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Mark Meelhuysen wrote: > > > > When i create a new send connector that makes sure that for the particular > domain the mail is delivered to the ISP smarthost the images arrive fine. > > > > > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > -- > Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud en lijkt > schoon te zijn. > Meelhuysen IT Solutions . > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > -- *With Regards**,* Md. Sayfur Rahman ( RHCE, MCSE, CCNA, HP-UX) System Administrator Spark Systems Limited -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark at msapiro.net Wed Jun 1 02:12:14 2016 From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro) Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:12:14 -0700 Subject: Outbound e-mail through MailScanner : JPG gets corrupted. In-Reply-To: References: <14e9175e994d433083b4f099d088c516@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <3afd735b72f0475887583e548686f679@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <28FB3B13-C0F2-4B4B-8A52-FD8A24B7066A@vidadigital.com.pa> <2b01f06950a94a0f8705b9916010593e@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <441D39B3-61DA-4BB9-963B-FAEA368F456C@vidadigital.com.pa> <62EEF173-CDE3-4807-8D71-D26A6B770C3E@mailborder.com> <372f4f3d46b14958af576d62afb2ab3a@DC01.meelhuysen.com> <76944434-7522-4232-9F57-9DB765EB21BE@mailborder.com> <7217aaf759534903a07316579c5f2696@DC01.meelhuysen.com> Message-ID: <674b2e36-a1c0-7d3a-b161-e2917ef1fec3@msapiro.net> On 5/31/16 5:23 PM, saifur rahman wrote: > Dear Sir, > How do i allow double extension for perticular domain in MailScanner? > There are certain domains on my server that I do not want MailScanner to > scan AT ALL, How do I set this up? > Can I configure MailScanner to not check zip/archive files for only one > domain? Please don't hijack existing threads for new topics and please don't post the same question more than once. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan From mark at msapiro.net Wed Jun 1 02:13:22 2016 From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro) Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:13:22 -0700 Subject: survey.medallia.com in phishing.bad.sites.conf? In-Reply-To: References: <20160531170817.GA7991@cisunix.unh.edu> <23FA53A4-F950-4F2A-B335-5CF05E782F25@mailborder.com> <20160531185817.GA11260@cisunix.unh.edu> <20160531194444.GA13052@cisunix.unh.edu> <27c1edd1-f6be-4dc5-d48a-cbd6eff077f8@msapiro.net> Message-ID: On 5/31/16 5:19 PM, saifur rahman wrote: > > Dear Sir, > How do i allow double extension for perticular domain in MailScanner? > There are certain domains on my server that I do not want MailScanner to > scan AT ALL, How do I set this up? > Can I configure MailScanner to not check zip/archive files for only one > domain? You can do these things with rule sets. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan From steve at mjnservices.com Wed Jun 1 17:50:01 2016 From: steve at mjnservices.com (Steven Jardine) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:50:01 -0600 Subject: Denial Of Service Attack Messages In-Reply-To: <3B0448D0-B222-46F8-8BE0-9C28DC32FD78@mailborder.com> References: <023101d1ad42$4198ba30$c4ca2e90$@z00b.com> <493D6AA0-8AB3-43C2-9A11-AB2D4A639DDF@crossip.net> <573FAF9E.9070701@msapiro.net> <058e01d1b4c9$332bcdf0$998369d0$@com> <58AEE94E-2FB0-41CE-B054-4A665DA9EDE7@mailborder.com> <5744B410.2000509@mjnservices.com> <5744C0C4.4070204@msapiro.net> <5744C75E.5080900@mjnservices.com> <5749172F.8020501@msapiro.net> <3B0448D0-B222-46F8-8BE0-9C28DC32FD78@mailborder.com> Message-ID: <574F2049.10306@mjnservices.com> OK. So I upgraded to v5.0.2-1 and I created a group called mtagroup and added smmsp, smmta, www-data, clamav to the group. I changed the: Incoming Work User = clamav Incoming Work Group = mtagroup Incoming Work Permissions = 0660 Also, I set in clamd.conf: AllowSupplementaryGroups true Still showing the problem. Maybe 30 messages today have the error. All look like this: Jun 1 05:50:14 mail MailScanner[4864]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Jun 1 05:50:20 mail MailScanner[4864]: HTML disarming died, status = 13 Jun 1 05:50:20 mail MailScanner[4864]: Content Checks: Detected and have disarmed KILLED tags in HTML message in u51BoCcl030596 from bounce-21178_html-182046758-2943000-10142840-4602 at bounce.homedepotemail.com Any ideas? Is there a way to add additional logging? It also seems to me like it would be better to allow these messages be delivered without modification rather than removing the content with the denial of service attack message. Thanks! Steve On 05/29/2016 04:26 AM, Jerry Benton wrote: > With v5.0.2-1 and the Incoming Work User set to clamav (or whatever it is for your system) I have not seen any more failures where a process was killed. I also set work permissions to 0660 and the incoming work group to mtagroup making sure that postfix, clam, etc. users are in the group. I also allow supplementary groups in clamd.conf. > > Side note: I am not seen any errors where clam was unable to read the .header for extracted files anymore either. > > > > - > Jerry Benton > www.mailborder.com > > > >> On May 27, 2016, at 11:57 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> On 05/24/2016 02:27 PM, Steven Jardine wrote: >>> I would say that 25% of the disarm messages were >>> >>> Content Checks: Detected and have disarmed KILLED tags in HTML message... >>> >>> and they produced the Denial Of Service Attack messages. >>> >>> The others look like this: >>> >>> Content Checks: Detected and have disarmed phishing tags in HTML message >>> ... >> >> OK, so it fails intermittently, about 25% of the time. >> >> >>> I have no idea why there would be any kind of permission error. If my >>> permissions weren't set right I would be having all kinds of errors, right? >> >> I would think so, but the latest v5.0.2-1 version >> has some changes in the >> permissions used for temp work files and may help. I suggest you try >> this one and report what happens with it. >> >> -- >> Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, >> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan >> >> >> -- >> MailScanner mailing list >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >> > > IMPORTANT: This email does not constitute a contract or an offer of acceptance of an offer to enter into a contract. Further, this email may not be used to modify, supplement, novate, or waive any rights with respect to an existing contract or other binding commercial terms. MJN Services, Inc. conducts business under our service terms and conditions found at www.mjnservices.com unless otherwise agreed to in writing by an officer of MJN Services, Inc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Denis.Beauchemin at usherbrooke.ca Fri Jun 3 13:28:39 2016 From: Denis.Beauchemin at usherbrooke.ca (Denis Beauchemin) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:28:39 +0000 Subject: Any ideas how to accomplish this? Message-ID: Hello, I am trying to do the following and can't find a simple solution to it: I want to duplicate all incoming mail so that one copy goes to the intended destination and the other one goes to a set email address. The first copy should go through MailScanner before reaching its intended destination while the second copy should go directly to the set email address without any MailScanner intervention. Is this possible? I tried a milter-bcc and all it did was to add a bcc to all incoming emails so the set email address received the email after it was scanned by MailScanner. Not what I am trying to achieve. We are using sendmail with LDAP queries. Thanks. Denis PS: we want to test EOP (Exchange Online Protection from Office365) before moving all our students there. From alex at vidadigital.com.pa Fri Jun 3 13:30:08 2016 From: alex at vidadigital.com.pa (Alex Neuman van der Hans) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:30:08 -0500 Subject: Any ideas how to accomplish this? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/roundhouse/ > On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Denis Beauchemin wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to do the following and can't find a simple solution to it: I want to duplicate all incoming mail so that one copy goes to the intended destination and the other one goes to a set email address. > > The first copy should go through MailScanner before reaching its intended destination while the second copy should go directly to the set email address without any MailScanner intervention. > > Is this possible? I tried a milter-bcc and all it did was to add a bcc to all incoming emails so the set email address received the email after it was scanned by MailScanner. Not what I am trying to achieve. > > We are using sendmail with LDAP queries. > > Thanks. > > Denis > > PS: we want to test EOP (Exchange Online Protection from Office365) before moving all our students there. > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Denis.Beauchemin at usherbrooke.ca Fri Jun 3 13:43:41 2016 From: Denis.Beauchemin at usherbrooke.ca (Denis Beauchemin) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:43:41 +0000 Subject: Any ideas how to accomplish this? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <62145957765b4371949010c43e032d80@ex13mbx03.sti.usherbrooke.ca> Wow! Fast answer. A first look at it seems pretty much on the nail! Thanks Alex! Denis De?: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+denis.beauchemin=usherbrooke.ca at lists.mailscanner.info] De la part de Alex Neuman van der Hans Envoy??: 3 juin 2016 09:30 ??: MailScanner discussion Objet?: Re: Any ideas how to accomplish this? http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/roundhouse/ On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Denis Beauchemin wrote: Hello, I am trying to do the following and can't find a simple solution to it: I want to duplicate all incoming mail so that one copy goes to the intended destination and the other one goes to a set email address. The first copy should go through MailScanner before reaching its intended destination while the second copy should go directly to the set email address without any MailScanner intervention. Is this possible? I tried a milter-bcc and all it did was to add a bcc to all incoming emails so the set email address received the email after it was scanned by MailScanner. Not what I am trying to achieve. We are using sendmail with LDAP queries. Thanks. Denis PS: we want to test EOP (Exchange Online Protection from Office365) before moving all our students there. -- MailScanner mailing list mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner From alex at vidadigital.com.pa Fri Jun 3 13:45:14 2016 From: alex at vidadigital.com.pa (Alex Neuman van der Hans) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:45:14 -0500 Subject: Any ideas how to accomplish this? In-Reply-To: <62145957765b4371949010c43e032d80@ex13mbx03.sti.usherbrooke.ca> References: <62145957765b4371949010c43e032d80@ex13mbx03.sti.usherbrooke.ca> Message-ID: Glad to help. You *may* need to run an additional process to ?hand off? mail to the ?real? sendmail/MailScanner process; maybe on an additional VM. Also the ?original? process may have to do a ?smarthost" setup to hand off the email to the splitter. I know it?s been done before for compliance purposes, but I haven?t done it in a while. Let us know how it goes. > On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Denis Beauchemin wrote: > > Wow! Fast answer. A first look at it seems pretty much on the nail! > > Thanks Alex! > > Denis > > > De : MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+denis.beauchemin=usherbrooke.ca at lists.mailscanner.info ] De la part de Alex Neuman van der Hans > Envoy? : 3 juin 2016 09:30 > ? : MailScanner discussion > > Objet : Re: Any ideas how to accomplish this? > > http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/roundhouse/ > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Denis Beauchemin > wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to do the following and can't find a simple solution to it: I want to duplicate all incoming mail so that one copy goes to the intended destination and the other one goes to a set email address. > > The first copy should go through MailScanner before reaching its intended destination while the second copy should go directly to the set email address without any MailScanner intervention. > > Is this possible? I tried a milter-bcc and all it did was to add a bcc to all incoming emails so the set email address received the email after it was scanned by MailScanner. Not what I am trying to achieve. > > We are using sendmail with LDAP queries. > > Thanks. > > Denis > > PS: we want to test EOP (Exchange Online Protection from Office365) before moving all our students there. > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark at msapiro.net Sat Jun 4 05:51:09 2016 From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:51:09 -0700 Subject: OpenDKIM and MailScanner In-Reply-To: <574DD9C1.9010104@pztop.com> References: <574DD466.1090305@pztop.com> <574DD9C1.9010104@pztop.com> Message-ID: <89b739a7-28ea-e398-d293-701de05675a1@msapiro.net> On 5/31/16 11:36 AM, Gao wrote: > Thank you Jerry for the quick reply. > > The issue happens for outgoing emails. > > Postfix has these lines: > smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891 > non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters I am not a Postfix expert, but I think it might work to remove the smtpd_milters setting and set just non_smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891 Try that, and if it doesn't work, ask on a Postfix list. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan From pascal.maes at uclouvain.be Sat Jun 4 10:21:01 2016 From: pascal.maes at uclouvain.be (Pascal Maes) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 10:21:01 +0000 Subject: SpamAssasin not installed ! Message-ID: <2D4EBC0F-0923-4E65-BC67-B428FDCFD316@uclouvain.be> Hello, We have installed SpamAssasin : # apt-get install spamassassin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done spamassassin is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. The following script is running well : #!/usr/bin/perl if (eval "require Mail::SpamAssassin") { print "SpamAssassin : OK\n"; } else { print "SpamAssassin : KO\n"; } # ./test-sa.pl SpamAssassin : OK but MailScanner complains about SpamAssassin not installed : # MailScanner --lint Trying to setlogsock(unix) Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/UCL.conf Read 501 hostnames from the phishing whitelist Read 18378 hostnames from the phishing blacklists Config: calling custom init function CheckSMTPAuth Checking version numbers... Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.0.1) is correct. Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct. MailScanner setting GID to (117) MailScanner setting UID to (111) Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)... You want to use SpamAssassin but have not installed it. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 169. I will run without SpamAssassin for now, you will not detect much spam until you install SpamAssassin. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 170. Do you have an idea about the problem ? Thanks -- Pascal From patrick at yoopermail.us Sat Jun 4 13:35:19 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 09:35:19 -0400 Subject: MailScanner v5 directory structure Message-ID: <5752D917.6040608@yoopermail.us> Hello Jerry, I know you posted something about the new folder/file structure for mailscanner v5 but I cannot find it in the mailing list archive. Could you please post it again. Thank you -- Patrick Goupell Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com From mark at msapiro.net Sat Jun 4 16:06:28 2016 From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 09:06:28 -0700 Subject: SpamAssasin not installed ! In-Reply-To: <2D4EBC0F-0923-4E65-BC67-B428FDCFD316@uclouvain.be> References: <2D4EBC0F-0923-4E65-BC67-B428FDCFD316@uclouvain.be> Message-ID: <527dadbd-edf8-1861-0df4-d467c492496b@msapiro.net> On 6/4/16 3:21 AM, Pascal Maes wrote: > > The following script is running well : > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > if (eval "require Mail::SpamAssassin") > { > print "SpamAssassin : OK\n"; > } > else > { > print "SpamAssassin : KO\n"; > } > > > # ./test-sa.pl > SpamAssassin : OK What happens if you run sudo -u'#111' -g'#117' ./test-sa.pl > but MailScanner complains about SpamAssassin not installed : > > # MailScanner --lint ... > MailScanner setting GID to (117) > MailScanner setting UID to (111) > > Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)... > You want to use SpamAssassin but have not installed it. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 169. > I will run without SpamAssassin for now, you will not detect much spam until you install SpamAssassin. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 170. Somehow the directory containing perl's Mail/SpamAssassin.pm is not in the perl's include path, or the effective user/group can't read it. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Sat Jun 4 16:10:53 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:10:53 -0400 Subject: MailScanner v5 directory structure In-Reply-To: <5752D917.6040608@yoopermail.us> References: <5752D917.6040608@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: <43B75838-87C7-4487-A6C8-2B3F20D07CC3@mailborder.com> /etc/MailScanner /usr/share/MailScanner /usr/lib/MailScanner /var/spool/MailScanner > On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Patrick Goupell wrote: > > Hello Jerry, > > I know you posted something about the new folder/file structure for mailscanner v5 but I cannot find it in the mailing list archive. > > Could you please post it again. > > Thank you > > -- > Patrick Goupell > > Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ > Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Sat Jun 4 16:11:55 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:11:55 -0400 Subject: SpamAssasin not installed ! In-Reply-To: <527dadbd-edf8-1861-0df4-d467c492496b@msapiro.net> References: <2D4EBC0F-0923-4E65-BC67-B428FDCFD316@uclouvain.be> <527dadbd-edf8-1861-0df4-d467c492496b@msapiro.net> Message-ID: <392E2000-992D-49D3-83D3-6321DD647D74@mailborder.com> Make sure you are not running MailScanner --lint from the /root directory as well. > On Jun 4, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 6/4/16 3:21 AM, Pascal Maes wrote: >> >> The following script is running well : >> >> #!/usr/bin/perl >> >> if (eval "require Mail::SpamAssassin") >> { >> print "SpamAssassin : OK\n"; >> } >> else >> { >> print "SpamAssassin : KO\n"; >> } >> >> >> # ./test-sa.pl >> SpamAssassin : OK > > > What happens if you run > > sudo -u'#111' -g'#117' ./test-sa.pl > >> but MailScanner complains about SpamAssassin not installed : >> >> # MailScanner --lint > ... >> MailScanner setting GID to (117) >> MailScanner setting UID to (111) >> >> Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)... >> You want to use SpamAssassin but have not installed it. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 169. >> I will run without SpamAssassin for now, you will not detect much spam until you install SpamAssassin. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 170. > > > Somehow the directory containing perl's Mail/SpamAssassin.pm is not in > the perl's include path, or the effective user/group can't read it. > > -- > Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > From pascal.maes at uclouvain.be Sat Jun 4 17:17:06 2016 From: pascal.maes at uclouvain.be (Pascal Maes) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 17:17:06 +0000 Subject: SpamAssasin not installed ! In-Reply-To: <392E2000-992D-49D3-83D3-6321DD647D74@mailborder.com> References: <2D4EBC0F-0923-4E65-BC67-B428FDCFD316@uclouvain.be> <527dadbd-edf8-1861-0df4-d467c492496b@msapiro.net> <392E2000-992D-49D3-83D3-6321DD647D74@mailborder.com> Message-ID: <34A89AB6-1149-4D18-870F-C63C3EE3A729@uclouvain.be> That was probably the reason # sudo -u'#111' -g'#117' ./test-sa.pl SpamAssassin : OK but I have to move the script first because it was in ~root Thanks > Le 4 juin 2016 ? 18:11, Jerry Benton a ?crit : > > Make sure you are not running MailScanner --lint from the /root directory as well. > > > >> On Jun 4, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> On 6/4/16 3:21 AM, Pascal Maes wrote: >>> >>> The following script is running well : >>> >>> #!/usr/bin/perl >>> >>> if (eval "require Mail::SpamAssassin") >>> { >>> print "SpamAssassin : OK\n"; >>> } >>> else >>> { >>> print "SpamAssassin : KO\n"; >>> } >>> >>> >>> # ./test-sa.pl >>> SpamAssassin : OK >> >> >> What happens if you run >> >> sudo -u'#111' -g'#117' ./test-sa.pl >> >>> but MailScanner complains about SpamAssassin not installed : >>> >>> # MailScanner --lint >> ... >>> MailScanner setting GID to (117) >>> MailScanner setting UID to (111) >>> >>> Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)... >>> You want to use SpamAssassin but have not installed it. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 169. >>> I will run without SpamAssassin for now, you will not detect much spam until you install SpamAssassin. at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/SA.pm line 170. >> >> >> Somehow the directory containing perl's Mail/SpamAssassin.pm is not in >> the perl's include path, or the effective user/group can't read it. >> >> -- >> Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, >> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan >> >> >> -- >> MailScanner mailing list >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >> > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > -- Pascal From gao at pztop.com Mon Jun 6 16:51:22 2016 From: gao at pztop.com (Gao) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:51:22 -0700 Subject: OpenDKIM and MailScanner In-Reply-To: <89b739a7-28ea-e398-d293-701de05675a1@msapiro.net> References: <574DD466.1090305@pztop.com> <574DD9C1.9010104@pztop.com> <89b739a7-28ea-e398-d293-701de05675a1@msapiro.net> Message-ID: <5755AA0A.1060300@pztop.com> On 16-06-03 10:51 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I am not a Postfix expert, but I think it might work to remove the > smtpd_milters setting and set just non_smtpd_milters = > inet:127.0.0.1:8891 Try that, and if it doesn't work, ask on a Postfix > list. Tested with your recommended configuration, OpenDKIM will not sign the message at all. Gao From steve at mjnservices.com Mon Jun 6 17:23:05 2016 From: steve at mjnservices.com (Steven Jardine) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:23:05 -0600 Subject: Denial Of Service Attack Messages In-Reply-To: <574F2049.10306@mjnservices.com> References: <023101d1ad42$4198ba30$c4ca2e90$@z00b.com> <493D6AA0-8AB3-43C2-9A11-AB2D4A639DDF@crossip.net> <573FAF9E.9070701@msapiro.net> <058e01d1b4c9$332bcdf0$998369d0$@com> <58AEE94E-2FB0-41CE-B054-4A665DA9EDE7@mailborder.com> <5744B410.2000509@mjnservices.com> <5744C0C4.4070204@msapiro.net> <5744C75E.5080900@mjnservices.com> <5749172F.8020501@msapiro.net> <3B0448D0-B222-46F8-8BE0-9C28DC32FD78@mailborder.com> <574F2049.10306@mjnservices.com> Message-ID: <5755B179.6040206@mjnservices.com> I am not really trying to be a nuisance on this but this is still happening way too often. Legitimate emails are getting completely wiped out. Are there any ideas for how to best find out what is causing the "status = 13" error? Thanks! Steve On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Steven Jardine wrote: > OK. So I upgraded to v5.0.2-1 and I created a group called mtagroup > and added smmsp, smmta, www-data, clamav to the group. I changed the: > > Incoming Work User = clamav > Incoming Work Group = mtagroup > Incoming Work Permissions = 0660 > > Also, I set in clamd.conf: > > AllowSupplementaryGroups true > > Still showing the problem. Maybe 30 messages today have the error. > > All look like this: > > Jun 1 05:50:14 mail MailScanner[4864]: Virus and Content Scanning: > Starting > Jun 1 05:50:20 mail MailScanner[4864]: HTML disarming died, status = 13 > Jun 1 05:50:20 mail MailScanner[4864]: Content Checks: Detected and > have disarmed KILLED tags in HTML message in u51BoCcl030596 from > bounce-21178_html-182046758-2943000-10142840-4602 at bounce.homedepotemail.com > > Any ideas? Is there a way to add additional logging? It also seems to > me like it would be better to allow these messages be delivered > without modification rather than removing the content with the denial > of service attack message. > > Thanks! > Steve > > On 05/29/2016 04:26 AM, Jerry Benton wrote: >> With v5.0.2-1 and the Incoming Work User set to clamav (or whatever it is for your system) I have not seen any more failures where a process was killed. I also set work permissions to 0660 and the incoming work group to mtagroup making sure that postfix, clam, etc. users are in the group. I also allow supplementary groups in clamd.conf. >> >> Side note: I am not seen any errors where clam was unable to read the .header for extracted files anymore either. >> >> >> >> - >> Jerry Benton >> www.mailborder.com >> >> >> >>> On May 27, 2016, at 11:57 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >>> >>> On 05/24/2016 02:27 PM, Steven Jardine wrote: >>>> I would say that 25% of the disarm messages were >>>> >>>> Content Checks: Detected and have disarmed KILLED tags in HTML message... >>>> >>>> and they produced the Denial Of Service Attack messages. >>>> >>>> The others look like this: >>>> >>>> Content Checks: Detected and have disarmed phishing tags in HTML message >>>> ... >>> OK, so it fails intermittently, about 25% of the time. >>> >>> >>>> I have no idea why there would be any kind of permission error. If my >>>> permissions weren't set right I would be having all kinds of errors, right? >>> I would think so, but the latest v5.0.2-1 version >>> has some changes in the >>> permissions used for temp work files and may help. I suggest you try >>> this one and report what happens with it. >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, >>> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan >>> >>> >>> -- >>> MailScanner mailing list >>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >>> >> > > *IMPORTANT:* This email does not constitute a contract or an offer of > acceptance of an offer to enter into a contract. Further, this email > may not be used to modify, supplement, novate, or waive any rights > with respect to an existing contract or other binding commercial > terms. MJN Services, Inc. conducts business under our service terms > and conditions found at www.mjnservices.com unless otherwise agreed to > in writing by an officer of MJN Services, Inc. > > > IMPORTANT: This email does not constitute a contract or an offer of acceptance of an offer to enter into a contract. Further, this email may not be used to modify, supplement, novate, or waive any rights with respect to an existing contract or other binding commercial terms. MJN Services, Inc. conducts business under our service terms and conditions found at www.mjnservices.com unless otherwise agreed to in writing by an officer of MJN Services, Inc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark at msapiro.net Tue Jun 7 06:13:12 2016 From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:13:12 -0700 Subject: Denial Of Service Attack Messages In-Reply-To: <5755B179.6040206@mjnservices.com> References: <023101d1ad42$4198ba30$c4ca2e90$@z00b.com> <493D6AA0-8AB3-43C2-9A11-AB2D4A639DDF@crossip.net> <573FAF9E.9070701@msapiro.net> <058e01d1b4c9$332bcdf0$998369d0$@com> <58AEE94E-2FB0-41CE-B054-4A665DA9EDE7@mailborder.com> <5744B410.2000509@mjnservices.com> <5744C0C4.4070204@msapiro.net> <5744C75E.5080900@mjnservices.com> <5749172F.8020501@msapiro.net> <3B0448D0-B222-46F8-8BE0-9C28DC32FD78@mailborder.com> <574F2049.10306@mjnservices.com> <5755B179.6040206@mjnservices.com> Message-ID: <575665F8.4030408@msapiro.net> On 06/06/2016 10:23 AM, Steven Jardine wrote: > I am not really trying to be a nuisance on this but this is still > happening way too often. Legitimate emails are getting completely wiped > out. Are there any ideas for how to best find out what is causing the > "status = 13" error? You could try the attached patch to /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/Message.pm. It just logs the paths of the files that it's working with. I don't actually see how this is happening with the regularity that you see it with that error. Unless: > On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Steven Jardine wrote: >> OK. So I upgraded to v5.0.2-1 and I created a group called mtagroup >> and added smmsp, smmta, www-data, clamav to the group. I changed the: >> >> Incoming Work User = clamav >> Incoming Work Group = mtagroup >> Incoming Work Permissions = 0660 What is MailScanner's Run As User and Run As Group? The Run As Group should be in the mtagroup. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Message.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 631 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pparsons at techeez.com Tue Jun 7 23:54:02 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:54:02 +0000 Subject: Mail watch issue Message-ID: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. From gao at pztop.com Wed Jun 8 00:07:46 2016 From: gao at pztop.com (Gao) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:07:46 -0700 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> Message-ID: <575761D2.7010708@pztop.com> On 16-06-07 04:54 PM, Philip Parsons wrote: > I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. > > Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. > > Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. > > I just looked my MailWatch and I don't see the release section at all. (Spam mail have a release section on the bottom). Anyway, you should be able to release quarantined mail in command line, for example: sendmail -t -i < /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20151217/65F7320B9A615.A8F61/message I did not test the above command on mail marked as Virus. Gao From alex at vidadigital.com.pa Wed Jun 8 02:30:15 2016 From: alex at vidadigital.com.pa (Alex Neuman van der Hans) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:30:15 -0500 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: <575761D2.7010708@pztop.com> References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> <575761D2.7010708@pztop.com> Message-ID: Probably a permissions issue. Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital +1 (440) 253-9789 | +507 6781-9505 | Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype: alexneuman > On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:07 PM, Gao wrote: > > > > On 16-06-07 04:54 PM, Philip Parsons wrote: >> I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. >> >> Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. >> >> Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. >> >> > I just looked my MailWatch and I don't see the release section at all. (Spam mail have a release section on the bottom). > > Anyway, you should be able to release quarantined mail in command line, for example: > > sendmail -t -i < /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20151217/65F7320B9A615.A8F61/message > > I did not test the above command on mail marked as Virus. > > Gao > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gao at pztop.com Wed Jun 8 16:09:25 2016 From: gao at pztop.com (Gao) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 09:09:25 -0700 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> <575761D2.7010708@pztop.com> Message-ID: <57584335.4020700@pztop.com> On 16-06-07 07:30 PM, Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote: > Probably a permissions issue. > >> > > > I doubt it's a permission issue, because there is no error logging in the web server log. I looked the PHP code of the detail.php, line 422: foreach ($quarantined as $item) { echo " \n"; // Don't allow message to be released if it is marked as 'dangerous' // Currently this only applies to messages that contain viruses. if ($item['dangerous'] !== "Y" || $_SESSION['user_type'] == 'A') { ... So I think it is designed to not allow release a mail if it is marked as "dangerous" in MailWatch. I think ALL the virus and SOME of spam are labelled as "dangerous". Gao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pparsons at techeez.com Thu Jun 9 00:54:16 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 00:54:16 +0000 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> <575761D2.7010708@pztop.com> Message-ID: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800A0B11@exchange.techeez.com> I had high hopes for a permission issue but the permissions are set the same as the spam messages which allow me to release. From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Alex Neuman van der Hans Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 7:30 PM To: MailScanner discussion Subject: Re: Mail watch issue Probably a permissions issue. [logo] Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital +1 (440) 253-9789 | +507 6781-9505 | Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype: alexneuman [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/facebook.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/pinterest.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/youtube.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/instagram.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/wordpress.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/amazon.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/webapp.wisestamp.com/XT9yavvmRJaZZvINZFTQ_skype.png] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/webapp.wisestamp.com/wEM3vsigQhq5yev6iwEV_whatsapp.png] On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:07 PM, Gao > wrote: On 16-06-07 04:54 PM, Philip Parsons wrote: I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. I just looked my MailWatch and I don't see the release section at all. (Spam mail have a release section on the bottom). Anyway, you should be able to release quarantined mail in command line, for example: sendmail -t -i < /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20151217/65F7320B9A615.A8F61/message I did not test the above command on mail marked as Virus. Gao -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Thu Jun 9 02:27:44 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:27:44 -0400 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> Message-ID: "Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it? I am going to go out on a limb here with a really crazy notion ? does the file even exist on the hard drive? Was it actually quarantined? Did you review these settings? # There is no point quarantining most viruses these days as the infected # messages contain no useful content, so if you set this to "no" then no # infections listed in your "Silent Viruses" setting will be quarantined, # even if you have chosen to quarantine infections in general. This is # currently set to "yes" so the behaviour is the same as it was in # previous versions. # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. Quarantine Silent Viruses = no # Do you want to store copies of messages which have been disarmed by # having their HTML modified at all? # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. Quarantine Modified Body = no # Do you want to quarantine the original *entire* message as well as # just the infected attachments? # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. Quarantine Whole Message = no # When you quarantine an entire message, do you want to store it as # raw mail queue files (so you can easily send them onto users) or # as human-readable files (header then body in 1 file)? Quarantine Whole Messages As Queue Files = no - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 > On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Philip Parsons wrote: > > I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. > > Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. > > Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > From mailscanner at replies.cyways.com Thu Jun 9 14:40:35 2016 From: mailscanner at replies.cyways.com (Peter Lemieux) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 10:40:35 -0400 Subject: Sharp drop in JScript attacks Message-ID: <57597FE3.7020405@replies.cyways.com> This isn't directly pertinent to MailScanner, but since you all are pretty experienced in fighting malware, I thought I'd ask. I have a healthcare client who was being deluged with JScript attacks. On one day alone, the quarantine directory in MailScanner exceeded 7 GB in size. For weeks MS was blocking thousands of JS files. Now the attacks have abruptly stopped. Has anyone else seen this behavior, or have any ideas about what might have happened? Thanks! Peter From jorgeaaq at gmail.com Thu Jun 9 15:00:38 2016 From: jorgeaaq at gmail.com (Jorge A Arenas Quezada) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:00:38 -0500 Subject: Sharp drop in JScript attacks In-Reply-To: <57597FE3.7020405@replies.cyways.com> References: <57597FE3.7020405@replies.cyways.com> Message-ID: <830C0EDB-A652-4C24-869A-8468C6BA6244@gmail.com> I have no answer of what happened but i have the same behavior with some clients Thousands of mails on one day and completely stop the next This has happened in the last two months Jorge Arenas On 6/9/16, 9:40 AM, "MailScanner on behalf of Peter Lemieux" wrote: >This isn't directly pertinent to MailScanner, but since you all are pretty >experienced in fighting malware, I thought I'd ask. > >I have a healthcare client who was being deluged with JScript attacks. On one >day alone, the quarantine directory in MailScanner exceeded 7 GB in size. For >weeks MS was blocking thousands of JS files. Now the attacks have abruptly >stopped. Has anyone else seen this behavior, or have any ideas about what >might have happened? > >Thanks! > >Peter > > >-- >MailScanner mailing list >mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > From pparsons at techeez.com Thu Jun 9 15:22:10 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:22:10 +0000 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> Message-ID: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800A33EA@exchange.techeez.com> Thanks Jerry but I have just found the reason. if the virus scanner returns infected status then MailWatch will not let you release the message, this is a feature and not a bug. I'm probably not going to change how this works - even for admins (they should know how to do this from the command-line anyway) as it is too dangerous. -----Original Message----- From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Jerry Benton Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 7:28 PM To: MailScanner Discussion Subject: Re: Mail watch issue "Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it? I am going to go out on a limb here with a really crazy notion ? does the file even exist on the hard drive? Was it actually quarantined? Did you review these settings? # There is no point quarantining most viruses these days as the infected # messages contain no useful content, so if you set this to "no" then no # infections listed in your "Silent Viruses" setting will be quarantined, # even if you have chosen to quarantine infections in general. This is # currently set to "yes" so the behaviour is the same as it was in # previous versions. # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. Quarantine Silent Viruses = no # Do you want to store copies of messages which have been disarmed by # having their HTML modified at all? # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. Quarantine Modified Body = no # Do you want to quarantine the original *entire* message as well as # just the infected attachments? # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. Quarantine Whole Message = no # When you quarantine an entire message, do you want to store it as # raw mail queue files (so you can easily send them onto users) or # as human-readable files (header then body in 1 file)? Quarantine Whole Messages As Queue Files = no - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 > On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Philip Parsons wrote: > > I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. > > Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. > > Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Thu Jun 9 16:24:36 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 12:24:36 -0400 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800A33EA@exchange.techeez.com> References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800A33EA@exchange.techeez.com> Message-ID: <4141A9F5-1726-4BDB-AC19-75802EBFDCCF@mailborder.com> His approach is flawed as sometimes ClamAV and Sophos identify files as viruses if they contain macros, even when they are not viruses. This is also true for Sane Security signatures. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 > On Jun 9, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Philip Parsons wrote: > > Thanks Jerry but I have just found the reason. > > > if the virus scanner returns infected status then > MailWatch will not let you release the message, this is a feature and > not a bug. I'm probably not going to change how this works - even for > admins (they should know how to do this from the command-line anyway) as > it is too dangerous. > > -----Original Message----- > From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Jerry Benton > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 7:28 PM > To: MailScanner Discussion > Subject: Re: Mail watch issue > > "Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it? > > I am going to go out on a limb here with a really crazy notion ? does the file even exist on the hard drive? Was it actually quarantined? Did you review these settings? > > > # There is no point quarantining most viruses these days as the infected > # messages contain no useful content, so if you set this to "no" then no > # infections listed in your "Silent Viruses" setting will be quarantined, > # even if you have chosen to quarantine infections in general. This is > # currently set to "yes" so the behaviour is the same as it was in > # previous versions. > # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. > Quarantine Silent Viruses = no > > # Do you want to store copies of messages which have been disarmed by > # having their HTML modified at all? > # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. > Quarantine Modified Body = no > > # Do you want to quarantine the original *entire* message as well as > # just the infected attachments? > # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. > Quarantine Whole Message = no > > # When you quarantine an entire message, do you want to store it as > # raw mail queue files (so you can easily send them onto users) or > # as human-readable files (header then body in 1 file)? > Quarantine Whole Messages As Queue Files = no > > > > > - > Jerry Benton > www.mailborder.com > +1 - 844-436-6245 > > > > > > >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Philip Parsons wrote: >> >> I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. >> >> Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. >> >> Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. >> >> >> -- >> MailScanner mailing list >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >> > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > From pparsons at techeez.com Thu Jun 9 16:57:14 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:57:14 +0000 Subject: Whitelist issue Message-ID: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800A39B7@exchange.techeez.com> MailScanner version 4.85.2 Using Mailwatch for the whitelisting For the exact same email. The issue I am having is for example whitelsted email comes in at 3:52 is whitelisted whitelsted email comes in at 3:54 does not get whitelisted.. Log entries for whitelisted mail un 2 15:51:54 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 13707 bytes Jun 2 15:51:55 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: tag found in message u52Mpria030161 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: HTML Img tag found in message u52Mpria030161 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: MCP Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Spam Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Expired 2 records from the SpamAssassin cache Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Whitelist refresh time reached Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Starting up SQL Whitelist Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Read 6587 whitelist entries Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Message u52Mpria030161 from 192.168.2.10 (sales at xxxxxxxx) is whitelisted Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: SpamAssassin cache hit for message u52Mpria030161 Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Message u52Mpria030161 from 192.168.2.10 (sales at xxxxxxxx) to xxxxxxxx is not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (cached, score=5.205, required 5, BAYES_50 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 1.00, KAM_EU 0.50, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.72, TVD_RCVD_SINGLE 2.17, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT 0.01) Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Delivery of nonspam: message u52Mpria030161 from sales at xxxxxxxx to rodd at xxxxxxxx with subject Connect with Collect! at the ACA International Convention & Expo in Denver Log for spam listed Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: tag found in message u52MrUIa032159 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: HTML Img tag found in message u52MrUIa032159 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: MCP Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Spam Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Message u52MrUIa032159 from 192.168.2.10 (sales at xxxxxxxx) to xxxxxxxx is spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=5.205, required 5, BAYES_50 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 1.00, KAM_EU 0.50, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.72, TVD_RCVD_SINGLE 2.17, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT 0.01) Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Spam Checks: Found 1 spam messages Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Non-delivery of spam: message u52MrUIa032159 from sales at xxxxxxxx to rodd at xxxxxxxx with subject Connect with Collect! at the ACA International Convention & Expo in Denver Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Spam Actions: message u52MrUIa032159 actions are store,header Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Deleted 1 messages from processing-database Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Logging message u52MrUIa032159 to SQL Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[22363]: u52MrUIa032159: Logged to MailWatch SQL Thank you. Philip Parsons -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pparsons at techeez.com Thu Jun 9 17:41:31 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:41:31 +0000 Subject: Mail watch issue In-Reply-To: <4141A9F5-1726-4BDB-AC19-75802EBFDCCF@mailborder.com> References: <22CA997B-ACE4-4B96-BE2D-C3C411838824@techeez.com> <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800A33EA@exchange.techeez.com> <4141A9F5-1726-4BDB-AC19-75802EBFDCCF@mailborder.com> Message-ID: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800A3CA0@exchange.techeez.com> Yeah I agree but will have to wait until some coders want to have it changed. -----Original Message----- From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Jerry Benton Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:25 AM To: MailScanner Discussion Subject: Re: Mail watch issue His approach is flawed as sometimes ClamAV and Sophos identify files as viruses if they contain macros, even when they are not viruses. This is also true for Sane Security signatures. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 > On Jun 9, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Philip Parsons wrote: > > Thanks Jerry but I have just found the reason. > > > if the virus scanner returns infected status then > MailWatch will not let you release the message, this is a feature and > not a bug. I'm probably not going to change how this works - even for > admins (they should know how to do this from the command-line anyway) as > it is too dangerous. > > -----Original Message----- > From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Jerry Benton > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 7:28 PM > To: MailScanner Discussion > Subject: Re: Mail watch issue > > "Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it? > > I am going to go out on a limb here with a really crazy notion ? does the file even exist on the hard drive? Was it actually quarantined? Did you review these settings? > > > # There is no point quarantining most viruses these days as the infected > # messages contain no useful content, so if you set this to "no" then no > # infections listed in your "Silent Viruses" setting will be quarantined, > # even if you have chosen to quarantine infections in general. This is > # currently set to "yes" so the behaviour is the same as it was in > # previous versions. > # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. > Quarantine Silent Viruses = no > > # Do you want to store copies of messages which have been disarmed by > # having their HTML modified at all? > # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. > Quarantine Modified Body = no > > # Do you want to quarantine the original *entire* message as well as > # just the infected attachments? > # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. > Quarantine Whole Message = no > > # When you quarantine an entire message, do you want to store it as > # raw mail queue files (so you can easily send them onto users) or > # as human-readable files (header then body in 1 file)? > Quarantine Whole Messages As Queue Files = no > > > > > - > Jerry Benton > www.mailborder.com > +1 - 844-436-6245 > > > > > > >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Philip Parsons wrote: >> >> I know this is the MailScanner list but I have posted to the mail watch list and there does not seem to be any takers so I am hopping a MailScanner user might have come across this issues as well. >> >> Everything is working 100% except for when you look at the mail watch list page and an email has been marked as a virus you cannot release it, it looks like the path is incorrect but I cannot find where that path is set. Anyone got any ideas. >> >> Techeez on the go so please excuse the spelling. >> >> >> -- >> MailScanner mailing list >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >> > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From kimmo at hedman.fi Mon Jun 13 09:34:21 2016 From: kimmo at hedman.fi (Kimmo (CollaMail)) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:34:21 +0000 Subject: Custom spamassassin values per user , is it possible ? Message-ID: Hi planning to test mailscanner for first time, i try to dig info that is it possible that user (with MailWatch) could change spamassasin trigger values by themselves from webUI ? And whatabout teaching bayes if some spam gets thru ? Regards, Kimmo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gao at pztop.com Mon Jun 13 16:08:11 2016 From: gao at pztop.com (Gao) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:08:11 -0700 Subject: {Disarmed} How to deal with this carefully crafted HTML spam Message-ID: <575EDA6B.2000106@pztop.com> Hi all, There is a type of spam with use carefully crafted HTML to form the message body which always got low score. Is there a better way to filter this out? Here is the email looks like: Here is the email source looks like: Return-Path: X-Original-To: mike at mydomain.com Delivered-To: mike at mydomain.com Received: by zeta.mydomain.com (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 381A32003197E; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (g-narration.com: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=zeta.mydomain.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="noreply at g-narration.com"; helo=g-narration.com; client-ip=210.178.72.8 Received: from g-narration.com (unknown [210.178.72.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zeta.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D23582003197B; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:26:54 +0100 From: Canadian-Meds X-Priority: 3 To: , , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7Y696D91821252448Kr" Message-ID: <4C1E46F4.1033858 at g-narration.com> Subject: Throughout the long years of operation our company has become synonymous to quality! MIME-Version: 1.0 X-mydomain-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IT Administrator for more information X-mydomain-MailScanner-ID: D23582003197B.A3D74 X-mydomain-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-mydomain-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=1.969, required 3, BAYES_50 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, RCVD_IN_XBL 0.38, RDNS_NONE 0.79) X-mydomain-MailScanner-SpamScore: 1 X-mydomain-MailScanner-From: noreply at g-narration.com X-Spam-Status: No --7Y696D91821252448Kr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0A=09=09League came up into a-power transmission oil missed, and=0Ai= ncludingtheir views. Meats tableside in i-look sanjaya up that this=0Ajust = didnt. =0A=0A=09=09Me=0A=09=09ds=0A=09=099f=0A=09=09or=0A=09=098M=0A=09=09e= n=0A=0AVi=0ACi=0ACi=0ALe=0APr=0A ag=0Aal=0Aal=0Avi=0Aop=0A ra=0Ais=0Ais=0At= r=0Aec=0A=0A S=0Aa =0Aia=0A=0Aof=0A=0At =0A=0ATa=0A=0Abs=0A=0A $0=0A$1=0A$2= =0A$2=0A$0=0A .9=0A.6=0A.5=0A.5=0A.4=0A 9=0A5=0A0=0A0=0A5=0A=0A=09=09Me=0A= =09=09ds=0A=09=098f=0A=09=09or=0A=09=092W=0A=09=09om=0A=09=09en=0A=0AAc=0AC= l=0ADe=0AFe=0AFe=0A om=0Aom=0Afl=0Ama=0Ama=0A pl=0Aid=0Auc=0Ale=0Ale=0A ia= =0A=0Aan=0A C=0A V=0A=0Aia=0Aia=0A=0Ali=0Agr=0A=0As =0Aa =0A=0A $1=0A$0=0A$= 1=0A$1=0A$0=0A .7=0A.4=0A.2=0A.1=0A.7=0A 5=0A5=0A5=0A1=0A2=0A=0A 24=0ANo=0A= An=0ASp /7=0A p=0Aon=0Aec c=0Are=0Aym=0Aia us=0Asc=0Aou=0Al to=0Ari=0As = =0Ain me=0Apt=0Ade=0Ate r =0Aio=0Ali=0Arn su=0An =0Ave=0Aet pp=0Are=0Ary=0A= p or=0Aqu=0A=0Ari t =0Air=0A=0Ace =0Aed=0A=0As =0A=0A O=0A 1=0A V=0A = F nl=0A00=0Ais=0Aas y =0A% =0Aa,=0At re=0AAu=0AMa=0Awo li=0Ath=0Ast=0Arl a= b=0Aen=0Aer=0Adw le=0Ati=0Aca=0Aid s=0Ac =0Ard=0Ae up=0AMe=0A,E=0Ash pl= =0Ads=0Ach=0Aip ie=0A=0Aec=0Api rs=0A=0Ak =0Ang =0A=0A=09=09>> Enter Here= =20 --7Y696D91821252448Kr Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
League came up into a-power transmission = oil missed, and includingtheir views. Meats tableside in i-look sanjaya up = that this just didnt.
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
or
Meds9f8Men
=
=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A
Vi
C= i
Ci
Le
Pr
ag
al
al
vi
op
ra
is
is
tr
ec
  
  
 S

ia
  
  
of
  
  
<= /td>
  
  

  
  =
  
  
Ta
  
  
<= /td>
  
  
bs
  
  
<= /td>
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
$0
$1
$2
$2
$0
.9
.6
.5
.5
.4
9
5
0
0
5
=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A=0A
Meds8for2Women
=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A
Ac
Cl
De
Fe
= Fe
om
om
fl
ma
ma
pl
id
uc
le
le
ia
  
an
 C
 V
  
  
  
ia
ia
  
  
  
li
gr
  
  
  


<= /td>
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
$1
$0
$1
$1
$0
.7
.4
.2
.1
.7
5
5
5
1
2
=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A
24
No
An<= br>Sp
/7
 p
on
ec
 c
re
ym
ia
us
sc
ou
to
ri

in
me
pt
de
te

io
li
rn
su

ve
et
pp
re
ry
 p
or
qu
  
ri

ir
  
ce
  
ed
  
  
  
  
&= nbsp; 
 O
 1
 V
 F
nl
00
is
as


a,
re
Au
Ma
wo
li
th
st
rl
ab
en
er
dw
le
ti
ca
id
 s

rd
up
Me
,E
sh
pl
ds
ch
ip
ie
  
ec
pi
rs
  

ng
 
 
 
 
=0A
>>= Enter Here <<
=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
Antibiotic= s
=0A=0A=0A=0A
= =0A=0A
Am
Au
Ba
Ce
Ci
ox
gm
ct
ph
pr
ic
en
ri
al

il
ti

ex
  
li

  
in
  

  
  
  
  =
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
$0
$1
$0
$0
$0
.5
.5
.3
.2
.3
2
9
5
4
0
=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
Painkillers
=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A
Ar
Ce
Di
FlTo
co
le
cl
ex
ra
xi
br
of
er
do

ex
en
il

  
  
ac
  
  
<= /td>
  
  
 G
  
  =
  
  
el
  
  
<= /td>
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
$0
$0
$9
$0
$0
.3
.5
.0
.8
.5
8
9
0
9
9
=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A
Asthma6&1Allergy
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A
Ad
Fl
Na
Se
Si
va
ov
so
re
ng
ir
en
ne
ve
ul
  


nt
ai
  
  
  
  
r =
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
$2
$1
$1
$1
$0
4.
9.
7.
8.
.9
95
95
99
95
9
=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A
Dealing9with0Depression
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A
Ce
Cy
Le
Pr
Pr
le
mb
xa
is
oz
xa
al
pr
ti
ac
  
ta


  
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
  
  
  
  
 &= nbsp;
$0
$1
$0
$1
$0
.5
.1
.6
.1
.3
0
3
3
1
5
=0A
=0A=0A
Commute is tubes, where s= he also. Economicforum study abroad and holidays according to office, the s= ubject to point. Legend of saints and tough. Plans, designs, inventions or = area buick. Develops a crowd, deeded rights of loved farida. Community i-fi= gured the iep meeting agreed that. Column johnny said expected redundancy p= ackages and discuss silent generally. Adventurous souls propoganda put off = limits, workarounds will get rid of endure.
=0A=0A=0A=0A --7Y696D91821252448Kr-- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spam.png Type: image/png Size: 34311 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alex at vidadigital.com.pa Mon Jun 13 18:32:42 2016 From: alex at vidadigital.com.pa (Alex Neuman van der Hans) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:32:42 -0500 Subject: {Disarmed} How to deal with this carefully crafted HTML spam In-Reply-To: <575EDA6B.2000106@pztop.com> References: <575EDA6B.2000106@pztop.com> Message-ID: <3FDEF384-BA00-43D4-A828-CBEC012F1858@vidadigital.com.pa> RCVD_IN_XBL 0.38, RDNS_NONE 0.79 These two could be set higher. Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital +1 (440) 253-9789 | +507 6781-9505 | Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype: alexneuman > On Jun 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Gao wrote: > > RCVD_IN_XBL 0.38, RDNS_NONE 0.79) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mailscanner-list at okla.com Mon Jun 13 18:43:10 2016 From: mailscanner-list at okla.com (Tracy Greggs) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:43:10 -0500 Subject: {Disarmed} How to deal with this carefully crafted HTML spam In-Reply-To: <3FDEF384-BA00-43D4-A828-CBEC012F1858@vidadigital.com.pa> References: <575EDA6B.2000106@pztop.com> <3FDEF384-BA00-43D4-A828-CBEC012F1858@vidadigital.com.pa> Message-ID: <05ac01d1c5a3$723d5be0$56b813a0$@okla.com> I personally drop the NO PTR record emails at the MTA. IMO there is no reason not to have a PTR for a legit mail server. Either way, totally agree with at least scoring both of those up a good bit. Best wishes From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+mailscanner-list=okla.com at lists.mailscanner.info ] On Behalf Of Alex Neuman van der Hans Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 1:33 PM To: MailScanner discussion Subject: Re: {Disarmed} How to deal with this carefully crafted HTML spam RCVD_IN_XBL 0.38, RDNS_NONE 0.79 These two could be set higher. logo Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital +1 (440) 253-9789 | +507 6781-9505 | Panama | alex at vidadigital.com.pa | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype: alexneuman On Jun 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Gao wrote: RCVD_IN_XBL 0.38, RDNS_NONE 0.79) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alex at vidadigital.com.pa Mon Jun 13 18:45:13 2016 From: alex at vidadigital.com.pa (Alex Neuman van der Hans) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:45:13 -0500 Subject: {Disarmed} How to deal with this carefully crafted HTML spam In-Reply-To: <05ac01d1c5a3$723d5be0$56b813a0$@okla.com> References: <575EDA6B.2000106@pztop.com> <3FDEF384-BA00-43D4-A828-CBEC012F1858@vidadigital.com.pa> <05ac01d1c5a3$723d5be0$56b813a0$@okla.com> Message-ID: <0B3415B1-B5C0-4D2E-B334-5B6E5D667987@vidadigital.com.pa> I?ve had people *not* drop PTR-less emails because they receive e-mail from clients in countries where PTR records are not easy to get for whatever reasons. I do, however, agree completely that whenever possible they should be rejected at the MTA, not received at all. Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital +1 (440) 253-9789 | +507 6781-9505 | Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype: alexneuman > On Jun 13, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Tracy Greggs wrote: > > I personally drop the NO PTR record emails at the MTA. IMO there is no reason not to have a PTR for a legit mail server. > > Either way, totally agree with at least scoring both of those up a good bit. > > Best wishes > > > From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+mailscanner-list=okla.com at lists.mailscanner.info ] On Behalf Of Alex Neuman van der Hans > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 1:33 PM > To: MailScanner discussion > Subject: Re: {Disarmed} How to deal with this carefully crafted HTML spam > > RCVD_IN_XBL 0.38, RDNS_NONE 0.79 > These two could be set higher. > > Alex Neuman van der Hans Producer/Host, Vida Digital > +1 (440) 253-9789 | +507 6781-9505 | Panama |alex at vidadigital.com.pa | http://vidadigital.com.pa/ |Skype: alexneuman > > > > >> On Jun 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Gao > wrote: >> >> RCVD_IN_XBL 0.38, RDNS_NONE 0.79) > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner , and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner , and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patrick at yoopermail.us Tue Jun 14 23:24:25 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:24:25 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie Message-ID: <57609229.7020207@yoopermail.us> Has anyone tried instlling 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie? What results? Patrick From mark at msapiro.net Wed Jun 15 00:32:00 2016 From: mark at msapiro.net (Mark Sapiro) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:32:00 -0700 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie In-Reply-To: <57609229.7020207@yoopermail.us> References: <57609229.7020207@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: <5760A200.9060004@msapiro.net> On 06/14/2016 04:24 PM, Patrick Goupell wrote: > Has anyone tried instlling 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie? What results? I've installed MailScanner 5.0.2 on both Ubuntu 14.04 (older than Jessie) and Ubuntu 16.04 (newer). I can't speak to installation on Debian Jessie, but given that MailScanner 5.0.2 installs easily on both those Ubuntu platforms, I would expect no serious issues. MailScanner 5.0.2 does move some things around and do some things differently from 4.86.1 and prior versions which may require getting used to, but I think it should be fine. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan From heino.backhaus at fink-computer.de Wed Jun 15 07:05:58 2016 From: heino.backhaus at fink-computer.de (Heino Backhaus) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:05:58 +0200 Subject: Ability to controll Non-Forging Viruses treatment with a ruleset needed. Message-ID: <3b6cd24f-63ed-001e-25d2-d45141cb7c41@fink-computer.de> Hello List, I've configured the Mailscanners (v4.84.6) of our customers to treat office documents with makros, detected by ClamAV, as non forging viruses. Now one of our customers needs to send and receive those documents to and from special emailadresses. Is there a way other than disableing the makro detection of ClamAV to let them pass through. I'm thinking about an option like "Still deliver Non-Forging Viruses" as a ruleset, would be very nice. Any Ideas? -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen H. Backhaus Fink-Computer Systeme Heggrabenstr. 9, 35435 Wettenberg Email: heino.backhaus at fink-computer.de Web: www.fink-computer.de Fax: +49-641-98444638 Fon: +49-641-98444640 UST-ID: DE151040770 HRB: 2143 Gie?en GF: Fredi Fink "In retrospect it becomes clear that hindsight is definitely overrated!" -Alfred E. Neumann From pascal.maes at uclouvain.be Wed Jun 15 10:39:26 2016 From: pascal.maes at uclouvain.be (Pascal Maes) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:39:26 +0000 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie In-Reply-To: <57609229.7020207@yoopermail.us> References: <57609229.7020207@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: > Le 15 juin 2016 ? 01:24, Patrick Goupell a ?crit : > > Has anyone tried instlling 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie? What results? > > Patrick > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > I just made the update form 5.0.1 to 5.0.2 - the owner and the group of the folders /var/spool/MailScanner/{archive,incoming,quarantine} are changed to mail and mtagroup even if we have defined other values in MailScanner.conf MailScanner[9051]: Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/9051. Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming correct? - ClamAV has been updated as well and one parameter (AllowSupplementaryGroups) is no longer supported ERROR: Parse error at line 8: Unknown option AllowSupplementaryGroups Except these, all is working as before (or better). -- Pascal From patrick at yoopermail.us Wed Jun 15 11:50:32 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:50:32 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie In-Reply-To: References: <57609229.7020207@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: <57614108.9000008@yoopermail.us> Thanks to both responders. This is my first MailScxanner install so I expect a learning curve of some kind. So I'll give it a go and see what happens. On 06/15/2016 06:39 AM, Pascal Maes wrote: >> Le 15 juin 2016 ? 01:24, Patrick Goupell a ?crit : >> >> Has anyone tried instlling 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie? What results? >> >> Patrick >> >> >> -- >> MailScanner mailing list >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >> > > > I just made the update form 5.0.1 to 5.0.2 > > > - the owner and the group of the folders /var/spool/MailScanner/{archive,incoming,quarantine} are changed to mail and mtagroup > even if we have defined other values in MailScanner.conf > > MailScanner[9051]: Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/9051. > Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming correct? > > > - ClamAV has been updated as well and one parameter (AllowSupplementaryGroups) is no longer supported > > ERROR: Parse error at line 8: Unknown option AllowSupplementaryGroups > > > > Except these, all is working as before (or better). > > -- Patrick Goupell Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Wed Jun 15 12:07:33 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 05:07:33 -0700 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie In-Reply-To: References: <57609229.7020207@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: The correct permission are set in the new MailScanner.conf. Logic: - /var/spool/MailScanner/* directories need to use group level read/write permissions so that both your MTA and virus scanners can do their work. - The install script (or package scripts in .deb and .rpm) check for common existing users and adds them to the mtagroup. (mail, clam, clamav, sophos, postfix, exim, etc.) - You should run your incoming work group as mtagroup - You should run your incoming work permissions as 0660 - Your ?Run As User? needs to be a member of the mtagroup - AllowSupplementaryGroups is set to TRUE in clamd.conf so the daemon will be allowed to access items with group level permissions that it does not own but is owned by an entity in the same group. The fact that AllowSupplementaryGroups is no longer supported must be new. - With the testing I did, AllowSupplementaryGroups was valid on all versions of clamav installed from each distribution. On countless occasions people ask this list about permissions when they encounter crazy stuff like clam?s .lstat() errors. If you follow the new thought process that I put in place for v5, all of those problems disappear. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -----Original Message----- From:?Pascal Maes Reply:?MailScanner Discussion Date:?June 15, 2016 at 6:39:47 AM To:?MailScanner Discussion Subject:? Re: MailScanner 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie > > > Le 15 juin 2016 ? 01:24, Patrick Goupell a ?crit : > > > > Has anyone tried instlling 5.0.2 on Debian Jessie? What results? > > > > Patrick > > > > > > -- > > MailScanner mailing list > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > > > > I just made the update form 5.0.1 to 5.0.2 > > > - the owner and the group of the folders /var/spool/MailScanner/{archive,incoming,quarantine} > are changed to mail and mtagroup > even if we have defined other values in MailScanner.conf > > MailScanner[9051]: Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/9051. > Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming correct? > > > - ClamAV has been updated as well and one parameter (AllowSupplementaryGroups) is no > longer supported > > ERROR: Parse error at line 8: Unknown option AllowSupplementaryGroups > > > > Except these, all is working as before (or better). > > > -- > Pascal > > > > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > From rcooper at dwford.com Wed Jun 15 18:14:51 2016 From: rcooper at dwford.com (Rick Cooper) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:14:51 -0400 Subject: Ability to controll Non-Forging Viruses treatment with a ruleset needed. In-Reply-To: <3b6cd24f-63ed-001e-25d2-d45141cb7c41@fink-computer.de> References: <3b6cd24f-63ed-001e-25d2-d45141cb7c41@fink-computer.de> Message-ID: <7EA147E88C1B4E30A37E6B96318106F7@SAHOMELT> If you use the spam virus header and spam virus names (instead of the incorrect non-forging) you can easily set up a SpamAssassin meta rule that excludes your client's addresses from hitting. Hint: clam calls the office macros Heuristics.OLE2.ContainsMacros I have a two prong approach to this with Exim. If the mail comes in from just anywhere (not in special "white list") anything clam hits on is rejected and if the mail comes in from internal addresses or addresses from a specific "white list" then anything that clam hits on that is NOT Heuristics.OLE2.ContainsMacros is rejected We then have, among other items, Heuristics.OLE2.ContainsMacros in the Spam Virus names and Our meta rule checks for the Spam Virus header, then checks the envelope sender/ return address and if it's one of the whitelisted addresses there is no score, otherwise it's given a score of 24 and quarantined. Of course you could simplify that and just added the respective addresses to the spam check rules to be skipped for spam scan altogether. Rick Heino Backhaus wrote: > Hello List, > > I've configured the Mailscanners (v4.84.6) of our customers to treat > office documents with makros, detected by ClamAV, as non forging > viruses. Now one of our customers needs to send and receive those > documents to and from special emailadresses. > > Is there a way other than disableing the makro detection of ClamAV to > let them pass through. > > I'm thinking about an option like "Still deliver Non-Forging Viruses" > as a ruleset, would be very nice. > > Any Ideas? > > > -- > Mit freundlichen Gruessen > > H. Backhaus > > Fink-Computer Systeme > Heggrabenstr. 9, 35435 Wettenberg > Email: heino.backhaus at fink-computer.de > Web: www.fink-computer.de > Fax: +49-641-98444638 > Fon: +49-641-98444640 > UST-ID: DE151040770 > HRB: 2143 Gie?en > GF: Fredi Fink > > "In retrospect it becomes clear that hindsight is definitely > overrated!" > > -Alfred E. Neumann From patrick at yoopermail.us Wed Jun 15 18:33:22 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:33:22 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt Message-ID: <57619F72.1030900@yoopermail.us> This is my first attempt with both ubuntu and mailscanner. Did a clean install of ubuntu server 16.04 downloaded and ran the mailscanner-5.0.2 install.sh Did a basic configuration of MailScanner. Ran MailScanner --lint Got the following errors (permissions?). User is postfix and group is mtagroup as set by the install script and configuration settings. Do I need to do anything with apparmor? patrick at efa1:/etc/apparmor.d/local$ MailScanner --lint Trying to setlogsock(unix) Can't call method "close" on an undefined value at /usr/sbin/ms-create-locks line 48. Error: Attempt to create locks in /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/Locks failed! Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README Read 501 hostnames from the phishing whitelist Read 16128 hostnames from the phishing blacklists Config: calling custom init function SQLWhitelist Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging Config: calling custom init function SQLBlacklist Checking version numbers... Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.0.2) is correct. Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct. Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1343. Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming correct? at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/WorkArea.pm line 147. Patrick From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Wed Jun 15 18:45:04 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:45:04 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt In-Reply-To: <57619F72.1030900@yoopermail.us> References: <57619F72.1030900@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: - Pretty sure you need to run ?MailScanner ?lint? as the root user ? - Do not the command from the /root directory. Change to /tmp - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -----Original Message----- From:?Patrick Goupell Reply:?MailScanner Discussion Date:?June 15, 2016 at 2:35:16 PM To:?mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info Subject:? MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt > This is my first attempt with both ubuntu and mailscanner. > > Did a clean install of ubuntu server 16.04 > > downloaded and ran the mailscanner-5.0.2 install.sh > > Did a basic configuration of MailScanner. > > Ran MailScanner --lint > > Got the following errors (permissions?). User is postfix and group is > mtagroup as set by the install script and configuration settings. Do I > need to do anything with apparmor? > > patrick at efa1:/etc/apparmor.d/local$ MailScanner --lint > Trying to setlogsock(unix) > Can't call method "close" on an undefined value at > /usr/sbin/ms-create-locks line 48. > Error: Attempt to create locks in /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/Locks > failed! > > Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf > Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README > Read 501 hostnames from the phishing whitelist > Read 16128 hostnames from the phishing blacklists > Config: calling custom init function SQLWhitelist > Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging > Config: calling custom init function SQLBlacklist > > Checking version numbers... > Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.0.2) is correct. > > Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct. > Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1343. > Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming > correct? at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/WorkArea.pm line 147. > > Patrick > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > From patrick at yoopermail.us Wed Jun 15 19:31:03 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:31:03 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt In-Reply-To: References: <57619F72.1030900@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: <5761ACF7.1050009@yoopermail.us> Running as root user in /tmp shows no errors. Onward I go. Thank you. On 06/15/2016 02:45 PM, Jerry Benton wrote: > - Pretty sure you need to run ?MailScanner ?lint? as the root user ? > > - Do not the command from the /root directory. Change to /tmp > > > > > - > Jerry Benton > www.mailborder.com > +1 - 844-436-6245 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Goupell > Reply: MailScanner Discussion > Date: June 15, 2016 at 2:35:16 PM > To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt > >> This is my first attempt with both ubuntu and mailscanner. >> >> Did a clean install of ubuntu server 16.04 >> >> downloaded and ran the mailscanner-5.0.2 install.sh >> >> Did a basic configuration of MailScanner. >> >> Ran MailScanner --lint >> >> Got the following errors (permissions?). User is postfix and group is >> mtagroup as set by the install script and configuration settings. Do I >> need to do anything with apparmor? >> >> patrick at efa1:/etc/apparmor.d/local$ MailScanner --lint >> Trying to setlogsock(unix) >> Can't call method "close" on an undefined value at >> /usr/sbin/ms-create-locks line 48. >> Error: Attempt to create locks in /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/Locks >> failed! >> >> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf >> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README >> Read 501 hostnames from the phishing whitelist >> Read 16128 hostnames from the phishing blacklists >> Config: calling custom init function SQLWhitelist >> Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging >> Config: calling custom init function SQLBlacklist >> >> Checking version numbers... >> Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.0.2) is correct. >> >> Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct. >> Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1343. >> Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming >> correct? at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/WorkArea.pm line 147. >> >> Patrick >> >> >> -- >> MailScanner mailing list >> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >> >> > -- Patrick Goupell Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com From patrick at yoopermail.us Wed Jun 15 19:59:58 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:59:58 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt In-Reply-To: <5761ACF7.1050009@yoopermail.us> References: <57619F72.1030900@yoopermail.us> <5761ACF7.1050009@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: <5761B3BE.5060000@yoopermail.us> Configured postfix and sent a test email thru. Got the following. Searching for calmd lstat failed gives me some results about selinux and apparmor. Not sure what to do now. Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 1127 bytes Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 clamd[854]: WARNING: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1678 Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Clamd::ERROR:: UNKNOWN CLAMD RETURN ./lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR :: /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1678 Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Virus Scanning: Clamd found 1 infections Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Spam Checks: Starting Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255 with signal 0 On 06/15/2016 03:31 PM, Patrick Goupell wrote: > Running as root user in /tmp shows no errors. Onward I go. > > Thank you. > > > > On 06/15/2016 02:45 PM, Jerry Benton wrote: >> - Pretty sure you need to run ?MailScanner ?lint? as the root user ? >> >> - Do not the command from the /root directory. Change to /tmp >> >> >> >> >> - >> Jerry Benton >> www.mailborder.com >> +1 - 844-436-6245 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Patrick Goupell >> Reply: MailScanner Discussion >> Date: June 15, 2016 at 2:35:16 PM >> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >> >> Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt >> >>> This is my first attempt with both ubuntu and mailscanner. >>> >>> Did a clean install of ubuntu server 16.04 >>> >>> downloaded and ran the mailscanner-5.0.2 install.sh >>> >>> Did a basic configuration of MailScanner. >>> >>> Ran MailScanner --lint >>> >>> Got the following errors (permissions?). User is postfix and group is >>> mtagroup as set by the install script and configuration settings. Do I >>> need to do anything with apparmor? >>> >>> patrick at efa1:/etc/apparmor.d/local$ MailScanner --lint >>> Trying to setlogsock(unix) >>> Can't call method "close" on an undefined value at >>> /usr/sbin/ms-create-locks line 48. >>> Error: Attempt to create locks in /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/Locks >>> failed! >>> >>> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf >>> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README >>> Read 501 hostnames from the phishing whitelist >>> Read 16128 hostnames from the phishing blacklists >>> Config: calling custom init function SQLWhitelist >>> Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging >>> Config: calling custom init function SQLBlacklist >>> >>> Checking version numbers... >>> Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.0.2) is correct. >>> >>> Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct. >>> Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1343. >>> Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming >>> correct? at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/WorkArea.pm line >>> 147. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> >>> -- >>> MailScanner mailing list >>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info >>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >>> >>> >> > -- Patrick Goupell Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Wed Jun 15 20:03:06 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:03:06 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt In-Reply-To: <5761B3BE.5060000@yoopermail.us> References: <57619F72.1030900@yoopermail.us> <5761ACF7.1050009@yoopermail.us> <5761B3BE.5060000@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: Run As User = postfix Incoming Work User = clamav or clam depending upon your distro. I know the config file is big, but you really need to go through the whole thing and read everything. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -----Original Message----- From:?Patrick Goupell Reply:?MailScanner Discussion Date:?June 15, 2016 at 4:01:19 PM To:?mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info Subject:? Re: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt > Configured postfix and sent a test email thru. Got the following. > > Searching for calmd lstat failed gives me some results about selinux and > apparmor. > > Not sure what to do now. > > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, > 1127 bytes > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 clamd[854]: WARNING: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1678 > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Clamd::ERROR:: UNKNOWN CLAMD > RETURN ./lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR :: > /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1678 > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Virus Scanning: Clamd found 1 > infections > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Virus Scanning: Found 1 viruses > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner[1678]: Spam Checks: Starting > Jun 15 15:45:54 efa1 MailScanner: Process did not exit cleanly, returned > 255 with signal 0 > > > > > > On 06/15/2016 03:31 PM, Patrick Goupell wrote: > > Running as root user in /tmp shows no errors. Onward I go. > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > On 06/15/2016 02:45 PM, Jerry Benton wrote: > >> - Pretty sure you need to run ?MailScanner ?lint? as the root user ? > >> > >> - Do not the command from the /root directory. Change to /tmp > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> Jerry Benton > >> www.mailborder.com > >> +1 - 844-436-6245 > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Patrick Goupell > >> Reply: MailScanner Discussion > >> Date: June 15, 2016 at 2:35:16 PM > >> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > >> > >> Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 and Ubuntu server 16.04 first attempt > >> > >>> This is my first attempt with both ubuntu and mailscanner. > >>> > >>> Did a clean install of ubuntu server 16.04 > >>> > >>> downloaded and ran the mailscanner-5.0.2 install.sh > >>> > >>> Did a basic configuration of MailScanner. > >>> > >>> Ran MailScanner --lint > >>> > >>> Got the following errors (permissions?). User is postfix and group is > >>> mtagroup as set by the install script and configuration settings. Do I > >>> need to do anything with apparmor? > >>> > >>> patrick at efa1:/etc/apparmor.d/local$ MailScanner --lint > >>> Trying to setlogsock(unix) > >>> Can't call method "close" on an undefined value at > >>> /usr/sbin/ms-create-locks line 48. > >>> Error: Attempt to create locks in /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/Locks > >>> failed! > >>> > >>> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf > >>> Reading configuration file /etc/MailScanner/conf.d/README > >>> Read 501 hostnames from the phishing whitelist > >>> Read 16128 hostnames from the phishing blacklists > >>> Config: calling custom init function SQLWhitelist > >>> Config: calling custom init function MailWatchLogging > >>> Config: calling custom init function SQLBlacklist > >>> > >>> Checking version numbers... > >>> Version number in MailScanner.conf (5.0.2) is correct. > >>> > >>> Your envelope_sender_header in spamassassin.conf is correct. > >>> Cannot create temporary Work Dir /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1343. > >>> Are the permissions and ownership of /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming > >>> correct? at /usr/share/MailScanner/perl/MailScanner/WorkArea.pm line > >>> 147. > >>> > >>> Patrick > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> MailScanner mailing list > >>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > >>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- > Patrick Goupell > > Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ > Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > From pparsons at techeez.com Fri Jun 17 16:28:48 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:28:48 +0000 Subject: Whitelisting issue Message-ID: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800BA97C@exchange.techeez.com> MailScanner version 4.85.2 Using Mailwatch for the whitelisting For the exact same email. The issue I am having is for example whitelsted email comes in at 3:52 is whitelisted whitelsted email comes in at 3:54 does not get whitelisted.. Log entries for whitelisted mail un 2 15:51:54 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 13707 bytes Jun 2 15:51:55 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: tag found in message u52Mpria030161 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: HTML Img tag found in message u52Mpria030161 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: MCP Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Spam Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Expired 2 records from the SpamAssassin cache Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Whitelist refresh time reached Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Starting up SQL Whitelist Jun 2 15:52:29 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Read 6587 whitelist entries Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Message u52Mpria030161 from 192.168.2.10 (sales at xxxxxxxx) is whitelisted Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: SpamAssassin cache hit for message u52Mpria030161 Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Message u52Mpria030161 from 192.168.2.10 (sales at xxxxxxxx) to xxxxxxxx is not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (cached, score=5.205, required 5, BAYES_50 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 1.00, KAM_EU 0.50, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.72, TVD_RCVD_SINGLE 2.17, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT 0.01) Jun 2 15:52:30 mailscanner MailScanner[20125]: Delivery of nonspam: message u52Mpria030161 from sales at xxxxxxxx to rodd at xxxxxxxx with subject Connect with Collect! at the ACA International Convention & Expo in Denver Log for spam listed Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: tag found in message u52MrUIa032159 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: HTML Img tag found in message u52MrUIa032159 from sales at xxxxxxxx Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: MCP Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:53:59 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Spam Checks: Starting Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Message u52MrUIa032159 from 192.168.2.10 (sales at xxxxxxxx) to xxxxxxxx is spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=5.205, required 5, BAYES_50 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 1.00, KAM_EU 0.50, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.72, TVD_RCVD_SINGLE 2.17, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT 0.01) Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Spam Checks: Found 1 spam messages Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Non-delivery of spam: message u52MrUIa032159 from sales at xxxxxxxx to rodd at xxxxxxxx with subject Connect with Collect! at the ACA International Convention & Expo in Denver Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Spam Actions: message u52MrUIa032159 actions are store,header Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Deleted 1 messages from processing-database Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[16421]: Logging message u52MrUIa032159 to SQL Jun 2 15:54:07 mailscanner MailScanner[22363]: u52MrUIa032159: Logged to MailWatch SQL Thank you. Philip Parsons -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Sun Jun 19 17:24:08 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 10:24:08 -0700 Subject: Scripts Message-ID: Attached. Extract and copy the files to /usr/sbin then edit each file to change custom file locations then chmod +x /usr/sbin/mb-* then copy the portal_user.html where you like. Edit to fit your needs. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: steve.zip Type: application/octet-stream Size: 20742 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pparsons at techeez.com Mon Jun 20 21:25:53 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:25:53 +0000 Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner Message-ID: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C1263@exchange.techeez.com> For us it is important to receive them. The Domain is already whitelisted. And it gets tagged as spam(no watermark or sender address) Any one got an idea. Thank you. Philip Parsons -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Mon Jun 20 21:28:50 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:28:50 -0400 Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner In-Reply-To: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C1263@exchange.techeez.com> References: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C1263@exchange.techeez.com> Message-ID: Set watermarking actions for empty sender to ?nothing?. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -----Original Message----- From:?Philip Parsons Reply:?MailScanner Discussion Date:?June 20, 2016 at 5:26:00 PM To:?MailScanner Discussion Subject:? Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > For us it is important to receive them. The Domain is already whitelisted. And it gets > tagged as > > spam(no watermark or sender address) > > Any one got an idea. > > > Thank you. > Philip Parsons > > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > From pparsons at techeez.com Mon Jun 20 21:34:37 2016 From: pparsons at techeez.com (Philip Parsons) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:34:37 +0000 Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner In-Reply-To: References: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C1263@exchange.techeez.com> Message-ID: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C12E8@exchange.techeez.com> Thanks Jerry so you are saying to change Check Watermarks With No Sender = yes to Check Watermarks With No Sender = no ? -----Original Message----- From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Jerry Benton Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 2:29 PM To: MailScanner Discussion Subject: Re: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner Set watermarking actions for empty sender to ?nothing?. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -----Original Message----- From:?Philip Parsons Reply:?MailScanner Discussion Date:?June 20, 2016 at 5:26:00 PM To:?MailScanner Discussion Subject:? Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > For us it is important to receive them. The Domain is already whitelisted. And it gets > tagged as > > spam(no watermark or sender address) > > Any one got an idea. > > > Thank you. > Philip Parsons > > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Mon Jun 20 21:37:55 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:37:55 -0400 Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner In-Reply-To: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C12E8@exchange.techeez.com> References: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C1263@exchange.techeez.com> <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C12E8@exchange.techeez.com> Message-ID: Treat Invalid Watermarks With No Sender as Spam = nothing - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -----Original Message----- From:?Philip Parsons Reply:?MailScanner Discussion Date:?June 20, 2016 at 5:34:42 PM To:?MailScanner Discussion Subject:? RE: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > Thanks Jerry so you are saying to change > > Check Watermarks With No Sender = yes > to > Check Watermarks With No Sender = no > ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] > On Behalf Of Jerry Benton > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 2:29 PM > To: MailScanner Discussion > Subject: Re: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > > Set watermarking actions for empty sender to ?nothing?. > > > > - > Jerry Benton > www.mailborder.com > +1 - 844-436-6245 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philip Parsons > Reply: MailScanner Discussion > Date: June 20, 2016 at 5:26:00 PM > To: MailScanner Discussion > Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > > > For us it is important to receive them. The Domain is already whitelisted. And it gets > > tagged as > > > > spam(no watermark or sender address) > > > > Any one got an idea. > > > > > > Thank you. > > Philip Parsons > > > > > > > > > > -- > > MailScanner mailing list > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Mon Jun 20 21:41:07 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:41:07 -0400 Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner In-Reply-To: References: <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C1263@exchange.techeez.com> <11D8E491D9562549A61FD3186F36342002800C12E8@exchange.techeez.com> Message-ID: FWIW - unless you are using multiple gateways transporting mail between one another and trying to save a few cycles on spam scanning, you should just turn watermarking off. - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com +1 - 844-436-6245 -----Original Message----- From:?Jerry Benton Reply:?Jerry Benton Date:?June 20, 2016 at 5:37:55 PM To:?MailScanner Discussion Subject:? RE: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > Treat Invalid Watermarks With No Sender as Spam = nothing > > > > - > Jerry Benton > www.mailborder.com > +1 - 844-436-6245 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philip Parsons > Reply: MailScanner Discussion > Date: June 20, 2016 at 5:34:42 PM > To: MailScanner Discussion > Subject: RE: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > > > Thanks Jerry so you are saying to change > > > > Check Watermarks With No Sender = yes > > to > > Check Watermarks With No Sender = no > > ? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces+pparsons=techeez.com at lists.mailscanner.info] > > On Behalf Of Jerry Benton > > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 2:29 PM > > To: MailScanner Discussion > > Subject: Re: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > > > > Set watermarking actions for empty sender to ?nothing?. > > > > > > > > - > > Jerry Benton > > www.mailborder.com > > +1 - 844-436-6245 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Philip Parsons > > Reply: MailScanner Discussion > > Date: June 20, 2016 at 5:26:00 PM > > To: MailScanner Discussion > > Subject: Anyone found a way to allow auto responders through MailScanner > > > > > For us it is important to receive them. The Domain is already whitelisted. And it gets > > > tagged as > > > > > > spam(no watermark or sender address) > > > > > > Any one got an idea. > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > Philip Parsons > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > MailScanner mailing list > > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > MailScanner mailing list > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > > > -- > > MailScanner mailing list > > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner > > > > > From patrick at yoopermail.us Tue Jun 21 12:30:19 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:30:19 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 on debian jessie clamav-daemon does not start Message-ID: <5769335B.3040506@yoopermail.us> Does not start at boot time. Cannot find any log messages for why it did not start. If I do a status command for it I get: root at efa1:/var/log# /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon status ? clamav-daemon.service - Clam AntiVirus userspace daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/clamav-daemon.service; enabled) Active: inactive (dead) start condition failed at Tue 2016-06-21 08:21:47 EDT; 8s ago ConditionPathExistsGlob=/var/lib/clamav/daily.{c[vl]d,inc} was not met Docs: man:clamd(8) man:clamd.conf(5) http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/doc/ folder /var/run is symlinked to /run. No /var/run/clamav folder is present on debian But on Ubuntu 16.04 the folder /var/run/clamav is created and the pid file /var/run/clamav/clamav.ctl is created and it runs. -- Patrick Goupell Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com From patrick at yoopermail.us Tue Jun 21 13:01:06 2016 From: patrick at yoopermail.us (Patrick Goupell) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:01:06 -0400 Subject: MailScanner 5.0.2 on debian jessie clamav-daemon does not start In-Reply-To: <5769335B.3040506@yoopermail.us> References: <5769335B.3040506@yoopermail.us> Message-ID: <57693A92.6060702@yoopermail.us> I edited the /etc/clamav/clamd.conf for LogSyslog true, restart and it is now createing the /var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl and seems to be ok. On 06/21/2016 08:30 AM, Patrick Goupell wrote: > Does not start at boot time. Cannot find any log messages for why it > did not start. > > If I do a status command for it I get: > > > root at efa1:/var/log# /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon status > ? clamav-daemon.service - Clam AntiVirus userspace daemon > Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/clamav-daemon.service; enabled) > Active: inactive (dead) > start condition failed at Tue 2016-06-21 08:21:47 EDT; 8s ago > ConditionPathExistsGlob=/var/lib/clamav/daily.{c[vl]d,inc} was not met > Docs: man:clamd(8) > man:clamd.conf(5) > http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/doc/ > > > folder /var/run is symlinked to /run. No /var/run/clamav folder is > present on debian > > But on Ubuntu 16.04 the folder /var/run/clamav is created and the pid > file /var/run/clamav/clamav.ctl is created and it runs. > -- Patrick Goupell Are you free? Find out at http://www.sedm.org/ Income taxes? Find out at http://www.whatistaxed.com From stbbeo at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 11:53:41 2016 From: stbbeo at gmail.com (jini Sumno) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:53:41 +0700 Subject: I need one person egift starbucks procurement, $ 100 price 40% there are many, receiving shipping iteam egift card starbucks card, thank you Message-ID: I need one person egift starbucks procurement, $ 100 price 40% there are many, receiving shipping iteam egift card starbucks card, thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jawaidahmad27 at gmail.com Wed Jun 22 17:33:44 2016 From: jawaidahmad27 at gmail.com (Jawaid Ahmad) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:03:44 +0530 Subject: I need one person egift starbucks procurement, $ 100 price 40% there are many, receiving shipping iteam egift card starbucks card, thank you In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: i will come On 6/22/16, jini Sumno wrote: > I need one person egift starbucks procurement, $ 100 price 40% there are > many, receiving shipping iteam egift card starbucks card, > thank you > From jerry.benton at mailborder.com Wed Jun 22 18:33:58 2016 From: jerry.benton at mailborder.com (Jerry Benton) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:33:58 -0400 Subject: I need one person egift starbucks procurement, $ 100 price 40% there are many, receiving shipping iteam egift card starbucks card, thank you In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1F24E2CD-336B-4D91-8699-425B79E9DBBF@mailborder.com> Mark, Will you kick these guys please ? - Jerry Benton www.mailborder.com Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 22, 2016, at 13:33, Jawaid Ahmad wrote: > > i will come > >> On 6/22/16, jini Sumno wrote: >> I need one person egift starbucks procurement, $ 100 price 40% there are >> many, receiving shipping iteam egift card starbucks card, >> thank you > > > -- > MailScanner mailing list > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info > http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner >