Bug

[Mark Sapiro]

On 02/04/2016 03:09 PM, Jerry Benton wrote:
> Can someone test this please?


I tested and it seems OK. With Scan Messages = yes and a message
containing a virus, I get

X-GPC-MailScanner-ID: A083311E1A7E.AA8CD
X-GPC-MailScanner: Found to be infected
X-GPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=-0.85,
	required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -0.75, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10,
	DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
X-GPC-MailScanner-From: mark at sbh16.songbird.com
X-Spam-Status: No

and with Scan Messages = virus I get

X-GPC-MailScanner-ID: 8C0CA11E1A7E.AAD33
X-GPC-MailScanner: Found to be infected
X-GPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-GPC-MailScanner-From: mark at sbh16.songbird.com
X-Spam-Status: No


so it appears in this case while it still adds the

X-GPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck:

and

X-Spam-Status: No

headers that it is not doing the Spam scan. I also tested with an
attached junk.txt.exe file and with Scan Messages = yes it detects the
bad file name and with Scan Messages = virus, it doesn't.

I'd say the fix is good.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan